Kelemen, Katalin

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell lymphoma that usually localizes to serous body cavities to subsequently form effusions in the absence of a discrete mass. Although some tumors can develop in extracavitary locations, the areas most often affected include the peritoneum, pleural space, and the pericardium. PEL is associated with the presence of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8), also called the Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), with some variability in transformation potential suggested by frequent coinfection with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (~80%), although the nature of the oncogenesis is unclear. Most patients suffering with this disease are to some degree immunocompromised (e.g., Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or post-solid organ transplantation) and, even with aggressive treatment, prognosis remains poor. There is no definitive guideline for the treatment of PEL, although CHOP-like regimens (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) are frequently prescribed and, given the rarity of this disease, therapeutic focus is being redirected to personalized and targeted approaches in the experimental realm. Current clinical trials include the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab into the EPOCH regimen and the treatment of individuals with relapsed/refractory EBV-associated disease with tabelecleucel.

Nucleophosmin (NPM1) is a multifunctional protein with both proliferative and growth-suppressive roles in the cell. In humans, NPM1 is involved in tumorigenesis via chromosomal translocations, deletions, or mutation. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutated NPM1, a distinct diagnostic entity by the current WHO Classification of myeloid neoplasm, represents the most common diagnostic subtype in AML and is associated with a favorable prognosis. The persistence of NPM1 mutation in AML at relapse makes this mutation an ideal target for minimal measurable disease (MRD) detection. The clinical implication of this is far-reaching because NPM1-mutated AML is currently classified as being of standard risk, with the best treatment strategy (transplantation versus chemotherapy) yet undefined. Myeloid neoplasms with NPM1 mutations and <20% blasts are characterized by an aggressive clinical course and a rapid progression to AML. The pathological classification of these cases remains controversial. Future studies will determine whether NPM1 gene mutation may be sufficient for diagnosing NPM1-mutated AML independent of the blast count. This review aims to summarize the role of NPM1 in normal cells and in human cancer and discusses its current role in clinical management of AML and related myeloid neoplasms.

AbstractObjectivesTo report the findings of the 2019 Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology Workshop within the categories of reactive eosinophilia, hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), germline disorders with eosinophilia (GDE), and myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms associated with eosinophilia (excluding entities covered by other studies in this series).MethodsThe workshop panel reviewed 109 cases, assigned consensus diagnosis, and created diagnosis-specific sessions.ResultsThe most frequent diagnosis was reactive eosinophilia (35), followed by acute leukemia (24). Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) received 17 submissions, including chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS). Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), MDS/MPN, and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms received 11, while GDE and HES received 12 and 11 submissions, respectively.ConclusionsHypereosinophilia and HES are defined by specific clinical and laboratory criteria. Eosinophilia is commonly reactive. An acute leukemic onset with eosinophilia may suggest core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia, blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1–positive leukemia, or t(5;14) B-lymphoblastic leukemia. Eosinophilia is rare in MDS but common in MDS/MPN. CEL, NOS is a clinically aggressive MPN with eosinophilia as the dominant feature. Bone marrow morphology and cytogenetic and/or molecular clonality may distinguish CEL from HES. Molecular testing helps to better subclassify myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia and to identify patients for targeted treatments.

Abstract Objectives To summarize cases submitted to the 2019 Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology Workshop under the category of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2 rearrangements, focusing on recent updates and relevant practice findings. Methods The cases were summarized according to their respective gene rearrangement to illustrate the spectrum of clinical, laboratory, and histopathology manifestations and to explore the appropriate molecular genetic tests. Results Disease presentations were heterogeneous, including myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), MDS/MPN, acute myeloid leukemia, acute B- or T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL/LBL), or mixed-lineage neoplasms. Frequent extramedullary involvement occurred. Eosinophilia was common but not invariably present. With the advancement of RNA sequencing, cryptic rearrangements were recognized in genes other than PDGFRA. Additional somatic mutations were more frequent in the FGFR1-rearranged cases. Cases with B-ALL presentations differed from Philadelphia-like B-ALL by the presence of an underlying MPN. Cases with FLT3 and ABL1 rearrangements could be potential candidates for future inclusion in this category. Conclusions Accurate diagnosis and classification of this category of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms has important therapeutic implications. With the large number of submitted cases, we expand our understanding of these rare neoplasms and improve our ability to diagnose these genetically defined disorders.

Abstract Objectives The 2019 Society for Hematopathology and European Association for Haematopathology Workshop reviewed the spectrum of neoplastic, nonneoplastic, and borderline entities associated with reactive eosinophilia in tissue. Methods The workshop panel reviewed 46 cases covered in 2 workshop sessions. Results The 46 cases were presented with their consensus diagnoses during the workshop. Reactive eosinophilia in lymph nodes and other tissues may be accompanied by or be distinct from peripheral blood eosinophilia. Reactive etiologies included inflammatory disorders such as Kimura disease and IgG4-related disease, which may show overlapping pathologic features and reactions to infectious agents and hypersensitivity (covered in a separate review). Hodgkin, T-cell, and B-cell lymphomas and histiocytic neoplasms can result in reactive eosinophilia. The spectrum of these diseases is discussed and illustrated through representative cases. Conclusions Reactive eosinophilia in lymph nodes and tissues may be related to both nonneoplastic and neoplastic lymphoid proliferations and histiocytic and nonhematolymphoid processes. Understanding the differential diagnosis of reactive eosinophilia and the potential for overlapping clinical and pathologic findings is critical in reaching the correct diagnosis so that patients can be treated appropriately.

Abstract Objectives The 2019 Workshop of the Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology received and reviewed cases covering the spectrum of mastocytosis and related diseases, including morphologic mimics, focusing on recent updates and relevant findings for pathologists. Methods The workshop panel reviewed 99 cases of cutaneous and systemic mastocytosis (SM) and SM and associated hematologic neoplasms (SM-AHN). Results Despite a common theme of KIT mutation (particularly D816V), mastocytosis is a heterogeneous neoplasm with a wide variety of presentations. This spectrum, including rare subtypes and extramedullary organ involvement, is discussed and illustrated by representative cases. Conclusions In the age of targeted treatment aimed at KIT, the accurate diagnosis and classification of mastocytosis has major implications for therapy and further interventions. Understanding the clinical, pathologic, and genetic findings of mastocytosis is crucial for selecting the proper tests to perform and subsequent arrival at a correct diagnosis in this rare disease.

AbstractAggressive morphologic variants of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), including blastoid and pleomorphic (B/P‐MCL), are rare and associated with poor clinical outcomes. The genomic landscape of these variants remains incompletely explored. In this multi‐institutional study, we describe recurrent mutations and novel genomic copy number alterations (CNAs) in B/P‐MCL, using next generation sequencing and SNP‐array. Chromothripsis, a recently described phenomenon of massive chromosomal rearrangements, was identified in eight of 13 (62%) B/P MCL cases, and a high degree of genomic complexity with frequent copy number gains and losses was also seen. In contrast, a comparative cohort of nine cases of conventional MCL (C‐MCL) showed no chromothripsis and less complexity. Twelve of 13 (92%) B/P‐MCL cases showed loss of CDKN2A/B (6 biallelic and 6 monoallelic losses); while only one C‐MCL showed monoallelic CDKN2A/B loss. In B/P‐MCL, TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene, with mutations present in eight cases (62%), six of which showed concurrent loss of chromosome 17p. Of the eight cases with chromothripsis, six (85%) harbored TP53 mutations. Other recurrent mutations in B/P‐MCL included ATM (7, 53%), CCND1 (5, 38%), NOTCH1 (2, 18%), NOTCH2, and BIRC3 (each in 3, 23%). Here, we describe high genomic instability associated with chromothripsis and a high frequency of CDKN2A/B and TP53 alterations in the aggressive variants of MCL. The nonrandom chromothripsis events observed in B/P‐MCL may be an indicator of clinically aggressive MCL. In addition, frequent CDKN2A deletion and high genomic instability may provide potential targets for alternative treatment.

In multiple myeloma (MM) the interaction of plasma cells, bone marrow stromal cells and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) plays a significant role in conferring resistance to therapy and in the maintenance of residual disease. Folate receptors (FR) are specifically expressed on metabolically active malignant cells and TAMs and their expression in normal tissues and resting macrophages is limited. FR mediates folate uptake by receptor-mediated endocytosis. This qualifies the receptor to be exploited for drug delivery of folate conjugated cancer therapeutics. Our primary goal in this study is to evaluate the expression of functional FR in MM cells and TAMs with a view to exploit this for folate conjugated targeted therapy for MM. First we evaluated the presence of TAMs in paraffin embedded bone marrow slides of newly diagnosed MM patients with CD68 (pan-Macrophage marker) and CD163 antibodies (specific marker of TAMs) and found extensive infiltration of macrophages in bone marrow from MM patients. Next to evaluate expression of FR in MM cells, we employed an FR antibody and evaluated MM cell lines with immunoblot, flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. In a panel of ten MM cell lines, we found that out of the three FR isoforms (α, β and γ), FR beta (FR-β) is expressed by all of them. Next to test whether this expressed receptor is indeed functional, we incubated the cells with folate deficient media, added different concentrations of EC17 (folate conjugated to FITC, Endocyte Inc.) to the medium and looked for the uptake by flow cytometry after washing off the drug at different time points (after 10, 20, 40 and 60 min).We observed that the uptake begins in 10 min and is saturated at 1 hour with 100nM Folate-FITC. With confocal imaging, Folate-FITC was found in the cytoplasm of MM cells suggesting internalization of Folate-FITC and localization in the cytoplasm. In addition to myeloma cell lines, we also confirmed the uptake of Folate-FITC in CD138+ plasma cells of a newly diagnosed myeloma patient by flow cytometry. This strongly suggests that MM cells express functional FR-β. To test the specificity of this FR mediated uptake, we pre-incubated cells with 0.1mM folic acid in medium for 30 min and then added EC17. This maneuver blocked the activity mediated by FR and no uptake was observed , which proves that the Folate-FITC is internalized only through the FR. To evaluate the expression of FR in-vivo samples, we stained paraffin embedded bone marrow slides of newly diagnosed MM patients with FR-β antibody and TAM specific markers. We observe that FR is expressed on both MM cells as well as TAMs. To assess the endurance of cytotoxic effect of folate conjugated chemotherapeutic agents, we treated MM cell lines with folate conjugated vinka alkaloids and compared them to unconjugated drug and found no significant difference in their action suggesting conjugation with folate does not alter its efficacy. To assess potential toxicity of folate conjugated therapeutics, we obtained CD34+ cells and looked for the uptake of Folate-FITC with flow cytometry. We found no uptake and this is in line with previous reports suggesting that CD34 positive cells express nonfunctional FR. So we propose that FR qualify as potential targets for cancer treatment. Folate targeted therapy using folate-conjugated drugs which can selectively act against both MM cells and supporting TAMs has the potential of specific anti-MM tumoricidal activity. This therapeutic approach would broaden the use of drugs that could be conjugated with folate for MM therapy. Additionally assessment of TAMs in bone marrow sections of MM patients would add another feature for grading, classifying and prognosticating MM. Disclosures: Fonseca: Cylene: Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Binding Site: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lilly: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of the disease: Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of the disease, Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of the disease Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Background Myeloid neoplasms (MN) occurring secondary to treatment of non-malignant disease, especially autoimmune diseases (AID), and the overlap between them, is an increasing clinically important observation. Confounding variables for myeloid transformation include the nature of autoimmune disease as an incessant, chronically activated inflammatory cascade that has been associated with an increased risk of myeloid malignancy, and disease modifying therapies, often with cytotoxic and immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, the addition of therapeutic agents for treatment of AID theoretically amplifies the opportunity for MN to develop in genetically susceptible individuals. To our knowledge, there is no large study evaluating a comprehensive primary AID population that developed MDS or AML with detailed assessment of therapeutic interventions for AID. The presented study queries the association of cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and immune-modulating agents to treat AID as risk factors for developing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods In a 10-year period from 2004-2014, a total of 40,011 patients with an ICD-9 coded diagnosis of AID were seen at Mayo Clinic Arizona and Florida campuses; 311 patients from this population had a concomitant coded diagnosis of MDS and/or AML. In an IRB approved, retrospective chart review, we confirmed 86 cases meeting strict inclusion criteria for AID and confirmed MDS or AML. We performed a case-control match from the same primary autoimmune population for age, gender, and autoimmune specific diagnosis at a 2:1 ratio querying for therapeutic interventions. Results Myeloid neoplasm specifics in our case cohort of 86 patients were 55 MDS, 21 de novo AML, and 10 AML with history of MDS. Average age was 72 years with a slight male predominance (57%). Rheumatoid arthritis (26.4%), psoriasis (20.7%), systemic lupus (13.8%), was the most common autoimmune profiles. Median onset of autoimmune disease to diagnosis of myeloid neoplasm was 6 years (range 1-54 years). Up to 26% controls documented no systemic agent for treatment of autoimmune disease and similarly 12.8% of the case cohort (p=0.142). Case and control populations treated with systemic therapies had similar exposures by category for immune-modulating agents (33.7% and 37.8% respectively) and cytotoxic therapies (47.7 and 44.8% respectively). A total of 57/86 cases (66.3%) received either a cytotoxic or immune-modulating agent. In comparison, 105/172 (61.1%) controls received either agent; p=0.495. Azathioprine was the only statistically significant agent exposure observed more frequently in the study cohort than controls with an OR of 7.05 (p= < 0.001). There was no increased incidence of MDS or AML in TNF-antagonist treated patients. No significant correlation for duration of agent exposure by drug category was observed. Discussion In a large primary AID population, azathioprine exposure was associated with a 7 fold risk of MDS or AML (p=< 0.001). Notable, but not statistically significant case cohort trends among cytotoxic agents was exposure to cyclophosphamide (OR 3.58) followed by mitoxantrone (OR 2.73). Methotrexate, mercaptopurine, and mycophenolate had favorable odd ratios, but these were not statistically significant. No association was found for TNF-inhibitory agents. Finally, there was no association of drug exposure time to the incidence in development of MDS or AML. Disclosures Dueck: Bayer: Honoraria. Mesa:Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; CTI: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Foran:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria; karyopharm: Honoraria; medscape: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding.