Grothey, Axel

627 Background: The SLI of the BEACON CRC phase 3 study assessed the safety and efficacy of the combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (ENCO) + MEK inhibitor binimetinib (BINI) + anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (CETUX) in pts with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC after 1 or 2 prior regimens. CEA and CA19-9 are tumor markers that are widely used to monitor the effectiveness of systemic therapies for mCRC; here we report on the association of CEA and CA19-9 changes while on treatment with clinical outcomes in pts from the SLI. Methods: Pts in the SLI received the triplet of ENCO 300 mg QD + BINI 45 mg BID + CETUX 400 mg/m2 (initial dose) then 250 mg/m2 QW in 28-day cycles. Pts were evaluated for safety, radiographic response, and change in tumor markers CEA and CA19-9. Results: 30 pts were treated. The triplet was generally well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with known BRAF, MEK, and EGFR inhibitor toxicities. The rate of severe skin toxicities (grade 3/4) was lower than generally observed for CETUX in mCRC. Of the 29 pts with a BRAFV600E mutation, the median time on study treatment was 5.6 mo (range, 1.0–9.3 mo), and 22 (76%) remained on study treatment at the time of data cutoff. The confirmed overall response rate (ORR) was 41%, with 1 complete and 11 partial responses. In addition, 9 pts had prolonged stable disease (SD) up to 9.3 mo.CEA and CA19-9 were analyzed in 28 pts. CEA and CA19-9 decreased in 96% and 82% of these pts, respectively. Among 15 pts with treatment duration ≥5.6 mo, median/mean % decreases were 97%/79% for CEA and 92%/82% for CA19-9 in confirmed responders (n=6). Respective decreases in pts with prolonged SD (n=9) were similar: 84%/68% for CEA and 89%/68% for CA19-9. Updated safety, efficacy, and tumor marker results will be provided. Conclusions: ENCO + BINI + CETUX is generally well tolerated and has encouraging clinical activity in BRAFV 600E mCRC, with a confirmed ORR of 41%. In pts with study treatment duration ≥5.6 mo, the tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 decreased markedly and to the same degree in responders vs pts with prolonged SD, providing additional evidence of the meaningful clinical activity of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.

612 Background: mCRC is a heterogeneous disease leading to possible disparate responses among lesions in a single pt. This study assesses the heterogeneity of lesion responses and evaluates the prognostic value of LBR12 and its mortality risk discrimination beyond RECIST responses. Methods: Pts with ≥ 2 lesions and no new lesions at 12 weeks (wks) were eligible. For each pt, after 12 wks of Rx, each lesion was categorized as progressive disease (L-PD: ≥20% increase in the longest diameter [LD]), partial response (L-PR: ≥30% decrease in LD), or stable disease (L-SD: neither L-PD nor L-PR). LBR12 was defined, per patient, by the combination of lesion responses: homogeneous LBR12 (L-PD, L-SD, L-PR only) and heterogeneous LBR12 (mixture of L-PD/L-SD, L-PD/L-PR, L-SD/L-PR). LBR12 and overall survival (OS) were correlated using stratified multivariate Cox models after adjusting for age, gender, and ECOG PS. Results: Among 9,092 mCRCs (Rx: chemo alone 44%; chemo + VEGF inhibitor [VEGFi] 42%; chemo + EGFR inhibitor [EGFRi] 10%) from 16 1st-line studies. Median OS: 2.2 years. Per RECIST at 12 wks, CR 0%; PR 36.1%; SD 60.9%; PD 3.0%. Responses in 52% were heterogeneous (Table). VEGFi and EGFRi treated pts had the highest rate of L-SD/L-PR (45%) and L-PR only (22%) status, respectively. Median OS increased monotonically across pts with more L-PRs and fewer L-PDs (Table). Pts with L-SD/L-PR status, among which 51% had SD per RECIST, had longer OS than those with L-SD only status (HRadj.= .81, padj.< .0001), but shorter OS than those with L-PR only status (HRadj.= 1.46, padj.< .0001). Pts with L-PD/L-SD status, among which 71% were SD per RECIST, had shorter OS than those with L-SD only status (HRadj.= 2.22, padj.< .0001). These associations were consistent across treatment regimens. Conclusions: The lesion-based response captures the heterogeneity of within pt lesion responses and provides refinement in predicting outcome beyond RECIST response at 12 wks. [Table: see text]

611 Background: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with survival benefit in refractory mCRC patients (pts). Toxicities such as Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES), fatigue and hypertension (HTN) have limited its use. Despite absence of supportive data, various dosing or interval scheduling have been implemented into clinical practice. Methods: A randomized phase II study of regorafenib dose-escalation (Arm A: 80 mg/day, weekly dose escalation if no significant drug-related toxicities, up to 160 mg/day) vs. standard dose (Arm B: 160 mg/day) in pts with mCRC for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Pts were randomized 1:1:1:1 to arms A1 and B1 (Pre-emptive Clobetasol for PPES); A2 and B2 (Reactive Clobetasol). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who completed 2 cycles of treatment and initiated the 3rd in Arm A (Pooled A1 + A2) vs. Arm B (Pooled B1 + B2). Superiority for Arm A was to be declared if the one-sided p-value calculated using Fisher’s exact method was less than 0.2. Results: From June 2015 to June 2017, 123 pts were randomized with 116 (A = 54, B = 62) evaluable for the primary endpoint. Demographic data were well balanced with overall median age of 61yrs (range: 29-81), M/F (61/39%) and ECOG PS 0/1 (37/63%) and KRAS MT/WT/UNK (47/44/9%).The study met its primary endpoint with 43% of pts on Arm A initiating the 3rd vs. only 25% of pts Arm B [one-sided p-value 0.028]. Median Overall Survival (OS) was improved in Arm A vs. Arm B (9.0 mos vs. 5.9 mos; p = 0.094). Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 2.5 mos for Arm A vs. 2.0 mos for Arm B (p=0.553). Overall rates of grade 3/4 toxicity were more favorable for Arm A vs. Arm B (% PPES 15 vs. 16, HTN 7 vs. 15 and fatigue 13 vs. 18, respectively). Multiple QOL parameters were improved in A vs. B primarily at week 2 of the first cycle. Conclusion: A strategy with weekly dose escalation of regorafenib from 80 mg to 160 mg/day was found to be superior to a starting dose of 160 mg/day. These results establish a new standard for optimizing regorafenib dosing. Further data on outcomes of preemptive vs. reactive clobetasol strategies are undergoing analysis and will be presented later. Clinical trial information: NCT02368886.

TPS4136 Background: AGOC has a poor prognosis with no established standard treatment following failure of chemotherapy (CT). Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506)(REG) is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor targeting kinases involved in angiogenesis (VEGFR1-3, TIE-2), tumor microenvironment (PDGFR-β, FGFR), and oncogenesis (RAF, RET and KIT). INTEGRATE (phase 2) demonstrated REG was highly effective in prolonging PFS across a range of AGOC pts, with a positive OS trend. Regional differences were found in magnitude of effect, but REG was effective in all regions/subgroups. The phase 3 INTEGRATE II will explore whether REG is effective in prolonging survival in patients overall, and in the Asian sub-population. Methods: International (Australia/New Zealand (NHMRC CTC); Canada (CCTG), Korea, Japan, Taiwan, USA (ACCRU)) randomised phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 2:1 (REG:placebo)(PBO) randomisation and stratification by: Location of tumour, Geographic region, prior VEGF inhibitors. Eligible patients (histologically confirmed AGOC), with evaluable metastatic or locally advanced disease refractory to, or relapsed following second line CT, will receive best supportive care plus 160mg REG or matched placebo orally on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle until disease progression or prohibitive adverse events. Primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints: PFS, response rate, quality of life, safety, identification of prognostic/predictive biomarkers for study endpoints, and REG PK across geographical regions. 350 patients (50% from Asia) randomized in a 2:1 ratio will provide 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) for OS of 0.67 with a 2-sided α of 0.05 assuming PBO median survival is 4.5 mos. The sample size accommodates 2 interim analyses undertaken at 1/3 and 2/3 of required events. As of January 2017, 12 of 28 planned ANZ sites are open, with 4 patients enrolled. Regulatory approval has been received for 12 Canadian sites, and 12 Korean sites. Korean recruitment is expected to commence in February 2017. Regulatory submissions are pending in Taiwan, Japan, and the USA. Clinical trial information: NCT02773524.

e15045 Background: BRAF V600E mutations are present in 7% of mCRC patients (pts) and portend a poor prognosis. Data guiding initial treatment decisions are limited. This study investigates the management approach and clinical impact of utilizing metastasectomy for pts with BRAF V600E mCRC. Methods: By using prospective clinical and molecular data from Mayo Clinic, pts with BRAF V600E mCRC were analyzed for clinical characteristics, treatment and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: 164 pts with BRAF V600E mCRC were identified between 6/1999-8/2015. Complete follow up data were available for 52 pts. Median age of 65 years, 61% female, ECOG PS ≤ 1, 71% of pts had right sided tumors and 28% presented with liver limited metastasis. Only 7% (4/52) received FOLFOXIRI/BEV (average of 8 cycles). Peripheral neuropathy, pending BRAF status , and prior progression on FOLFOX, were the most common reasons documented for avoiding FOLFOXIRI/BEV. FOLFOX/BEV was the most common 1st line regimen used (32% of pts). Median overall survival (mOS) for all 52 pts was 25 months (mo) with median progression free survival (PFS) of 9.3 mo, reflecting worse survival when compared to BRAF wild-type control patients treated at Mayo Clinic (249 pts, mOS: 43 mo). With median follow up of 18.3 mo, 21 pts who underwent metastasectomy had improved OS (29.1mo vs. 22.7mo, HR = 0.33; CI: 0.12-0.78; p = 0.01) and PFS (13.6mo vs. 6.2mo, HR = 0.53, CI: 0.28-0.97; p = 0.03) when compared to the non-metastasectomy cohort, respectively. In multivariate analysis, metastasectomy remained statistically significant for improved survival outcomes (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.07-1.02; p = 0.02). Median relapse-free survival after metastasectomy was 9.7 mo (95% CI, 5.5 mo-19.5 mo). Only 2 pts remain disease free at the time of last follow up, with 1 pt without recurrent disease for greater than 2 years (28.9 mo). Conclusions: The use of multimodality therapy incorporating metastasectomy for BRAF V600E mCRC is a critical component for enhanced survival outcomes.

e15030 Background: Deficiencies in the DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system cause errors during DNA replication, which in turn give rise to microsatellite instability (MSI-H). MSI-H in mCRC is rare and its prognostic and predictive impact on outcome is unclear. This cohort study aims to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of MSI-H in metastatic CRC prior to the immune therapy era. Methods: 75 MSI-H mCRC patients (pts) and 75 matched (age, gender, disease sidedness, metachronous) MSS mCRC pts were identified from 1268 mCRC who had MSI/MMR test results at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1992 and 7/2016. A retrospective review was conducted by using data from electronic medical records (EMR). Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In the MSI-H group, there were 39 male (52%) and 36 female (48%) pts. Median age at metastatic disease diagnosis was 54.7 years. 35 patients presented with stage IV CRC. Primary tumors location: 38 right side, 11 transverse colon, 15 left side, 11 rectum. The MSS group was well matched (3 mismatches for gender and 1 mismatch for metachronous metastatic disease). Median overall survivals (OS) were 28.1 and 37.4 months for MSI-H and MSS pts, respectively ( p= 0.098). 98.7% MSS pts and 94.7% MSI-H pts had Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease and there was no median OS difference between these two groups (37.4 vs. 32.3 months p= 0.91). 43 MSI-H and 39 MSS pts had metastasectomy including ablation ( p= 0.51) with longer median OS (82.0 and 69.9 months, p= 0.90) compared to pts without metastasectomy (13.9 and 19.7 months, p= 0.15). Age < 65, metastasectomy, asymptomatic metastatic lesions, BRAF wild type, and multiple metastasectomy were associated with better survival in univariate analysis. Only metastasectomy remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis ( p< 0.0001). Conclusions: MSI-H mCRC do not appear to have improved prognosis compared with MSS cancers, in fact, there is a trend toward inferior outcome. In both groups, metastasectomy including multiple metastasectomy should be considered to optimize OS.

TPS3624 Background: To improve survival for patients with mCRC, efforts are needed to identify and treat actionable genomic alterations. HER2 is amplified in approximately 5-8% of patients with KRAS and NRAS (RAS) wild-type mCRC. HER2 functions as an oncogenic driver and a mediator of EGFR antibody (Ab) resistance. Although prior studies have shown that anti-HER2 therapies are active in patients with HER2+ (HER2 IHC 3+ or HER2 amplified) mCRC, there are no HER2-directed therapies approved for these patients. Tucatinib is a potent and highly selective oral small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2, currently being developed to treat metastatic breast cancer. In HER2+ CRC patient derived xenograft models, tucatinib has substantial anti-tumor activity. The addition of the anti-HER2 monoclonal Ab trastuzumab augments tumor growth inhibition. Methods: This single-arm phase II study will test the combination of tucatinib and trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ mCRC. Eligible patients include those with RAS wild-type mCRC who have been previously treated with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and an anti-VEGF monoclonal Ab. Patients must have HER2+ disease by IHC, FISH, or NGS. Prior treatment with anti-HER2 targeting therapy is excluded. The primary objective is to assess the objective response rate for the combination. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy (PFS, OS, clinical benefit rate), safety, and tolerability of the combination. Correlation between tissue and blood-based biomarkers and clinical outcomes will be explored. Blood will be collected at baseline and each restaging to determine if the combination eliminates HER2 amplified circulating tumor DNA. Subjects will receive tucatinib at a dose of 300mg by mouth daily, and trastuzumab will be administered every 3 weeks (8 mg/kg IV day 1 of cycle 1, then 6 mg/kg IV Q3 weeks). Response will be assessed every 3 cycles (9 weeks) per RECIST version 1.1. Both agents will be provided by the study. This study was initiated in February 2017. Recruitment is ongoing at 8 sites in the Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313.

TPS3622 Background: BRAF mutations are found in ≈10% of mCRC cases. Pts with BRAFV600E mCRC have a poor prognosis, with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than pts with BRAFwt mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2011; Modest et al 2012; Sorbye et al 2015). The benefits of combined BRAF + EGFR inhibition in mCRC have been demonstrated in vitro (Corcoran et al 2012; Prahallad et al 2012; Yang et al 2012), and preclinical evidence suggests that adding MEK signaling inhibition improves antitumor activity. Early clinical data indicate that BRAF + EGFR + MEK inhibition has greater activity than BRAF + EGFR inhibition in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2016). Our study will examine the combination of BINI (a MEK inhibitor) + ENCO (a selective BRAF kinase inhibitor) + CTX (an anti-EGFR antibody) and of ENCO + CTX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: BEACON CRC (NCT02928224) is enrolling pts with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. A safety lead-in phase (≈30 pts) will determine the safety and tolerability of oral ENCO 300 mg QD + oral BINI 45 mg BID + intravenous CTX 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 QW. In the phase 3 portion, ≈615 pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to triplet (ENCO + BINI + CTX), doublet (ENCO + CTX), or control (investigator’s choice of IRI/CTX or FOLFIRI/CTX) arms. Pts will be treated in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, or death. The primary endpoint is OS (triplet vs control). Secondary endpoints include OS (doublet vs control), confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate according to RECIST version 1.1 (triplet or doublet vs control; triplet vs doublet), PFS (triplet or doublet vs control), duration of response, time to response, pharmacokinetics, and pt-reported outcomes. Safety will be summarized using standard adverse event reporting. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.