Mehra, Rohit

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) has been recently recognized by the World Health Organization classification of prostatic tumors as a distinct entity, most often occurring concurrently with invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa). Whether documented admixed with PCa or in its rare pure form, numerous studies associate this entity with clinical aggressiveness. Despite increasing clinical experience and requirement of IDC-P documentation in protocols for synoptic reporting, the specifics of its potential contribution to assessment of grade group (GG) and cancer quantitation of PCa in both needle biopsies (NBx) and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens remain unclear. Moreover, there are no standard guidelines for incorporating basal cell marker immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the diagnosis of IDC-P, either alone or as part of a cocktail with AMACR/racemase. An online survey containing 26 questions regarding diagnosis, reporting practices, and IHC resource utilization, focusing on IDC-P, was undertaken by 42 genitourinary subspecialists from 9 countries. The degree of agreement or disagreement regarding approaches to individual questions was classified as significant majority (>75%), majority (51% to 75%), minority (26% to 50%) and significant minority (≤25%). IDC-P with or without invasive cancer is considered a contraindication for active surveillance by the significant majority (95%) of respondents, although a majority (66%) also agreed that the clinical significance/behavior of IDC-P on NBx or RP with PCa required further study. The majority do not upgrade PCa based on comedonecrosis seen only in the intraductal component in NBx (62%) or RP (69%) specimens. Similarly, recognizable IDC-P with GG1 PCa was not a factor in upgrading in NBx (78%) or RP (71%) specimens. The majority (60%) of respondents include readily recognizable IDC-P in assessment of linear extent of PCa at NBx. A significant majority (78%) would use IHC to confirm or exclude intraductal carcinoma if other biopsies showed no PCa, while 60% would use it to confirm IDC-P with invasive PCa in NBx if it would change the overall GG assignment. Nearly half (48%, a minority) would use IHC to confirm IDC-P for accurate Gleason pattern 4 quantitation. A majority (57%) report the percentage of IDC-P when present, in RP specimens. When obvious Gleason pattern 4 or 5 PCa is present in RP or NBx, IHC is rarely to almost never used to confirm the presence of IDC-P by the significant majority (88% and 90%, respectively). Most genitourinary pathologists consider IDC-P to be an adverse prognostic feature independent of the PCa grade, although recommendations for standardization are needed to guide reporting of IDC-P vis a vis tumor quantitation and final GG assessment. The use of IHC varies widely and is performed for a multitude of indications, although it is used most frequently in scenarios where confirmation of IDC-P would impact the GG assigned. Further study and best practices recommendations are needed to provide guidance with regards to the most appropriate indications for IHC use in scenarios regarding IDC-P.

Abstract Purpose: The heterogeneity of androgen receptor (AR)-activity (AR-A) is well-characterized in heavily treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the diversity and clinical implications of AR-A in treatment-naïve primary prostate cancer is largely unknown. We sought to characterize AR-A in localized prostate cancer and understand its molecular and clinical implications. Experimental Design: Genome-wide expression profiles from prostatectomy or biopsy samples from 19,470 patients were used, all with independent pathology review. This was comprised of prospective discovery (n = 5,239) and validation (n = 12,728) cohorts, six retrospective institutional cohorts with long-term clinical outcomes data (n = 1,170), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 333). Results: A low AR-active subclass was identified, which comprised 9%–11% of each cohort, and was characterized by increased immune signaling, neuroendocrine expression, and decreased DNA repair. These tumors were predominantly ERG and basal subtype. Low AR-active tumors had significantly more rapid development of recurrence or metastatic disease across cohorts, which was maintained on multivariable analysis [HR, 2.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22–5.60; P = 0.014]. Low AR-active tumors were predicted to be more sensitive to PARP inhibition, platinum chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, and less sensitive to docetaxel and androgen-deprivation therapy. This was validated clinically, in that low AR-active tumors were less sensitive to androgen-deprivation therapy (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21–0.80; P = 0.008). Conclusions: Leveraging large-scale transcriptomic data allowed the identification of an aggressive subtype of treatment-naïve primary prostate cancer that harbors molecular features more analogous to mCRPC. This suggests that a preexisting subgroup of patients may have tumors that are predisposed to fail multiple current standard-of-care therapies and warrant dedicated therapeutic investigation.

Abstract Purpose: Protein kinases are known to play a prominent role in oncogenic progression across multiple cancer subtypes, yet their role in prostate cancer progression remains underexplored. The purpose of this study was to identify kinases that drive prostate cancer progression. Experimental Design: To discover kinases that drive prostate cancer progression, we investigated the association between gene expression of all known kinases and long-term clinical outcomes in tumor samples from 545 patients with high-risk disease. We evaluated the impact of genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of the most significant kinase associated with metastatic progression in vitro and in vivo. Results: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNAPK) was identified as the most significant kinase associated with metastatic progression in high-risk prostate cancer. Inhibition of DNAPK suppressed the growth of both AR-dependent and AR-independent prostate cancer cells. Gene set enrichment analysis nominated Wnt as the top pathway associated with DNAPK. We found that DNAPK interacts with the Wnt transcription factor LEF1 and is critical for LEF1-mediated transcription. Conclusions: Our data show that DNAPK drives prostate cancer progression through transcriptional regulation of Wnt signaling and is an attractive therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer.

2 Background: Significant genomic diversity exists in the androgen receptor ( AR) and its activity (AR-A) in mCRPC. In localized prostate cancer, the biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic clinical implications of AR-A heterogeneity have yet to be interrogated Methods: Genome-wide expression profiles of FFPE RP or biopsy tumor samples were evaluated from a prospective registry cohort (n = 5,239, NCT02609269) and six retrospective institutional cohorts (n = 1,170). AR-A was calculated based on expression of 9 targets of AR.. Results: Utilizing 6,409 localized prostate adenocarcinomas with full transcriptomic data, we found there was marked inter-individual transcriptomic diversity in AR and AR-A expression, and weak correlation between them (r = 0.08 to 0.36 based on cohort), in contrast to mCRPC that has a strong correlation between AR and AR-A expression (r = 0.76). Additionally, serum PSA had no correlation to intratumoral AR-A (r = 0.06). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering identified a distinct subclass of low AR-A prostate tumors, which had increased markers of immunogenicity (decreased T-regs and MDSCs, and increased CD3 effector T-cells), increased neuroendocrine marker expression ( NCAM1, ENO2, and SCG2), and decreased DNA repair pathway expression (all p < 0.001). Clinically, low AR-A tumors had more rapid development of metastatic disease in three independent cohorts, were more prone to develop resistance to hormonal therapy and develop CRPC, and were found at an increased frequency in African-American men. Interrogating in vitro drug sensitivity analyses utilizing the NCI-60 panel, low AR-A tumors appear more sensitive to platinum chemotherapy and PARP inhibition, and less sensitive to hormone therapy and taxanes. Conclusions: The diversity in AR-signaling in localized prostate cancer represents important biological heterogeneity that is both prognostic and predictive of treatment response. These findings are provocative in that low AR-A tumors may be more susceptible to immunotherapy, PARP inhibition, platinum chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy. Patients with low AR-A tumors warrant dedicated biomarker enhanced clinical trials.

7 Background: Improved prognostic biomarkers are needed for localized prostate cancer. We undertook an unbiased large-scale analysis of genes associated with metastatic progression and validated the prognostic ability of the top candidate gene. Methods: Prostate cancer samples from prostatectomy patients were analyzed for gene expression using a clinical-grade, high-density Affymetrix GeneChip platform, encompassing >1 million genomic loci and assessed in a CLIA-certified laboratory. Nomination of prognostic candidate genes was performed on a discovery cohort (n=545) and validated on 3 independent cohorts (n=463). Multivariate analyses were performed for the primary endpoint of metastasis. The top prostate-specific gene was further evaluated in 208 additional tumor samples with a novel RNA in-situ hybridization (ISH) assay and in urine samples from 230 patients using PCR. Results: Of all known genes, the long noncoding RNA SChLAP1 ranked first for elevated expression in patients with metastatic progression by receiver-operator-curve analyses. Validation in three independent cohorts confirmed the prognostic value of SChLAP1. On multivariate modeling, SChLAP1 expression independently predicted metastasis within 10 years (odds ratio (OR) = 2.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70 – 3.53), death within 10 years (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.31 – 2.85), and biochemical recurrence within 5 years (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.28 – 2.41) with ORs comparable to Gleason score. Evaluation of SChLAP1 expression by RNA ISH confirmed a significant association with disease recurrence (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.06 – 3.73). Evaluation of urine SChLAP1 levels demonstrated increased expression in patients at higher risk for disease progression. Conclusions: We perform the largest high-throughput, unbiased study of prostate cancer prognostic biomarkers to date and discover SChLAP1 as a top gene predictive of metastatic progression. We validate SChLAP1 extensively with a clinical-grade assay. We show feasibility of a RNA ISH assay and a non-invasive urine test for SChLAP1. Our results, spanning 1,446 patients from 6 independent patient cohorts, suggest that SChLAP1 represents a very promising biomarker for aggressive clinical course.

Abstract Background/purpose: Despite recent advances in the development of androgen deprivation therapies (ADT), prostate cancer (PCa) remains the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Thus, there is a critical need to improve treatment outcomes for men with aggressive PCa. The purpose of this study was to identify and functionally characterize kinases that can serve as both prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in PCa. Methods: To identify kinases associated with metastatic progression of PCa, we utilized high-density oligonucleotide arrays to interrogate the expression of all kinases in 545 prostatectomy samples, obtained from high-risk patients with long-term clinical follow-up (&gt;10 years). We ranked all kinases by their fold change in expression between PCas that subsequently metastasized versus those that did not. We then characterized the top ranked kinase in preclinical PCa models with in vitro mechanistic experiments and in vivo therapeutic studies. Results: We nominated DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNAPK) as the top kinase associated with metastatic PCa progression. Interrogation of pathways associated with DNAPK knockdown in PC3, DU145, VCaP and C4-2B, identified canonical Wnt signaling as the top DNAPK-activated pathway. In PCa cells (PC3, LNCaP C.S. {LNCaP grown under charcoal-stripped serum condition}, C4-2B and LNCaP-AR) DNAPK inhibition significantly abrogates Wnt signaling and abolishes cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Interestingly, we found that DNAPK directly modulates the Wnt signaling independent of the androgen receptor (AR), highlighting the therapeutic potential of DNAPK inhibition in cancers resistant to ADT. Indeed, in VCaP xenograft models, pharmacologic inhibition of DNAPK with NU7441 demonstrated 3.4 fold (p&lt;0.01) reduction of tumor growth at non-toxic doses. Using an independent prostate cancer tissue cohort, we validate DNAPK expression as a biomarker for metastatic disease progression (p = 6.4 e−06, hazard ratio = 2). Conclusion: In summary, we nominate DNAPK as a potential biomarker of disease progression and as a novel therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer. Our data suggests that DNAPK mediates PCa progression by upregulating Wnt signaling, and demonstrates that DNAPK inhibition results in significant tumor responses in PCa xenografts. Citation Format: Vishal Kothari, Jonathan F. Goodwin, Shuang Zhao, Elai Davicioni, Jeffrey R. Karnes, Robert B. Den, Rohit Mehra, Karen E. Knudsen, Felix Y. Feng. Investigating DNAPK as a biomarker and a novel therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2853. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2853