Vassilaki, Maria

Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias are leading causes of death worldwide. While socioeconomic status (SES) is a critical determinant, its impact on mortality after diagnosis remains understudied. Objective To investigate the roles of neighborhood-level and individual-level SES in predicting mortality risk among older adults with incident dementia. Methods We analyzed data from 924 participants with incident dementia from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (N = 6909), a cohort with clinical follow-up visits every 15 months. We assessed mortality risk using Cox's time-varying survival regression, adjusting for time-fixed and time-varying covariates. Primary predictors were neighborhood-level SES (Area Deprivation Index [ADI]) and individual-level SES (housing-based SES index [HOUSES], education, and occupation). We also applied a random survival forest model to assess the predictive contribution of SES indicators and identify influential predictors. Results 857 participants (92.7%) died, with a median time from dementia diagnosis to death of 29 months (IQR: 12–54). Lower SES measured by HOUSES was associated with increased mortality risk (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07–1.52). Conversely, ADI, education, and occupation were not associated with mortality. Male sex, older age, congestive heart failure and diabetes were associated with higher mortality risk. In predictive analysis, HOUSES ranked among the top 10 contributors to mortality risk. Conclusions Among older adults with dementia, lower HOUSES was associated with higher mortality risk beyond neighborhood-level deprivation, education, and occupation. Integrating this housing-based individual-level SES measure into dementia care planning may help identify patients with greater socioeconomic vulnerability and inform mortality risk stratification.

Rural populations are underrepresented in cognitive impairment research and have limited resources for education about brain and cognitive health, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, or caregiving. As our Outreach, Recruitment, and Engagement team aimed to expand activities into more rural communities, we also wanted to better understand the characteristics of the communities surrounding our center and gain insight into the social exposome of the areas. The goal of the manuscript is to reflect on our experience and share measures that were useful in this effort, which can be further enriched and adjusted by other outreach teams.

Abstract Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics offers insights into molecular changes in aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Key AD biomarkers, in particular amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau, in CSF are strongly associated with APOE genotype, the strongest genetic risk determinant of AD. To investigate how APOE genotype influences CSF proteome across AD pathology and age, we analyzed 362 neurology-related proteins and established AD biomarkers in CSF from 145 cognitively unimpaired participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Importantly, our cohort is uniquely balanced across APOE genotypes, with similar representation of APOE2 carriers, APOE3/3 genotype, and APOE4 carriers. We identified several proteins, including lipid metabolism-related Lp-PLA2 and immune-related ITGAM, with strong APOE genotype-specific association. Notably, meta-analysis confirmed that ITGAM levels were consistently higher in APOE4 compared to APOE2 carriers across multiple cohorts and proteomic platforms. In addition, with increasing amyloid deposition, APOE4 carriers exhibited stronger immune responses, reflected by elevated ITGAM, TNF-α receptors, and IL-6, whereas APOE2 carriers showed attenuated responses. We further observed sex-specific effects among APOE2 carriers, characterized by distinct patterns in amyloid and CXCL11 levels. These findings suggest distinct mechanisms underlying APOE2’s protective and APOE4’s detrimental effects in brain aging and AD, paving for personalized diagnostics and interventions.

Abstract Background Decreased kidney function, indicated by a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), may affect interpretation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers, including phosphorylated tau ( p ‐tau) and amyloid‐beta (Aβ) peptides, due to altered clearance. However, there is limited data available to determine the influence of eGFR on these biomarkers and whether it differs by biomarker or assay type, especially in racially diverse studies of community‐based older adults. Methods We used data from 557 participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (Rochester, MN n = 182; age 79±8 years; 36.3% Female, White participants) and the UMMC MIND Center‐Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (Jackson, MS n = 375; age 69±8 years; 73% Female 27% Black participants). eGFR was determined using the 2021 CKD‐EPI Creatinine equation. Plasma biomarkers were measured using the Lumipulse immunoassays for p ‐tau217, Aβ42, and Aβ40 (Fujirebio Diagnostics; n = 420); or the mass spectrometry‐based PrecivityAD2 assay (C2N Diagnostics; n = 253) for p ‐tau217, np‐tau217, Aβ42, and Aβ40. Common ratio values were calculated. Aβ42/40 measures were inverted so higher values are worse for all biomarkers. Log base‐2 transformed regression analysis related eGFR to each single analyte and ratio; coefficients (95% CI) reflect estimated doubling in biomarker per doubling in eGFR. Group specific [MN White ( n = 182), MS White ( n = 224), MS Black ( n = 151) participants] estimates are reported, as the distribution of social determinants of health can vary across populations and locations. Results Lower eGFR was associated with higher (worse) AD‐plasma biomarkers, and group stratified estimates were mostly consistent (Figure 1). Ratios of biomarkers diminished but did not entirely alleviate associations with eGFR. For example, MN White participants’ C2N p ‐tau217 association of ‐1.47 (‐1.94, ‐1.00), was attenuated to ‐0.67 (‐1.11, ‐0.22), when using p ‐tau217/np‐tau217. Conclusions Kidney function may be associated with AD‐plasma biomarker values, even with common ratio corrections. There was not strong evidence for highly differential associations of eGFR by race/site categories, though sample sizes are currently limited. The implications for diagnosis and risk classification need to be explored further to support health equity. Optimal consideration of comorbidities on blood biomarker concentrations must continue to be informed by investigation in large, racially and ethnically diverse, community‐based studies.

Abstract Background Chronic disease conditions lead to brain changes elevating dementia risk. We hypothesized that tissue microstructural changes caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension could be effectively captured using an advanced diffusion MRI technique, Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI). Our goal was to evaluate the usefulness of composite NODDI scores, customized for increased hemoglobin (Hb) A1c and systolic blood pressure as predictors of cognition and compare their performance to other measures typically used to assess dementia risk. Method We collected multi‐shell diffusion MR on 1024 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants. NODDI measures (neurite density index (NDI), orientation dispersion index (ODI), and free water fraction (FWF)) in gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) regions were estimated. To identify brain regions susceptible to both conditions, a multiple linear regression model was fitted for each NODDI metric, using hemoglobin (Hb) A1c (in N = 305 participants) or systolic blood pressure ( N = 906) as predictor, with age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) as covariates. Event‐based modeling was performed with the identified NODDI metrics to investigate the chronological pattern along the course of chronic condition development from this cross‐sectional dataset. Composite metrics were created as a weighted sum of susceptible NODDI metrics. We evaluated the impact of both conditions on cognition using gradient boosting models incorporating composite metrics, additional brain measurements, and demographics. Result Increased HbA1c impacts both GM and WM NODDI relatively evenly, whereas increased systolic blood pressure related NODDI changes were mainly seen in WM (data not shown). With increased HbA1c, the earliest changes were observed in GM ODI, followed by changes in the pons and cortical FWF (Figure 1A). With increased systolic blood pressure, the earliest changes occurred in association fibers and middle cerebellar peduncle, followed by FWF change in lobar and projection WM fibers (Figure 1B). Average feature importance from 100 gradient boosting models for cognition prediction suggests that diabetes‐induced GM changes play a moderately important role in cognitive decline (Figure 2). Conclusion Chronic medical conditions, especially T2DM, result in brain changes that are captured by NODDI and contribute moderately to cognitive performance.

ABSTRACT Background Previous studies on the relationship between prediabetes, HbA1c and cognitive trajectories show mixed results. Therefore, we investigated the association of prediabetes, diabetes and HbA1c with change in global and domain‐specific cognitive scores in cognitively unimpaired (CU) adults, as well as the potential effect modification by sex or age. Methods This longitudinal study included 4236 CU persons aged ≥ 50 years from the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. We ran linear mixed‐effect models with baseline prediabetes, diabetes and HbA1c predicting longitudinal global and domain‐specific (i.e., memory, language, attention/executive function, and visuospatial skills) cognitive z‐scores and raw scores. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education, medical comorbidity, repeated cognitive testing, and ApoEɛ4. We additionally ran models with sex and age interactions. Results Compared to normoglycemic individuals, individuals with prediabetes and diabetes showed poorer performance on cognitive tests, i.e., TMT‐B, category fluency, and block design subtest over time. Additionally, the presence of prediabetes, diabetes, longer diabetes duration and higher HbA1c were associated with faster global and domain‐specific cognitive decline over a median follow‐up of 6.4 years (range 1–19). Three‐way interactions showed that the effect of diabetes on decline in global cognition, attention and visuospatial domains was more pronounced in women than in men. Age did not modify the effect of diabetes or higher HbA1c on cognition. Conclusions The results suggest that prediabetes and diabetes significantly shorten the timeframe before a potentially clinically noticeable change in global and domain‐specific cognition is reached. Thus, lifestyle modification to reverse prediabetes and prevent diabetes could potentially reduce the rate of cognitive decline in aging populations. The findings differed by sex (i.e., the effect of diabetes on decline in global cognition, attention and visuospatial domains was more pronounced in women than men).