Citations 125

Validation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and tumor budding as predictors of prognosis in patients with stage III colon cancers treated in a FOLFOX-based adjuvant trial: NCCTG N0147 (Alliance).

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 3583-3583

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.3583

A phase I/II trial adding poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor veliparib to induction carboplatin-paclitaxel (Carbo-Tax) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Alliance A091101.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 6031-6031

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.6031

Phase I trial of TAS-102 and concurrent radiation therapy for patients with locally recurrent, unresectable or metastatic, rectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS3623-TPS3623

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.tps3623

Abstract LB-305: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled immunoprevention trial with MUC1 vaccine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced adenomas

Cancer Research | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: LB-305-LB-305

10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-lb-305

Abstract Background: Immunotherapy targeting tumor-associated antigens aberrantly expressed on colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps offers the potential for a relatively non-invasive and non-toxic prevention strategy, and because of the specificity of the immune response and its long-term memory, the potential for prolonged protection. In a double-blind randomized trial in patients with a diagnosis of advanced colorectal adenomas within the previous year, we are evaluating MUC1 vaccine with the TLR-3 agonist polyICLC (Hiltonol®) as an adjuvant, for its immunogenicity and effect on colorectal adenoma recurrence at follow up colonoscopy. Aim: We report on a primary endpoint, MUC1 immunogenicity at week 12 (following vaccine or placebo administration at 0, 2, and 10 weeks), and on determinants of the immune response and vaccine toxicity. Methods: Subjects with an advanced adenoma (defined as ≥1cm, tubulovillous or villous histology, or with HGD) were randomized. Response to the vaccine was assessed by monitoring IgG anti-MUC1 antibody titer ratio; defined as t12/t0, where t0 is the initial titer measured prior to vaccination, and t12 is the titer drawn at 12 weeks. A ratio of 2.0 was used as the primary definition of a significant immune response. T Regulatory and myleoid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) levels at baseline were assessed in relation to vaccine response. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Results: 102 subjects were randomized at 6 centers, 52 received MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. Subjects had a mean age of 59.4±7.0 (range 40-70) years, 60.8% were male, 88.2% were white, and 18.6% Hispanic or Latino. At 12 weeks the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 13/52 (25%) of patients receiving vaccine (ratio range 2.9-17.3), vs. 0/50 in placebo group (P=.0001), and was ≥1.5 in 19/52 (36.5%) of patients receiving vaccine compared to 1/50 (2%) in placebo group (P<.0001). In the vaccinated group, the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 45% of women (9/20) vs. 12.5% of men (4/32) (P=0.009) and ≥1.5 in 55% of women (11/20) vs. 25% of men (8/32) (P=0.03). In the vaccinated group, reduced levels of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) pre-vaccination were associated with response, 0.2±0.1 among responders (n=13) vs. 0.8±1.1 among non-responders (N=39) (p=0.0006) whereas monocytic MDSC and T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25, Foxp3) were not. There were no grade 3 adverse events (AE) possibly or probably related to the vaccine. The most common AE was an injection site reaction (grade 1 or 2) which occurred in 80.8% (n=42/52) in vaccine group vs. 6.0% in the placebo group (3/50). Conclusions: Subjects with an advanced adenoma receiving MUC1 vaccine compared with a placebo are significantly more likely to develop an anti-IgG MUC1 immune response at 12 weeks. Women and subjects with lower circulating PMN-MDSC levels at baseline were more likely to respond. The vaccine was well tolerated. Follow up for the effect of the vaccine on adenomatous polyp recurrence is ongoing. Citation Format: Robert E. Schoen, Lisa A. Boardman, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Ajay Bansal, Pamela L. Beatty, David Kastenberg, Chin Hur, Lynda Dzubinski, Luz Rodriguez, Andres Salazar, John McKolanis, Drew Seisler, Nathan R. Foster, May-Yin Polley, Paul J. Limburg, Olivera J. Finn. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled immunoprevention trial with MUC1 vaccine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced adenomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-305.
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Concomitant Radiation followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Results of a Planned Interim Toxicity Analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N044E

Clinical medicine. Oncology | September 14, 2017 | Volume: 2 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.4137/cmo.s444 | PMID 21892283

Purpose This brief report describes a planned, interim, 6-patient toxicity analysis that confirms the safety of pemetrexed, carboplatin, radiation with subsequent surgery, as prescribed in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial N044E, in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Methods Six patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable esophageal cancer received pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 on days 1 and 22 with 5040 centigray of concomitant radiation in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks followed by esophagectomy as a prelude to a phase II multi-institutional trial. Results Only 1 of the 6 patients experienced a grade 4 adverse event (neutropenia). This patient also experienced a grade 3 depression. Of the remaining 5 patients, three experienced at least one grade 3 adverse event (neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, and esophagitis). There were no deaths. Incidentally, one patient manifested a complete pathologic response, three a partial pathologic response, and one stable disease. Conclusion These preliminary observations on safety suggest that this regimen can be further studied in this clinical setting.
Should Vital Signs be Routinely Obtained Prior to Intravenous Chemotherapy? Results from a 2-Center Study

Cancer Control | August 30, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 515-519

10.1177/107327481502200419 | PMID 26678980

A Single-Institution Study of Demographics and Outcomes of Adult Patients with Multiple Cancers

Cancer Control | August 30, 2017 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 455-460

10.1177/107327481602300418 | PMID 27842336

Background Few studies have described the demographics and outcomes in patients with multiple cancers. Methods We reviewed the health records of patients with at least 3 invasive solid-tumor malignancies (lung, colorectal, pancreatic, prostate, breast, or ovarian) diagnosed between 1995 and 2014 at our institution. Results A total of 163 patients were identified. The median age at first cancer diagnosis was 61 years. Sixteen (10%) had a family history of cancer, and 7 (4%) had a cancer-predisposing syndrome. Most had early-stage malignancies and underwent a series of surgical resections. The median survival from the first cancer diagnosis was 14 years (95% confidence interval: 12–16). Forty-three percent developed 4 or more cancers. In univariate analyses, older age, male sex, smoking history, concurrent cancer, and stage IV disease were associated with worse survival; by contrast, breast cancer as the first cancer diagnosis yielded better survival. In multivariate analyses, older age, smoking history, and stage IV disease were associated with worse survival. Conclusions A small group of patients with no ostensible risk factors develop multiple early-stage cancers, receive curative therapy (often surgery), and live for years. These patients merit further study to ascertain the broader prevalence rates of individuals with multiple invasive cancers and to better understand factors that contribute to cancer risk.
Abstract CT076: Multicenter phase II study of nivolumab in previously treated patients with recurrent and metastatic non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma - Mayo clinic Phase 2 Consortium P2C-MN026, NCI9742, NCT02339558

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: CT076-CT076

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-ct076

Abstract Background: Endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) refers to non-keratinizing (NK) subtypes harboring Epstein Barr virus (EBV) that frequently express programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). We recently reported ≥30% of NPC harbor MHC class 1 gene alterations in a whole genome study. Method: We investigated the activity of nivolumab (NIVO) & relationship with PD-L1 & HLA expression (exp) in tumor cells (TC) & tumor infiltrating cells (TIL). Eligible patient (pt)s had to fail ≥ 1 prior line of platinum-based chemo. NIVO (3mg/kg IV, q2 weeks) was given until disease progression (PD). Archived tumors were analyzed for PD-L1 (DAKO) & HLA mutations (indicated by loss of HLA-A &/or B exp). Result: A total of 45 pts were enrolled across 11 sites from Oct 2015 to June 2016. Overall, 43 and 44 pts were evaluable respectively for response rate (RR, RECIST) & adverse events (AE). The median age was 57 years, 77% pts were males & 84% were Asians. The median number of prior chemo was 3 (range 1-9 lines). Of the 43 evaluable pts, there were 8 confirmed (19%, 95% CI: 8-33%) & 1 unconfirmed partial response (PR), 17 PD (40%), 14 stable disease (SD, 33%) & 3 pts were not assessed. One pt (MD015-027) had an unconfirmed clinical CR in an occipital metastasis (met). Pts received a median of 3 cycles of NIVO (range 1 - 14). Median overall survival has not been reached yet. Of the 44 pts evaluable for AE, 8 (18.2%) had grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs & 1 pt died of sepsis. The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were increase in alanine/aspartate aminotransferase (n=3), & 1 pt respectively for hyponatremia, neutropenia, fatigue & diarrhea. Of the 21 tumor samples analyzed, 11/21 (52%) had >1% PD-L1 expressed mainly in TC. Table 1 outlines relationship between RR & PD-L1 exp. All pts with PR had >5% PD-L1 exp & one pt (34003-022) with CR (nasopharynx) & PR (lung mets) had the highest exp (80%). Majority of pts with PD had <1% PD-L1 exp tumors. One primary progressor (34003-032) had a PD-L1 +ve tumor harboring a complete loss of HLA-B signal (TC), but intact signal in TILs & stromal cells. Conclusion: NIVO is active in this heavily pre-treated group of pts with NK-NPC and longer follow-up is needed for survival endpoints. Preliminary result suggests PD-L1 exp may predict benefit from NIVO. The analytical result of all 45 tumors will be presented. Table 1.PD-L1 exp and RECIST response in 21 ptsPD-L1%espRR%PRSDPD0-11<1%-265%24-10%--120%-1-30%11-80%1--Total498 Citation Format: Brigette B. Ma, Boon Cher Goh, Wan T. Lim, Kwok W. Lo, Edwin P. Hui, Jonathan W. Riess, Mark Agulnik, Alex Y. Chang, Julie A. Kish, Dean W. Lim, Douglas R. Adkins, Kevin J. Cullen, Barbara J. Gitlitz, Nathan R. Foster, Adam M. Pettinger, Sanna Mckinzie, Ka F. To, Brian Costello, Howard Streicher, Anthony T. Chan. Multicenter phase II study of nivolumab in previously treated patients with recurrent and metastatic non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma - Mayo clinic Phase 2 Consortium P2C-MN026, NCI9742, NCT02339558 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT076. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT076
North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543 (Alliance): A phase 2 trial of pharmacogenetic‐based dosing of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as first‐line therapy for patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma

Cancer | May 10, 2017 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 3494-3501

10.1002/cncr.30766 | PMID 28493308

BACKGROUNDOxaliplatin in combination with either 5‐fluorouracil or capecitabine is commonly used as first‐line therapy for patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma. The addition of irinotecan improves survival in other gastrointestinal tumors but at the cost of hematologic toxicity. The authors performed a phase 2 cooperative group study (North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543, Alliance) using genotype‐dosed capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (gCAPIRINOX), with dosing assigned based on UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) genotype to test: 1) whether the addition of irinotecan would improve outcomes; and 2) whether UGT1A1 genotype‐based dosing could optimize tolerability.METHODSPreviously untreated patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma received irinotecan (day 1), oxaliplatin (day 1), and capecitabine (days 2‐15) in a 21‐day cycle and were dosed with gCAPIRINOX according to UGT1A1*28 genotypes (6/6, 6/7, and 7/7).RESULTSA total of 33 patients (17 with the 6/6 genotype, 10 with the 6/7 genotype, and 6 with the 7/7 genotype) were enrolled from October 2007 to November 2013; 73% were male, with a mean age of 64 years (range, 41‐77 years). Location of the primary tumor included the duodenum (58%), jejunum (30%), and ileum (9%). The regimen yielded a confirmed response rate of 37.5% (95% confidence interval, 21%‐56%), with a median progression‐free survival of 8.9 months and a median overall survival of 13.4 months. Neither hematologic toxicity (grade ≥3 in 52.9%, 30.0%, and 33.3%, respectively, of the 6/6, 6/7, and 7/7 genotype groups) nor tumor response rate (41.2%, 33%, and 33%, respectively) were found to differ significantly by UGT1A1 genotype.CONCLUSIONSUGT1A1 genotype‐directed dosing (gCAPIRINOX) appears to be feasible with favorable rates of hematologic toxicity compared with prior 3‐drug studies in unselected patients. Larger studies would be needed to determine the regimen's comparability to oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOx) alone or if response/toxicity differs among patients with different UGT1A1 genotypes. Cancer 2017;123:3494‐501. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Bioactivity of Oral Linaclotide in Human Colorectum for Cancer Chemoprevention

Cancer Prevention Research | April 10, 2017 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 345-354

10.1158/1940-6207.capr-16-0286 | PMID 28396341

Abstract Guanylate cyclase C (GUCY2C) is a tumor-suppressing receptor silenced by loss of expression of its luminocrine hormones guanylin and uroguanylin early in colorectal carcinogenesis. This observation suggests oral replacement with a GUCY2C agonist may be an effective targeted chemoprevention agent. Linaclotide is an FDA-approved oral GUCY2C agonist formulated for gastric release, inducing fluid secretion into the small bowel to treat chronic idiopathic constipation. The ability of oral linaclotide to induce a pharmacodynamic response in epithelial cells of the colorectum in humans remains undefined. Here, we demonstrate that administration of 0.87 mg of oral linaclotide daily for 7 days to healthy volunteers, after oral colon preparation with polyethylene glycol solution (MoviPrep), activates GUCY2C, resulting in accumulation of its product cyclic (c)GMP in epithelial cells of the cecum, transverse colon, and distal rectum. GUCY2C activation by oral linaclotide was associated with homeostatic signaling, including phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein and inhibition of proliferation quantified by reduced Ki67-positive epithelial cells. In the absence of the complete oral colonoscopy preparation, linaclotide did not alter cGMP production in epithelial cells of the colorectum, demonstrating that there was an effect related to the laxative preparation. These data show that the current FDA-approved formulation of oral linaclotide developed for small-bowel delivery to treat chronic idiopathic constipation is inadequate for reliably regulating GUCY2C in the colorectum to prevent tumorigenesis. The study results highlight the importance of developing a novel GUCY2C agonist formulated for release and activity targeted to the large intestine for colorectal cancer prevention. Cancer Prev Res; 10(6); 345–54. ©2017 AACR.