Foster, Nathan R.

Abstract Polyphenon E (Poly E) is a green tea polyphenol preparation whose most active component is epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). We studied the cancer preventive efficacy and safety of Poly E in subjects with rectal aberrant crypt foci (ACF), which represent putative precursors of colorectal cancers. Eligible subjects had prior colorectal advanced adenomas or cancers, and had ≥5 rectal ACF at a preregistration chromoendoscopy. Subjects (N = 39) were randomized to 6 months of oral Poly E (780 mg EGCG) daily or placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar by treatment arm (all P >0.41); 32 of 39 (82%) subjects completed 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was percent reduction in rectal ACF at chromoendoscopy comparing before and after treatment. Among 32 subjects (15 Poly E, 17 placebo), percent change in rectal ACF number (baseline vs. 6 months) did not differ significantly between study arms (3.7% difference of means; P = 0.28); total ACF burden was also similar (−2.3% difference of means; P = 0.83). Adenoma recurrence rates at 6 months were similar by arm (P > 0.35). Total drug received did not differ significantly by study arm; 31 (79%) subjects received ≥70% of prescribed Poly E. Poly E was well tolerated and adverse events (AE) did not differ significantly by arm. One subject on placebo had two grade 3 AEs; one subject had grade 2 hepatic transaminase elevations attributed to treatment. In conclusion, Poly E for 6 months did not significantly reduce rectal ACF number relative to placebo. Poly E was well tolerated and without significant toxicity at the dose studied. Prevention Relevance: We report a chemoprevention trial of polyphenon E in subjects at high risk of colorectal cancer. The results show that polyphenon E was well tolerated, but did not significantly reduce the number of rectal aberrant crypt foci, a surrogate endpoint biomarker of colorectal cancer.

Abstract Background: Sorafenib (Sor) remains a first-line option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or refractory renal cell carcinomas (RCC). PLC/PRF/5 HCC model showed upregulation of hypoxia with enhanced efficacy when Sor is combined with hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide (Evo). Methods: This phase IB 3 + 3 design investigated 3 Evo dose levels (240, 340, 480 mg/m2 on days 8, 15, 22), combined with Sor 200 mg orally twice daily (po bid) on days 1-28 of a 28-day cycle. Primary objectives included determining maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of Sor + Evo. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled (median age 62.5 years; 17 male /1 female; 12 HCC/6 RCC) across three dose levels (DL0: Sor 200 mg bid/Evo 240 mg/m2 [n=6], DL1:Sor 200 mg bid/Evo 480 mg/m2 [n=5], DL1a: Sor 200 mg bid/Evo 340 mg/m2 [n=7]). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported with Evo 480 mg/m2 (grade 3 mucositis, grade 4 hepatic failure). Grade 3 rash DLT was observed in one patient at Evo 240 mg/m2. No DLTs were observed at Evo 340 mg/m2. MTD and RP2D were established as Sor 200 mg/Evo 340 mg/m2 and Sor 200/Evo 240 mg/m2, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and nausea/vomiting. Two partial responses were observed, one each at DL0 and DL1a.; disease control rate was 55%.Conclusions: RP2D was established as sorafenib 200 mg bid + Evo 240 mg/m2. While preliminary anti-tumor activity was observed, future development must account for advances in immunotherapy in HCC/RCC. NCT01497444Date of registration December 20, 2011

AbstractBackgroundEligibility criteria and endpoints for cancer cachexia trials—and whether weight loss should be included—remain controversial. Although most cachexia trials enrol patients after initial cancer diagnosis, few studies have addressed whether weight loss well after a cancer diagnosis is prognostic.MethodsWe pooled data from non‐small cell lung cancer patients from prospectively conducted trials within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (1998–2008), a nationally funded infrastructure. We examined (i) weight data availability and weight changes and (ii) survival.ResultsA total of 822 patients were examined. Of these, 659 (80%) were on treatment at the beginning of Cycle 2 of chemotherapy; weight was available for 656 (80%). By Cycles 3 and 4, weight was available for 448 (55%) and 384 (47%), respectively. From baseline to immediately prior to Cycle 2, 208 (32%) gained weight; 225 (34%) lost <2% of baseline weight; and 223 (34% of 656) lost 2% or more. Median survival from the beginning of Cycle 2 was 13.0, 10.9, and 6.9 months for patients with weight gain, weight loss of <2%, and weight loss of 2% or more, respectively. In multivariate analyses, adjusted for age, sex, performance score, type of treatment, and body mass index, weight loss of 2% or more was associated with poor overall survival compared with weight gain [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33–2.07; P < 0.001] and compared with weight loss of <2% (HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27–1.95; P < 0.001). Although weight loss of <2% was not associated with poorer overall survival compared with weight gain, it was associated with poorer progression‐free survival (HR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01–1.51; P = 0.036). Similar findings were observed in a separate 255‐patient validation cohort.ConclusionsWeight should be integrated into cancer cachexia trials because of its ease of frequent measurement and sustained prognostic association.

Abstract Immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoints has become a common approach for many types of cancer but currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict and monitor treatment response. Immunohistochemical staining of PD-L1, which was initially developed as a companion diagnostic, is problematic due to tumor heterogeneity, variations in specimen preparation and multiple scoring schemes. There is, therefore, a critical need for a better biomarker to guide the use of immunotherapy to improve clinical outcomes. We previously reported that higher levels of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in CD8+ T cells were associated with increased response to PD-1 blockade therapy in patients with melanoma; high levels of Bim were also prognostic of poor survival in melanoma patients. In this study, we investigated the roles of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in patients receiving PD-1 blockade therapy (i.e. pembrolizumab) for small bowel adenocarcinoma as part of planned correlative analysis of the ACCRU clinical trial, NCT02949219. Patients with unresectable or metastatic biopsy-proven small bowel adenocarcinoma (excluding ampulla of Vater and appendix) who had at least one prior line of systemic chemotherapy were eligible for the trial. Pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered over 30 minutes intravenously every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or patient refusal. All patients underwent peripheral blood collection at baseline prior to initiation of treatment and then after 3 cycles of treatment. Levels of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in circulating T cells were quantified by flow cytometry using patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Data was analyzed via Cox proportional hazards model, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test, and Kaplan Meier curves using SAS 9.4. A total of 35 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Three patients had confirmed response (all partial responses) and 10 had stable disease as their best overall response. Seven patients had disease progression around the second blood draw. The median time from baseline to the second blood draw was 9 weeks. Lower levels of Bim in CD8+CD11ahi T cells at baseline on the percentage scale were associated with treatment response (median 54.5% vs. 79.5%; p=0.0087) and disease control (partial response plus stable disease; median 71.2% vs. 81.3%; p=0.0104) but higher levels led to worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio=1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.08; p=0.0051). In addition, positive changes in CX3CR1/granzyme B in CD8+CD11ahi T cells from baseline were associated with better overall survival (median 20.2 months vs. 3.7 months, p=0.0086). The levels of PD-1 and Ki-67 in CD8+CD11ahi T cells were not associated with treatment response or survival. In conclusion, Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B are biomarkers that associate with response and survival benefits respectively of PD-1 blockade therapy. This preliminary data calls for a larger-scale, prospective study to validate their predictive and prognostic utilities. Citation Format: Mojun Zhu, Henan Zhang, Nathan R. Foster, Haidong Dong, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, Brandy L. Jaszewski, Patrick M. Boland, Michael J. Overman, Katrina Pedersen, Robert R. McWilliams, Academic and Community Cancer Research United (AACRU). Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in circulating CD8+ T cells are predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4467.

Abstract Barrett's esophagus (BE), a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), predisposes patients to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Reliable biomarkers for early detection and discovery of potential drug targets are urgently needed for improved BE and EAC patient outcomes. In this study, COX2 and TBXAS are highly expressed in BE and EAC patients accompanied by a pronounced elevation of circulating TXA2 levels in patient biopsy samples. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) suppressed BE and EAC growth by targeting the TXA2 pathway in a esophagoduodenostomy mouse model of reflux. Additionally, biopsies from patients showed that ASA substantially decreased serum TXA2 levels, resulting in reduced inflammation in a window opportunity clinical trial. Overall, this study establishes the importance of the COX1/2-driven TXA2 pathway in BE and EAC pathophysiology and lays the groundwork for introducing a TXA2-targeting strategy for EAC prevention and early detection. ASA targets the TXA2 pathway and suppresses BE and EAC. Citation Format: Tianshun Zhang, Qiushi Wang, Wei-Ya Ma, Keke Wang, Xiaoyu Chang, Michele L. Johnson, Ruihua Bai, Ann M. Bode, Nathan R. Foster, Gary W. Falk, Prasad G. Iyer, Zigang Dong. Inhibition of COX1/2-driven thromboxane A2 pathway suppresses Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma development [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2593.

11093 Background: Defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) results in microsatellite instability (MSI) and is detected in approximately 15% of sporadic colon cancers. MMR status has been shown to provide prognostic and predictive information in primary colon cancers. We sought to develop a model to predict MMR deficiency using clinically available data, and thereby facilitate patient selection for MMR or MSI testing. Methods: TNM stage II and III colon carcinomas (n= 982) were studied from six 5- fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy trials conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. MMR status in tumors had been analyzed by MSI (using mono- and dinucleotide markers) or by immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins (hMLH1 and hMSH2). Logistic regression and a recursive partitioning and amalgamation (RPA) analysis was used to identify important predictive factors of MMR status. Factors explored included age, gender, histologic grade, tumor site, stage, lymph node metastases, and T-stage. Results: Defective MMR was found in147 (15%) cancers. Tumor site was the most important predictor of MMR status followed by histologic grade. Distal tumors had a low likelihood of defective MMR (3% rate overall; 13/468), whereas proximal tumors had a greater likelihood of defective MMR (26%; 130/506). For patients with proximal tumors, the addition of histologic grade and gender increased the prediction of defective MMR ( Table ). Using tumor site, histologic grade, and gender, the logistic regression model showed excellent discrimination (c- statistic = 0.81). Conclusions: Tumor site is an important predictor of defective MMR that is rare in distal and increased in proximal tumors. The combination of proximal site, poor differentiation, and female gender resulted in a 51% likelihood of defective MMR. Therefore, this model can facilitate the selection of sporadic colon cancers for MMR or MSI testing to enable its use in clinical decision-making. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

11088 Background: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer. However, the influence of body mass index (BMI) upon the prognosis of patients with established colon cancer remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 1,803 patients with surgically resected stage III colon cancer who were enrolled in five randomized trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Patient height and weight were recorded at study entry and BMI (kg/m2) was calculated and categorized. Cancer recurrence or death were monitored during 5 years of follow-up. The score and likelihood ratio p-values were determined from univariate and multivariate Cox regression models respectively, after stratifying by study. Results: Among stage III colon cancer patients, 19% were obese (BMI 30 kg/m2), 37% were overweight (BMI, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2), 38% were of normal-weight (BMI, 20 to 24.9 kg/m2), and 6% were underweight (BMI < 20 kg/m2). Obese versus normal-weight patients showed higher rates of lymph node (LN) metastasis (>3 LNs; 38% vs. 29%, p <0.01) and tumor site was more likely to be distal versus proximal (52% vs. 45%, p= 0.03). No differences in age, gender, or histologic grade were found. In a univariate analysis, obese patients had significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) compared with normal-weight patients (hazard ratio 1.25 (95% CI: 1.04 -1.51; p= 0.02). The 5 year DFS rates were 49% in obese patients versus 57% in normal weight subjects. Furthermore, poorer DFS was observed for obese patients after adjusting for age, sex, histologic grade, and tumor site (p= 0.03). Neither overweight nor underweight patients (vs. normal-weight) had significantly different DFS. Analysis of the predictive impact of BMI for 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy is in progress. Conclusions: Obesity (BMI 30 kg/m2) was associated with a greater number of metastatic lymph nodes and poorer disease-free survival in patients with stage III colon cancer, suggesting that obesity influences tumor progression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8085 Background: Historically, tumor response has been the primary endpoint in phase II (P2) trials in ED-SCLC. We investigated the suitability of alternate PFS based endpoints to predict OS as early evidence of efficacy in the P2 setting. Methods: Individual patient (pt) data from 942 pts from 11 previously untreated ED-SCLC P2 and phase III (P3) platinum- or paclitaxel-based treatment trials were pooled. Best response (BR), response confirmed (RC), objective status at 16 weeks (RR16), and PFS rate at 5 and 6 months were considered. Percent agreement (PA) and kappa (k) for PFS5, PFS6, BR, RC, and RR16 with OS at 12 months (OS12) was calculated on a per-pt basis and predictive utility was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (A- ROC) curve in logistic models. Cox models were used to assess the prognostic impact of the endpoints on subsequent survival, using landmark analysis. Results: The median OS and PFS were 9.6 m and 5.5 m, respectively. PFS5 and PFS6 had the highest PA, k, and A-ROC values, and were predictive of subsequent survival in the landmark analysis (p <0.0001; c-statistics ≥ 0.60). While RR16 and BR were significantly associated with subsequent survival (p<0.0001, c-statistics of 0.61 and 0.57, respectively) the PA, k, and A-ROC values were lower. Conclusions: PFS rate at 5 and 6 months is more predictive of 12-month OS and subsequent survival than tumor response in untreated ED-SCLC. PFS based endpoints should be routinely used as primary endpoints in P2 trials within ED-SCLC. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

6512 Background: The use of randomized phase II designs with an experimental arm and a standard-treatment control arm (R2PII) instead of a conventional single-arm design is clearly increasing in oncology. In practice, sample size, related cost issues, the belief that historical controls are adequate, and the use of a standard-treatment control arm in a phase II setting are frequently raised objections to R2PII trials. As the expense and complexity of definitive phase III trials increase, the ability of phase II trials to provide reliable and accurate results is critical. Methods: We investigated the ability of single arm vs R2PII trials to provide accurate conclusions by modeling variability in historical controls, patient outcome drifts independent of the tested therapy, and patient selection effects. Simulations compared R2PII and single-arm designs with binary endpoints under realistic parameters (e.g. alpha = beta = 0.10, historical control success rate = 20%, target success rate = 40%). Results: In the absence of variability in historical controls, estimated false positive and negative rates in both designs mirror the designated specifications. However, even in the presence of a modest drift effect in the population (mean 5% absolute shift in true control success rate), the false positive rate in single-arm designs is inflated two to three fold (to 20%-30%), while the R2PII retains the desired error rates. Greater confidence in historical controls in the single-arm design corrects only a small portion of the deviations. Increasing the sample size in each trial inflates the false positive error rate further to as much as 50%. Varying several sets of parameters gave similar results. Conclusions: In the presence of variability in historical controls, patient drift and/or selection effects, the false positive error rate of a single arm design is unacceptably high. In contrast, the R2PII design is reliable and robust despite the complexities in patient outcome drift and selection effects, and variability in historical control success rates. Given the rapid improvements in outcomes of many tumor types, the R2PII design should be the preferred method to evaluate novel agents in oncology in spite of the associated costs and the use of a reference control arm. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

6512 Background: Lenvatinib is an approved therapy for patients with RAIR DTC. While the overall response rate (ORR) is high, few patients achieve a complete response (CR) and most patients eventually have progressive disease (PD). Combination lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is being explored in many different cancers, and this combination has been approved for advanced endometrial carcinoma. Methods: Patients with RAIR DTC with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST v1.1) measurable PD (<14 months (mo) prior to registration) were enrolled in this single-arm multicenter phase II study. Patients were excluded if they had received previous VEGFR-directed multikinase therapy. The lenvatinib starting dose was 20 mg/day orally and pembrolizumab was 200mg IV every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was CR. ORR, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 were secondary endpoints. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. The median age was 62.5 years, and 53% of the patients were women. Seventy percent of patients had grade 3 adverse events (AEs) and 10 percent had grade 4 AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common > grade 3 AEs were hypertension (47%), weight loss (13%), maculopapular rash (13%), leukopenia (7%), diarrhea (7%) and oral mucositis (7%). Twenty-one patients (70%) required lenvatinib dose reduction. Of 29 evaluable patients, 18 (62%) had a partial response (PR) and 10 (35%) had stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (ORR +SD) was 97%. Median time to tumor nadir was 7.4 mo (1.6-17.8 mo). Median PFS was not yet reached. The PFS at 12 months was 74%. Median time on therapy was 9.9 mo (3.2-18.9 mo). Fourteen patients are continuing therapy (7.6-18.9 mo). Six of these patients (43%) have not yet reached tumor size nadir. Three patients (10%) had > 80% target tumor shrinkage. Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is reasonably tolerated in patients with RAIR DTC. To date, there have been no documented complete responses. Combination lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab therapy has a high ORR in patients with RAIR DTC. Continuation of this study will help determine the depth and length of the responses. Clinical trial information: NCT02973997 .