Ehman, Richard L.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) has rapidly increased in prevalence over the past two decades, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Historically, the clinical gold standard for diagnosis, assessment of severity, and longitudinal monitoring of CLD has been liver biopsy with histological analysis, but this approach has limitations that may make it suboptimal for clinical and research settings. Magnetic resonance (MR)-based biomarkers can overcome the limitations by allowing accurate, precise, and quantitative assessment of key components of CLD without the risk of invasive procedures. This review briefly describes the limitations associated with liver biopsy and the need for non-invasive biomarkers. It then discusses the current state-of-the-art for MRI-based biomarkers of liver iron, fat, and fibrosis, and inflammation.

Brain magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an imaging technique capable of accurately and non-invasively measuring the mechanical properties of the living human brain. Recent studies have shown that MRE has potential to provide clinically useful information in patients with intracranial tumors, demyelinating disease, neurodegenerative disease, elevated intracranial pressure, and altered functional states. The objectives of this review are: (1) to give a general overview of the types of measurements that have been obtained with brain MRE in patient populations, (2) to survey the tools currently being used to make these measurements possible, and (3) to highlight brain MRE-based quantitative biomarkers that have the highest potential of being adopted into clinical use within the next 5 to 10 years. The specifics of MRE methodology strategies are described, from wave generation to material parameter estimations. The potential clinical role of MRE for characterizing and planning surgical resection of intracranial tumors and assessing diffuse changes in brain stiffness resulting from diffuse neurological diseases and altered intracranial pressure are described. In addition, the emerging technique of functional MRE, the role of artificial intelligence in MRE, and promising applications of MRE in general neuroscience research are presented.

BackgroundNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects 25% of the global population. The standard of diagnosis, biopsy, is invasive and affected by sampling error and inter‐reader variability. We hypothesized that widely available rapid MRI techniques could be used to predict nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) noninvasively by measuring liver stiffness, with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and liver fat, with chemical shift‐encoded (CSE) MRI. Besides, we validate an automated image analysis technique to maximize the utility of these methods.PurposeTo implement and test an automated system for analyzing CSE‐MRI and MRE data coupled with model‐based prediction of NASH.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsEighty‐three patients with suspected NAFLD.Field Strength/SequenceA 1.5 T using a flow‐compensated motion‐encoded gradient echo MRE sequence and a multiecho CSE‐MRI sequence.AssessmentsThe MRE and CSE‐MRI data were analyzed by two readers (5+ and 1 years of experience) and an automated algorithm. A logistic regression model to predict pathology‐diagnosed NASH was trained based on stiffness and proton density fat fraction, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated using 10‐fold cross validation for models based on both automated and manual measurements. A separate model was trained to predict the NASH severity score (NAS).Statistical TestsPearson's correlation, Bland–Altman, AUROC, C‐statistic.ResultsThe agreement between automated measurements and the more experienced reader (R2 = 0.87 for stiffness and R2 = 0.99 for proton density fat fraction [PDFF]) was slightly better than the agreement between readers (R2 = 0.85 and 0.98). The model for predicting biopsy‐diagnosed NASH had an AUROC of 0.87. The NAS‐prediction model had a C‐statistic of 0.85.Data ConclusionWe demonstrated a workflow that used a limited MRI acquisition protocol and fully automated analysis to predict NASH with high accuracy. These methods show promise to provide a reliable noninvasive alternative to biopsy for NASH‐screening in populations with NAFLD.Level of Evidence2Technical Efficacy Stage2

ObjectivesTo quantify the bias of shear wave speed (SWS) measurements between different commercial ultrasonic shear elasticity systems and a magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) system in elastic and viscoelastic phantoms.MethodsTwo elastic phantoms, representing healthy through fibrotic liver, were measured with 5 different ultrasound platforms, and 3 viscoelastic phantoms, representing healthy through fibrotic liver tissue, were measured with 12 different ultrasound platforms. Measurements were performed with different systems at different sites, at 3 focal depths, and with different appraisers. The SWS bias across the systems was quantified as a function of the system, site, focal depth, and appraiser. A single MRE research system was also used to characterize these phantoms using discrete frequencies from 60 to 500 Hz.ResultsThe SWS from different systems had mean difference 95% confidence intervals of ±0.145 m/s (±9.6%) across both elastic phantoms and ± 0.340 m/s (±15.3%) across the viscoelastic phantoms. The focal depth and appraiser were less significant sources of SWS variability than the system and site. Magnetic resonance elastography best matched the ultrasonic SWS in the viscoelastic phantoms using a 140 Hz source but had a − 0.27 ± 0.027‐m/s (−12.2% ± 1.2%) bias when using the clinically implemented 60‐Hz vibration source.ConclusionsShear wave speed reconstruction across different manufacturer systems is more consistent in elastic than viscoelastic phantoms, with a mean difference bias of < ±10% in all cases. Magnetic resonance elastographic measurements in the elastic and viscoelastic phantoms best match the ultrasound systems with a 140‐Hz excitation but have a significant negative bias operating at 60 Hz. This study establishes a foundation for meaningful comparison of SWS measurements made with different platforms.

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a phase contrast–based MRI technique that can measure displacement due to propagating mechanical waves, from which material properties such as shear modulus can be calculated. Magnetic resonance elastography can be thought of as quantitative, noninvasive palpation. It is increasing in clinical importance, has become widespread in the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis, and additional clinical applications are being explored. However, publications have reported MRE results using many different parameters, acquisition techniques, processing methods, and varied nomenclature. The diversity of terminology can lead to confusion (particularly among clinicians) about the meaning of and interpretation of MRE results. This paper was written by the MRE Guidelines Committee, a group formalized at the first meeting of the ISMRM MRE Study Group, to clarify and move toward standardization of MRE nomenclature. The purpose of this paper is to (1) explain MRE terminology and concepts to those not familiar with them, (2) define “good practices” for practitioners of MRE, and (3) identify opportunities to standardize terminology, to avoid confusion.

PurposeTo develop a novel magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) acquisition using a hybrid radial EPI readout scheme (TURBINE), and to demonstrate its feasibility to obtain wave images and stiffness maps in a phantom and in vivo brain.MethodThe proposed 3D TURBINE‐MRE is based on a spoiled gradient‐echo MRE sequence with the EPI readout radially rotating about the phase‐encoding axis to sample a full 3D k‐space. A polyvinyl chloride phantom and 6 volunteers were scanned on a compact 3T GE scanner with a 32‐channel head coil at 80 Hz and 60 Hz external vibration, respectively. For comparison, a standard 2D, multislice, spin‐echo (SE) EPI‐MRE acquisition was also performed with the same motion encoding and resolution. The TURBINE‐MRE images were off‐line reconstructed with iterative SENSE algorithm. The regional ROI analysis was performed on the 6 volunteers, and the median stiffness values were compared between SE‐EPI‐MRE and TURBINE‐MRE.ResultsThe 3D wave‐field images and the generated stiffness maps were comparable between TURBINE‐MRE and standard SE‐EPI‐MRE for the phantom and the volunteers. The Bland–Altman plot showed no significant difference in the median regional stiffness values between the two methods. The stiffness measured with the 2 methods had a strong linear relationship with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.943.ConclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility of the new TURBINE‐MRE sequence for acquiring the desired 3D wave‐field data and stiffness maps in a phantom and in‐vivo brains. This pilot study encourages further exploration of TURBINE‐MRE for functional MRE, free‐breathing abdominal MRE, and cardiac MRE applications.

Level of Evidence5Technical EfficacyStage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:459–460.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to perform a whole-brain analysis of alterations in brain mechanical properties due to normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH).Materials and MethodsMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) examinations were performed on 85 participants, including 44 cognitively unimpaired controls, 33 with NPH, and 8 who were amyloid-positive with Alzheimer clinical syndrome. A custom neural network inversion was used to estimate stiffness and damping ratio from patches of displacement data, accounting for edges by training the network to estimate the mechanical properties in the presence of missing data. This learned inversion was first compared with a standard analytical approach in simulation experiments and then applied to the in vivo MRE measurements. The effect of NPH on the mechanical properties was then assessed by voxel-wise modeling of the stiffness and damping ratio maps. Finally, a pattern analysis was performed on each individual's mechanical property maps by computing the correlation between each person's maps with the expected NPH effect. These features were used to fit a classifier and assess diagnostic accuracy.ResultsThe voxel-wise analysis of the in vivo mechanical property maps revealed a unique pattern in participants with NPH, including a concentric pattern of stiffening near the dural surface and softening near the ventricles, as well as decreased damping ratio predominantly in superior regions of the white matter (family-wise error correctedP< 0.05 at cluster level). The pattern of viscoelastic changes in each participant predicted NPH status in this cohort, separating participants with NPH from the control and the amyloid-positive with Alzheimer clinical syndrome groups, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.999 and 1, respectively.ConclusionsThis study provides motivation for further development of the neural network inversion framework and demonstrates the potential of MRE as a novel tool to diagnose NPH and provide a window into its pathogenesis.

480 Background: Currently, there is a lack of imaging biomarkers of immunotherapy outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study aim was to determine if HCC enhancement on MRI and stiffness change measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can predict immunotherapy response. Methods: This was a prospective, Institutional Review Board approved study of 38 patients with HCC treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. All patients had liver MRI/MRE and HCC biopsy at baseline, and MRI/MRE with biopsy or resection after 6 weeks therapy. HCC stiffness (kPa) was measured on MRE elastograms (liver stiffness maps). HCC enhancement and change in stiffness were compared with treatment response to ICB in 1) non-surgical patients (pembrolizumab), and 2) surgical patients (nivolumab +/- ipilimumab). For non-surgical patients, treatment response was defined as overall survival >1 year. For surgical patients, treatment response was defined as <50% viable tumor at time of resection. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation; p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-five patients were evaluable. Median age was 67 years (32, 78). Etiology of liver disease was NASH (n=8), HCV (n=8), HBV (n=2) and unknown (n=7). Treatment response occurred in 11/25 (44%) patients. Median HCC size and change in size were 4.7 cm (1.2, 14.0) and –0.32 cm, respectively. Median baseline HCC stiffness and change in stiffness were 5 kPa (2.2, 12.4) and –0.1 kPa (–2.2, 1.5), respectively. Median change in HCC size for responders and non-responders was –1.2 cm (–4.8, 0.4) and 0 cm (–1.5, 1.1), respectively (p = 0.02). Treatment response was associated with absence of portal venous phase capsular enhancement and increase in HCC stiffness, (p<0.001). Conclusions: Capsular enhancement and MRE stiffness change may be useful biomarkers of immune cell activated response to ICB therapy.

Disease monitoring in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is limited by absence of noninvasive biomarkers of disease regression or progression. We aimed to examine the role of multiparametric three‐dimensional magnetic resonance elastography (3D‐MRE) and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF) in the detection of NASH regression after interventions. This is a single‐center prospective clinical trial of 40 patients who underwent bariatric surgery. Imaging and liver biopsies were obtained at baseline and 1 year after surgery. The imaging protocol consisted of multifrequency 3D‐MRE to determine the shear stiffness at 60 Hz and damping ratio at 40 Hz, and MRI‐PDFF to measure the fat fraction. A logistic regression model including these three parameters was previously found to correlate with NASH. We assessed the model performance in the detection of NASH resolution after surgery by comparing the image‐predicted change in NAFLD activity score (delta NAS) to the histologic changes. A total of 38 patients (median age 43, 87% female, 30 of 38 with NAS ≥ 1, and 13 of 38 with NASH) had complete data at 1 year. The NAS decreased in all subjects with NAS ≥ 1 at index biopsy, and NASH resolved in all 13. There was a strong correlation between the predicted delta NAS by imaging and the delta NAS by histology (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). The strength of correlation between histology and the predicted delta NAS using single conventional parameters, such as the fat fraction by MRI‐PDFF or shear stiffness at 60 Hz by MRE, was r = 0.69 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.43 (P = 0.009), respectively. Conclusion: Multiparametric 3D‐MRE and MRI‐PDFF can detect histologic changes of NASH resolution after bariatric surgery. Studies in a nonbariatric setting are needed to confirm the performance as a composite noninvasive biomarker for longitudinal NASH monitoring.