Hefazi, Mehrdad

Key Points Systemic immune microenvironment signatures in CMML indicate an altered T- and natural killer cell balance. CMML bone marrow dendritic cell aggregates associate with disease progression and systemic regulatory T-cell phenotypic switch.

Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy is highly effective and was FDA approved for certain B-cell malignancies, most patients relapse after CART infusion within the first 1-2 years due to inadequate CART expansion in vivo. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has the ability to infect and lyse cancer cells. Clinical trials of VSV oncolytic therapy indicate that VSV efficiently infects cancer cells as well as innate immune cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that in patients who achieve suboptimal response to CART19, VSV engineered to express CD19 will augment anti-tumor activity through 1) direct lysis of cancer cells and 2) infecting cancer cells and innate immune cells with CD19 to further stimulate CART19. To test our hypothesis, human CD19 or GFP (control) was engineered between the glycoprotein and large-protein (Fig.1A) in a modified VSV backbone. A matrix inactivating mutation (M51R) rendered it incapable of suppressing anti-viral reactions of infected targets, potentially promoting its immunogenicity. First, we tested the anti-tumor activity of VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP against the luciferase (luc)+CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line NALM6 and the luc+CD19- acute myeloid leukemia cell line MOLM13. VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP successfully lysed NALM6 (Fig.1B) or MOLM13, both in vitro and in vivo (data not shown). Next, we investigated the efficiency of VSV-CD19 in infecting tumor and immune cells. 24 hours after exposure to VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP, we analyzed the surface expression of CD19 on MOLM13 and revealed efficient CD19 delivery (Fig.1C). Next, we assessed VSV infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors (HDs). Freshly isolated HD PBMCs were infected with VSV-CD19 for 6 hours and subsequently assessed for CD19 expression. Consistent with findings from clinical trials, VSV-CD19 selectively infected and induced CD19 expression on monocytes while other cells were not affected (Fig.1D). To exclude potential toxicities against CART19, we co-cultured CART19 with VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP using second-generation 4-1BB costimulated CART19. Both VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP did not infect CART19 as evident by preservation of CART19 viability and lack of CD19 or GFP expression (Fig.1E). Having demonstrated that VSV-CD19 specifically delivered CD19 to monocytes, we next tested whether the infected monocytes stimulated CART19. VSV-CD19 infected monocytes induced potent antigen-specific proliferation of CART19 (Fig.1F) and resulted in enhanced anti-tumor activity against luc+NALM6 in vitro (Fig.1G). Next, we aimed to confirm these findings in vivo. We generated luc+CART19 to track CART19 expansion in vivo. Freshly isolated HD monocytes were infected with VSV-CD19 ex vivo. After 4 hours, VSV-CD19 was washed away and immunocompromised NSG mice were intravenously injected with VSV-CD19 infectedmonocytes. After 24 hours, 3.5x106 of luc+untransduced T cells (UTD) or luc+CART19 were injected intravenously. The T cell expansion was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI). VSV-CD19 infected monocytes specifically stimulated and expanded CART19 (Fig.1H). Finally, we tested whether VSV-CD19 can stimulate and rescue suboptimal anti-tumor effects of CART19 in vivo using a NALM6 relapsed model. Here, 1x106 luc+NALM6 were injected intravenously into NSG mice on day -6. At day -1, mice were imaged and randomized according to tumor burden to receive 1x106 UTD or CART19 on day 0. Subsequently, at day 4, mice were re-imaged and randomized. At day 5, HD monocytes were injected intravenously. Three hours after administering monocytes, mice received 1x107 VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP (Fig.1I). BLI revealed that CART19 plusVSV-CD19 showed better tumor control than CART19 monotherapy or CART19 plus VSV-GFP (Fig.1J-K). Furthermore, CART19 plus VSV-CD19 exhibited long-term survival (Fig.1L). In summary, VSV-CD19 not only demonstrated direct anti-tumor effects but also specifically delivered CD19 to monocytes and tumor cells, thereby re-stimulating and enhancing the anti-tumor activity of CART19. This work provides a rationale to study VSV-CD19 in patients who demonstrate only suboptimal response to CART19. This approach could also be applied to augment CART therapy in other tumors. Figure 1 Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Eckert:Genentech: Current Employment. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding. Peng:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Russell:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Kenderian:Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding.

Recent successes and FDA approvals of CD19 redirected chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy have been achieved in pivotal clinical trials in patients with B cell malignancies. However, durable response rates in non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma (B-NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are low. Tumor-associated macrophages have emerged as key mediators of tumor-induced CART cell immunosuppression. Axl receptor tyrosine kinase (Axl-RTK) is overexpressed in various human cancers including B-NHL or CLL and correlates with poor overall survival. Thus, several Axl-RTK inhibitors are currently being investigated in clinical trials. We have previously reported that the Axl-RTK inhibitor TP-0903 modulates CART19 function by Th1 polarization. Moreover, we observed a significant reduction in myeloid-derived cytokines in preclinical models. This led us to hypothesize that Axl-RTK inhibition also modulates monocytes which in turn affects CART function. To test our hypothesis, we interrogated the interactions between Axl-RTK inhibition, monocytes, and CART. First, we isolated CD14+ monocytes from peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors by magnetic negative selection. Flow cytometric analysis revealed a robust Axl expression on monocytes (Fig.1A). Monocytes were maintained in ImmunoCult Macrophage Medium (STEMCELL Technologies) and differentiated with lipopolysaccharide and interferon-γ for M1-type and interleukin (IL)-4 for M2-type macrophages. After confirming the macrophage phenotypes, cells were assessed for Axl expression. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that M2-type macrophages expressed higher Axl compared to M1 macrophages (Fig.1B). Then, we treated PBMCs from healthy donors with TP-0903 for 24 hours to determine the specific cell types affected by Axl-RTK inhibition. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that monocytes were significantly inhibited by TP-0903 compared to B cells or T cells (Fig.1C). Having demonstrated that TP-0903 strongly suppresses monocytes and that M2-type macrophages express Axl on their surface, we then performed a cytotoxicity assay against CD19+ mantle cell lymphoma cell line, JeKo-1, to study the impact of Axl-RTK inhibition on monocyte-induced CART suppression. We used CART19 generated in our laboratory (FMC63-41BBζ). CART19, JeKo-1, and M2-type macrophages were co-cultured at 1:2:1 ratio and incubated for 3 days. The data revealed that M2-type macrophages strongly suppress CART19 killing (Fig.1D) which could be overcome with TP-0903 (Fig.1E). Next we studied monocyte-induced CART19 suppression with antigen-specific proliferation. CART19, JeKo-1, and monocytes were co-cultured at 1:5:1 ratio and incubated for 5 days. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that in the presence of monocytes, antigen-specific proliferation of CART19 was significantly suppressed, which was reversed in the presence of TP-0903 (Fig.1F). To assess how Axl inhibition modulates myeloid cell-derived cytokines/chemokines, we performed Multiplex (Millipore-Sigma) with the supernatants obtained from these co-culture assays. The presence of monocytes resulted in a significant increase in IL-17a, IL-6, IL-1 receptor agonist, IL-1β, and soluble CD40 ligand. However, Axl-RTK inhibition resulted in selective reduction of those cytokines/chemokines (Fig.1G) while preserving other effector cytokines. Finally, we tested whether Axl-RTK inhibition with TP-0903 could overcome the negative effects of monocytes in vivo. Here, immunocompromised NSG mice were injected with 1x106 luciferase+ JeKo-1 cells intravenously. Ten days later, mice were injected with freshly isolated monocytes derived from a healthy donor. Two weeks after JeKo-1 inoculation, tumor burden was assessed with bioluminescence imaging. Mice were then randomized according to the tumor burden to receive 0.5x106 CART19 as a monotherapy or in combination with 20 mg/kg/day of oral TP-0903. The combination therapy resulted in superior anti-tumor effects and overall survival compared to CART19 monotherapy (Fig.1H-I). In summary, Axl-RTK inhibition with TP-0903 demonstrates a direct suppression of inhibitory monocytes, which in turn enhances CART cell function. Our findings support the strategy of further refining and testing the novel and potent combination of Axl-RTK inhibition and CART cell therapy for the treatment of B cell malignancies. Figure 1 Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Mouritsen:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.: Current Employment. Foulks:Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Warner:Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Ding:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kenderian:Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Lentigen: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Abstract The availability and use of blinatumomab symbolizes a paradigm shift in the management of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort analysis of 239 ALL patients (227 relapsed refractory [RR], n = 227; minimal residual disease [MRD], n = 12) who received blinatumomab outside of clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy in the “real-world” setting. The median age of patients at blinatumomab initiation was 48 years (range, 18-85). Sixty-one (26%) patients had ≥3 prior therapies and 46 (19%) had allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation before blinatumomab. The response rate (complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery) in patients with RR disease was 65% (47% MRD−). Among 12 patients who received blinatumomab for MRD, 9 (75%) patients achieved MRD negativity. In patients with RR disease, median relapse-free survival and overall survival (OS) after blinatumomab was 32 months and 12.7 months, respectively. Among patients who received blinatumomab for MRD, median relapse-free survival was not reached (54% MRD− at 2 years) and OS was 34.7 months. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity were observed in 3%, 7%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Among patients who achieved complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery, consolidation therapy with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation retained favorable prognostic significance for OS (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.97; P = .04). In this largest “real-world” experience published to date, blinatumomab demonstrated responses comparable to those reported in clinical trials. The optimal sequencing of newer therapies in ALL requires further study.

Cellular immunotherapy is a rapidly progressing field in multiple myeloma (MM). Multiple clinical trials have reported impressive efficacy of B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy (BCMA CART) in MM. While trials demonstrated an overall response rate of 70-90% in patients with relapsed/refractory MM, the durable response rate is around 30%. Most patients lose their CART cells and the disease relapses within the first year, suggesting an inhibition by the MM tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore strategies to overcome this inhibition would represent a major advance in CART cell therapy for MM. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) within the TME play a critical role in promoting tumor growth and in the generation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment. We hypothesized that CAFs from bone marrows of patients with MM (MM-CAFs) inhibit BCMA CART cells and contribute to their failure and that targeting both the malignant plasma cells and CAFs can overcome this resistance. To test this hypothesis, we isolated MM-CAFs and studied their interaction with BCMA CART cells generated from normal donors (41BB costimulated, lentivirally transduced). Our initial findings suggest that MM-CAFs inhibit BCMA CART cell antigen specific proliferation in the presence of the BCMA+ MM cell line OPM2, and this inhibition is predominantly mediated through the secretion of TGF-β (Fig A). MM-CAFs also promoted MM tumor growth in an MM-TME xenograft model established in the laboratory (Fig B). Here, immunocompromised NOD-SCID-γ-/- (NSG) mice were engrafted with 1x106 luciferase+ BCMA+ OPM2, in combination with either 1x106 CAFs or vehicle control intraveneously (IV). Subsequent tumor burden was monitored by bioluminescent imaging of these mice. The presence of CAFs in this model significantly accelerated MM progression (Fig B). Based on these findings, we aimed to develop CART cell therapy targeting both malignant MM cells and their CAFs and to determine whether this strategy can reverse MM-CAF induced CART cell inhibition. To identify targets for these CART cells, we first verified the expression of Fibroblast Associated Protein (FAP), an established CAF target, on MM-CAFs. Flow cytometric analysis of MM-CAFs showed significantly higher expression of FAP, compared to fibroblasts derived from normal bone marrow (Fig C). In addition, our screening flow cytometric analysis identified CS1 as another protein overexpressed by MM-CAFs (Fig C). We therefore designed and generated FAP CART cells (41BB costimulated, lentivirally transduced) and CS1 CART cells (CD28 costimulated, lentivirally transduced). We also generated dual CART cells for both BCMA-FAP CART cells and BCMA-CS1 CART cells. These dual CART cells were generated through the dual transduction of two lentiviral vectors during CART manufacturing. Next, we evaluated the impact of CAFs on effector functions of BCMA CART cells compared to dual targeting CART cells. When CART cells were stimulated with the BCMA+ MM cell line MM1S, in the presence of MM-CAFs, the antigen specific proliferation of BCMA CART cells, but not the dual targeting CART cells was significantly inhibited (Fig A). Similarly, in the presence of MM-CAFs, production of key effector cytokines by BCMA CART cells, but not the dual CART cells was reduced (Fig D). Finally, to verify the significance of our laboratory findings, we investigated the impact of CAFs on CART cell functions in vivo. First, using OPM2 xenografts, treatment with BCMA CART cells were able to completely eradicate MM (Fig E). However, to determine the effect of targeting CAFs, we used our MM-TME model. Here, NSG mice were engrafted with the luciferase+ MM cell line OPM2, along with MM-CAFs, as described in Fig 1B. Mice were then imaged for engraftment and randomized to treatment with 1) untransduced control T cells, 2) BCMA CART cells, 3) BCMA-FAP CART cells, or 4) BCMA-CS1 CART cells. A lower dose (1x106 IV) of CART cell was used to induce relapse post BCMA CART cells. Treatment with BCMA CART cells led to a transient antitumor activity in this MM-TME model (mice died within 2 weeks), while dual targeting CART cells resulted in durable remissions and long term survival of these mice (Fig F). In summary, we demonstrate for the first time that dual targeting both malignant plasma cells and the CAFs within the TME is a novel strategy to overcome resistance to CART cell therapy in multiple myeloma. Figure Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB. Kenderian:Lentigen: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding.

Treatment with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy has resulted in unprecedented clinical outcomes and was FDA-approved in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma. However, its success in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been modest to date. An increasing body of evidence indicates that impaired CART cell fitness is the predominant mechanism of the relative dysfunction in CLL. The immunosuppressive microenvironment in CLL is well known and in part may be related to the abundance of circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) bearing immunomodulatory properties. We hypothesized that CLL-derived EVs contribute to CART cell dysfunction. In this study, we aimed to investigate the interaction between circulating EVs isolated from CLL patient plasma (designated as CLL-derived EVs) and CART19 cells. We enumerated and immunophenotyped circulating EVs from platelet free plasma in untreated patients with CLL. We determined their interaction with CART19 cells using second generation, 41BB co-stimulated, lentiviral transduced CART19 cells generated in the laboratory from normal donors (FMC63-41BBζ CART cells). Our findings indicate that CLL-derived EVs impair normal donor CART19 antigen-specific proliferation against the CD19+ mantle cell lymphoma cell line Jeko-1 (Figure 1A). Next, we characterized CLL-derived EVs using nanoscale flow cytometric analysis of surface proteins and compared to healthy controls. Although the total EV particle count was not different between CLL and healthy controls (Figure 1B), there were significantly higher PD-L1+ EVs in patients with CLL (Figure 1C). Based on these results, we sought to assess the physical interaction between CLL-derived EVs and CART cells from normal individuals. When CLL-derived EVs were co-cultured with CART19 and CLL B cells and imaged with super-resolution microscopy, EVs were localized at the T cell-tumor junction (Figure 1D). Furthermore, CLL-derived EVs are captured by T cells as indicated by a significant reduction in the absolute count of EVs when co-cultured with resting T cells (Figure 1E). Having demonstrated that 1) there is an excess of PD-L1+ EVs in patients with CLL (Figure 1C) and 2) CLL-derived EVs physically interact with CART cells (Figures 1D-E), we sought to establish their functional impact on CART19 cells. Here, CART19 cells were stimulated with irradiated CD19+ JeKo-1 cells at a 1:1 ratio in the presence of increasing concentrations of CLL-derived EVs. There was a significant upregulation of inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 on the T cells (Figure 1F). This is associated with a reduction in CART effector cytokines (i.e., TNFβ) at higher concentrations of EVs (Figure 1G), suggesting a state of exhaustion in activated CART19 cells in the presence of CLL-derived EVs. This was further supported by transcriptome interrogation of CART19 cells. Here, CART19 cells were stimulated via 24-hour co-culture with the irradiated CD19+ cell line JeKo-1, in the presence of CLL-derived EVs at ratios of 10:1 and 1:1 EV:CART19 and then isolated by magnetic sorting. RNA sequencing of these activated CART19 cells indicated a significant upregulation of AP-1 (FOS-JUN) and YY1 (Figures 1H), known critical pathways in inducing T cell exhaustion. Finally, to confirm the impact of CLL-derived EVs on CART19 functions in vivo, we used our xenograft model for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. Here, immunocompromised NOD-SCID-ɣ-/- mice were engrafted with the CD19+ luciferase+ cell line JeKo-1 (1x106 cells I.V. via tail vein injection). Engraftment was confirmed through bioluminescent imaging and mice were randomized to treatment with 1) untreated, 2) CART19 cells, or 3) CART19 cells co-cultured ex vivo with CLL-derived EVs for six hours prior to injection. A single low dose of CAR19 (2.5x105) was injected, to induce relapse. Treatment with CART19 cells that were co-cultured ex vivo with CLL-derived EVs resulted in reduced anti-tumor activity compared to treatment with CART19 alone (Figure 1I). Our results indicate that CLL-derived EVs induce significant CART19 cell dysfunction in vitro and in vivo, through a direct interaction with CART cells resulting in a downstream alteration of their exhaustion pathways. These studies illuminate a novel way through which circulating and potentially systemic EVs can lead to CART cell dysfunction in CLL patients. Disclosures Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Sakemura:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Kay:Agios: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Kenderian:Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding.

Despite the success of chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy, it is limited by 1) lower rates of durable responses related to inadequate CART cell expansion and trafficking to tumor sites and 2) development of life-threatening complication such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Development of a strategy to efficiently and robustly image and track CART cells in the clinic would allow the in vivo characterization of T cell expansion and trafficking to tumor sites as well as the development of strategies to potentially overcome these limitations. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is a characterized and sensitive reporter system that has been used for cell imaging in the clinic. We hypothesized that the incorporation of NIS into CART cells would be a sensitive and efficient way to assess CART cell expansion, trafficking, and toxicity. To test our hypothesis, we used two CART cell constructs that are characterized in preclinical models and studied extensively in the clinic: CART19 (41BB costimulated) and BCMA-CART cells (41BB costimulated). First, we generated NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART cells through dual transduction of lentiviral vectors (Fig A) and revealed the exclusive 125I uptake by these NIS+CARTs and its inhibition by the NIS inhibitor KClO4in vitro (Fig B). We then analyzed T cell functions of NIS+CART cells. Here, NIS+CART19 or CART19 cells were cultured with the CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line NALM6. There was no difference in CART cell cytotoxicity (Fig C), proliferation, or cytokine production (not shown) between NIS+CART19 and CART19. This indicates that the incorporation of NIS into CART cells does not impair their antitumor activity. Next, we evaluated the sensitivity of NIS+CART19 cell detection by TFB-PET in vivo; imaging was performed using an Inveon TFB-PET/CT scanner. Mice received 250 μCi 18F-TFB 45 minutes prior to image acquisition. NIS+CART cells were detectable with TFB-PET when cells were subcutaneously injected at a dose of 1.25x106 cells (Fig D). Having demonstrated that the incorporation of NIS in CART cells provides a sensitive way of their detection by TFB-PET and does not interfere with their effector functions, we tested its efficiency to assess CART cell trafficking in vivo, using multiple myeloma (MM) xenografts. Here, immunocompromised NOD-SCID-ɣ-/- (NSG) mice were engrafted with the BCMA+OPM2 MM cell line (1x106 IV). After engraftment, the tumor burden was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and mice were randomized to receive 1) BCMA-CART or 2) NIS+BCMA-CART cells (5x106 IV). Mice were then serially imaged for 1) bioluminescence as a measure of disease burden, and 2) with TFB-PET to assess CART cell expansion and trafficking. As expected, BLI demonstrated that MM predominantly engrafts in bones (Fig E). TFB-PET confirmed trafficking of the NIS+BCMA-CART cells to the bones, corresponding to the areas involved by MM based on BLI (Fig E, right). Both BCMA-CART and NIS+BCMA-CART cells exhibited similarly potent antitumor activity in this model (not shown). Finally, we aimed to explore whether TFB-PET can detect CART massive expansion in vivo and predict the development of CRS. Here, we used an established CRS model in our laboratory. NSG mice were engrafted with patient derived relapsed ALL blasts (5x106 IV). Engraftment was confirmed by peripheral blood sampling. When the leukemic burden is >10 CD19+ cell/µl, mice were treated with either high dose NIS+CART19 cells (5x106 IV) or PBS control. One week after NIS+CART19 cell treatment, mice developed muscle weakness, hunched bodies, and weight loss (Fig F), which correlate with an extreme elevation of cytokines (Sterner et al. Blood 2018). TFB-PET revealed a significant uptake in the bone marrow, spleen, liver, and lungs (Fig G) of the diseased mice but not control mice. Mice were then euthanized, and tissues were harvested. Flow cytometric analysis confirmed an extensive infiltration of CART cells in the liver and spleen. This demonstrates the ability of TFB-PET to detect NIS+CART cell expansion in vivo, correlating with the development of CRS. In summary, our results robustly show that the incorporation of NIS into CART cells provides a sensitive, clinically applicable platform to image CART cells using TFB-PET and to assess their expansion, trafficking to tumor sites, and the development of CRS. These studies illuminate a novel way to noninvasively assess CART cell functions in vivo. Figure Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Suksanpaisan:Imanis: Employment. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria. Kay:Agios: Other: DSMB; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Peng:Imanis: Equity Ownership. Russell:Imanis: Equity Ownership. Kenderian:Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Patients with hematological malignancies are at an increased risk for developing both primary and recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection (RCDI) along with complications such as toxic mega colon and treatment failure likely due to underlying immunosuppression and frequent use of broad spectrum antibiotics that lead to altered gut microbiome. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment for RCDI (Brandt et. al; 2012). However, experience in patients with hematologic malignancies is sparse and most clinical trials exclude these patients due to potential complications. We report the largest case series to date from a single institution evaluating the safety and efficacy of FMT for RCDI in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods: After IRB approval, a database of 452 RCDI patients treated with FMT between August 2012 and June 2016 was reviewed to identify those with an underlying hematologic malignancy. Data regarding demographics, hematologic disease, C. difficile history, treatments, and outcomes were retrospectively abstracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Sixteen patients (median age 74 years; male 50%) with known hematologic malignancies underwent FMT during the study period. The underlying diagnoses are outlined in Table 1. Five patients had received hematopoietic cell transplantation (3 allogeneic and 2 autologous) prior to FMT. Patients had a median of 4.5 (range 2-9) CDI episodes before FMT, and 4 of them had severe/severe-complicated CDI at some stage. Prior treatments included a median of 3 (range 1-5) standard vancomycin/metronidazole courses, median of 2 (range 0-4) vancomycin taper courses, fidaxomicin in 3 patients, and chronic vancomycin suppression in one patient. Diarrheal symptoms were in remission in all but 3 patients in the week before FMT. FMT was performed via colonoscopy in all patients. At the time of FMT, hematologic malignancies were in complete remission in 9 patients, stable on active treatment in 4, stable off treatment in 2, and relapsed awaiting treatment in 1 patient. Median time from last anti-neoplastic treatment (n = 14) and from last neutropenia (n = 8) to FMT were 10 (range 0-301) and 9.5 (0-68) months, respectively. One patient with hairy cell leukemia was still neutropenic and on prophylactic oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at the time of FMT. Five patients were on active immunosuppressive medications, including prednisone (n = 2), methotrexate (n = 2), sirolimus (n =1), and cyclosporine (n =1) for related comorbidities at the time of FMT (Table 2). At last follow up (median 12, range 0-32 months), 6 patients had active/relapsed hematological disease, 6 had received additional antineoplastic treatments, and 7 had received additional antibiotics. RCDI developed in two (12%) patients at 8 and 22 months post FMT secondary to exposure to broad spectrum antimicrobials. These patients were successfully treated with a second FMT and with metronidazole, respectively. Severe adverse events included death in one patient that occurred 3 days post FMT due to unexpected cardiac arrest and was deemed unrelated to the procedure. Another patient developed community-acquired pneumonia 15 days post FMT and was treated successfully with oral azithromycin. Minor adverse events within the first two weeks post FMT were noted in 6 (38%) patients (self-limited diarrhea in 3, fecal urgency in 2, abdominal cramps in 2, and constipation in one patient) (Table 3). Only one patient had persistent diarrhea shortly after FMT, with the cause attributed to underlying Crohn's disease. No complications related to the colonoscopy procedure were noted. Conclusion: FMT appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for RCDI in patients with hematological malignancies. Considering very few adverse events and particularly no infectious complications in our series, we conclude that immunosuppression should not preclude the use of FMT for treatment of RCDI in this high risk population. These results need prospective validation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic agent calicheamicin, which is approved for relapsed/ refractory (RR) B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), based on efficacy demonstrated in a randomized control trial. We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of InO in the "real world" setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in collaboration with 11 U.S. academic institutions, and evaluated the outcome of patients (pts) with RR B-cell ALL, who received InO outside of clinical trials. These pts were evaluated for response to InO, duration of response, overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Demographic and disease characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via log-rank test. Duration of response was estimated among pts who achieve complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Results: From June 2016 to May 2019, 84 pts with RR-B cell ALL were identified. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age of pts at InO initiation was 50 years (yrs) (range, 20-87). Twenty-two (27.5%) pts had t(9;22) (Ph+ve) and 6 (7.5%) pts had t(4;11) (MLL gene) chromosomal abnormalities. Nine (11%) and 20 (25%) pts had CNS disease at diagnosis and at relapse, respectively. Median number of therapies prior to InO was 2 (range, 0-7), 40 (48%) pts had ≥ 3 therapies and 23 (27%) pts had allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) prior to InO. Forty (48%) pts received blinatumomab prior to InO. Fourteen (17%) pts received InO in combination with chemotherapy and/ or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Overall response rate (CR/CRi) was 63%; 44% had CR with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by flow cytometry. Response rate in Ph+ve B-cell ALL was 73%. Twenty-three (27%) pts were successfully bridged to allo-HCT. Median response duration with InO was 11.5 months (mo); 32.5% had sustained response at 2 yrs (Fig. 1a). Median response duration post InO, censored at allo-HCT was not reached (NR) (51% in remission at 2 yrs) (Fig. 1b). Median OS after InO was 11.6 mo and 32% were alive at 2 yrs (Fig. 1c). Median OS post InO, censored at of allo-HCT was 13.6 mo (Fig. 1d). Median OS after InO in Ph+ve pts was NR (71% alive at 1 yr). Forty-nine percent, 27%, 6% and 5% of pts discontinued InO due to progression, allo-HCT, adverse events and maintenance therapy, respectively. Nineteen (30%) pts had dose interruptions. In terms of toxicities, 14 (17%) and 7 (8%) pts had grade (G)1-2 and G3 transaminases secondary to InO, respectively. One pt each had G2 and G3 pancreatitis, respectively. One (1%) and 2 (2%) pts had G2 and G4 veno-occlusive disease secondary to InO, respectively. Two of these pts were treated with defibrotide. Two (2%) pts died due to InO toxicity. A complete description of adverse events are summarized in Table 1. Conclusion: Our real-world data obtained by multicenter collaboration suggest that InO was well tolerated and had significant efficacy in this heavily treated patient population of RR B-cell ALL. Disclosures Liedtke: Celator: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IQVIA/Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Aldoss:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; AUTO1: Consultancy; Helocyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses. Curran:Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Celgene: Other: Grant funding, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yang:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy. Mattison:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Advani:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding. Atallah:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy.

BACKGROUND Pulmonary infiltrates are common after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and can have infectious or non-infectious etiologies. Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy (FOB) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is frequently used to evaluate these patients. However, the diagnostic yield can be highly variable according to patient populations, and the impact on management is not well defined, especially in the era of modern antimicrobial therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of FOB-BAL in adult patients with pulmonary infiltrates during the first 100 days following HCT. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adult HCT patients who underwent FOB-BAL during the first 100 days post HCT between January 2005 and December 2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The interval from HCT to FOB was stratified into early (days 1-30) vs. late (days 31-100). The finding of progressively more hemorrhagic effluent and/or ≥ 20% hemosiderin-laden macrophages in BAL were considered diagnostic for diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fit to identify clinical and transplant characteristics that may impact the diagnostic yield of FOB-BAL. RESULTS A total of 114 patients (median age 55 years), representing 12% of all HCT patients underwent FOB-BAL. Underlying diagnoses were AML in 36%, MDS in 16%, ALL in 16%, MPN in 12% , CLL in 7%, and other in 13%. Transplants were from matched related donor in 43%, matched unrelated donor in 40%, and other donor/matching status in 17%. FOB-BAL was performed during the early period in 61% and during the late period in 39% of patients. In the early period, FOB-BAL provided a specific diagnosis in 49% of patients (30% DAH and 19% infection). In the late period, FOB-BAL had a diagnostic yield of 55% (14% DAH and 36% infection) (Figure 1). The distribution of bacterial and viral infections identified via BAL were similar during the early period (39% and 38%, respectively), whereas more bacterial than viral infections were identified in the later period (56% vs. 19%, respectively) (Figure 2). Non-invasive testing for respiratory tract infection was performed in 34% of patients. These included nasopharyngeal swab for RSV/Influenza PCR in 16% (all negative), multiplex respiratory pathogen PCR in 5% (1 positive for coronavirus), and sputum culture in 21% (positive in 8 patients). This compares with the identification of an infectious pathogen via BAL in 36% of patients; bacterial in 16%, viral in 11%, and fungal in 10%. Transbronchoscopic lung biopsy biopsies were performed in 8 patients and provided diagnostic information in 3 patients (eosinophilic pneumonia, organizing pneumonia and diffuse alveolar damage each in 1 patient). Procedural complications occurred in 3 patients; 2 after transbronchoscopic lung biopsy (1 bleeding and 1 pneumothorax) and 1 during FOB-BAL (atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate). In a multivariable logistic regression model, the underlying diagnosis, presence of acute respiratory failure, and early vs. later time period after HCT were independently affecting the diagnostic yield of FOB-BAL, with higher likelihood of DAH being diagnosed in patients with AML/MDS and during the early post-HCT period, and higher likelihood of DAH being diagnosed in patients with acute respiratory failure (Table 1). In 40% of patients, FOB-BAL findings lead to treatment changes. These included addition of antimicrobials in 24% and addition of corticosteroids in 22% (17% DAH, 2% idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, and 1% organizing pneumonia) (Figure 3). FOB findings lead to more antimicrobial modifications in the early than in the later period (32% vs. 18%, respectively). Overall survival was poor in all the three groups, although significantly better in patients with non-diagnostic FOB findings (median of 2, 3, and 11 months in patients with DAH, infection, or non-diagnostic FOB finings, respectively) (p = 0.03) (Figure 4). CONCLUSION FOB-BAL provides clinically useful information in the post-transplant period. BAL findings were diagnostic in 51% of patients, and led to management changes in 40% of patients. Transbronchoscopic lung biopsy is associated with higher rates of procedural complications. Further characterization of the underlying diagnosis in patients with non-diagnostic FOB-BAL findings remains an unmet clinical goal. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian:Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Patnaik:Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.