Grothey, Axel

505 Background: MSI is a tumor biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy that is closely associated w/deficient MMR, and is also variably associated w/somatic muts of the MMR genes, loss of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and high TMB. Germ-line muts (Lynch syndrome/LS) in the 4 MMR genes are recognized to have distinct cancer spectrums/penetrance in LS, yet across all tumors, gene-specific variability in MMR IHC, MMR muts, and TMB is understudied. Methods: Results of TGPs performed by Caris Lifesciences (2015-17) were analyzed in colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC) and all other cancers/tumors (OT) as: 1) all MSI-H tumors (n = 1057) and 2) all tumors w/ ≥1 mut in an MMR gene (n = 470). A subset of cases had IHC for MMR protein and PD-L1 expression. MSI and TMB were determined by NGS. Results: Characteristics of MSI-H tumors and tumors w/ ≥1 MMR mut are seen in the Table. A single MSH6 mut [F1088fs] in a coding microsatellite represented 31% of all MMR muts detected. F1088fs was found in 58% tumors w/MLH1/PMS2 loss (IHC) but only 25% w/MSH2/MSH6 loss (p < 0.001), was more commonly seen in EC vs CRC/OT (p < 0.001), and was negatively associated w/somatic POLE mut (p = 0.002). Distinct mut signatures in the MMR genes (e.g. GLUàSTOP) were seen in tumors w/POLE muts and DNA repair genes. Conclusions: MSI-H and MMR mutated tumors demonstrate marked gene-specific heterogeneity in IHC patterns, TMBs, and somatic muts that may be relevant to treatment selection, resistance, and response. [Table: see text]

726 Background: Primary tumor location is an important prognostic factor in mCRC. Efficacy differences with EGFR antibodies by tumor location show a predictive effect (Arnold et al. Ann Oncol 2017). Two first-line (1L) pivotal bev trials showed the prognostic value of sidedness (Loupakis et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015). In this exploratory study, further analysis of the predictive effect of bev is presented. Methods: Data from two randomized phase III studies (NO16966 [NCT00069095], AVF2107g [NCT00109070]) of bev+CT vs CT-alone as 1L treatment for mCRC were analyzed retrospectively. Patients (pts) with sidedness information available were included; pts from NO16966 (part 1) randomized to CT only were excluded. Sidedness was identified by case report forms. Results: Sidedness was determined in 1590 pts (27% Right and 73% Left) out of 2214 pts total (Table). In the pooled analysis, PFS improved with bev+CT compared to CT only in both right-sided (HR=0.75; 95% CI 0.61, 0.93) and left-sided (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.67, 0.86) mCRC with similar magnitude of benefit in both sides. OS also improved with bev+CT in right-sided (HR=0.82; 95% CI 0.65, 1.03) and left-sided (HR=0.85; 95% CI 0.74, 0.98) pts. Conclusions: This exploratory subgroup analysis of two pivotal studies indicates that the effect of bev is independent of tumor location in mCRC patients. Survival outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00069095 and NCT00109070. [Table: see text]