AbstractFirst‐line cytoreductive drug of choice in high risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) is currently hydroxyurea, a practice based on the results of a randomized study; second‐line drugs of choice include pegylated interferon‐α, busulfan and anagrelide. Anagrelide clinical trials were pioneered by the late Murray N. Silverstein (1928‐1998) of the Mayo Clinic whose studies led to FDA approval in March 1997. The current study represents a retrospective examination of the potential impact of anagrelide therapy on survival and disease complications in ET. 1076 patients with ET were considered (median age 58 years; females 63%); risk distribution, according to the international prognostic score for ET (IPSET), was 28% high, 42% intermediate, and 30% low. Overall (OS), myelofibrosis‐free (MFFS) and thrombosis‐free survival data were compared for ET patients diagnosed before and after the 1997 FDA approval date for anagrelide; a significant difference was apparent in OS (P = .006; HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1‐1.7) and MFFS (P < .001; HR 4.2, 95% CI 2.7‐6.5), in favor of patients diagnosed prior to 1997; the difference was sustained during multivariable analysis that included IPSET. Similarly stratified survival data in polycythemia vera (n = 665) and primary myelofibrosis (n = 1282) showed no similar impact on survival (P = .3 and .17, respectively). The current study represents a retrospective analysis and suggests significantly decreased OS and MFFS in ET patients diagnosed after the FDA approval date of anagrelide. Whether or not anagrelide therapy was to blame for the worsening of OS and MFFS over time cannot be assumed and requires validation in a prospective study.
A novel predictive model of outcome in acute myeloid leukemia without favorable karyotype based on treatment strategy, karyotype and FLT3‐ITD mutational status
American Journal of Hematology | September 19, 2018 | Volume: 93 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available
Abstract Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for large stone burden can be problematic in patients with significant risk of bleeding complications, specifically thrombocytopenia. This report demonstrates effective correction of two patients' thrombocytopenia, subsequently leading to removal of large stone burden through PCNL. Case Presentation: We present two Middle Eastern patients who presented with medical histories significant for thrombocytopenia, secondary to splenomegaly and hepatic vein thrombosis, and large volume nephrolithiasis. Patient 1 is a 65-year-old female with a right 5 cm stone and a platelet count of 34,000. Patient 2 is a 45-year-old female with a 3 cm left staghorn stone and a platelet count of 44,000. After consultation with hematology, both underwent therapy with prednisone and intravenous immunoglobulin without improvement in their platelet count. They then received 3 μg/kg/dose of romiplostim weekly that improved their platelet counts to 133,000 and 195,000 in 2 weeks, respectively. Patient 1's PCNL was completed in a single-stage procedure with stone-free status shown on CT postoperative day 1. Patient 2 underwent PCNL and a secondary ureteroscopy for residual stone fragments on postoperative day 2. Both patients experienced no complication during the procedure, hospital stay, or postoperative course. Both continued romiplostim for 20 days postoperatively with platelet levels returning to their baseline range after 1 month. Conclusion: In the appropriately selected patient, romiplostim can correct thrombocytopenia enough to safely and effectively perform PCNL in patients with underlying hematologic disorders. Close coordination between urology and hematology is imperative to ensure an effective outcome in this challenging patient population.
Clinical course of patients with incidental finding of 20q‐ in the bone marrow without a morphologic evidence of myeloid neoplasm
American Journal of Hematology | March 1, 2016 | Volume: 91 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 556-559