We report the case of a previously healthy, 6-year-old boy who presented with 2 days of generalized body aches. Given a recent viral illness with cough and congestion, the emergency department’s initial diagnosis of the condition was viral myositis. He was admitted for pain treatment. During his hospitalization, he developed worsening pain, decreased mobility, and intermittent nocturnal desaturations. The team elicited additional history of snoring and witnessed apneas, which raised concern for obstructive sleep apnea. They consulted pulmonology who was concerned for central sleep apnea and respiratory depression and recommended consulting neurology. Neurology recommended a lumbar puncture, the results of which led to the eventual diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of critical reasoning and knowledge of the pediatric presentation of diseases that affect both adults and children.
Parents’ attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey
A central principle of justice is that similar cases should be decided in similar ways. In pediatrics, however, there are cases in which 2 infants have similar diagnoses and prognoses, but their parents request different treatments. In this Ethics Rounds, we present such a situation that occurred in a single NICU. Three physician-ethicists analyze the issues.