Erben, Young

Introduction We present a case of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in a morbidly obese patient with prior femoro-popliteal artery PTFE bypass occlusion successfully treated with a hybrid femoral-to-posterior tibial artery bypass utilizing the previously occluded graft. Case Report A 69-year-old morbidly obese woman presented with acute left leg pain and numbness with preserved motor function. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrates chronic superficial femoral artery and femoro-popliteal PTFE bypass occlusion with a new native popliteal artery thrombosis and loss of tibial runoffs. After systemic heparinization, the leg was revascularized through a small medial thigh incision and a jump PTFE bypass to the posterior tibial artery. The previously occluded femoro-popliteal artery bypass was accessed to re-establish proximal flow through a retrograde endovascular construction using a 7 mm by 25 cm Viabahn (Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) stent. This stent was used as a bridge with distal deployment within a new 6 mm PTFE graft, which was then anastomosed in an end to side fashion to a Linton patch of the posterior tibial artery. There were no postoperative complications, and the ankle-brachial-index was measured to be 0.98 with a CTA with runoffs confirming bypass patency. Discussion ALI in the setting of a prior bypass occlusion in a morbidly obese patient reflects the typical contemporary patient and disease complexity, which demands corrective revascularization with appropriate mitigation/prevention of other postoperative complications. A limited thigh exposure to access a previously occluded bypass can successfully restore in-line flow in these high-risk patients. Conclusion Hybrid lower extremity revascularization is an alternative surgical modality to restore in-line flow to a lower extremity as a limb salvage option while avoiding groin re-exploration in a previously accessed groin for bypass construction in a morbidly obese patient.

Introduction Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the primary treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Despite favorable early outcomes, lifelong surveillance is essential as endoleaks remain a major cause of reintervention. Among these, type II endoleaks (T2E) remain controversial regarding optimal management. This study aimed to identify factors associated with intervention for T2E using time-to-event analysis and predefined anatomic thresholds. Secondary objectives included comparing outcomes between T2E patients with (intT2E) and without (nointT2E) intervention. Methods A retrospective review of EVAR procedures from 2011-2024 was performed. Patients with newly diagnosed or persistent T2E were identified on completion and follow-up CT angiography. Patients were categorized as intT2E or nointT2E. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated time to first intervention, and logistic regression served as sensitivity analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed freedom from intervention by inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) size. Results Among 207 EVAR patients, 78 (37.6%) developed T2E over a mean 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Nineteen (24.3%) required intervention. IntT2E patients were younger (74.9 ± 6.8 vs 78.3 ± 7.9 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent anticoagulation use (47.4% vs 20.3%, P = 0.02), larger IMAs (4.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.7 mm, P < 0.01), and more lumbar arteries (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 5.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.02). IMAs >4 mm occurred in 68.4% of intT2E vs 8.5% of nointT2E ( P < 0.01). Mean sac growth was greater in intT2E (9.7 ± 5.3 mm vs −1.9 ± 6.5 mm, P < 0.01). Thirty-day complications following the index EVAR procedure, mid-term reinterventions, and overall mortality were similar between groups. Post-embolization, T2E resolved in 36.9%, with sac regression in 63.1%. Among embolized patients, 26.3% required a second embolization and one patient required 3 attempts without achieving resolution. IMA >4 mm independently predicted intervention (HR 7.18, 95% CI 1.97-26.16, P < 0.01). Logistic regression confirmed IMA >4 mm (OR 23.4, 95% CI 6.17-88.6, P < 0.01), >6 lumbar arteries (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.10-15.98, P = 0.02), and anticoagulation (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.17-10.6, P = 0.02) as predictors. Conclusions Approximately one-quarter of T2E patients required embolization. IMA >4 mm was the strongest predictor of intervention, while anticoagulation and increased lumbar artery number also increased risk. Management should prioritize risk-stratified surveillance and selective intervention.

Background: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) often have comorbidities that make them poor candidates for open surgical repair (OSR). Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) circumvents the morbidity associated with OSR of AAA. Candidacy for EVAR is impacted by multiple factors, including the quality and size of vascular access vessels and involvement of visceral arteries, as seen in paravisceral abdominal aortic aneurysms (PVAAA). Additional challenges, such as obesity, can complicate vascular access during EVAR. PVAAA may be better suited for fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) using a physician-modified endograft (PMEG). Materials and Methods: In this report, we describe the case of a 64-year-old female patient with a complex PVAAA in the setting of significant aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with intermittent claudication. We describe a successful staged FEVAR technique in which vascular access challenges were first addressed by recanalization of the iliac system with femoral conduit (FC) creation, followed by successful FEVAR using bilateral FC for deployment of the PMEG. Conclusion: Patients with PAAA have unique and complex pathology that are clinically challenging to address. It is not uncommon that these patients also have co-morbid conditions that make them less-than ideal candidates for open repair. Patients may also have other conditions such as AIOD which make EVAR complex. Staged approach with iliac recanalization and femoral conduit creation followed by FEVAR with PMEG is an effective treatment option for high-risk complex patients and can help avoid common complications such as groin infection and delay in FEVAR which may result in a catastrophic event such as interval AAA rupture.

Objective To evaluate outcomes in patients with type 2 endoleak (T2E) and the impact of treatment outside the device instructions for use (IFU). Methods This retrospective single-center study included abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients who underwent EVAR (2011- 2024). Primary outcomes were 30-day and mid-term complications, reintervention, and mortality by T2E status. Propensity score matching was applied and secondary analysis stratified outcomes by IFU compliance, comparing within ( in IFU) or outside( out IFU) IFU in each T2E group. Results Among 154 EVAR patients (137 men (89.1%) and 17 women (11.0%); mean age 77.5 ± 7.6 years), 77 were T2E(−), and 77 were T2E(+). Baseline characteristics were similar. Thirty-day complications were comparable (T2E(−): 5, 6.4% vs T2E(+): 2, 2.56%, P = 0.72). The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 ± 2.4 years. Sac diameter change (Δ) decreased in the T2E(−) (7.7 ± 8.4 mm) and enlarged in the T2E(+) (1.79 ± 12.5 mm; P < 0.01). Mid-term graft-related complications (T2E(−): 3, 3.8% vs T2E(+): 49, 62.8%, P < 0.01) and reinterventions (T2E(−): 3, 3.8%, vs T2E(+): 20, 25.6% P < 0.01) were higher in the T2E(+) with no difference in mortality ( P = 1.00). These findings remained after excluding type 1 endoleaks. Among the T2E(+), those treated out IFU had longer hospital stays ( out IFU: 3.0 ± 2.8 days vs in IFU: 1.8 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.03), higher T1E ( out IFU: 3, 33.3% vs in IFU: 1, 4.34%, P < 0.01), higher rates of reintervention ( out IFU: 9, 100.0% vs in IFU:17; 24.6%, P < 0.01) and higher all-cause mortality than those within IFU criteria ( out IFU: 5, 55.0% vs in IFU: 13, 18.8%, P < 0.01). IFU status did not significantly affect outcomes in T2E(−) patients. Conclusions T2E is associated with sac growth and increased reinterventions, but not higher mortality. On subgroup analysis, those T2E(+) treated out IFU had longer hospitalizations, higher T1E rates, more reinterventions, and higher all-cause; but not aneurysmal-related mortality.

Vascular surgery has evolved from durable yet invasive open reconstructions to less traumatic endovascular techniques. While endovascular repair reduces perioperative morbidity, it introduces durability challenges and the need for lifelong surveillance. Laparoscopic surgery bridged some gaps but was hindered by steep learning curves and technical limitations. Robotic-assisted surgery represents a “third revolution”, combining the durability of open repair with the recovery and ergonomic benefits of minimally invasive approaches through enhanced 3D visualization, wristed instrumentation, and tremor filtration. This review synthesizes current evidence on robotic applications in vascular surgery, including aortic, visceral, venous, and endovascular interventions. Feasibility of robotic vascular surgery has been demonstrated in over 1500 patients across aortic, visceral, venous, and decompression procedures. Reported outcomes include pooled conversion rates of ~5%, 30-day mortality of 1–3%, and long-term patency rates exceeding 90% in aortoiliac occlusive disease. Similarly favorable outcomes have been observed in AAA repair, visceral artery aneurysm repair, IVC reconstructions, renal vein transpositions, and minimally invasive decompression procedures such as median arcuate ligament and thoracic outlet syndromes. Endovascular robotics enhances catheter navigation precision and reduces operator radiation exposure by 85–95%, with multiple series demonstrating consistent benefit compared to manual techniques. Despite these advantages, adoption is limited by high costs, lack of dedicated vascular instruments, absent haptic feedback on most platforms, and the need for standardized training. Most available evidence is observational and from high-volume centers, highlighting the need for multicenter randomized trials. Future directions include AI-enabled planning and augmented-reality navigation, which are the most feasible near-term technologies since they rely largely on software integration with existing systems. Other advances such as microsurgical robotics, soft-robotic platforms, and telesurgery remain longer-term developments requiring new hardware and regulatory pathways. Overcoming barriers through collaborative innovation, structured training, and robust evidence generation is essential for robotics to become a new standard in vascular care.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of regional anesthesia (RA) in enabling arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in patients with small-caliber veins who would typically receive arteriovenous grafts (AVG), and to compare access outcomes between AVF and AVG cohorts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database from 2018 through 2024 involving patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring access creation. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older with inadequate veins for AVF creation based on initial ultrasound vein mapping. All patients underwent RA prior to the access creation and had a repeated intraoperative vein mapping at least 30 min after RA. Patients whose veins were sufficiently dilated and met the criteria for AVF creation underwent AVF formation; otherwise, an AVG was created. Outcomes included access maturation, patency rates, access failure, abandonment, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Of the 106 patients, 67 (63.2%) underwent AVF creation post-RA due to sufficient vein dilation, while 39 (36.8%) received AVGs. Baseline vein diameters and comorbidities were comparable between groups. AVF maturation was achieved in 83.6% of AVF patients, with longer times to successful cannulation compared to AVG (median 187.0 vs 80.0 days, p = 0.037). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in primary patency ( p = 0.97), but AVF patients had superior primary assisted ( p = 0.015) and secondary patency ( p = 0.033), and lower access failure rates ( p = 0.034) compared to AVG patients. Access abandonment and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: RA-induced venodilation enables the use of veins previously deemed inadequate for AVF creation, leading to improved access outcomes compared to AVG placement. Implementing RA may increase AVF utilization and enhance patient outcomes in hemodialysis access surgery.

Background Secondary aortoenteric fistulas (SAEF) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is an extremely rare event but life threatening. Our review offers comprehensive knowledge on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options. Aim To summarize the current literature regarding pathophysiology, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic approach of aortoenteric fistulas secondary to EVAR. Methods We performed a literature search in Pubmed/MEDLINE to identify the literature published about SAEF after EVAR. Cases were summarized in a table and prevalences. Other relevant literature was included in the results sections. Results A total of 35 reports (single cases and small series) with 45 patients were included. SAEF after EVAR can result from infection, inflammation, or mechanical factors. Clinical presentation is often non-specific, ranging from a gastrointestinal herald bleed to hemorrhagic shock, or malaise and general infection-related symptoms. Cross-sectional imaging plays a critical role in diagnosing SAEF. The treatment approach involves a multidisciplinary team approach and requires broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, endovascular intervention for urgent hemorrhage control, and open surgical intervention for definitive repair. Long-term antimicrobial therapy is essential to avoid reinfection. Conclusions SAEF following EVAR represents a complex, life-threatening condition with limited evidence-based management strategies. Given the growing prevalence of endovascular procedures, comprehensive knowledge of SAEF is crucial for all health care providers to improve early diagnosis and outcomes.

Background: Patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (NoCLTI), lacking suitable distal arteries for conventional revascularization, face major limb amputation. The 1-year mortality rate after major amputation is 48.3%, increasing to 70.9% in 3 years. Open deep venous arterialization (DVA) offers a promising alternative for limb salvage, achievable through open, endovascular, or hybrid approaches. We aim to provide a comprehensive, step-by-step guide to performing open DVA in NoCLTI patients, addressing preoperative and postoperative considerations as well as the technical details of the procedure. Methods: Patient selection for open DVA focuses on individuals with NoCLTI at high risk for amputation. Preoperative assessments include evaluating risk factors, determining limb threat severity using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score, and mapping anatomical patterns via the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS). The procedure involves identifying the target artery using Doppler ultrasound, performing microdissection to expose the artery and vein, ligating proximal vein branches, and creating a side-to-side anastomosis. Venous valves are disrupted with a valvulotome to allow antegrade flow. A proximal bypass graft may be applied if necessary. Results: Postoperatively, patients are monitored for 2–4 days with frequent Doppler assessments. Anticoagulation therapy begins with a heparin drip, transitioning to oral agents and/or dual antiplatelet therapy. Wound care includes deferred debridement for 2–4 weeks and may involve negative-pressure therapy. Follow-up involves weekly visits for the first month, and then at 3 months, and every 6 months thereafter, with surveillance using transcutaneous oxygen measurement, the toe–brachial index, and arterial duplex ultrasound. Conclusions: Open DVA represents a viable limb salvage option for patients with NoCLTI, potentially avoiding major amputations and improving quality of life. Success depends on careful patient selection, a meticulous surgical technique, and comprehensive postoperative care.

We present an 81-year-old male with an extensive past medical history and an enlarging abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Axial imaging showed dense aortoiliac calcification with a complete occlusion of the right common iliac and high-grade stenosis of the left common iliac artery (CIA). Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy and the pave-and-crack technique utilizing an endoconduit were used to dilate the left external iliac artery and the CIA to facilitate placement of an aortic stent graft and exclude the patient’s AAA. This method gives surgeons the ability to treat patients with AAAs endovascularly, despite a heavily diseased and/or diminutive iliac anatomy. We also present a contemporary literature review of the utilization of the pave-and-crack technique as well as tips and tricks of how we do it.