Introduction: Thoracic external beam radiation therapy (XRT) for cancer is associated with a multitude of long-term cardiotoxic side effects. Previous studies have suggested worse outcomes in XRT-treated cancer survivors who undergo revascularization with CABG, but sample sizes have been small. In addition, XRT after CABG is thought to portend decreased patency and survival. We aimed to examine outcomes after CABG in patients with XRT compared with to those without XRT. Methods: We identified all patients who were treated with both CABG (between 1999 and 2013) and curative thoracic XRT for cancer (between 1971 and 2013) (>30 Gray). Baseline clinical characteristics and comorbidities at time of CABG, as well as long-term outcomes after CABG and XRT were compared with propensity matched control cohorts. Results: A total of 38 patients underwent CABG following XRT [Group 1] (mean age 67.9, 63% female) and 43 patients underwent XRT after CABG [Group 2] (mean age 69.3, 63% female). Compared with propensity-matched controls (Group 1: n=141; Group 2: n=167), baseline clinical and demographic characteristics between cases and controls were similar in both groups, except a lower incidence of triple vessel disease in XRT cases in Group 2 (64 vs 80%, p=0.02). For Group 1, there was no significant difference in all-cause survival in long-term follow-up after CABG (Fig. 1, p=0.72). Meanwhile, Group 2 cases had significantly higher all-cause mortality following XRT (Fig. 2, p<0.001). Conclusions: Patients previously treated with thoracic XRT who subsequently undergo CABG for coronary artery disease have a similar overall mortality rate compared to patients without prior XRT. This suggests that CABG is an effective method of revascularization in these patients. The higher mortality rates in CABG patients who subsequently develop disease requiring thoracic XRT is likely due to oncologic rather than cardiovascular causes, but more data are necessary to evaluate this finding.
Abstract 18299: Device Selection: Does Ventricular Size Matter in LVAD Recipients?
Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 132 | Issue: suppl_3 | Pages: No page available
Introduction: Axial and centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have varied response to changes in loading conditions. Whether ventricular size modulates the response to LVAD therapy between the axial flow Heartmate II (HMII) and centrifugal flow Heartware (HVAD) is unknown. Hypothesis: Adverse event and survival rates between devices are affected by recipient pre-op left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). Methods: Data on 1,149 continuous-flow LVAD recipients from May 2004 to May 2015 was pooled from the Mechanical Circulatory Support Research Network (MCSRN). The effect of pre-op LVEDD on the instantaneous hazard of death and adverse events was evaluated between HMII (n=864) and HVAD (n=283). Results: The average LVEDD was 7.0cm and did not differ between the device recipients. Patients with a smaller LVEDD (≤ 6.3cm) were more likely female 39% v. 24% (p < 0.0001) and to have an ischemic cardiomyopathy (30% v. 24%, p = 0.045). For every 1cm increase in pre-op LVEDD, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality increased with HVAD (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.94-1.82, p = 0.005) and decreased with HMII (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.92, p = 0.005), Figure 1a. Other predictors of mortality included age (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12 - 1.53 per 10y, p < 0.001) and bilirubin (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.42 per mg/dL, p = 0.027). LVEDD by device type interaction was not a significant predictor of gastrointestinal bleeding or pump thrombosis. The risk of stroke increased with LVEDD for HVAD and decreased for HMII, but this did not reach statistical significance, Figure 1b. Ischemic etiology of heart failure (HR 1.7 95% CI 1.14 - 2.55, p = 0.01) and HVAD device use (HR 1.47 95% CI 1.00 - 2.17, p = 0.03) were significant predictors of stroke. Conclusions: Our data suggest important differences exist in patient outcomes between HMII and HVAD based on pre-op ventricular size. Studies are needed to determine if these differences in outcome are due to device or flow-specific differences in patient support.
Outcomes of Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis following Mediastinal Irradiation
No container title available | July 2, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available
Background Pericardiectomy for post-radiation constrictive pericarditis has been reported to generally have unfavorable outcomes. This study sought to evaluate surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing pericardiectomy for radiation-associated pericardial constriction. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients (≥18years) who underwent pericardiectomy for a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis with a prior history of mediastinal irradiation from June 2002 to June 2019 was conducted. There were 100 patients (mean age 57.2±10.1 years, 49% females) who met the inclusion criteria. Records were reviewed to look at surgical approach, extent of resection, early mortality and late survival. Results The overall operative mortality was 10.1% (n=10). The rate of operative mortality decreased over the study period; however, the test of trend was not statistically significant (P=0.062). Hodgkin’s disease was the most common malignancy (64%) for which mediastinal radiation had been received. Only 27% patients had an isolated pericardiectomy, and concomitant pericardiectomy and valve surgery was performed in 46% patients. Radical resection was performed in 50% patients, whereas 47% patients underwent a subtotal resection. Prolonged ventilation (26%), atrial fibrillation (21%) and pleural effusion (16%) were the most common post-operative complications. The overall 1,5- and 10-years survival was 73.6%, 53.4% and 32.1% respectively. Increasing age (HR 1.044, 95%CI 1.017-1.073) appeared to have a significant negative effect on overall survival in the univariate model. Conclusion Pericardiectomy performed for radiation associated constrictive pericarditis has poor long-term outcomes. The early mortality, though high (~10%), has been showing a decreasing trend in the test of time.
Cardiac surgeons' concerns, perceptions, and responses during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Journal of Cardiac Surgery | June 12, 2021 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 3040-3051
Temporal Trends, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes of Emergent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States
Journal of the American Heart Association | May 15, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 15 | Pages: No page available
Background There are limited contemporary data on the use of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Adult (aged >18 years) acute myocardial infarction admissions were identified using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (2000–2017) and classified by tertiles of admission year. Outcomes of interest included temporal trends of CABG use; age‐, sex‐, and race‐stratified trends in CABG use; in‐hospital mortality; hospitalization costs; and hospital length of stay. Of the 11 622 528 acute myocardial infarction admissions, emergent CABG was performed in 1 071 156 (9.2%). CABG utilization decreased overall (10.5% [2000] to 8.7% [2017]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98–0.98]; P <0.001), in ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (10.2% [2000] to 5.2% [2017]; adjusted OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.95–0.95]; P <0.001) and non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (10.8% [2000] to 10.0% [2017]; adjusted OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.99–0.99]; P <0.001), with consistent age, sex, and race trends. In 2012 to 2017, compared with 2000 to 2005, admissions receiving emergent CABG were more likely to have non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (80.5% versus 56.1%), higher rates of noncardiac multiorgan failure (26.1% versus 8.4%), cardiogenic shock (11.5% versus 6.4%), and use of mechanical circulatory support (19.8% versus 18.7%). In‐hospital mortality in CABG admissions decreased from 5.3% (2000) to 3.6% (2017) (adjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88–0.89 [ P <0.001]) in the overall cohort, with similar temporal trends in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. An increase in lengths of hospital stay and hospitalization costs was seen over time. Conclusions Utilization of CABG has decreased substantially in acute myocardial infarction admissions, especially in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Despite an increase in acuity and multiorgan failure, in‐hospital mortality consistently decreased in this population.
First Report of Proton Beam Therapy in a Patient With a Left Ventricular Assist Device
A 77 year old man previously implanted with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator presented with a left upper lobe squamous cell lung cancer. Oncology determined that proton beam therapy was indicated for treatment, and a multidisciplinary team of radiation physicists, radiation oncologists, and LVAD providers developed a protocol to proceed safely. He was successfully treated with combined proton beam radiation therapy and reduced dose chemotherapy. This case demonstrates feasibility and considerations of proton beam therapy for malignancy relevant to patients with implantable cardiac devices including LVADs.
Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Versus Central Aortic Pressure in Patients Supported on Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
Abstract Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) administration has increased among cardiac surgery patients in recent years; however, use in LVAD implantation/exchange is not widespread due to the fear of thrombotic complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing LVAD implantation/exchange with intraoperative PCC administration versus traditional transfusion practices alone. Adult LVAD implants/exchanges at our institution between 2015 and 2018 were included. Patients were categorized as receiving intraoperative PCC or no‐PCC (traditional). The primary outcome was the need for allogenic transfusion and transfusion volume at 48 hours after initial intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included metrics of morbidity and mortality. A total of 160 patients (39 PCC, 121 traditional) were analyzed. In unadjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group received lower intraoperative transfusion volumes compared to the traditional group although not statistically significant (1464 mL [IQR 796, 4876] vs. 2568 mL [IQR 1292, 3606]; P value .37). In the fully adjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group had increased odds of transfusion within 48 hours of ICU admission (OR 4.06, 95% CI: 1.35‐12.20; P < .01); however, there was no significant difference in transfusion volumes ( P = .09). Patients receiving PCCs had higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (10.3% vs. 0%; P < .01) and 30‐day mortality (17.9% vs. 4.1%; P < .01). LVAD pump thrombosis occurred in 2.6% versus 0.8% in the PCC and traditional groups, respectively; P = .98. Patients undergoing LVAD implantation and exchange represent a complex surgical cohort. The results of this study suggest that the intraoperative PCC use during LVAD implant/exchange was associated with reduced intraoperative transfusions. Intraoperative PCC use was, however, associated with higher odds of postoperative transfusion, although transfusion volumes were not significantly different. While the deep vein thrombosis and 30‐day mortality rates were higher in the PCC group, these results are likely related to the degree of surgical and patient complexity rather than PCC use itself. Further studies are needed to assess PCC use in this surgical cohort.
Decreased right ventricular strain before LVAD implantation is associated with adverse early outcome
European Heart Journal | November 26, 2020 | Volume: 41 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: No page available
Abstract Objectives Right ventricular (RV) failure occurring after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with increased mortality. Purpose We sought to determine whether RV strain by echocardiography predicts outcomes following LVAD. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent continuous flow LVAD placement at our clinic between February 2007 and October 2018 were included. Patients with complex congenital heart disease and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy were excluded. Baseline characteristics, pre-operative hemodynamic catheterization (1 week) transthoracic echocardiography (1 month) measurements were obtained from the medical record. Speckle tracking RV free wall longitudinal 2D strain was measured using TomTec Imaging System. Univariate and multivariable analysis performed to identify predictors of mortality following LVAD. Results The study group was comprised of 323 patients (mean age 60.8±11.5, 79.9% male) of which 256 had adequate image quality for RV strain. RV strain was impaired in most patients (mean −11.7±3.47). RV strain of −8.1% was identified as predictive of poor outcomes. RV strain did not correlate with other measures of RV dysfunction including pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and RVFAC. After adjusting for PAPi, RA pressure, and clinical cumulative risk scores (Matthews, Kormos and Lietz-Miller) impaired RV free wall longitudinal strain (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.01–1.29, p=0.025), tricuspid regurgitation (by vena contracta width (TRvc) (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.05–1.36, p=:0.0021) and smaller LVEDD (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92–0.99, p:0.023) predicted 30-day all-cause mortality and RV failure. Decreased RV free wall strain also predicted peri-operative mortality (22.58% vs. 4.89%, p=0.0003) and prolonged inotropic support (247.0.±277.4 vs. 122.8±139.3, p=0.024). Conclusions RV free wall strain is a non-invasive independent predictor of 30-day adverse outcomes (RV failure or all-cause mortality) Routine measurement of RV free strain may identify those patients at highest risk for early and long term mortality following LVAD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None