Isaq, Nasro A.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with fluctuating activity that requires long-term visual documentation to evaluate disease severity and treatment response. A standardized protocol for photographing HS is critically needed. Objectives: To establish a standardized protocol for using photography to clinically document HS. Methods: We brought together a panel of international experts and used a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on statements about standardized practices for using photography to document HS in clinical practice and research settings. A 75% agreement level was prespecified as the cutoff for consensus. Results: Consensus for photographically documenting HS was developed within 6 key areas: patient preparation, background, lighting, size and reference scale, camera considerations, and patient positioning. The revised and optimized protocol includes 34 standardized reference illustrations. However, the proposed recommendations are for ideal scenarios, and their implementation may not always be practical in a clinical setting. Variations in resources may not have been captured. Conclusions: The proposed consensus-based protocol provides a standard for consistent photographic documentation of HS. This protocol may help clinicians provide better disease surveillance and patient care, and it may aid in more precise and reliable research and clinical trials for HS.

Abstract Background Perianal draining tunnels in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and perianal fistulizing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) present diagnostic and management dilemmas. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with perianal disease evaluated at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 1998, through July 31, 2021. Patients' demographic and clinical data were extracted, and 28 clinical features were collected. After experimenting with several machine learning techniques, random forests were used to select the 15 most important clinical features to construct the diagnostic prediction model to distinguish perianal HS from fistulizing perianal IBD. Results A total of 263 patients were included (98 with HS, 100 with IBD, and 65 with both IBD and HS). Patients with HS had a higher mean body mass index, a higher smoking rate, and more commonly showed cutaneous manifestations of tunnels and comedones, while fistulas, abscesses, induration, anal tags, ulcers, and anal fissures were more common in patients with IBD. In addition to having lesions in the perianal area, patients with IBD often had lesions in the buttocks and perineum, while those with HS had additional lesions in the axillae and groin. Among the statistically significant features, the 15 most important were identified by random forest: fistula , tunnel , digestive symptom , knife‐cut ulcer , perineum , body mass index , age , axilla , abscess , tags , smoking , groin , genital cutaneous edema , erythema , and bilateral/unilateral . Conclusions The results of this study may help differentiate perianal lesions, especially perineal HS and fistulizing perineal IBD, and provide promise for a better therapeutic outcome.

AbstractBackgroundNeutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis (NEH) is a benign neutrophilic dermatosis not well recognized beyond an association with malignancy. Although the disease is commonly reported in adults with malignancy, this association is uncommon in children. The diagnosis of NEH is predominantly based on histologic findings to exclude alternative diagnoses for adults, but biopsy is not usually required for children.MethodsA retrospective study was performed of adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with NEH at three Mayo Clinic sites from January 1, 1992, to January 1, 2022. The aim of this study was to elucidate risk factors for NEH and its clinical characteristics, treatment options, and natural course. Clinical information and pathologic results were collected from health records. Available pathologic slides were reviewed with a dermatopathologist.ResultsOf 47 patients identified, 33 had either histologic or clinical confirmation of the diagnosis; 21 were adults (64%), and 12 were children (36%). Most adults (16/21; 76%) had underlying malignancy and received chemotherapy. Five adults (24%) were classified as having idiopathic NEH, and they were younger and had higher NEH recurrence rates than the other adults. Only one pediatric patient (8%) had underlying malignancy. For 10 children (83%), NEH was preceded by strenuous activity. Initial findings of idiopathic NEH were palmoplantar eruptions for both adult and pediatric patients, whereas malignancy‐associated NEH commonly involved the face and axillae.ConclusionsAmong adults, NEH is commonly associated with malignancy and chemotherapy. Among children, idiopathic NEH occurs primarily after overexertion, and malignancy is highly unlikely to be the cause of NEH.

AbstractDemodex folliculorum is a commensal mite that inhabits the orifices of cutaneous pilosebaceous follicles. Overgrowth of these organisms can lead to Demodex folliculitis, which typically presents as papules and pustules predominantly involving the temples, cheeks, and occasionally the chest. We present a 51‐year‐old woman with iatrogenic Demodex folliculitis secondary to immunosuppressive treatment for an autoimmune connective tissue disease. Histopathological exam of a skin biopsy, which revealed follicular Demodex mites, confirmed the diagnosis. The eruption was treated with oral ivermectin and topical metronidazole gel, and the patient's immunosuppressive regimen was decreased, resulting in marked improvement in the eruption within 6 weeks and no worsening of her underlying autoimmune disorder. This case emphasizes the importance of considering Demodex folliculitis in the differential diagnosis of a new onset rash in the context of immunosuppressive treatment.

AbstractBackgroundInfantile perianal pyramidal protrusion (IPPP) is a rare benign skin condition that is typically seen in infant girls. This condition is often mistaken for other skin lesions such as acrochordons, condyloma acuminatum, and sequelae of sexual abuse. Many clinicians are unfamiliar with IPPP which can lead to aggressive workup and treatment. The purpose of this study was to elucidate demographic data, clinical features, diagnostic workup, and management of IPPP in a large cohort of patients seen at an academic medical center.MethodsA retrospective review of patients diagnosed with IPPP at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN was conducted. Demographic data, examination findings, diagnostic workup, and treatments were noted.ResultsTwenty‐seven patients with IPPP, 24 of which were girls and 3 were boys from the ages of 1 day to 4 years (mean 10.8 months, median 8.6 months) were identified. Symptoms were reported in 63% (17/27) of patients. Four patients received treatment with topical corticosteroid or local anesthetic. No patient underwent skin biopsy.ConclusionIPPP is commonly observed in healthy prepubertal girls. Constipation is a common symptom. Awareness of this entity may prevent overtreatment and unnecessary evaluation.