Boué, Daniel R.

Abstract Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumors (DLGNT) are rare central nervous system tumors. Our understanding of the clinical course, prognostic factors, and optimal treatment strategies remains limited. Histologic, molecular, and clinical data were collected and analyzed for 25 patients with DLGNT reviewed at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. The median age at diagnosis was 6 years (11 months-20 years). Nineteen (72%) patients were male. The disease was localized at diagnosis in 12 (48.0%) patients, with most tumors localized in the spinal cord. BRAF fusion was present in 22 (95.6%) of 23 patients who had material for testing. Of 18 patients who had tissue for DNA methylation profiling, 3 (16.7%) matched to DLGNT MC-1, 3 (16.7%) to DLGNT MC-2, and 12 (66.7%) did not match to a DLGNT subclass. Median follow-up was 63 months. Twenty-four (96.0%) patients received adjuvant therapy after initial diagnosis or at progression. Thirty-five cytotoxic chemotherapy and 24 single-agent targeted therapy regimens were used in 22 and 13 patients, respectively. With targeted therapy, 3 (12%) patients had partial responses. Eleven (44.0%) received radiotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) after a patient’s first chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy regimen was 44 months (1-77), 11 months (4-39), and 16.5 months (9-23), respectively. The 5-year PFS was 18.7%±9.2, while the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82.4%±9.2. The 5-year OS was lower in patients older than 9 years at diagnosis (60.0%±21.9 vs 91.7%±8.0, p = 0.02). Ki67 >4% was associated with worse PFS (0%±0 vs 24.6%±11.9 at 5 years, p = 0.03). Initial disease dissemination (localized vs. disseminated) and 1q gain status do not influence PFS or OS. PFS for DLGNT remains poor across all treatment modalities, including targeted therapies, despite the high frequency of BRAF fusions. Due to its rarity, establishing optimal therapeutic strategies for DLGNT requires additional treatment and outcome data and prospective multi-institutional trials.

Ectomesenchymomas (EM) are rare malignant neoplasms usually consisting of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with a neural component. Only 21 cases have been previously reported. Here we extend the clinicopathologic spectrum of EM by describing our findings in 15 cases. Only 5 patients were infants; 10 were ≤3 years old and 5 were ≥6 years old. No male predilection was observed; 7 were female. The originating institutional diagnoses were; RMS (12), undifferentiated sarcoma (1), or EM (2), suggesting underdiagnosis of this entity. The primary tumor sites included external genital (5), pelvis/abdomen (6), head and neck (3), and extremity (1). The size of the primary neoplasm was usually ≥5 cm at diagnosis but dissemination only occurred in a minority. Local infiltration was not uncommon. These neoplasms were typically multilobate, thinly encapsulated, hemorrhagic, and necrotic. Light microscopic features were highly variable, but embryonal RMS with scattered or clustered ganglion cells, often in lacunae, was characteristic. In some cases, primitive neuroblastic or neuroectodermal areas were found and/or a component of alveolar RMS was seen. Focal anaplasia was occasionally observed. Mitotic activity appears higher than previously appreciated and some necrosis was invariably present. Electron microscopy was performed in 11 cases, which confirmed skeletal muscle ± neural differentiation. Cytogenetic studies performed in five cases revealed no specific abnormality. Monoclonal neuron-specific enolase was the best marker of ganglion cells and primitive neural elements. MIC-2 (CD99) membrane expression was not definitively present in any of the six cases examined. A number of the above parameters appear to be of some prognostic significance, but overall, these neoplasms appear to have a similar outcome as would be predicted for their RMS element alone (exclusive of any neural component), with respect to the RMS subtype, age of the patient, and anatomic location of the neoplasm.