Citations 5

Genome-wide association analysis identifies PLA2G4C as a susceptibility locus for Multiple System Atrophy

No container title available | February 6, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-3461290/v1

Abstract To elucidate the molecular basis of multiple system atrophy (MSA), a neurodegenerative disease, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in a Japanese MSA case/control series followed by replication studies in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, European, and North American samples. In the GWAS stage, rs2303744 on chromosome 19 showed a suggestive association (P = 6.5 × 10− 7) that was replicated in additional Japanese samples (P = 2.9 × 10− 6, odds ratio (OR) = 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.30–1.91), and then confirmed as highly significant in a meta-analysis of East Asian population data (P = 5.0 × 10− 15, OR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.35–1.65). The association of rs2303744 with MSA remained significant in combined European/North American samples (P = 0.017, OR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.02–1.23) despite allele frequencies being quite different between these populations. rs2303744 leads to an amino acid substitution in PLA2G4C that encodes the cPLA2γ lysophospholipase/transacylase. The cPLA2γ-Ile143 isoform encoded by the MSA risk allele has significantly decreased transacylase activity compared with the alternate cPLA2γ-Val143 isoform, and may perturb membrane phospholipids and promote oligodendroglial pathology.
The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy

Movement Disorders | April 21, 2022 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1131-1148

10.1002/mds.29005 | PMID 35445419

ABSTRACT Background The second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) are widely recognized as the reference standard for clinical research, but lack sensitivity to diagnose the disease at early stages. Objective To develop novel Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for MSA diagnosis using an evidence‐based and consensus‐based methodology. Methods We identified shortcomings of the second consensus criteria for MSA diagnosis and conducted a systematic literature review to answer predefined questions on clinical presentation and diagnostic tools relevant for MSA diagnosis. The criteria were developed and later optimized using two Delphi rounds within the MSA Criteria Revision Task Force, a survey for MDS membership, and a virtual Consensus Conference. Results The criteria for neuropathologically established MSA remain unchanged. For a clinical MSA diagnosis a new category of clinically established MSA is introduced, aiming for maximum specificity with acceptable sensitivity. A category of clinically probable MSA is defined to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity. A research category of possible prodromal MSA is designed to capture patients in the earliest stages when symptoms and signs are present, but do not meet the threshold for clinically established or clinically probable MSA. Brain magnetic resonance imaging markers suggestive of MSA are required for the diagnosis of clinically established MSA. The number of research biomarkers that support all clinical diagnostic categories will likely grow. Conclusions This set of MDS MSA diagnostic criteria aims at improving the diagnostic accuracy, particularly in early disease stages. It requires validation in a prospective clinical and a clinicopathological study. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
A critique of the second consensus criteria for multiple system atrophy

Movement Disorders | April 30, 2019 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 975-984

10.1002/mds.27701 | PMID 31034671

Recommendations of the Global Multiple System Atrophy Research Roadmap Meeting

Neurology | December 13, 2017 | Volume: 90 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 74-82

10.1212/wnl.0000000000004798 | PMID 29237794

Variants associated with Gaucher disease in multiple system atrophy

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology | February 28, 2015 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 417-426

10.1002/acn3.185 | PMID 25909086