Taylor, William R.

4088 Background: Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) are broadly informative for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) but have not been extensively studied for post-treatment surveillance and disease monitoring. We aimed to assess the feasibility of novel CRC-associated MDMs for detection of distant recurrent CRC (rCRC) in plasma. Methods: A panel of 13 MDMs previously identified to be discriminant for primary CRC was selected. In a cross-sectional analysis of plasma samples, MDMs were assayed blindly (by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal assay) from 160 age/sex-balanced patients (60 healthy controls, 60 with resected CRC and no evidence of disease (NED), and 40 rCRC after primary tumor resection). Plasma-derived carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was measured on all patients. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs (with and without CEA) for the endpoint of rCRC relative to healthy controls. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in the test set. Results: Median patient age was 55 (interquartile range: 49-64) years. As shown in the Table below, a single MDM with the highest AUC was significantly better than CEA ( p= 0.02). On cross validation, CEA provided no additional improvement to the performance of the panel of 13 MDMs ( p= 0.2). The cross-validated panel of MDMs detected rCRC liver metastases with 96% (79-100%) sensitivity, lung metastases with 78% (40-97%) sensitivity, and peritoneal/nodal metastases with 57% (18-90%) sensitivity. Lesions with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors sum > 4 cm were detected with 94% (73-100%) sensitivity and ≤4 cm with 78% (52-94%) sensitivity. Conclusions: Novel MDMs in plasma detect rCRC with promising accuracy. The clinical utility of MDMs for non-invasive post-treatment surveillance and treatment monitoring in CRC warrants further evaluation in longitudinal studies with sufficient follow-up to exclude sub-clinical recurrence in those with NED. [Table: see text]

INTRODUCTION: Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of average-risk screening, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the 2 nd leading cause of cancer death in the US. For optimal prevention, CRC screening tools should be highly accurate, user-friendly, and broadly accessible. Patient and provider adoption of the FDA-approved, guideline-endorsed multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test has grown exponentially since its launch in 2014. Toward ongoing improvement in CRC screening effectiveness, we conducted a blinded case-control study to assess the detection accuracy of a mt-sDNA panel of novel, highly discriminant methylated DNA markers (MDMs). METHODS: We selected 12 candidate MDMs from prior whole methylome discovery and validation in tissue. Stool was obtained as part of previous large, multicenter studies and collected prior to or 7 days post-colonoscopy (prior to any clinically-indicated treatment). CRC, advanced adenoma (AA; size ≥1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, or ≥25% villous morphology), non-AA, or control (no neoplasia) status was defined by colonoscopy and histopathology. Samples were blinded to operators and randomized by characterization to balance the test sets prior to assessment. MDMs were quantified by target-specific DNA capture and Long-probe Quantitative Amplified Signal assay on bisulfite-converted DNA; fecal hemoglobin was quantified by immunoassay. Bootstrapping methods were used to select a panel of 3 MDMs, which was then 10-fold cross-validated; hemoglobin was also included, as was a colon epithelium-specific MDM to normalize stool MDM levels. RESULTS: Participant samples included 117 CRC, 120 AA, 161 non-AA, and 327 controls. Median age was 67 (IQR 61, 75) years; 51% were men. The AUC with best-fit was 0.97 for CRC and 0.84 for AA, and these high AUCs held up tightly on cross-validation (Figure 1). At 92% (95% CI 88-94%) specificity, sensitivity of the panel was 92% (95% CI 86-96%) for CRC. Neither CRC stage (Figure 2) nor CRC site significantly affected performance. At the same 92% specificity, sensitivity was 65% (95% CI 56-73%) for AAs overall, 67% (38-88%) for sessile serrated polyps ≥1 cm, and 71% (57-82%) for adenomas with villous features (Figure 3). CONCLUSION: These data support highly accurate performance of a novel panel of mt-sDNA markers for detecting both CRC (including early stage lesions) and AAs at greatest risk of progression. Prospective comparative studies are warranted to further establish the clinical potential of this novel screening tool.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) may be precancerous. Those likely to harbor high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer (PC) are targets for surgical resection. Current algorithms to predict advanced neoplasia (HGD/PC) in PCLs lack diagnostic accuracy. In pancreatic tissue and cyst fluid (CF) from PCLs, we sought to identify and validate novel methylated DNA markers (MDMs) that discriminate HGD/PC from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or no dysplasia (ND). METHODS: From an unbiased whole-methylome discovery approach using predefined selection criteria followed by multistep validation on case (HGD or PC) and control (ND or LGD) tissues, we identified discriminant MDMs. Top candidate MDMs were then assayed by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction on archival CF from surgically resected PCLs. RESULTS: Of 25 discriminant MDMs identified in tissue, 13 were selected for validation in 134 CF samples (21 cases [8 HGD, 13 PC], 113 controls [45 ND, 68 LGD]). A tree-based algorithm using 2 CF-MDMs ( TBX15 , BMP3 ) achieved sensitivity and specificity above 90%. Discrimination was significantly better by this CF-MDM panel than by mutant KRAS or carcinoembryonic antigen, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.86–0.99), 0.71 (0.57–0.85), and 0.72 (0.60–0.84), respectively. Cutoffs for the MDM panel applied to an independent CF validation set (31 cases, 56 controls) yielded similarly high discrimination, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.94, P = 0.2). DISCUSSION: Novel MDMs discovered and validated in tissue accurately identify PCLs harboring HGD/PC. A panel of 2 MDMs assayed in CF yielded results with potential to enhance current risk prediction algorithms. Prospective studies are indicated to optimize and further evaluate CF-MDMs for clinical use.

3599 Background: Existing tools for post-treatment CRC surveillance and monitoring are insensitive and expensive. MDMs are broadly informative for early detection of CRC but have not been extensively studied for disease monitoring. As a first step, we sought to assess the concordance of novel CRC-associated MDMs in pCRC and mCRC. Methods: A panel of 14 MDMs previously identified to be highly discriminant for pCRC was selected on the basis of high median fold-change of MDM levels relative to buffy coat (682 (IQR: 132-19347)). Surgically resected pCRC and paired mCRC were identified from institutional pathology databases. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR was used to assay MDMs. 30 paired samples per metastatic subtype were calculated to be sufficient. MDM levels were compared using two-sample and paired Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: 87 patients with paired pCRC and mCRC including 57 synchronous and 30 metachronous metastases were included. 41/87 (47%) had neoadjuvant and 59/87 (68%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. All synchronous metastases were to liver. Metachronous metastases were to liver in 19/30 (63%) and to lung in 11/30 (37%). The levels of 14 selected MDMs were remarkably similar between paired pCRC and mCRC (Table). Individual MDM levels and the average level of all MDMs combined were not significantly different ( p> 0.0018 by Bonferroni correction). Conclusions: MDM levels are highly concordant in pCRC and mCRC. Thus, MDMs discovered from pCRC should be further studied for non-invasive surveillance after surgical resection and monitoring of treatment response in mCRC. [Table: see text]

Early detection improves hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes, but better noninvasive surveillance tools are needed. We aimed to identify and validate methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for HCC detection. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 18 HCC and 35 control tissues. Candidate MDMs were confirmed by quantitative methylation‐specific PCR in DNA from independent tissues (74 HCC, 29 controls). A phase I plasma pilot incorporated quantitative allele‐specific real‐time target and signal amplification assays on independent plasma‐extracted DNA from 21 HCC cases and 30 controls with cirrhosis. A phase II plasma study was then performed in 95 HCC cases, 51 controls with cirrhosis, and 98 healthy controls using target enrichment long‐probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQAS) assays. Recursive partitioning identified best MDM combinations. The entire MDM panel was statistically cross‐validated by randomly splitting the data 2:1 for training and testing. Random forest (rForest) regression models performed on the training set predicted disease status in the testing set; median areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUCs; and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were reported after 500 iterations. In phase II, a six‐marker MDM panel (homeobox A1 [HOXA1], empty spiracles homeobox 1 [EMX1], AK055957 , endothelin‐converting enzyme 1 [ECE1], phosphofructokinase [PFKP], and C‐type lectin domain containing 11A [CLEC11A]) normalized by beta‐1,3‐galactosyltransferase 6 (B3GALT6) level yielded a best‐fit AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93‐0.99) with HCC sensitivity of 95% (88%‐98%) at specificity of 92% (86%‐96%). The panel detected 3 of 4 (75%) stage 0, 39 of 42 (93%) stage A, 13 of 14 (93%) stage B, 28 of 28 (100%) stage C, and 7 of 7 (100%) stage D HCCs. The AUC value for alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) was 0.80 (0.74‐0.87) compared to 0.94 (0.9‐0.97) for the cross‐validated MDM panel (P < 0.0001). Conclusion : MDMs identified in this study proved to accurately detect HCC by plasma testing. Further optimization and clinical testing of this promising approach are indicated.

Abstract Purpose: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Accurate and affordable noninvasive detection methods have potential value for screening and surveillance. Herein, we identify novel methylated DNA markers (MDM) for gastric adenocarcinoma, validate their discrimination for gastric adenocarcinoma in tissues from geographically separate cohorts, explore marker acquisition through the oncogenic cascade, and describe distributions of candidate MDMs in plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls. Experimental Design: Following discovery by unbiased whole-methylome sequencing, candidate MDMs were validated by blinded methylation-specific PCR in archival case–control tissues from U.S. and South Korean patients. Top MDMs were then assayed by an analytically sensitive method (quantitative real-time allele-specific target and signal amplification) in a blinded pilot study on archival plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls. Results: Whole-methylome discovery yielded novel and highly discriminant candidate MDMs. In tissue, a panel of candidate MDMs detected gastric adenocarcinoma in 92% to 100% of U.S. and South Korean cohorts at 100% specificity. Levels of most MDMs increased progressively from normal mucosa through metaplasia, adenoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma with variation in points of greatest marker acquisition. In plasma, a 3-marker panel (ELMO1, ZNF569, C13orf18) detected 86% (95% CI, 71–95) of gastric adenocarcinomas at 95% specificity. Conclusions: Novel MDMs appear to accurately discriminate gastric adenocarcinoma from normal controls in both tissue and plasma. The point of aberrant methylation during oncogenesis varies by MDM, which may have relevance to marker selection in clinical applications. Further exploration of these MDMs for gastric adenocarcinoma screening and surveillance is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5724–34. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Methylated DNA markers can discriminate upper from lower GI neoplasms (Gastroenterology 2013;144(5):S84). It is unknown if organ-specific molecular prediction of GI tumor site can be achieved. Experimental design: An unbiased search for neoplasm markers at each major GI organ site was conducted by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Top marker candidates were then blindly validated by methylation specific PCR on independent tissue DNA samples from normal mucosa [17 esophagus (E), 13 stomach (S), 33 pancreas (P), 35 bile duct/liver (BD), 21 colorectal (CR)] and neoplasia [42 E, 43 S, 36 P, 48 BD, 97 CR]. Recursive partitioning (rPart) trees modeled all stepwise combinations of single markers to classify controls vs neoplasms and then neoplasms by site (CR, gastroesophageal or pancreaticobiliary). A 2nd model was designed from tissue data for blinded clinical piloting on 42 independent plasma DNA samples (14 normal and 28 cancers (14 P, 14 CR). Results: From the top 100 markers, 95 were validated and used for rPart modeling. A 3- marker panel (chr12.133484978-5047, BMP3, chr11.123301058-255) was selected for the universal detection of GI neoplasms, as it classified neoplasms and control tissues with 95% accuracy. Two markers (chr7.25896389-501, QKI) then assigned lower vs upper GI neoplasms with 94% accuracy. Finally, 3 markers (PDGFD, ELOVL2, PCBP3) called pancreaticobiliary vs gastroesophageal neoplasms with 94% accuracy. All 8 markers applied in a single model (Table) accurately predicted control vs tumor by site [88% (p &lt;0.0001)]. In plasma, a 2-marker panel (BMP3, QKI) was 78% accurate in assigning patients to cancer or control groups (p&lt;0.0009) and 83% accurate in assigning cancer origin to CR or P sites (p&lt;0.0001). Predicted by ModelTissue SourceControlsColorectal neoplasiaPancreatico-biliary cancerGastro-esophageal neoplasiaControls1169102Colorectal neoplasia18617Pancreatico-biliary cancer10654Gastro-esophageal neoplasia12872 Conclusion: Panels of methylated DNA markers were identified for both universal detection of GI neoplasia and accurate prediction of tumor site. Pilot testing of these markers in plasma supports potential clinical feasibility. Citation Format: John B. Kisiel, William R. Taylor, Tracy C. Yab, Hassan M. Ghoz, Patrick H. Foote, Mary E. Devens, Douglas W. Mahoney, Thomas C. Smyrk, Lisa A. Boardman, Gloria M. Petersen, Navtej S. Buttar, Lewis R. Roberts, Graham P. Lidgard, David A. Ahlquist. Accurate site prediction of gastrointestinal cancer by novel methylated DNA markers: Discovery & validation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4252. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4252

Abstract Purpose: Discriminant markers for pancreatic cancer detection are needed. We sought to identify and validate methylated DNA markers for pancreatic cancer using next-generation sequencing unbiased by known targets. Experimental Design: At a referral center, we conducted four sequential case–control studies: discovery, technical validation, biologic validation, and clinical piloting. Candidate markers were identified using variance-inflated logistic regression on reduced-representation bisulfite DNA sequencing results from matched pancreatic cancers, benign pancreas, and normal colon tissues. Markers were validated technically on replicate discovery study DNA and biologically on independent, matched, blinded tissues by methylation-specific PCR. Clinical testing of six methylation candidates and mutant KRAS was performed on secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice samples from 61 patients with pancreatic cancer, 22 with chronic pancreatitis, and 19 with normal pancreas on endoscopic ultrasound. Areas under receiver-operating characteristics curves (AUC) for markers were calculated. Results: Sequencing identified &gt;500 differentially hyper-methylated regions. On independent tissues, AUC on 19 selected markers ranged between 0.73 and 0.97. Pancreatic juice AUC values for CD1D, KCNK12, CLEC11A, NDRG4, IKZF1, PKRCB, and KRAS were 0.92*, 0.88, 0.85, 0.85, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.75, respectively, for pancreatic cancer compared with normal pancreas and 0.92*, 0.73, 0.76, 0.85*, 0.73, 0.77, and 0.62 for pancreatic cancer compared with chronic pancreatitis (*, P = 0.001 vs. KRAS). Conclusions: We identified and validated novel DNA methylation markers strongly associated with pancreatic cancer. On pilot testing in pancreatic juice, best markers (especially CD1D) highly discriminated pancreatic cases from controls. Clin Cancer Res; 21(19); 4473–81. ©2015 AACR.