Hewett, Timothy E.

Background: The existent literature has well explored knee ligament kinetics and strain at and after initial contact (IC) during landing tasks. However, little is known about knee ligament biomechanics in flight before IC. Purpose: To quantify and compare change in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) strain before IC relative to after IC. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 40 cadaveric specimens were analyzed after being subjected to simulated landings in a mechanical impact simulator. External joint loads of varying magnitudes were applied to mimic relative injury risk load levels from an in vivo cohort and were coupled with an impulse force to represent initial ground contact. Implanted strain gauges continually recorded ligament strain. Kruskal-Wallis tests evaluated the significance of risk level and pre- and post-IC factors, while Wilcoxon each-pair tests evaluated differences within both factors. Results: Strain responses during simulated landing tasks for the ACL ( P ≥ .545) and MCL ( P ≥ .489) were consistent after IC regardless of the level of relative injury risk simulated in each trial. Before IC, the level of injury risk kinetics applied to a specimen differentiated strain response in the ACL ( P < .001) and MCL ( P < .001), as higher risk profiles produced greater changes in ligament strain. Mean baseline strain was 4.0% in the ACL and 1.0% in the MCL. Mean change in strain from the ACL ranged from 0.1% to 3.9% pre-IC and from 2.9% to 5.7% post-IC, while the MCL ranged from 0.0% to 3.0% pre-IC and from 0.9% to 1.3% post-IC. Conclusion: Within each ligament, post-IC strain response lacked statistical differences among simulated risk profiles, while pre-IC response was dependent on the risk profile simulated. Individually, neither pre- nor poststrain changes were enough to induce ACL failure, but when combined over the course of a full landing task, they could lead to rupture. Clinical Relevance: Prevention and rehabilitation techniques should aim to limit the presence of increased risk biomechanics in flight before landing, as impulse delivery at IC is inevitable.

Context Early sport specialization, or the participation in 1 sport year-round to the exclusion of all others, is a growing concern in youth athletics because of its possible association with musculoskeletal injury. The underlying injury risk may be the result of coordination differences that sport-specialized athletes have been speculated to exhibit relative to multisport athletes; however, little evidence exists to support or refute this notion. Objective To examine relative hip- and knee-joint angular-motion variability among adolescent sport-specialized and multisport female adolescent athletes to determine how sport specialization may affect coordination. Design Cohort study. Setting Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants A total of 366 sport-specialized and 366 multisport adolescent female basketball, soccer, and volleyball players. Intervention(s) Drop–vertical-jump (DVJ) assessment. Main Outcome Measure(s) Average coupling-angle variability (CAV) for hip flexion and knee flexion, knee flexion and ankle flexion, hip flexion and knee abduction, knee flexion and knee abduction, knee flexion and knee internal rotation, and knee abduction and knee internal rotation. Results The sport-specialized group exhibited increased coupling variability in dominant-limb hip flexion and knee flexion (P = .015), knee flexion and knee abduction (P = .014), and knee flexion and knee internal rotation (P = .048) while landing during the DVJ, although they had small effect sizes (η2 = 0.010, 0.010, and 0.007, respectively). No differences were present between groups for any of the other CAV measures of the dominant limb, and no differences were found for any CAV measures of the nondominant limb (all P values &gt; .05). Conclusions Sport specialization was associated with increased variability of critical hip- and knee-joint couplings responsible for effective landing during the DVJ. Altered coordination strategies that involve the hip and knee joints may underlie unstable landings, inefficient force-absorption strategies, or greater contact forces that can place the lower extremities at risk for injury (or a combination of these).

Objective: Fatigue due to game play is often cited as a factor in musculoskeletal injuries; however, it is unclear whether or not this view is supported by published research findings. Given the importance researchers and practitioners place on the potential effects of game play with respect to injury, it is important to understand what inferences can be drawn from the collective research in this realm. This meta-analysis will consider the time of season and segment of the game, as it relates anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), groin, and hamstring injury occurrence. Data Sources: Database searches were run in PubMed, MEDLINE, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and Ausport, in addition to the inclusion of articles identified manually. Study Selection: Search terms were chosen to identify articles related to each of the 3 injuries of interest. There were no date limitations placed on the articles, as such, all published articles listed in the databases up to November 2017 were eligible for selection if they met the search criteria. Data Extraction: Initial searches yielded 1349 articles, and this was eventually reduced to 15 articles deemed suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis, which provided 21 data sets. Data Synthesis: Comparing the first half with the second half of the season, there were no differences in ACL, groin, or hamstring injury occurrences [ACL: odds ratio (OR), 1.27; confidence interval (CI), 0.43-3.78, groin: OR, 1.79; CI, 0.63-5.06, and hamstring: OR, 1.16; CI, 0.88-1.53]. Similarly, there were no differences in injury occurrence between the first and second halves of the game for the ACL or hamstring injuries (ACL: OR, 0.43; CI, 0.47-7.92, hamstring: OR, 0.85; CI, 0.58-1.24). Conclusions: Findings from this meta-analysis determined that time in season or time in game does not influence risk of the ACL, groin, or hamstring injury. Commonly, many studies did not provide sufficient detail to be included in the meta-analysis. Consequently, it is recommended that future studies report data related to the timing of the injury within the season or game.

Background: Many studies have investigated factors that predict a return to sport participation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but it is unclear whether the same factors are associated with a return to preinjury level of sport performance. Purpose: To identify factors that contribute to an athlete’s return to preinjury level of performance after ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A cohort of 222 patients (132 male, 90 female) who had ACL reconstruction surgery and completed a 12-month postoperative assessment were followed out to a mean 3 years (range, 2-4 years) to determine whether they had returned to their self-reported preinjury levels of sport performance. Rates of return to preinjury performance were calculated. Measures that had been recorded at the 12-month postoperative review—demographic (age, sex), sport activity level (Marx Activity Rating Scale, return to competition sport), knee laxity, limb symmetry (single and triple crossover hop), subjective function/symptoms (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective), and psychological readiness (Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury scale)—were compared between patients who returned to their preinjury levels of performance and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were also used to prospectively determine the association between these measures and return to preinjury level of sport performance. Results: A total of 135 (61%) patients reported that they had returned to their preinjury levels of performance, with return rates similar between males (59%) and females (63%) and between those who had returned to competition at 12 months (62%) and those who had not (60%). There was no significant age difference between patients who returned to their preinjury levels of sport performance and those who did not; however, higher psychological readiness ( P < .0001), greater limb symmetry ( P < .05), higher subjective knee scores ( P = .01), and a higher activity level ( P < .04) were all associated with a return to performance. In the multivariate model, psychological readiness was the only variable that remained a significant predictor (odds ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .0001). Conclusion: A majority of athletes who returned to sport after ACL reconstruction reported that their performance was comparable with preinjury. Having a greater psychological readiness to return during rehabilitation was the most significant predictor of a subsequent return to comparable performance.

Objectives: The ability of current return to sport (RTS) criteria to identify young, active patients after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) independently, at high risk for future ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine if meeting current, standard RTS criteria collectively, or in part, would identify young athletes at risk for an ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury after primary ACLR and RTS. The tested hypothesis was the likelihood of an ipsilateral or contralateral 2nd ACL injury in the first 2 years after RTS would be the same in groups that successfully met or failed to meet all RTS criteria prior to RTS. The second hypothesis was that quadriceps femoris strength at the time of RTS would identify which limb was at greatest risk for future ACL injury. Methods: One hundred eighty-one patients (116 female) with a mean age of 16.7±2.9 years old underwent ACLR and were released to return to pivoting/cutting sports. These patients were enrolled in a prospective, observational cohort study, completed a RTS assessment and were tracked for occurrence of an ipsilateral graft tear or contralateral ACL injury after ACLR for 24 months. The RTS assessment included 6 tests: isometric quadriceps strength, 4 functional hop tests and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) patient reported outcome survey. Limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for strength and hop test assessments [(inv/uninv)*100]. Subjects were classified into groups that successfully passed all 6 RTS tests at a level of 90 compared to those that failed to meet all 6 criteria. Chi Square tests and Fisher Exact Tests were used to determine if successfully passing all 6 RTS measures resulted in a reduced risk of 2nd ACL injury in the first 24 months after RTS as well as to assess if ability to successfully pass individual RTS criteria resulted in reduced risk of 2nd ACL injury. Results: Thirty-nine (21.5%) patients suffered a 2nd ACL injury with 18 ipsilateral graft failures and 21 contralateral ACL tears in the first 24 months after RTS following ACLR. At the time of RTS, 57 patients (31.5%) achieved LSI values of 90% or greater on all testing as well as an IDKC value of 90 or greater. At this level, there was no difference in ipsilateral graft failures between patients who passed all RTS criteria (15.8%) and those who failed at least 1 criterion (7.3%; p=0.08). There was also no difference in contralateral ACL injuries between patients who passed all RTS criteria (7.0%) and those who failed at least 1 criterion (13.7%; p=0.22). When individual RTS criterion were evaluated, patients who failed to achieve 90% quadriceps strength LSI were 84% less likely to suffer an ipsilateral graft failure (OR=0.16; 95%CI: 0.04, 0.74;p=0.009), but 3 times more likely to suffer a contralateral ACL injury (OR=2.5; 95%CI:1.0, 6.5;p=0.05). Conclusion: Current criteria to evaluate readiness to return young athletes to pivoting and cutting sports, may not identify young, active patients independently at high risk for a future ipsilateral graft tear or contralateral ACL injury. Inability to achieve 90% LSI on an isometric quadriceps strength assessment resulted in a reduced risk of ipsilateral graft failure, but an increased risk in contralateral ACL injury after ACLR and RTS. Further investigation is needed on the relationship between quad strength and side of future ACL injury and whether other factors may help contribute to a predictive model of future ACL injury specific to limb.

Objectives: Following ACL reconstruction, objective measurements of functional testing are often incorporated into the decision-making process with regard to clearance for return to sport (RTS), in order to reduce the risk of second ACL injury. However, there is limited data to assess the predictive value of functional testing to risk of second ACL injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether performance on functional testing following primary ACL reconstruction can predict second ACL injuries. Methods: Patient records were retrospectively analyzed for individuals who presented with an ACL injury at a single institution from 1990-2010. A total of 335 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction, had functional testing at the six month ± one month time point postoperatively, and had a minimum of two year post-operative follow-up were included in this study. Functional testing included vertical jump, single leg hop, and triple leg hop. Functional testing is represented as a measure of limb symmetry and was calculated as the involved limb divided by the uninvolved limb providing a percentage relative to the uninvolved limb. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the significance of functional test limb symmetries between those with and without a secondary tear by sex, then by age. Unpaired T-tests with an alpha level less than 0.05 was performed with JMP 13 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Group distributions as well as effect sizes were calculated. Results: 335 patients with a mean age of 25 (SD 9.76) at an average time of 9.05 years (SD 3.54) of follow-up after ACL reconstruction met inclusion criteria and underwent statistical analysis (females= 150, male= 185). Of the cohort, 53 patients (18%) experienced second tears (female= 26, male= 27) at an average time of 44.19 months (6.03- 168.4) following ACL reconstruction with 34 occurring on the contralateral side and 19 on the ipsilateral side. Results at six month post ACL reconstruction indicate a significant difference between those who experienced a second ACL injury and those who didn’t with respect to single hop limb symmetry (95% ±7% vs.90% ± 12%, P<0.01). Triple hop limb symmetry was also significantly different between those who suffered a second ACL tear and those who did not (94% ± 6% vs. 90% ±11%, P<0.01). No significant differences were found in limb symmetry of vertical jump. When data was analyzed by sex, significant differences were found in females in the single hop limb symmetry (96% ± 8%, vs. 89% ± 14%, P<0.05) as well as triple hop limb symmetry (95% ± 5% vs. 90% ± 12%, P< 0.05). No significant differences were found in vertical jump for neither females nor males. No significant differences were found when data was categorized by age or sex and age. Conclusion: Overall, at an average of 9.05 years follow-up, 18% of a young and active population of primary ACL reconstructions had a second ACL injury. Contralateral ACL injuries were observed at an increased frequency relative to subsequent ipsilateral ACL tears. Patients with greater limb symmetry on single hop or triple hop functional testing at 6 months are at an increased risk for second ACL tears. When functional testing is used for return-to-sport decisions, physicians should caution patients about the risk of subsequent ACL injury for high performing patients.

Background: Both the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the medial collateral ligament (MCL) bear load during athletic tasks of landing, cutting, pivoting, and twisting. As dynamic knee valgus is a purported mechanism for ACL injury, the MCL should bear significant strain load with valgus force. Hypothesis: The intact MCL will demonstrate a significant increase in strain upon failure of the ACL at 25° of knee flexion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In vivo kinetics/kinematics of 44 healthy athletic participants were measured to determine stratification of injury risk (ie, low, medium, and high) in 3 degrees of knee forces/moments (knee abduction moment, anterior tibial shear, and internal tibial rotation). These stratified kinetic values were input into a cadaveric impact simulator to assess ligamentous strain during a simulated landing task. Uniaxial and multiaxial load cells and differential variable reluctance transducer strain sensors were utilized to collect mechanical data for analysis. Conditions of external loads applied to the cadaveric limbs were varied and randomized. Results: ACL strain increased with increased dynamic knee abduction moment (χ 2 [5] = 14.123, P = .0148). The most extreme dynamic knee abduction moment condition demonstrated significantly higher ACL strain compared with lower loaded trials ( P≤ .0203). Similarly, MCL strain increased with dynamic knee abduction moment (χ 2 [5] = 36.578, P < .0001). Matched-pairs analysis compared ACL strain with MCL strain (maximum ACL strain – maximum MCL strain) and demonstrated high strain for the ACL versus the MCL ( S 177 = 6223.5, P < .0001). Conclusion: Although significant, MCL strain had minimal increase with increased dynamic knee abduction moment, and the event of ACL failure did not significantly increase MCL strain when compared with high dynamic knee abduction moment conditions in the cadaveric model. The ACL bears more strain than the MCL at increasing amounts of dynamic knee abduction moment at 25° of knee flexion, which may explain the limited concomitant MCL injury rate that can occur during a dynamic valgus collapse of the knee. Clinical Relevance: These characteristics of ACL and MCL strain are important to understand the mechanisms that drive these injuries at the knee and will improve rehabilitation and injury prevention techniques.

Background: The impact of maturation on lower extremity strength and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may help guide future studies of age-specific rehabilitation. Hypothesis Pediatric ACLR patients would demonstrate higher thigh strength symmetry and knee-related function at return to sport (RTS) compared with adolescent and young adult participants who underwent traditional ACLR. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 2. Methods: A total of 144 young athletes at the time of RTS clearance post-ACLR were classified into 3 maturational groups (pediatric, n = 16 with physeal-sparing ACLR [mean age = 12.3 years; range = 9.2-14.6 years]; adolescent, n = 113 [mean age = 16.5 years; range = 14.1-19.8 years]; young adult, n = 15 [mean age = 22.0 years; range = 20.5-24.9 years]). Quadriceps and hamstring strength were measured using an electromechanical dynamometer. Knee-related function was measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form and single-leg hop tests. The Limb symmetry Index (LSI) was used in calculations for hop and strength tests. Group differences were compared with Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests. Proportions of participants meeting literature-recommended RTS criterion cutoffs were compared among the groups using chi-square tests. Results: The pediatric group demonstrated higher quadriceps LSI ( P = 0.01), IKDC scores ( P < 0.01), single-hop LSI ( P < 0.01), and crossover-hop LSI ( P = 0.02) compared with the young adult group. In addition, the pediatric group demonstrated higher IKDC scores ( P < 0.01) and single-hop LSI ( P = 0.02) compared with the adolescent group. The adolescent group demonstrated higher IKDC scores ( P < 0.01), single-hop LSI ( P = 0.02), and crossover-hop LSI ( P = 0.03) compared with the young adult group. The proportions of participants meeting all RTS criterion cutoffs were highest in the pediatric group and lowest in the young adult group ( P = 0.03). Conclusion: Young athletes at RTS clearance after pediatric ACLR demonstrated higher quadriceps strength symmetry and knee-related function than adolescents and young adults after traditional ACLR. Clinical Relevance: These findings demonstrate the need for further study regarding the impact of these group differences on longitudinal outcomes after ACLR, including successful RTS and risk of second ACL injury.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries are known to occur during dynamic athletic tasks that place combinatorial frontal and transverse plane loads on the knee. A mechanical impact simulator that produces clinical presentation of ACL injury allows for the quantification of individual loading contributors leading to ACL failure. Purpose/Hypothesis: The objective was to delineate the relationship between knee abduction moment, anterior tibial shear, and internal tibial rotation applied at the knee and ACL strain during physiologically defined simulations of impact at a knee flexion angle representative of initial contact landing from a jump. The hypothesis tested was that before ACL failure, abduction moment would induce greater change in ACL strain during landing than either anterior shear or internal rotation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nineteen cadaveric specimens were subjected to simulated landings in the mechanical impact simulator. During simulations, external knee abduction moment, internal tibial rotation moment, and anterior tibial shear loads were derived from a previously analyzed in vivo cohort and applied to the knee in varying magnitudes with respect to injury risk classification. Implanted strain gauges were used to track knee ligament displacement throughout simulation. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess strain differences among loading factors, with Wilcoxon each pair post hoc tests used to assess differences of magnitude within each loading. Results: Each loading factor significantly increased ACL strain ( P < .005). Within factors, the high-risk magnitude of each factor significantly increased ACL strain relative to the baseline condition ( P≤ .002). However, relative to knee abduction moment specifically, ACL strain increased with each increased risk magnitude ( P≤ .015). Conclusion: Increased risk levels of each load factor contributed to increased levels of ACL strain during a simulated jump landing. The behavior of increased strain between levels of increased risk loading was most prevalent for changes in knee abduction moment. This behavior was observed in the ACL and MCL. Clinical Relevance: Knee abduction moment may be the predominant precursor to ACL injury and concomitant MCL injury. As knee abduction occurs within the frontal plane, primary preventative focus should incorporate reduction of frontal plane knee loading in landing and cutting tasks, but secondary reduction of transverse plane loading could further increase intervention efficacy. Constraint of motion in these planes should restrict peak ACL strain magnitudes during athletic performance.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries and reasons for time loss in sports and carries significant implications, including posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA). Instability associated with ACL injury has been linked to the development of secondary meniscal tears (defined as tears that develop after the initial ACL injury). To date, no study has examined secondary meniscal tears after ACL injury and their effect on OA and arthroplasty risk. Purpose: To describe the rates and natural history of secondary meniscal tears after ACL injury and to determine the effect of meniscal tear treatment on the development of OA and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A geographic database of >500,000 patients was reviewed to identify patients with primary ACL injuries between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2005. Information was collected with regard to ACL injury treatment, rates/characteristics of the secondary meniscal tears, and outcomes, including development of OA and conversion to TKA. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted multivariate survival analyses were performed to test for the effect of meniscal treatment on survivorship free of OA and TKA. Results: Of 1398 primary ACL injuries, the overall rate of secondary meniscal tears was 16%. Significantly lower rates of secondary meniscal tears were noted among patients undergoing acute ACL reconstruction within 6 months (7%) as compared with patients with delayed ACL reconstruction (33%, P < .01) and nonoperative ACL management (19%, P < .01). Of the 235 secondary meniscal tears identified (196 patients), 11.5% underwent repair, 73% partial meniscectomy, and 16% were treated nonoperatively. Tears were most often medial in location (77%) and complex in morphology (56% of medial tears, 54% of lateral tears). At the time of final follow-up, no patient undergoing repair of a secondary meniscal tear (0%) underwent TKA, as opposed to 10.9% undergoing meniscectomy and 6.1% receiving nonoperative treatment ( P = .28). Conclusion: Secondary meniscal tears after ACL injury are most common among patients undergoing delayed surgical or nonoperative treatment of their primary ACL injuries. Secondary tears often present as complex tears of the medial meniscus and result in high rates of partial meniscectomy.