Dickerson, Brad C.

AbstractBackgroundThe overarching goal of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer Disease study (LEADS) is to optimally characterize early‐onset AD (EOAD) and establish an EOAD clinical trials network. Here we report the baseline demographic and imaging biomarker comparisons of the LEADS cohort to late‐onset AD (LOAD) subjects from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3).Method123 amyloid‐positive EOAD, 47 amyloid‐negative EOnonAD, 60 cognitively normal young controls were compared to 130 amyloid‐positive LOAD, 110 amyloid‐negative LOnonAD and 286 amyloid‐negative cognitively normal older controls. To account for the effect of cognitive aging between EO and LO populations, each cognitive measure was Z‐transformed. Cortical and hippocampal atrophy were quantified using W‐scores adjusted for age, sex and total intracranial volume. Z‐scores and W‐scores were compared using t‐test or Wilcoxson rank test as appropriate. All p‐values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate correction.ResultEOAD showed greater pathology burden and greater cortical atrophy (AD signature) relative to LOAD. EOAD also showed greater cognitive impairment across all cognitive tests. EOAD showed greater functional impairment, more depression but less neuropsychiatric behaviors overall compared to LOAD (Table 1 and Figure 1, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses stratified by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.EOnonAD differed from LOnonAD by also showing greater impairment on all cognitive and functional measures There were no significant differences in amyloid and tau burden, or atrophy W‐scores between these groups. EOnonAD were more depressed and showed more functional impairment compared to LOnonAD (Table 2 and Figure 2, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses split by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.ConclusionConsistent with our preexisting hypotheses, EOAD and EOnonAD perform much worse relative to their LO counterparts. EOAD also show greater pathological burden as expected. The reported analyses were done in chronological rather than disease time (time since disease onset). Benchmarking individuals along the disease spectrum might prove to be a better strategy especially when conducting analyses on rate of disease progression.

AbstractBackgroundClinicopathologic studies reported that the NACC Uniform Dataset (UDS) 2.0 core measures do not adequately differentiate patients who ultimately died of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD) from Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The FTLD Module (FTLD‐MOD) assesses core features of behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Initial investigations suggest that the FTLD‐MOD improves discrimination between biomarker‐supported bvFTD and typical late‐onset AD, and that clinically diagnosed PPA participants performed worse than bvFTD on all FTLD‐MOD language tasks. However, the utility of these measures in the differential diagnosis of AD vs. major FTLD syndromes in young‐onset cases remains underexplored.MethodWe examined participants with age‐of‐onset < 65 years in the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) consortium and the Longitudinal Early Onset AD Study (LEADS). 115 bvFTD, 53 semantic variant PPA (svPPA), 29 non‐fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA) and 124 early‐onset AD (eoAD) cases completed the UDS3 and FLTD‐MOD. Linear regression analyses measured group differences in FLTD‐MOD raw scores and UDS3 neuropsychological z‐scores after accounting for group differences in demographic variables and global severity ratings. Alpha was 0.05 with Bonferroni corrections.ResultsParticipants with eoAD demonstrated the most impaired scores on tasks of attention, working memory, and processing speed, including Digit Span Backward (z=‐1.87) and Trails A (z=‐3.82). They also demonstrated difficulty on FTLD‐MOD language tasks with a working memory requirement (sentence repetition raw=3.68/5) and, as expected, memory (story delayed recall z=‐2.4z). svPPA performed the worst on FTLD‐MOD and UDS3 tasks assessing semantic memory, especially naming (all p’s ≤ 0.03). nfvPPA performed worst on sentence reading, sentence repetition, and letter fluency (all p’s ≤ 0.02). Consistent with previous work, these measures differentiate between bvFTD and PPA variants. However, relative to eoAD, bvFTD was equivalent (Trails B: bvFTDz=‐3.8, eoADz=‐3.82; p=0.12) or outperformed (sentence repetition: bvFTD=4.22/5, eoAD=3.68/5; p<0.001) the eoAD group on all tasks.ConclusionsWe undertook this analysis to compare performance of the major young‐onset sporadic AD and FTLD clinical syndromes in the ALLFTD and LEADS studies. Results demonstrate relatively distinct cognitive profiles among eoAD, svPPA, and nfvPPA, but not in bvFTD. Future analyses will include FTLD‐MOD behavioral symptom questionnaires to assess their utility in differentiating bvFTD.

AbstractBackgroundPrevious research has suggested that, compared to males, females are at greater risk for and have greater pathology burden in late onset. However, sex differences in early onset AD (EOAD) have not yet been studied.MethodWe included 167 participants [28 cognitively normal (CN, 68% females), 98 early onset AD (EOAD, 55% females), and 41 cognitively impaired amyloid‐negative (EOnonAD, 31% females] subjects from the Longitudinal Early‐Onset AD Study (LEADS) with available Flortaucipir PET, Florbetaben PET, and MRI data. Multiple linear regression (MLR) models including age and MMSE as covariates were used in the pooled sample to examine the effects of sex on hippocampal and white matter hyperintensity volume, mean cortical thickness, mean tau distribution by Braak regions and mean cortical amyloid SUVR. We also ran voxelwise MLR with sex as the predictor and cortical thickness, amyloid SUVR normalized to whole cerebellum, tau SUVR normalized to cerebellar crus, respectively, as the outcome measures while controlling for age, MMSE, and total intracranial volume (MRI only). Results are displayed at a cluster‐level FWE correction of p<0.05.ResultThere were no significant demographic differences between males and females in any diagnostic group. Across the pooled sample females showed significantly greater atrophy of the hippocampus (p=0.0001), greater tau SUVR in Braak regions 3&4 (p=0.05) and 5&6 (p=0.04) and trend for greater global amyloid uptake (p=0.074) (Table 2). The analyses in imaging space confirmed these findings and showed that the effects are driven by the EOAD group. Females showed greater amyloid deposition globally and greater tau deposition in the frontal, inferior parietal and temporal lobes (Figure 3).ConclusionFemale sex is associated with greater pathology burden in EOAD. Longitudinal studies will be needed to establish whether such difference translates in faster rates of progression in women relative to men.

AbstractBackgroundApproximately 5% of the 5.6 million (∼280,000) Americans with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) develop symptoms at age 65 or younger and are classified as having early‐onset AD (EOAD). Although EOAD and late‐onset AD (LOAD) share the same pathologic substrate, there are notable differences in their clinical and biological phenotypes. The Longitudinal Early‐onset AD study (LEADS) is a multi‐site, observational clinical and biomarker study of EOAD. In the present study we utilized the currently available LEADS imaging data to explore the spatial extent and magnitude of neurodegeneration EOADMethod95 amyloid positive patients with EOAD, 37 amyloid negative cognitively impaired patients (EOnonAD) , and 55 cognitively unimpaired controls (CNs) were included in the analysis. The magnitude of cortical thinning in the EOAD and EOnonAD groups was estimated using whole‐brain GLMs compared to the CN group. In addition, w‐scores were derived for each EOAD patient for these ROIs: average cortical thickness, hippocampal volume, AD‐signature cortical thickness (typically used in LOAD), and precuneus cortical thickness controlling for age, sex, and acquisition site. The utility of each ROI to differentiate EOAD patients from CNs was assessed by calculating the percentage of patients falling below a W‐threshold of ‐1.5.ResultIn EOAD, a distributed pattern of cortical thinning was observed in lateral temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex (p<.01), and was most prominent in the precuneus (Cohen’s d’ = 1.5). In the EOnonAD group, cortical thinning was observed but was highly variable across individuals. The w‐score analysis in the EOAD group yielded the following results: Mean Cortical thickness: Mean = ‐3.34, SD = 2.97, Classification = 72%.; Hippocampal volume: Mean = ‐2.96, SD = 2.39, Classification = 74%; AD Signature: Mean = ‐4.63, SD = 3.07, Classification = 80%; Precuneus: Mean = ‐5.98, SD = 4.1, Classification = 90%.ConclusionOur results are consistent with previous findings demonstrating cortical thinning in lateral parietal, precuneus, and lateral temporal lobes in EOAD with relatively less involvement of the medial temporal lobes. Our results also suggest that the precuneus may be especially vulnerable to neurodegeneration in patients with EOAD and may serve as a useful biomarker for patient classification.

AbstractBackgroundPlasma NfL is a sensitive marker of axonal injury that is elevated in symptomatic FTLD and asymptomatic carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic mutations at short‐term risk of phenoconversion to mild behavioral or cognitive impairment or dementia. In carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic mutations, NfL is associated with clinical measures of disease severity.MethodPlasma NfL was measured using single molecule array technology in baseline blood samples from 290 participants in the ARTFL/LEFFTDS consortia. Participants included 181 asymptomatic mutation carriers (C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT); 45 with mild impairment (MBI/MCI), and 64 with dementia. 103 family members without FTLD‐associated mutations served as asymptomatic controls. Social cognition scales were obtained through clinical evaluation at baseline, year 1, and year 2. Stepwise linear regressions assessed NfL relationships with baseline social cognition measures. Linear mixed models were used to test the ability of baseline NfL to predict longitudinal changes. Analyses corrected for age, sex, and genotype.ResultAt baseline, plasma NfL correlated with all measures of social cognition, regardless of genotype. Associations were strongest for the Revised Self‐monitoring Scale (RSMS;β = ‐.50, p < .001), total score of the Social Norms questionnaire (β= .48, p < .001), and caregiver burden (Zarit burden;β = .55, p < .001). Regardless of disease severity, baseline NfL related to worse RSMS scores over time (‐3.7 points at year 2/ LogNfL unit increase, 95% CI ‐1.7 to ‐5.7, p < .001). In MBI/MCI, higher baseline NfL was associated with worse longitudinal scores on the Social Norms questionnaire (‐5.9 points at year 2/LogNfL unit increase, 95% CI ‐1.1 to ‐10.7, p = .016). No associations were seen in asymptomatic non‐carriers.ConclusionIn this familial FTLD cohort, plasma NfL is correlated with clinical measures of social cognition and caregiver burden. Higher baseline plasma NfL concentrations are associated with worsening self‐monitoring and social norms scores over time. These associations suggest that NfL is correlated with clinically meaningful measures that may be relevant to therapeutic development.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter (WM) hypointensity volume in T1 MRI correlates strongly with T2 hyperintensities and both are typically associated with advancing age and vascular brain injury (VBI). Recent research has suggested that Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) neuropathologic changes (ADNC) also increases WM hypointensity volume. Sporadic early onset AD (EOAD) patients provide a unique model to examine the relationship between ADNC biomarkers and WM hypointensity volume in the absence of advanced age, cardiovascular injury, or autosomal dominant genetic mutations.MethodIncluded in the analysis were sporadic EOAD patients (n = 75) and cognitively normal controls (n = 39) from the Longitudinal Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS) for whom full demographic and health information were available. WM hypointensity volume in T1 MRI was segmented by Freesurfer and corrected for total white matter volume. Multiple‐factor ANOVA models with logarithmic transformations were used to determine the effects of age, cohort, and presence of cardiovascular conditions on WM hypointensity volume. Further multiple‐factor ANOVA models assessed whether the addition of covariates improved the model fit.ResultIn a reproduction of prior research, WM hypointensity volume was correlated with age for controls (p < 0.05), but not for EOAD patients. We additionally found an effect of cohort, such that EOAD patients had a higher mean WM hypointensity volume than controls when accounting for age (p < 0.05). No difference in the presence or number of cardiovascular conditions was found between groups. Additionally, no correlation was found between WM hypointensity volume and the presence or number of cardiovascular conditions. Including cardiovascular condition as a covariate failed to improve the model fit, even when accounting for interaction effects.ConclusionThese results support the hypothesis that patients with ADNC have higher WM hypointensity volume beyond what would be expected based on aging or cardiovascular risk factors. Further research is needed to assess the co‐localization of WM hypointensities with cortical degradation, amyloid pathology, and tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies have reported that age modifies the distribution and burden of tau (and, to a lesser extent, amyloid) pathology in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here we present preliminary baseline amyloid and tau PET results from the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS), a multi‐site longitudinal study of sporadic early‐onset AD.Method135 patients meeting clinical criteria for MCI or probable AD and 50 cognitively normal controls (all age<65 at enrollment) were enrolled at 12 US centers between August 2018 and December 2019 (Table 1). 18F‐Florbetaben amyloid‐PET (FBB) was used to assign patients to EOAD (amyloid‐positive) or EOnonAD (amyloid‐negative) subgroups based on visual rating and semi‐quantification. 130 patients and all controls had 18F‐Flortaucipir tau‐PET (FTP). Regional Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVR) for FBB (whole cerebellum reference) and FTP (inferior cerebellar gray reference) were extracted using co‐registered 3T‐MRI.Result98 patients (72.6%) were amyloid PET‐positive (EOAD) and 37 (27.4%) were amyloid PET‐negative (EOnonAD). Compared to EOAD, EOnonAD patients had higher MMSE, MOCA and CDR sum‐of‐boxes (CDR‐SB) and were more frequently male (Table 1). Patients with EOAD showed elevated FBB and FTP SUVR in temporoparietal and frontal cortex compared to CN and EOnonAD (Figures 1‐2). In EOAD, MMSE, MOCA and CDR‐SB were significantly correlated with FTP SUVR (Figure 3), while no significant correlations were found with FBB SUVR. EOnonAD patients showed variable FTP binding ranging from negative to mildly elevated binding in anterior temporal and frontal cortex and underlying white matter. Two EOnonAD cases showed intense FTP binding comparable to typical EOAD cases, despite visually and quantitatively negative FBB scans.ConclusionPatients with clinically mild, sporadic EOAD typically show an extensive distribution and burden of tau pathology in the setting of positive amyloid PET. Global clinical measures correlate with tau but not amyloid PET. Over 25% of patients meeting clinical criteria for early‐onset MCI/probable AD have negative amyloid PET, suggesting alternative etiologies for cognitive decline. These findings will inform future design of drug trials in this important and under‐studied population.

AbstractBackgroundThe LEFFTDS Consortium involves investigators at 8 centers in North America evaluating individuals in kindreds with mutations in microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT), progranulin (GRN), or chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) genes using a standardized battery of measures. Participants are evaluated annually. We sought to determine possible correlations between FTLD disease progression and neuropsychiatric features.MethodThe Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) scale is an informant‐based instrument that measures the presence and severity of 12 neuropsychiatric features in patients with dementia. The NPI‐Q was completed at each LEFFTDS visit. The individual NPI questions and total score were analyzed in those with CDR® Dementia Staging Instrument PLUS National Alzheimer Coordinating Center Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (CDR®+ NACC FTLD) ratings of 0 (i.e., clinically normal), 0.5 (i.e., questionably/minimally abnormal), 1, 2, and 3.ResultThe 472 participants enrolled to date with a baseline (Visit 1) assessment have the following characteristics: 261 (55.5%) female, mean age 48 (range 18‐80) years, mean education 16 (range 11‐22) years, and 275 participants with a CDR®+NACC FTLD=0 (58%) and known genetic status. Participants with a CDR®+NACC FTLD=0 plus a genetic mutation were compared to those without a mutation and found to have increased severity of apathy (mean score of 0.116 versus 0.035, p=0.0302). Regardless of the specific mutation, those with a CDR®+NACC FTLD=0.5 were reported to have increased severity of apathy, disinhibition, and irritability. For most domains, mean NPI‐Q severity scores increase between groups up to CDR®+NACC FTLD=2. Depression increases in severity up to CDR®+NACC FTLD=1, whereas apathy severity continues to increase with increasing disease severity through CDR®+NACC FTLD=3. Twenty participants converted from CDR®+NACC FTLD 0 to >0 between their baseline and most recent visit; apathy severity almost tripled in these participants. For those that converted, disinhibition, irritability, and NPI total score were different between baseline and most recent visit (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p<0.05).ConclusionKey neuropsychiatric features measured by the NPI‐Q demonstrate differences in apathy severity between clinically normal mutation vs non‐mutation carriers. Key domains differ at different levels of FTLD severity and show dynamic changes with increasing level of FTLD severity. Supported by AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976.

AbstractBackgroundIt is important to determine the natural history of sporadic and familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and generate clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biofluid data for planning disease‐modifying trials.MethodAs part of the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD; U19 AG063911) protocol, investigators at 19 centers in North America will enroll 2100 participants with FTLD over the next 5 years beginning in early 2020.ResultAs of 1/20/20, the ARTFL/LEFFTDS (A/L) Consortium had enrolled 1832 participants, including 850 in kindreds with familial FTLD (239 associated with mutations in MAPT, 192 in GRN, 370 in C9orf72, 4 with mutations in both GRN and C9orf72, and 45 with a mutation in a different gene or no mutation in any known FTLD‐associated gene). Over 500 participants have undergone 2 or more annual visits to date. MRI has been performed in 1105. Biofluid samples have also been collected, with blood (DNA, plasma, serum, mRNA, PBMC) in 1413 and CSF in 303. Over 60 manuscripts using A/L data or samples have been published to date. Five clinical trials involving A/L and ALLFTD participants are in progress or planned. The longitudinal arm in ALLFTD will enroll 500 of existing A/L and 600 future participants for annual assessments with similar methodology to A/L. An additional 1000 FTLD patients will undergo focused one‐time clinical evaluations and biofluid collection.ConclusionThe data/samples from already‐enrolled and planned participants in ALLFTD and findings published to date underscore the utility of evaluating FTLD subjects. The absence of identifiable mutations in some with familial FTLD suggests that other genes are yet to be discovered. ALLFTD data will inform clinical trial design, and many participants will be eligible for future trials. The key data and samples in ALLFTD are available to interested investigators worldwide. Supported by: AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976, AG21886.

AbstractIntroductionBehavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) may present sporadically or due to an autosomal dominant mutation. Characterization of both forms will improve understanding of the generalizability of assessments and treatments.MethodsA total of 135 sporadic (s‐bvFTD; mean age 63.3 years; 34% female) and 99 familial (f‐bvFTD; mean age 59.9; 48% female) bvFTD participants were identified. f‐bvFTD cases included 43 with known or presumed chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) gene expansions, 28 with known or presumed microtubule‐associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations, 14 with known progranulin (GRN) mutations, and 14 with a strong family history of FTD but no identified mutation.ResultsParticipants with f‐bvFTD were younger and had earlier age at onset. s‐bvFTD had higher total Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) scores due to more frequent endorsement of depression and irritability.Discussionf‐bvFTD and s‐bvFTD cases are clinically similar, suggesting the generalizability of novel biomarkers, therapies, and clinical tools developed in either form to the other.