Erben, Young

Introduction While neurovascular surgeries have largely been performed by neurosurgeons, the advent of endovascular procedures has produced increasing involvement of other specialists in this arena (i.e. neurologists and radiologists).This study aims to analyzethe involvement of different specialties within theneuroendovascular workforce by characterizingthem by their primary specialty. Methods The Medicare Provider Utilization Database was queried from 2013 to 2019 for all primary Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes identified by the American Medical Association as pertaining to endovascular procedures of the nervous system (61623, 61624, 61630, 61635, 61626, 61645, and 61650). We counted the number of unique providers in respective fields (neurology, neurosurgery, and radiology) who performed these procedures. Statistical analyses, including data aggregation, exploratory analysis, and propensity adjustment, were performed using R, version 4.0.1 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). The two‐sided Mann‐Kendall trend test, a non‐parametric statistical test that assesses for monotonic trends in either an upward or downward trend, was utilized to assess for trends over time. Within each year analyzed, a Chi‐squared test for trend in proportions was used. A significance level of 0.05 was used. Results In 2013, neurosurgeons comprised 45% of the workforce performing these procedures, neurologists were 9%, and radiologists were 47%. By 2019, neurosurgeons decreased to 34.5% of the workforce, while neurologists increased to 21.5%, and radiologists decreased slightly to 44%. Neurologists were the only field in which the proportional shift in providers was noted to have a significant change in trajectory (p:0.04), an upward trajectory. Overall proportional differences between respective specialists were statistically significant each year (p< 0.01). Conclusions Neurologists are increasingly performing endovascular procedures. Increased communication and coordination between specialties can improve disparities in care to ensure adequate access to neurovascular care across the US.

Introduction Endovascular procedures have become increasingly popular in recent years due to preference of minimally invasive approaches and technological advancement.This study aims to characterize the trends in procedural rates of common neuro‐endovascular procedures performed by neurologists, neurosurgeons, and radiologists. Methods The Medicare Provider Utilization Database was queried from 2013 to 2019 for all primary Current Procedural Terminology codes identified by the American Medical Association as pertaining to endovascular procedures of the nervous system (61623, 61624, 61630, 61635, 61626, 61645, and 61650). Statistical analyses, including data aggregation, exploratory analysis, and propensity adjustment, were performed using R, version 4.0.1 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). The two‐sided Mann‐Kendall trend test, a non‐parametric statistical test that assesses for monotonic trends in either an upward or downward trend, was utilized to assess for trends over time. A significance level of 0.05 was used. Results Between 2013 to 2019 a total of 40,730 endovascular procedures were performed by neurosurgeons, neurologists and radiologists treating Medicare patients. When all codes were combined, there was a significant increase in the number of procedures done by all specialists: Radiology (2013:1080; 2019:4938; p:0.02), Neurosurgery (2013:1230; 2019:4508; p< 0.01), and Neurology (2013:205; 2019:2397; p:0.04). Significant increases in mechanical thrombectomy (CPT61645) were observed in all fields: Radiology (2016:1287, 2019:3542; p< 0.01), Neurosurgery (2016:610; 2019:2326; p< 0.01), Neurology (2016:569; 2019:1951; p< 0.01). Increases in transcatheter permanent occlusion (CPT61624) were observed in neurosurgery (2013:1230; 2019:2049; p:0.04). Increases in temporary balloon artery occlusion (CPT61623) were noted in neurology (2013:21; 2019:27; p:0.04). Conclusions Endovascular procedures have seen a dramatic rise in utilization over a short amount of time, particularly mechanical thrombectomy. Future investigation should include more inclusive datasets beyond the Medicare population.

Background: Overall inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) utilization has decreased in the United States since the 2010 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication. The FDA renewed this safety warning in 2014 with additional mandates on reporting IVCF-related adverse events. We evaluated the impact of the FDA recommendations on IVCF placements for different indications from 2010 to 2019 and further assessed utilization trends by region and hospital teaching status. Methods: Inferior vena cava filter placements between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database using the associated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and Tenth Revision codes. Inferior vena cava filter placements were categorized by indication for venous thromboembolism (VTE) “treatment” in patients with VTE diagnosis and contraindication to anticoagulation and “prophylaxis” in patients without VTE. Generalized linear regression was used to analyze utilization trends. Results: A total of 823 717 IVCFs were placed over the study period, of which 644 663 (78.3%) were for VTE treatment and 179 054 (21.7%) were for prophylaxis indications. The median age for both categories of patients was 68 years. The total number of IVCFs placed for all indications decreased from 129 616 in 2010 to 58 465 in 2019, with an aggregate decline rate of −8.4%. The decline rate was higher between 2014 and 2019 than between 2010 and 2014 (−11.6% vs −7.2%). From 2010 to 2019, IVCF placement for VTE treatment and prophylaxis trended downward at rates of −7.9% and −10.2%, respectively. Urban nonteaching hospitals saw the highest decline for both VTE treatment (−17.2%) and prophylactic indications (−18.0%). Hospitals located in the Northeast region had the highest decline rates for VTE treatment (−10.3%) and prophylactic indications (−12.5%). Conclusion: The higher decline rate in IVCF placements between 2014 and 2019 compared with 2010 and 2014 suggests an additional impact of the renewed 2014 FDA safety indications on national IVCF utilization. Variations in IVCF use for VTE treatment and prophylactic indications existed across hospital teaching types, locations, and regions. Clinical Impact Inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are associated with medical complications. The 2010 and 2014 FDA safety warnings appeared to have synergistically contributed to a significant decline in IVCF utilization rates from 2010 – 2019 in the US. IVC filter placements in patients without venous thromboembolism (VTE) declined at a higher rate than VTE. However, IVCF utilization varied across hospitals and geographical locations, likely due to the absence of universally accepted clinical guidelines on IVCF indications and use. Harmonization of IVCF placement guidelines is needed to standardize clinical practice, thereby reducing the observed regional and hospital variations and potential IVC filter overutilization.

Background Transvenous embolization is emerging as a promising treatment for cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas (CVF) associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Objective To perform an independent validation of the efficacy and safety of the procedure and describe the procedural techniques used at our institution. Methods A retrospective review was performed including consecutive patients with SIH who had undergone CVF embolization with 3-month clinical and imaging follow-up. Clinical evaluation included the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale and six-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Bern SIH score was used for imaging evaluation on brain MRI. Post-treatment changes in scores were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Procedural technical details, including use of upper-extremity access and dual-microcatheter pressure cooker technique, were recorded. Results 18 patients (13 female, median age 60 years) were included. 17 (94%) procedures were performed with upper-extremity access and 12 (67%) using dual-microcatheter pressure cooker technique. After embolization, 16 (89%) patients reported much or very much improved at follow-up PGIC; median (IQR) HIT-6 score improved from 68 (62–72) to 36 (36–38) and Bern SIH score improved from 8 (6–8) to 3 (1.5–3.5), p values <0.001. Side effects were transient embolization site back pain in 15 (83%) and rebound intracranial hypertension requiring medical management in 9 (50%) patients. HIT-6 and Bern SIH score changes were similar between conventional and pressure cooker techniques ( p values >0.05). Conclusion Transvenous embolization is independently validated as a highly effective and safe treatment for CVF and is feasible using upper-extremity venous access. Dual-microcatheter and balloon/coil pressure cooker techniques may be used to optimize distribution of embolic material and potentially, treatment efficacy.

Objective Compression of the left renal vein by the superior mesenteric artery, known as nutcracker phenomenon (NCP), can cause retrograde flow and congestion in communicating venous systems. It has recently been speculated that NCP can result in retrograde flow and congestion of the lumbar veins and epidural venous plexus (EVP), thereby affecting the central nervous system. This study describes the novel use of time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (trMRA) to evaluate for retrograde left second lumbar vein (L2LV) flow and early EVP enhancement in patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) with and without NCP. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of 31 patients with CDH (27 females and 4 males; median age, 38 years [range, 18–63 years]) who underwent trMRA centered over the L2LV to evaluate the direction of blood flow and presence of early EVP enhancement from May 2020 to March 2022. Descriptive statistics were performed, and anatomic associations were analyzed in patients with and without retrograde L2LV flow and early EVP enhancement. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging findings in detecting these flow patterns was also assessed. Results Patients with NCP who demonstrated narrowing of the left renal vein, a positive beak sign (P = 0.052), decreased aortomesenteric distance (P = 0.038), and decreased SMA angle demonstrated increased rates of retrograde L2LV flow and early EVP enhancement. A positive beak sign was 83% specific, and an aortomesenteric distance of ≤6.5 mm was 61% sensitive and 83% specific for identifying retrograde L2LV flow with early regional EVP enhancement in patients with CDH. Conclusions Retrograde L2LV flow with early EVP enhancement in CDH patients can be effectively evaluated using trMRA and was seen with greater propensity in those patients with NCP.

AbstractThe authors illustrate the use of through-and-through brachio/radio-femoral access technique in two patients who presented with subclavian steal syndrome. This is an additional tool in the armamentarium of the endovascular specialist to improve management of complex cases with subclavian steal syndrome. This technique provides several advantages to improve efficiency and precision of the procedure while reserving the open surgical bypass option if needed.

AbstractBackgroundPatient Safety Indicator (PSI)‐12, a hospital quality measure designed by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to capture potentially preventable adverse events, captures perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is unclear how COVID‐19 has affected PSI‐12 performance.ObjectiveWe sought to compare the cumulative incidence of PSI‐12 in patients with and without acute COVID‐19 infection.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a retrospective cohort study including PSI‐12‐eligible events at three Mayo Clinic medical centers (4/1/2020‐10/5/2021).Exposure, Main Outcomes, and MeasuresWe compared the unadjusted rate and adjusted risk ratio (aRR) for PSI‐12 events among patients with and without COVID‐19 infection using Fisher's exact χ2 test and the AHRQ risk‐adjustment software, respectively. We summarized the clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 patients with a PSI‐12 event.ResultsOur cohort included 50,400 consecutive hospitalizations. Rates of PSI‐12 events were significantly higher among patients with acute COVID‐19 infection (8/257 [3.11%; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.35%–6.04%]) compared to patients without COVID‐19 (210/50,143 [0.42%; 95% CI, 0.36%–0.48%]) with a PSI‐12 event during the encounter (p < .001). The risk‐adjusted rate of PSI‐12 was significantly higher in patients with acute COVID‐19 infection (1.50% vs. 0.38%; aRR, 3.90; 95% CI, 2.12–7.17; p < .001). All COVID‐19 patients with PSI‐12 events had severe disease and 4 died. The most common procedure was tracheostomy (75%); the mean (SD) days from surgical procedure to VTE were 0.12 (7.32) days.ConclusionPatients with acute COVID‐19 infection are at higher risk for PSI‐12. The present definition of PSI‐12 does not account for COVID‐19. This may impact hospitals' quality performance if COVID‐19 infection is not accounted for by exclusion or risk adjustment.

Vasa nervorum are the blood vessels which supply adequate oxygen to peripheral nerves. Various vascular pathologies produce inflammatory changes compromising the blood flow through the vasa nervorum. We describe a patient with peripheral vascular disease admitted for below knee amputation who was found to have hypertrophied vasa nervorum in the ipsilateral femoral and popliteal sciatic nerves.

Abstract Background The multicenter prospective CREST‐2 Registry (C2R) provides recent experience in performing carotid artery stenting (CAS) for interventionists to ensure safe performance of CAS. Objective To determine the periprocedural safety of CAS performed using a transradial approach relative to CAS performed using a transfemoral approach. Methods Patients with ≥70% asymptomatic and ≥50% symptomatic carotid stenosis, ≤80 years of age and at standard or high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are eligible for the C2R. The primary endpoint was a composite of severe access‐related complications. Comparisons were made using propensity‐score matched logistic regression. Results The mean age of the cohort was 67.6 ± 8.2 years and 1906 (35.1%) were female. Indications for CAS included 4063 (74.9%) for primary atherosclerosis. A total of 2868 (52.8%) cases underwent CAS for asymptomatic disease. Transradial access was used in 213 (3.9%) patients. The transradial cohort had lower use of general anesthesia (1.5% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.007) and higher use of distal embolic protection (96.7% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.0004). There were no significant differences between radial and femoral access groups in terms of a composite of major access‐related complications (0% vs. 1.1%) or a composite of periprocedural stroke or death (3.3% vs. 2.4%; OR = 1.4 [confidence intervals 0.6, 3.1]; p = 0.42). Conclusion We found no significant differences in rates of major access‐related complications or periprocedural stroke or death with CAS performed using transradial compared to transfemoral access. Our results support incorporation of the transradial approach to clinical trials comparing CAS to other revascularization techniques.