Borges, Virginia F.

12081 Background: Young women with breast cancer may be at increased risk for premature development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in part due to their cancer treatment. Limited data are available on CVD risk among young breast cancer survivors. Methods: Women aged 30-40 years at diagnosis with stage 0-III breast cancer enrolled in a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤40 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Data were obtained from serial surveys and electronic medical records at breast cancer diagnosis and 5-year follow-up. We calculated “excess heart age,” which incorporates a CVD risk-based score (calculated using age, systolic blood pressure, blood pressure medication, diabetes, smoking, body mass index) to estimate the difference in years between an individual’s chronological age and their CVD-risk adjusted age. Multivariable logistic regression models (adjusting for age at diagnosis, stage, and race) were fitted to evaluate associations between treatment (radiation, endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and trastuzumab) and having a change in excess heart age ≥2 years from baseline to 5 years. Results: Among 372 young breast cancer survivors, mean age at diagnosis was 36.6 (SD 2.89), 93% were white, and 79% were diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer. Mean excess heart age was.32 (SD: 6.16) years at baseline, which declined to -.07 (SD 6.64) at 5-year follow-up (p=.17). At 5 years, 31% (n=114) of women experienced an increase of at least 2 years in their excess heart age since diagnosis, and their mean excess heart age was 4.34 years (range -9 to 30). In multivariable analyses, receipt of trastuzumab was associated with higher odds (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.77) of experiencing an increase of ≥2 years in excess heart age between diagnosis and 5 years of follow-up. Endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and radiation were not significantly associated with a change in excess heart age of ≥2 years at 5 years post-diagnosis. Conclusions: At 5 years post-diagnosis, approximately 1/3 of young breast cancer survivors experienced a change from baseline in their excess heart age of ≥2 years. Further research is warranted to confirm findings regarding trastuzumab and excess heart age, and potential effects on longer-term cardiac outcomes in this population. Extended follow-up of this cohort may further quantify CVD risk over time.[Table: see text]

e24108 Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased risk of hematologic malignancies and heart disease. Limited data suggest an increased prevalence of CHIP in patients treated for solid tumors, particularly after exposure to radiation and chemotherapy. CHIP testing may inform risk-reduction strategies for cancer survivors. Little is known about patient knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding CHIP testing. Methods: We surveyed survivors without history of recurrence participating in an ongoing prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The survey was sent by email and included an introduction to CHIP including risk factors and clinical associations. Respondents then reviewed a vignette and were asked about CHIP testing preferences (definitely/probably test vs. definitely/probably not test) considering sequentially: 1) population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematological malignancy and heart disease; 2) estimated increase in these risks with CHIP; 3) current CHIP management; 4) a dedicated CHIP clinic; and 5) a theoretical CHIP treatment. Changes in preferences from the prior scenario were evaluated with the McNemar's test using a type I error rate of 5%. Results: 528/642 (82.2%) eligible women responded to the survey, at a median age of 46 (range: 31-54) years (median time from diagnosis: 108 months (range: 60-168)), and 88% were white. Most had stage 1/2 BC (78.8%) and had received chemotherapy (73.1%) and/or radiation (61.9%). 93.6% had never heard of CHIP prior to survey. After initial patient vignette presentation, most women (87.1%,) recommended CHIP testing if offered. Preferences for testing decreased (p<0.05) when considering population-based risks, with 11.1% shifting their preference from CHIP testing to not testing. After considering increased risks associated with CHIP, interest in testing increased (p<0.05), with 10.1% shifting their preference to testing. Interest significantly (p<0.05) increased with the possibility of managing CHIP through a clinic or a hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching their preferences towards testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% responded that they themselves, after learning about CHIP and reviewing the vignette, would want to have CHIP testing; 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP and the associated risks caused them at least moderate anxiety. Conclusion: Few young BC survivors were aware of CHIP yet most indicated an interest in testing after learning about it. Testing preferences were influenced by risks presented and potential management strategies. Findings highlight the importance of effective risk communication and the need for adequate psychosocial support when considering testing for CHIP and other potential clinical biomarkers predictive of cancer and other medical risks in cancer survivors.

TPS595 Background: Patients (pts) with HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) and invasive residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have a higher risk of relapse than pts with a pathologic complete response (pCR). Post neoadjuvant T-DM1 has improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), but pts with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or nodal RD have suboptimal outcomes and recurrences in the central nervous system are a problem. More effective treatment strategies are needed. The CompassHER2 trials, EA1181 and A011801, leverage pCR to tailor post neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ EBC. EA1181 is a NAT de-escalation trial of a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) in clinical stage II-III HER2+ EBC; pts with a pCR complete HP +/- adjuvant radiation (RT) +/- endocrine therapy (ET). A011801 is an escalation trial for pts with high risk HER2+ RD after NAT, examining addition of the HER2 selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) tucatinib to adjuvant T-DM1. Methods: Eligibility and Intervention: Pts. with high-risk HER2+ RD (e.g. ER-,node-positive, or both) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1+ placebo (pb), vs. T-DM1 and tucatinib with adjuvant RT +/- ET. Eligibility criteria include completion of ≥ 6 cycles of NAT, including ≥ 9 weeks of T and H +/- P. All chemotherapy (CT) must be completed preoperatively unless participating in EA1181 (̃15-30% enrollees); these pts must receive postoperative CT to complete ≥ 6 cycles prior to enrollment on A011801. Pts who received prior HER2-targeted TKIs or antibody-drug conjugates are ineligible. Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if iDFS is higher with addition of T-DM1 to tucatinib in pts with HER2+ EBC with RD after NAT; secondary endpoints include overall survival, breast cancer free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, brain metastases-free survival and disease-free survival. Correlative objectives include the association of i) tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) levels in the primary tumor and RD with iDFS, ii) TILs with tucatinib benefit, iii) iDFS and circulating tumor cells (CTC) at serial timepoints and iv) the magnitude of benefit of tucatinib (iDFS) in pts with/without detectable pretreatment CTCs. Quality of life and pharmacokinetic endpoints will also be evaluated. Statistics: A011801 is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase III superiority trial; stratified by i) receipt of postoperative CT (Y/N), ii) hormone receptor-status (+/-),and iii) pathologic lymph node status (+/-). The study targets an absolute difference of 5% in iDFS (control vs. experimental arm 82% & 87%, HR = 0.7), with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. The sample size is 981; target accrual = 1031 pts; activation and completion dates are 01/6/21 and ̃ 01/2028. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Seagen Inc; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04457596 Clinical trial information: NCT04457596.

BackgroundThe diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can have profound effects on a young woman's family planning and fertility, particularly among women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.MethodsThe Young Women's Breast Cancer Study was a multicenter cohort of women aged 40 years or younger and newly diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016. Surveys included assessments of fertility concerns, endocrine therapy (ET) preferences, and use. Characteristics were compared between women who reported that fertility concerns affected ET decisions and those who did not. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having an ET decision affected by fertility concerns.ResultsOf 643 eligible women with hormone receptor–positive, stage I to III breast cancer, one‐third (213 of 643) indicated that fertility concerns affected ET decisions. In a multivariable analysis, only parity at diagnosis was significantly associated with fertility concerns affecting ET decisions (odds ratio for nulliparous vs ≥2 children, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 4.09‐11.83; odds ratio for 1 vs ≥2 children, 5.30; 95% confidence interval, 3.03‐9.87). Noninitiation/nonpersistence was higher among women with fertility concerns versus those without fertility concerns (40% vs 20%; P < .0001). Among women with fertility‐related ET concerns, 7% (15 of 213) did not initiate ET, and 33% (70 of 213) were nonpersistent over 5 years of follow‐up. Of these women, 66% (56 of 85) reported 1 or more pregnancies or pregnancy attempts; 27% (15 of 56) had resumed ET at the last available follow‐up through 5 years.ConclusionsConcern about fertility is a contributor to adjuvant ET decisions among a substantial proportion of young breast cancer survivors. Ensuring family planning is addressed in the setting of ET recommendations should be a priority throughout the cancer care continuum.

Abstract BackgroundCancer diagnosis and early treatment may have wide-ranging consequences for a woman’spartner (ie. spouse or significant other). In general, younger caregivers have been found to havegreater unmet needs and higher levels of distress compared to those who are older. To date,there is little known about the unmet needs and experiences of partners who care for youngwomen with breast cancer during active treatment.Trial Design: Cross-sectional survey of partners of young women with breast cancer.Eligibility Criteria: The current analysis focuses on a subset of respondent partners of womenwith breast cancer participating in the Young Womens Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246)who met the following criteria: diagnosed at age &lt; 40 years; time since diagnosis &lt;12 months;and/or Stage IV disease (at diagnosis or in metastatic setting); and/or local recurrent disease&lt; 12 months.Specific Aims: To explore the experience of partners of women in active treatment or havingvery recently completed treatment for breast cancer.Statistical Methods: We employed descriptive statistics to present sample characteristics,including means or medians for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables.We assessed partners’ responses re: sociodemographics, perceived social support (MOS-Social Support Survey, Cancer Perceived Agents of Social Support), quality of life (QOL)(Caregiver QOL Index-Cancer), coping (Brief COPE), perceived financial security, perceivedparenting concerns (Parenting Concerns Questionnaire), anxiety and depression symptoms(Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), sexual satisfaction (Global Measure of SexualSatisfaction), posttraumatic growth (Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-Short Form), and an open-ended question to explore their experiences and needs.Accrual: 25 participants were included.Results: All partners were male (25/25; 100%), and most were white (n=23/25; 92%), workingfull-time (n=21/25; 91%); and college educated (n=19/25; 86%). Eighteen partners (n=18/25;72%) were parenting children &lt;18 years old and 40% (n=10/25) were partnered with womenwith Stage 4 breast cancer. At the time of the survey, the median age of partners was 44 years(range, 28-69) and of patients was 38 years (range, 25-40). Many partners (57%) reportedsymptoms of anxiety (&gt;8 on the HADS anxiety subscale), fewer (22%) were categorized ashaving symptoms of depression (&gt;8 on the HADS depression subscale). Additionally, 39%reported not being sexually active; 41% reported maladaptive coping; 30% reported financialstrain;30% reported relationship strain. Reported caregiver QOL ranged from 22-116, with amean score of 52.5 (SD, 23.9), similar to population norms, with higher scores indicating lowerquality of life. Parenting concerns scores were generally low indicating less concern, with arange of 12-35, and mean of 20.5 (SD, 7.6). Post-traumatic growth ranged from 4-33, with amean score of 20.7 (SD, 7.4), with higher scores indicating greater personal growthexperienced. 44% (11/25) responded to the open-ended experiences and needs question.Common responses included feeling a lack of support, need for tailored and titrated information,and desire to connect with other men who faced similar experiences. Partners also reportedtheir struggles with uncertainty about the future. Discussion: A subset of partners of young women in active treatment for breast cancerexpressed concerns related to relationship strain, sexuality, need for support, and finances.Future work designed to meet the needs of partners of breast cancer patients includinginformational and psychosocial supports may benefit them and the patients as they manage theprocess of ongoing treatment and challenges about the future. Citation Format: Tamryn F Gray, Nancy Borstelmann, Shoshana Rosenberg, Shari Gelber, Meghan E Meyer, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Lidia Schapira, Steven Come, Virginia Borges, Tamara Cadet, Peter Maramaldi, Ann H. Partridge. The psychosocial impact of caregiving on partners of young women with breast cancer in treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-08.

Abstract Background: Young age at diagnosis is an independent risk factor for recurrence and death from breast cancer (BC), with the greatest impact of young age demonstrated in hormone receptor positive (HR+) disease. Younger women are less likely to be adherent to endocrine therapy (ET), which may contribute to disparate outcomes. Methods: As part of a prospective cohort that enrolled women with BC diagnosed at age ≤40 between 2006-2016, we identified women with HR+, Stage I-III BC. Serial surveys with items assessing socio-demographic and treatment information including medication use are administered 1-2 times per year. Medical record review was used to ascertain stage and HR status and to confirm recurrent disease (locoregional, distant, or new primary breast cancer). Women who initiated ET but discontinued it &lt;5-years post-diagnosis without resumption were classified as non-persistent. Univariable and multivariable regression models were fit to identify predictors of non-persistence and recurrence.Results: Among 607 women who initiated ET (median age at diagnosis: 36, range:17-40; 38%, 45%, 17% were Stage 1, 2, and 3, respectively).16% (99/607) were non-persistent, of whom 30% (30/99) discontinued ET ≤2 years post-diagnosis and over half had discontinued (54%, 54/99) by 3 years. In multivariable regression, those who were younger at diagnosis (age ≤30 vs. 36-40: OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.84-6.24; age 31-36 vs. 36-40: OR: 2.81 95% CI: 1.70-4.64) were more likely to discontinue ET while those with a higher stage at diagnosis were less likely to discontinue ET (Stage 2 vs. 1: OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.74; Stage 3 vs 1: OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.15-0.68). At a median follow-up time from diagnosis of 7.8 years (range 1-13 years), 15% of women (88/607) recurred or developed a new primary BC at a median time from diagnosis of 3.5 years (range 1-12 years). Of these, 66% (58/88) were distant recurrences, 32% (28/88) loco-regional, and 2% (2/88) new primary BCs. Rates of recurrence were higher among women who were persistent (81/508, 16%) vs. non-persistent (7/99, 7%, p=0.02). In multivariable regression, those who were non-persistent were less likely to recur (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19-0.98) while those with a higher stage were more likely to recur (Stage 3 vs. 1: OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.03-5.41). Sociodemographic, patient, and other treatment factors did not predict recurrence. Conclusions: Approximately 16% of young women with HR+ BC stop ET earlier than indicated, however non-persistence was not a risk factor for BC recurrence a median of 8 years following diagnosis in our cohort. Importantly, women with higher risk disease who are likely to benefit most from adherence to ET were less likely to discontinue treatment. Extended follow-up will further inform the impact of non-persistence on the incidence of late recurrences for which women with HR+ BC are at increased risk. Citation Format: Shoshana M Rosenberg, Yue Zheng, Philip Poorvu, Kathryn Ruddy, Rachel Gaither, Rulla Tamimi, Lidia Schapira, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Steven Come, Virginia Borges, Ann Partridge. Endocrine therapy non-persistence and recurrence in young women with early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-08.

Objective: We aimed to investigate eligibility for breast conserving surgery (BCS) pre- and post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), and trends in the surgical treatment of young breast cancer patients. Background: Young women with breast cancer are more likely to present with larger tumors and aggressive phenotypes, and may benefit from NST. Little is known about how response to NST influences surgical decisions in young women. Methods: The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multicenter prospective cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40, enrolled 1302 patients from 2006 to 2016. Disease characteristics, surgical recommendations, and reasons for choosing mastectomy among BCS-eligible patients were obtained through the medical record. Trends in use of NST, rate of clinical and pathologic complete response, and surgery were also assessed. Results: Of 1117 women with unilateral stage I-III breast cancer, 315 (28%) received NST. Pre-NST, 26% were BCS eligible, 17% were borderline eligible, and 55% were ineligible. After NST, BCS eligibility increased from 26% to 42% (P < 0.0001). Among BCS-eligible patients after NST (n = 133), 41% chose mastectomy with reasons being patient preference (53%), BRCA or TP53 mutation (35%), and family history (5%). From 2006 to 2016, the rates of NST (P = 0.0012), clinical complete response (P < 0.0001), and bilateral mastectomy (P < 0.0001) increased, but the rate of BCS did not increase (P = 0.34). Conclusion: While the proportion of young women eligible for BCS increased after NST, many patients chose mastectomy, suggesting that surgical decisions are often driven by factors beyond extent of disease and treatment response.

BackgroundMany young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer are interested in future pregnancies. Prospective data regarding fertility interest and reproductive patterns after diagnosis are needed to counsel patients.MethodsThe Young Women's Breast Cancer Study is a multicenter, prospective cohort of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40 years between 2006 and 2016. Women complete surveys at baseline, every 6 months for 3 years, then annually. Here, the authors describe fertility interest and pregnancies within 5 years of diagnosis for women with stage 0 through III breast cancer.ResultsOf 1026 eligible participants, 368 (36%) reported interest in future biologic children at least once within 5 years after diagnosis, including 16% at 5 years after diagnosis. Among 130 women who attempted to become pregnant, 90 (69.2%) conceived; and, among 896 women who did not attempt to conceive, 18 (2.0%) became pregnant, with a total of 152 pregnancies resulting in 91 live births. Factors associated with pregnancy included younger versus older age at diagnosis (aged ≤30 vs 36‐40 years: odds ratio [OR], 6.63; 95% CI, 3.18‐13.83; P < .0001; aged 31‐35 vs 36‐40 years: OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.37‐10.17; P < .0001) and being nulliparous versus parous (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.56‐4.53; P = .001). The receipt of endocrine therapy versus no endocrine therapy (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20‐0.59; P = .001) was inversely associated with pregnancy.ConclusionsMany women remain interested in future fertility in the 4 years after a breast cancer diagnosis, indicating that longitudinal fertility discussions are needed. Although a minority of those interested in having children attempted to become pregnant in the first 5 years, most who attempted to conceive did so and had live births.