Binder, Moritz

Abstract TET2 mutations (mTET2) are common genetic events in myeloid malignancies and clonal hematopoiesis. These mutations arise in the founding clone and are implicated in many clinical sequelae associated with oncogenic feedforward inflammatory circuits. However, the direct downstream effector of mTET2 responsible for the potentiation of these inflammatory circuits is unknown. To address this, we performed scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq in patients with COVID-19 with and without TET2-mutated clonal hematopoiesis reasoning that inflammation from COVID-19 may highlight critical downstream transcriptional targets of mTET2. Using this approach, we identified metastasis-associated lung adenoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), a therapeutically tractable lncRNA, as a central downstream effector of mTET2 that is both necessary and sufficient to induce the oncogenic proinflammatory features of mTET2 in vivo. We also elucidate the mechanism by which mTET2 upregulate MALAT1 and describe an interaction between MALAT1 and p65, which leads to RNA “shielding” from protein phosphatase 2A dephosphorylation, thus preventing resolution of inflammatory signaling. Significance: This work identifies MALAT1 as a requisite downstream effector of oncogenic feedforward inflammatory circuits necessary for the development of TET2-mutated CH and fulminant myeloid malignancy. We elucidate a novel mechanism by which MALAT1 “shields” p65 from dephosphorylation to potentiate this circuit and nominate MALAT1 inhibition as a future therapeutic strategy.

Abstract Background DNMT3A and TET2 are epigenetic regulator genes commonly mutated in age-related clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Despite having opposing epigenetic functions, these mutations are associated with increased all-cause mortality and a low risk for progression to hematological neoplasms. While individual impacts on the epigenome have been described using different model systems, the phenotypic complexity in humans remains to be elucidated. Results Here we make use of a natural inflammatory response occurring during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), to understand the association of these mutations with inflammatory morbidity and mortality. We demonstrate the age-independent, negative impact of DNMT3A mutant CH on COVID-19-related cytokine release severity and mortality. Using single cell proteogenomics we show that DNMT3A mutations involve myeloid and lymphoid cells. Using single cell multiomics sequencing, we identify cell-specific gene expression changes associated with DNMT3A mutations, along with significant epigenomic deregulation affecting enhancer accessibility, resulting in overexpression of IL32, a proinflammatory cytokine that can result in inflammasome activation in monocytes and macrophages. Finally, we show with single cell resolution that the loss of function of DNMT3A is directly associated with increased chromatin accessibility in mutant cells. Conclusions We demonstrate the negative prognostic impact of DNMT3Amt CH on COVID-19 related inflammatory morbidity and mortality. DNMT3Amt CH involves myeloid and lymphoid cells and in the context of COVID-19, was associated with inflammatory transcriptional priming, resulting in overexpression of IL32. This overexpression was secondary to increased chromatic accessibility, specific to DNMT3Amt CH cells. DNMT3Amt CH can serve as a potential biomarker for adverse inflammatory outcomes.

7558 Background: Survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) continues to improve with the newer therapies, but there is no clear evidence of a cure and patients continue to relapse. However, most patients have the most extended period without progression with their first-line therapy, and subsequent therapies often provide a shorter duration of response due to the use of drugs with overlapping mechanisms of action and, more importantly, a shorter first remission, pointing toward more aggressive disease biology. With newer immunotherapies being used at 1st relapse, this may change. We designed this study to explore the natural history of MM after the 1st relapse and define the predictors of outcome after the initial relapse. Methods: We identified all patients in the Mayo Clinic database diagnosed between Jan 2004-June 2019 who had had initial disease progression. The study cohort included 2005 patients. We explored the overall survival (OS) from the time of documented disease progression or the start of second-line treatment in patients who had not met IMWG criteria before second-line therapy. Front-line therapy was grouped into those with either an IMiD or PI, both IMiD and PI, daratumumab with IMiD and PI, and none of these agents. The IMiD and PI were always used with dexamethasone with or without an alkylator. Results: The median age was 63 (range 24-95) years and 60% were male. The median estimated follow-up from diagnosis for all patients was 86 mos. (95% CI; 82, 88) and the median time to progression from the start of therapy was 25 mos. (95% CI; 24, 26). The median OS from the first progression was 45 mos. (95% CI; 42, 50), 36 mos. for those diagnosed before 2009, and 52-53 mos. for those diagnosed later. On univariate analysis, age <70 at 1st relapse, RISS I, novel agents in initial therapy, CR in the first line, diagnosis after 2009, initial remission >18 mos, and initiation of therapy before IMWG progression were all associated with improved OS after 1st relapse (Table). On multivariate analysis, age <70, RISS I, initial remission >18 mos, and initiation of therapy before IMWG progression were all associated with improved OS after 1st relapse. Conclusions: The study provides an estimate of the outcomes and significant predictors of outcomes after 1st relapse in patients with MM. These factors should be taken into consideration when designing clinical trials in this patient population. In particular, these factors identify a high-risk group of patients not always identified by baseline characteristics and should be the focus of future trials. [Table: see text]

7520 Background: There are 2 CAR-T products and 3 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) that are FDA-approved for patients (pts) with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical trials experience to date suggests that clinical response of BsAb is less impacted after CAR-T therapy. We examined the outcome of pts who received BsAb in standard-of-care (SOC) practice at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Methods: Retrospective analysis of MM patients who received FDA-approved BsAb at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 12/2022- 1/2024. IMWG criteria was used for clinical response. Results: Sixty-two patients received BsAbs: 77% (48/62) received teclistamab, and 23% (14/62) received talquetamab. Median age was 62 years (range: 33-81), 60% (37/62) were males, and 45% (28/62) received prior CAR-T. Patients who had prior CAR-T therapy had more prior lines of therapy compared to those who did not. Overall, ORR to teclistamab was 61%, which is comparable to previous studies and other real-world reports. ORR and ≥CR rates were comparable between patients with and without prior CAR-T (Table). Of the 28 pts who received CAR-T before BsAbs, 61% (17/28) received idecabtagene vicleucel, 10% (3/28) were ciltacabtagene autoleucel, and 29% (8/28) on clinical trial. We then compared outcome of BsAb between pts who had relapsed from CAR-T within 1 year (n=21, median PFS: 8.84 months (range, 1.12, 10.84)) or after 1 year (n=7, median PFS: 16.62 months (range, 13.30, 36.20)). At the time of BsAb infusion, pts with who relapsed < 1 year vs ≥1 year post CAR-T had comparable blood counts, ALC, M-protein and involved FLC levels, CRP, ferritin and LDH. BsAb CR/sCR rate was significantly higher in pts with disease relapse ≥1 year compared to <1 year post CAR-T (57% vs 14%, p=0.02). Conclusions: Irrespective of prior CAR-T exposure, BsAb have clinical activity in SOC practice in pts with MM. Our preliminary data suggest that responses to BsAbs are better in pts with late compared to early relapse post CAR-T. Longer follow-up is needed to understand the duration of response. Larger, multi-center studies with longer follow-up will help identify factors that impact BsAb response post CAR-T.[Table: see text]

7515 Background: BCMA directed CAR T cells, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), and T cell engagers (TCEs) each have distinct strengths and weaknesses. While these agents have shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes, no head-head comparisons exist. We assessed the relative efficacy of different BCMA-therapies in relapsed myeloma, with a focus on high-risk subgroups. Methods: Retrospective study of MM patients treated at Mayo Clinic with commercial or investigational BCMA targeted therapies between April 2018-June 2023. Results: 385 patients (ADC=59, TCE=134, CAR T=192) with a median follow up of 20-months. The median time from diagnosis was 6.1 years. The table shows disease, and treatment characteristics. Amongst ADCs and TCEs recipients, the median treatment duration was 1.9 and 3.5 months respectively, disease progression (64% and 79%) and intolerance (22% and 10%) were the most common reasons for discontinuation. The overall response rates were 27, 50, and 86% for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Compared to ADCs, CAR T was associated with improved PFS (adjusted HRPFS=0.29, 95%CI=0.20-0.43) and OS (aHROS=0.28, 95%CI=0.18-0.44) when adjusting for age, R-ISS, double hit high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs), extramedullary disease (EMD, excluding paraskeletal plasmacytomas), triple class refractoriness, and the number of lines of therapy (LOTs) received in the preceding 1 year. Likewise compared to ADCs, TCEs were associated with superior PFS (aHRPFS=0.59, 95%CI=0.40-0.86) and OS (aHROS=0.60, 95%CI=0.39-0.93). Amongst patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) or EMD at the time of BCMA therapy (n=123), median PFS was poor irrespective of the therapeutic class at 1.3, 1.7 and 6.1 months for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Equally, for patients previously treated with BCMA therapy (n=58), median PFS was poor regardless of class at 1.9, 2.4 and 3 months for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Of 229 relapses the mode of relapse was known in 192 cases (84%), with 101 (52%) having EMD at relapse. Conclusions: While contingent on myriad other factors, patients able to receive BCMA-directed CAR T therapy experience superior survival compared to ADC and TCEs. EMD, PCL and BCMA-exposed populations are recalcitrant to BCMA-directed immunotherapy, and EMD is a common means of relapse. [Table: see text]

e14535 Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common complication of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) for hematologic malignancies. We hypothesized that patients undergoing CAR-T therapy who are on metformin will experience a lower incidence or severity of CRS than patients not on this medication. Methods: We evaluated all patients treated with CAR-T at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1/2018 and 1/31/2023, and abstracted relevant clinical and laboratory characteristics to determine the incidence and severity of CRS, PFS as well as OS in patients who were, or were not, on metformin before and during CAR-T therapy for Type 2 diabetes mellitus. We used the Chi-Square test, Mann-Whitney test and the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze data. Results: In the 5-year interval under consideration 237 patients received CAR-T, 168 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and 69 for multiple myeloma (MM). 23 patients (15 NHL and 8 MM) were on metformin at the time of CAR-T. 15 patient developed CRS while on metformin and 175 patients not on metformin (p=0.05). Grade 3 or 4 CRS incidence was 4% in both groups (p=0.41). Of the 153 patients with NHL not on metformin, 121 developed any grade of CRS, while 10 of 15 patients on metformin developed CRS (p=0.268). 4 NHL patients developed CRS Grade ≥3 or higher, while 0 of 15 on metformin developed Grade ≥3 CRS (p=0.237). For the MM patients, the incidence of CRS was 49 patients not on metformin and 5 patients on metformin (p<0.001). 3 MM patients developed CRS Grade ≥3 or higher, while 0 of 8 on metformin developed Grade ≥3 CRS (p=0.346). 12 of 15 patients on metformin with NHL achieved CR compared to 92 of 153 patients not on metformin (p=0.1305). 3 of 8 patients with MM on metformin compared to 24 of 61 patients with MM not on metformin achieved CR or better post CAR-T (p=0.92). Tocilizumab was used in 40% of patients on metformin but in 66% of patients not on metformin (p=0.0016). In NHL patients, PFS from CAR-T infusion was not reached (range: 6.3 to NR) for patients on metformin versus 9.9 months (range: 6.3–19.5) in patients not on metformin (p = 0.3332). In the MM patients, progression-free survival (PFS) from CAR-T infusion was 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.9–not reached [NR]) for patients on metformin and 22.6 months (13.7–NR) for those not on metformin (p = 0.07). Median OS for NHL patients on metformin was not reached (9.766–NR) versus 32.6 months (18.6–NR) for patients not on metformin (p = 0.7022). Median OS was 17 months (95% CI: 8.3 to NR) for patients with MM on metformin vs NR (95% CI: 9.4 to NR) for patients not on metformin (p = 0.2559). Conclusions: In this retrospective study, the co-administration of metformin during CAR-T cell therapy for NHL and MM appears to be associated with a numerically reduced incidence of CRS. The effect appears to be particularly marked in patients with multiple myeloma. Metformin therapy did not seem to affect the response to CAR-T therapy in either NHL or MM.

Introduction While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the management of hematologic malignancies, it requires frequent monitoring for acute toxicities, almost universally achieved through mandatory hospitalizations, therefore utilizing a significant amount of healthcare resources. At Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, our standard practice is administering CAR-T cell therapy in the outpatient setting through a multi-disciplinary hospital-based outpatient (HBO) unit and remote patient monitoring (RPM) program. Our CAR-T RPM program consists of in-home, electronic health record-integrated technology to monitor vital signs and neurologic symptoms for 30 days post CAR-T infusion. Here we report the healthcare utilization outcomes of CAR-T patients managed in the outpatient setting enrolled in the RPM program. Methods Patients undergoing FDA-approved CAR-T cell treatment in the outpatient setting and participating in the CAR-T RPM program at Mayo Clinic Rochester were included in this IRB-approved study. Patient characteristics, healthcare utilization metrics, inpatient interventions, and patient satisfaction data regarding the RPM program were reviewed. Length of stay (LOS) includes any hospitalizations for which the admission date falls within the RPM monitoring period (CAR-T cell infusion to day +30), even if the hospitalization continued past day +30. Results A total of 123 patients participated in the CAR-T RPM program and underwent treatment in the outpatient setting. Median age at CAR-T infusion was 63 years (range 22 - 83), and most patients were male (n=78, 63%). Non-Hodgkin lymphoma was the most common diagnosis (n=74, 60%), followed by multiple myeloma (n=47, 38%), ALL (n=1, 1%) and other (n=1, 1%). During the PRM monitoring period, 19 (16%) patients were managed entirely in the outpatient setting. The remaining 104 (84%) patients required at least one hospitalization, with most patients (n=70, 57%) hospitalized only once [26 (21%) patients were hospitalized twice, and 7 (6%) patients were hospitalized 3 times, and 1 (1%) patient hospitalized 4 times during the monitoring period]. When considering the first hospitalization post CAR-T infusion, the median LOS was 6 days (range 2 - 47). When considering all hospitalizations post CAR-T, the median LOS was 8 days (range 2 - 47). Only 7 (6%) patients required an ICU stay, with a mean ICU stay of 0.2 days (standard deviation 0.9). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was noted in 92 (75%) of patients at a median of 3 days (range 0 - 18) post CAR-T infusion. All patients with CRS received tocilizumab, at a median of 4 days post CAR-T infusion. Steroids for CRS were administered in 63 (68%) of these patients. Neurotoxicity was reported in 45 (37%) patients at a median of 7 days (range 1 - 19) post CAR-T infusion. During the RPM monitoring period, patients were seen in our HBO unit with a median of 18 outpatient visits (range 4 - 30). Patient survey data, obtained at the end of the RPM monitoring period, were available from 37 patients. The majority of patients felt that the RPM program helped them feel comfortable managing their health at home, were able to reach a team member, and receive an appropriate response promptly. The majority of patients felt comfortable using the RPM equipment and interacting with providers virtually. Overall, 83% of patients were satisfied with the RPM program and 6% were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. When asked about the reason for disappointment, technical difficulties/issues with the devices were the themes mentioned by the few patients (11%) who were unsatisfied with the RPM program. Conclusion: Despite the complexities and frequent monitoring associated with CAR-T cell therapy, outpatient CAR-T cell treatment is a feasible model of care. As the standard practice at our institution, the CAR-T RPM program was part of the management of nearly all patients undergoing an FDA-approved CAR-T product in the outpatient setting. RPM in the acute setting post CAR-T infusion is a well-received practice initiative by the majority of patients, including a high level of comfort utilizing the RPM equipment and virtual interaction with the RPM providers.

Background: Patients (pts) receiving FDA-approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy or Bispecific antibody Teclistamab (Tec) are commonly managed in the inpatient setting given the common adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome ICANS. We have previously reported that hospital-based outpatient (HBO) management of pts receiving CAR-T is feasible and safe (Bansal et al, ASH2022). In 2023, HBO management at our institution began incorporating home health visits and management of grade 1 CRS in outpatient setting for select pts receiving standard of care (SOC) CAR-T. Here, we report outcomes of our updated practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records and remote monitoring data of adult pts who received SOC CAR-T or Tec between 10/2020 and 7/2023 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester under an IRB approved protocol. Results: In 3/2023, pts deemed to be low risk for severe CRS (fever onset &gt;= 3 days from infusion, CRP&lt;100) received HBO management for grade 1 CRS, including outpatient administration of tocilizumab. If CRS improved or resolved, outpatient monitoring was continued. If CRS persisted within the observation period on HBO, pts were admitted. Recurrent CRS after the first episode were all managed inpatient. Nine pts met these criteria for HBO CRS management and their outcomes were compared to those who received initial inpatient (INPT) CRS management (INPT, n=17) during the same timeframe, as well as the outcome of 164 pts who had CRS management INPT prior to our practice change (Table 1). Two-third of the pts with initial management of CRS outpatient did not require hospitalization. Median time to hospitalization trended later than those managed inpatient at the onset of CRS. The duration of hospitalization was comparable for all pts admitted between initial HBO and INPT CRS management. However with fewer admissions in the initial CRS HBO group, the average hospitalization days (LOS) per patient treated for that group was lower compared to initial INPT CRS management. Data on additional pts will be presented at ASH. In 1/2023, pts on RPM with no ongoing CRS symptoms, no language barriers, and no compliance concerns received home health visits during weeks 3 and 4 post CAR-T infusion in place of clinic visits on HBO. Home health visit team communicated with HBO staff to review assessment and plan. Changes in HBO utilization will be presented. Finally, 24 pts received 223 Tec infusions on HBO. Median age was 66 years, 15 (61%) were males, 9 (38%) had high risk cytogenetics. The median prior lines of therapy was 5. Among these pts, 220/223 (99%) doses were performed on HBO and 204/220 (93%) infusions never required admission for management. Twenty pts enrolled in RPM (Figure 1). An average of 2 alerts were generated per patient during the 2 week period and median time from infusion to alert was 1.5 days. Majority of alerts were resolved over a phone call and only 13/114 (11%) alerts required a physician visit/hospital admission. Of the 16 Tec infusions resulting in admission, 4/16 (25%) required re-admission resulting in a total of 20 hospitalizations. Admissions mostly occurred during step-up dosing (18/20; 90%). Most common reason for first admission was fever (13/16, 85%) and median time to admission was 1 day from infusion. Median LOS was 1.5 days (range, 0-12). In terms of CRS, majority were Grade 1 (12/13, 93%) which were managed with steroids (dexamethasone/ prednisone) alone. One patient had CRS grade 4 event, in the setting of concurrent decompensation during dialysis, and was treated with steroids, tocilizumab, vasopressor, CRRT, thoracentesis, intubation and mechanical ventilation. The rate of second CRS event after management of first CRS with steroid (dexamethasone/ prednisone) was 15% (2/13). These second CRS episodes also resolved with steroid alone. Data on additional pts receiving Tec will be presented at ASH. Conclusion: Our data showed that additional advances in outpatient practice, including initial outpatient management of CRS and outpatient administration of Tec step up dosing are feasible, safe and reduce hospital resource utilization.

Introduction: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm with limited therapeutic options and dismal outcomes. Truncating mutations in the epigenetic modifier ASXL1 are common and lead to a proliferative disease phenotype, resistance to epigenetic therapies, and higher rates of AML transformation. ASXL1-mutant CMML is characterized by widespread epigenetic remodeling and up-regulation of key leukemogenic driver genes (e.g. HOXA9 and its co-factor MEIS1). There is a genotype-specific activation of enhancers in ASXL1-mutant CMML that is associated with up-regulation of these leukemogenic driver genes. Here, we test the hypothesis that disrupting the oncogenic interactions at these genotype-specific enhancers can be exploited for therapeutic benefit. Methods: We identified activated enhancers specific to ASXL1-mutant CMML as previously described ( Binder et al. Nat Commun 2022;13(1):1434). To disrupt the E2542605 enhancer, we created unique mapped single guide RNAs (confirmed by BLAT). We generated a ribonucleoprotein complex using the Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 system (IDT Technologies, Coralville IA). We combined the RNP along with Electroporation Enhancer to 3x10^5 cells of the monocytic cell line U937 in 20uL strip-wells provided by the SF Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). To deliver the RNP, U937 cells were electroporated via listed cell line specific protocol by the Amaxa 4D-Nucleofector (Lonza). Forty-eight hours post-electroporation, cells were split and sequenced for E2542605 genomic structure disruption. In parallel, RNA was harvested, converted to cDNA and qPCR for HOXA9 and MEIS1 expression was performed using PrimeTime qPCR FAM labeled probe assays (IDT). Gene expression was determined using delta-delta Ct method. For assessment of selective sensitivity of ASXL1 / enhancer interactions, we performed progenitor colony forming assays using primary bone marrow mononuclear cells from CMML patients with or without ASXL1 mutations and healthy normal controls (n=2 in each category), exposed to increasing concentrations of the dual p300/CBP and BET bromodomain inhibitor EP31670. Briefly, we plated cells in methocellulose fortified with recombinant human cytokines supporting hematopoietic growth in duplicate, in a range of EP31670 concentrations. After 10 days, visible hematopoietic colonies were quantified and characterized. IC 50 values were generated using non-linear regression log(EP31670) vs. normalized response. Results: We computationally identified candidate transcriptional regulators enriched at the activated enhancers specific to ASXL1-mutant CMML, including BRD4 (FDR&lt;2.57x10 -370), CBP (FDR=2.56x10 -217), and p300 (FDR=6.36x10 -93). We selected the ASXL1-mutant-specific enhancer E2542605 (predicted to drive HOXA9 expression), given the up-regulation of HOXA9 in ASXL1-mutant CMML (log 2-fold change +2.05, FDR=0.006, n=14). We disrupted E2542605 using two different CRISPR guides, leading to a PCR trace detection of a 14bp deletion and a 26bp indel in the E2542605 enhancer region, respectively. Both enhancer disruptions led to a down-regulation of its putative target gene HOXA9: Mean relative fold-change 0.36 (p=0.001, n=3) and 0.65 (p=0.046, n=3), respectively ( Fig. 1a). We then used a pharmacologic approach (EP31670) to target the candidate transcriptional regulators involved in the oncogenic interaction at these ASXL1-mutant-specific enhancers. We observed selective sensitivity to growth of CMML colonies (particularly ASXL1-mutant colonies) compared to ASXL1-wild type cases and normal bone marrow controls ( Fig. 1b). Conclusions: In CMML patients, truncating ASXL1 mutations are associated with the activation of genotype-specific enhancers and the recruitment of an extended repertoire of transcriptional regulators including BRD4, CBP, and p300. In a model system, the disruption of an enhancer predicted to govern the expression of the leukemogenic driver HOXA9, led to a significant down-regulation of HOXA9 expression. Pharmacologically disrupting the oncogenic interaction at such enhancers with EP31670 in primary patient samples led to significant therapeutic effects at nanomolar drug concentrations in a genotype-specific manner. Oncogenic interactions at activated enhancers are viable therapeutic targets in ASXL1-mutant CMML and warrant further clinical investigation.

Background: Cytopenias are a common complication of and prolonged (beyond month 3 post CAR-T infusion), severe (grade 3 or higher) cytopenias can be difficult to manage. Stem cell boosts have been reported to restore hematopoiesis; however, stem cells would need to be available prior to CAR-T therapy for potential use post CAR-T. Most lymphoma patients and limited number of myeloma patients may have pre-collected stem cells in storage. Identifying patients at high risk for prolonged and severe cytopenia post CAR-T at the time of CAR-T evaluation (baseline), before leukapheresis, can help identify the patients for coordination of stem cell collection during CAR-T manufacturing and increase the likelihood that the collected stem cells would be used. In this study, we aim to identify clinical variables at the time of CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis, that are associated with severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T infusion and identify patients who could be considered for pre-emptive stem cell collection prior to CAR-T therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who received CAR-T products at Mayo Clinic from 01/2016 to 06/2022. Patients with progressive disease in the first year post CAR-T were excluded from the analysis. Baseline (at CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis) variables were compared between those with and without severe cytopenia at month 3 post CAR-T. Severe cytopenias were defined as hemoglobin (Hg) &lt; 8 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) &lt; 0.5 x 10 9/L, and/or platelet count (PLT) &lt; 50 x 10 9/L. Statistically significant variables (p&lt;0.05) by analysis were examined for statistical significance in multivariate analysis (MVA). Results: Among the 166 patients who received CAR-T (88 NHL, 78 MM) during the study period, 31 (18.67%) had a severe cytopenia at month . Twenty baseline variables were examined; HGB, PLT, ANC, and c-reactive protein (CRP) We devised a cytopenia risk score using 1 point each for Hg&lt;10 or PLT&lt;100k at baseline, with a range of 0 to 2. Demographics and clinical outcome by cytopenia risk score is shown in Table 1B. A higher percentage of patients with a score of 1 or 2 had a severe cytopenia at month 3 (Figure 1). In particular, there was a . In addition Conclusion: Baseline cytopenias before leukapheresis may identify patients with increased risk for severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T. These patients can have continued slow hematopoietic recovery in the first year. Stem cell collection, if feasible, could be considered before CAR-T to alleviate post-CAR-T severe prolonged cytopenias.