Bhattarai, Yogesh

Using 32 immune cell surface markers, we identified 23 monocyte clusters in murine blood. Diabetic gastroparesis was associated with a significant decrease in two circulating classical monocyte-like clusters and an upregulation of the Ccr2-Ccl2 axis in the gastric muscularis propria, suggesting increased tissue monocyte migration. This study offers new targets by pointing to a possible role for two classical monocyte subsets connected to the Ccr2- Ccl2 axis.

The human gastrointestinal (GI) tract is home to trillions of microorganisms. There is dynamic interaction between the gut microbiota and the human host, but how gut microbiota modulates GI physiology is largely unknown. A recent study from our laboratory showed that human gut microbiota increases host serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine, 5‐HT) biosynthesis. 5‐HT is an important neurotransmitter and a paracrine messenger in the GI tract that increases intestinal secretion primarily through 5‐HT 3 and 5‐HT 4 receptors. In this study we investigated whether gut microbiota modulate 5‐HT 3 R and 5‐HT 4 R expression and host secretory response to 5‐HT. Methods We used proximal colon mucosa‐submucosa preparations from germ free (GF) and humanized (ex‐GF colonized with human bacteria for 4–5 weeks; HM) male mice. The change in short circuit current (ΔIsc) was determined in response to increasing concentrations of 5‐HT (0.003–300μM) on the submucosal side either alone or in the presence of 5‐HT 3 R antagonist ondansetron (100nM) in an Ussing chamber. Receptor expression was quantified using rt‐PCR (normalized to L32) and western blot (normalized to GAPDH). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to determine localization of 5‐HT 3 R in the paraformaldehyde‐fixed 10μm sections from proximal colonic epithelium. Differences between groups were tested using Mann‐Whitney U (Mdn; IQ range) with P ‐value lower than 0.05 considered significant. Results 5‐HT induced ΔIsc was significantly higher in GF than HM mice (218; 184–274 vs 163; 132–182 μA/cm 2 , n=6, P = 0.04). To determine if this change was due to an alteration in 5‐HTR, we quantified receptor expression. We found significantly higher 5‐HT 3 R mRNA expression (1.82; 1.08–2.80 vs 1.00; 0.33–1.38, n=8–9, P = 0.046) in GF compared to HM mice, but no change in 5‐HT 4 R expression. 5‐HT 3 R protein expression was also significantly higher in GF mice compared to HM (4.62; 1.06–6.14 vs 1.00; 1–1.3, n= 11–12, P = 0.01) mice. There was a significantly higher ΔIsc in GF compared to HM (87.1; 51.7–149 vs 37.0; 19.5–44 μA/cm 2 , n=5, P = 0.02) mice, following application of 2‐methyl 5‐hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (selective 5‐HT 3 R agonist) suggesting increased receptor expression augments secretory response. Furthermore, ondansetron significantly blocked 5‐HT induced maximum ΔIsc in GF mice (201; 189–260 vs 117.6; 92–149 μA/cm 2 , n=6–8, P = 0.001) but not in HM mice (163; 132–182 vs 120; 107–150 μA/cm 2 , n=6, P = 0.24). To determine the expression of 5‐HT 3 R in mouse colon mucosa‐submucosa we used 5‐HT 3 –tagged GFP mice. IHC identified 5‐HT 3 R‐GFP positive cells in the mouse colonic epithelium. To ascertain if the significant difference in 5‐HT‐induced ΔIsc between GF and HM mice (188; 152–200 vs 125; 99–139 μA/cm 2 , n=5, P = 0.008) is driven by epithelial 5‐HT 3 R, we measured the response in the presence of TTX (block neuronal transmission). TTX (500 nM) had no effect of ondansetron inhibition of 5‐HT‐induced ΔIsc, suggesting a role for epithelial 5HT 3 R. Conclusion Gut microbial colonization decreases host secretory response to 5‐HT by downregulating 5‐HT 3 R expression. Epithelial 5‐HT 3 R may be important in gut microbiota modulation of intestinal secretion Support or Funding Information NIH K08 DK

Background Microbial conversion of dietary substrate to bioactive molecules represents a potential regulatory mechanism by which gut microbes can alter intestinal physiology. Tryptamine, a monoamine structurally similar to serotonin (5‐HT), can be generated via decarboxylation of tryptophan by the gut bacteria but its physiological effect is not known. Aim To determine the effect of bacterial metabolite tryptamine on colonic secretion. Methods We mounted proximal colon mucosa‐submucosa preparations from germ free (GF), humanized (HM; ex‐GF colonized with human gut bacteria for 4–5 weeks), conventionally raised WT and 5‐HT4 receptor knockout (5‐HT4R −/− ) male mice in the Ussing chamber. The change in short circuit current (ΔIsc) was determined in response to application of increasing concentrations of tryptamine (3μM – 3mM) on the submucosal (basolateral) side either alone or in the presence of 5‐HT3R or 5‐HT4R antagonist, ondansetron (100nM) and GR‐113808 (30nM) respectively, with and without TTX (500nM). Colonoids (3‐dimensional epithelial organoids derived from colon) from GF and HM were used for swelling assay and ELISA based cAMP measurement. Results Tryptamine application significantly increased Isc in both GF and HM mice (n=6, P < 0.05, two‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni post‐hoc). Tryptamine mediated ΔIsc response was not significantly affected by amiloride, an inhibitor of epithelial sodium channels and Na + /H + exchangers, which are primarily responsible for absorption but was significantly decreased by 5‐Nitro‐2‐(3‐phenylpropylamino) benzoic acid (NPPB; anion blocker), a calcium‐sensitive chloride channel and sodium bicarbonate exchanger inhibitor responsible for anionic secretion in both GF and HM mice (n=4, P < 0.05, two‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni post‐hoc). Tryptamine evoked ΔIsc was not inhibited by 5‐HT3R (n=4, P > 0.05) but completely blocked by 5‐HT4R antagonist and was absent in 5HT4R knock out mice suggesting that the effect of tryptamine is mediated via 5HT4R. The increase in Isc in response to tryptamine and its inhibition by 5‐HT4R antagonist was also seen in presence of TTX (neuronal blocker; n=4, one‐way ANOVA , P < 0.05) suggesting that the epithelial 5‐HT4R alone can mediate the effect of tryptamine. Application of tryptamine (1mM) for 30 minutes led to a significant increase in the surface area of fluorescein labelled colonoids (n=5, one‐way ANOVA , P < 0.05), similar to forskolin, when compared to vehicle treated and 5HT4R antagonist pre‐treated GF and HM colonoids. Colonoids incubated with tryptamine (1mM) for 60 minutes had significantly higher cAMP levels (normalized to forskolin) compared to vehicle treated GF and HM colonoids, confirming that tryptamine activates 5‐HT4 GPCR (n=3, student's t‐test, P < 0.05). Conclusion Tryptamine, a tryptophan‐derived microbial metabolite, increases colonic secretion via 5HT4 GPCR activation. The identification of a bacterial metabolite activating a host GPCR to alter GI function represents an important advance in the field, and provides a distinct example of small molecule mediated host‐microbe interaction. Engineered probiotics producing tryptamine could be used as therapeutics in diseases associated with constipation. Support or Funding Information NIH DK111850, DK114007 (PCK) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

AbstractBackgroundHigh‐fat diet, microbial alterations and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are thought to cause enteric diabetic neuropathy and intestinal dysmotility. However, the role of the gut microbiota, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from Gram‐positive bacteria and short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the development of diabetic enteric neuropathy and intestinal dysmotility is not well understood. Our aim was to examine the role of the gut microbiota, LTA and SCFAs in the development of diabetic enteric neuropathy and intestinal dysmotility.MethodsWe fed germ‐free (GF) and conventionally raised (CR) mice either a high‐fat (HFD) or standard chow diet (SCD) for 8 weeks. We analyzed the microbial community composition in CR mice using 16S rRNA sequencing and damage to myenteric neurons using immunohistochemistry. We also studied the effects of LPS, LTA, and SCFAs on duodenal muscularis externa contractions and myenteric neurons using cultured preparations.Key ResultsHigh‐fat diet ingestion reduced the total number and the number of nitrergic myenteric neurons per ganglion in the duodenum of CR but not in GF‐HFD mice. GF mice had fewer neurons per ganglion compared with CR mice. CR mice fed a HFD had increased abundance of Gram‐positive bacteria. LTA and LPS did not affect the frequency of duodenal muscularis contractions after 24 hours of cultured but reduced the density of nitrergic myenteric neurons and increased oxidative stress and TNFα production in myenteric ganglia. SCFAs did not affect muscularis contractions or injure myenteric neurons.Conclusions & InferencesGut microbial alterations induced increase in Gram‐positive bacterial LTA may contribute to enteric neuropathy.

AbstractThe gastrointestinal barrier and the blood brain barrier represent an important line of defense to protect the underlying structures against harmful external stimuli. These host barriers are composed of epithelial and endothelial cells interconnected by tight junction proteins along with several other supporting structures. Disruption in host barrier structures has therefore been implicated in various diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. While there are several factors that influence host barrier, recently there is an increasing appreciation of the role of gut microbiota and their metabolites in regulating barrier integrity. In the current issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Marungruang et al. describe the effect of gastrointestinal barrier maturation on gut microbiota and the blood brain barrier adding to the growing evidence of microbiota‐barrier interactions. In this mini‐review I will discuss the effect of gut microbiota on host epithelial barriers and its implications for diseases associated with disrupted gut‐brain axis.

Serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)], an important neurotransmitter and a paracrine messenger in the gastrointestinal tract, regulates intestinal secretion by its action primarily on 5-HT3and 5-HT4receptors. Recent studies highlight the role of gut microbiota in 5-HT biosynthesis. In this study, we determine whether human-derived gut microbiota affects host secretory response to 5-HT and 5-HT receptor expression. We used proximal colonic mucosa-submucosa preparation from age-matched Swiss Webster germ-free (GF) and humanized (HM; ex-GF colonized with human gut microbiota) mice. 5-HT evoked a significantly greater increase in short-circuit current (Δ Isc) in GF compared with HM mice. Additionally, 5-HT3receptor mRNA and protein expression was significantly higher in GF compared with HM mice. Ondansetron, a 5-HT3receptor antagonist, inhibited 5-HT-evoked Δ Iscin GF mice but not in HM mice. Furthermore, a 5-HT3receptor-selective agonist, 2-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride, evoked a significantly higher Δ Iscin GF compared with HM mice. Immunohistochemistry in 5-HT3A-green fluorescent protein mice localized 5-HT3receptor expression to enterochromaffin cells in addition to nerve fibers. The significant difference in 5-HT-evoked Δ Iscbetween GF and HM mice persisted in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX) but was lost after ondansetron application in the presence of TTX. Application of acetate (10 mM) significantly lowered 5-HT3receptor mRNA in GF mouse colonoids. We conclude that host secretory response to 5-HT may be modulated by gut microbiota regulation of 5-HT3receptor expression via acetate production. Epithelial 5-HT3receptor may function as a mediator of gut microbiota-driven change in intestinal secretion.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that gut microbiota alters serotonin (5-HT)-evoked intestinal secretion in a 5-HT3receptor-dependent mechanism and gut microbiota metabolite acetate alters 5-HT3receptor expression in colonoids.View this article's corresponding video summary at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOMYJMuLTcw&feature=youtu.be .

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Despite its prevalence, the pathophysiology of IBS is not well understood although multiple peripheral and central factors are implicated. Recent studies suggest a role for alterations in gut microbiota in IBS. Significant advances in next-generation sequencing technology and bioinformatics and the declining cost have now allowed us to better investigate the role of gut microbiota in IBS. In the following review, we propose gut microbiota as a unifying factor in the pathophysiology of IBS. We first describe how gut microbiota can be influenced by factors predisposing individuals to IBS such as host genetics, stress, diet, antibiotics, and early life experiences. We then highlight the known effects of gut microbiota on mechanisms implicated in the pathophysiology of IBS including disrupted gut brain axis (GBA), visceral hypersensitivity (VH), altered GI motility, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and immune activation. While there are several gaps in the field that preclude us from connecting the dots to establish causation, we hope this overview will allow us to identify and fill in the voids.