Reddy, Yogesh N.V.

Abstract Background Diuretic resistance (DR) is the failure to achieve adequate natriuresis despite high diuretic doses, reflecting a state of low diuretic efficiency (DE). In heart failure (HF) and general intensive care cohorts, low DE and the presence of DR have been associated with adverse outcomes, including increased risk of rehospitalization and mortality (1-3). Quantitative data, however, remains limited in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) – a population characterized by cardiac critical illnesses and substantial cardiorenal interactions. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate and characterize the association between DR and associated mortality outcomes in CICU patients. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adult CICU patients (2007-2018) who received loop diuretics on day 1 of admission. Patients with a stay <1 day or oliguria [<400mL urine output (UOP) total] were excluded. DR was defined as <500mL of UOP per 40mg oral furosemide equivalent (FSE). Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined per KDIGO guidelines. Primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality (including CICU deaths), and secondary outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. In-hospital mortality predictors were evaluated using logistic regression and 1-year mortality predictors by Cox proportional-hazards models. 1-year survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariable models were adjusted for known confounders. Results 3,229 total patients were included. Median age was 71.2 (61.2, 80.7) years and 41.3% were female. Admission diagnoses included HF exacerbation (79.9%), acute coronary syndrome (34.5%), and respiratory failure (38.9%), among others. 1,098 (34.0%) patients met DR criterion; they had higher severity of illness scores, more comorbidities (including HF, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, and chronic kidney disease, p<0.001), and greater laboratory derangements. On admission, 23.6% patients had AKI, of which 54.3% patients met DR criterion. During hospitalization, 56.0% patients had AKI; those with DR had higher prevalence and severity of AKI (unadjusted OR 3.55 [3.02-4.17], p<0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was 9.8% (including 5.2% in the CICU). In patients with DR, in-hospital mortality was 17.0% (9.7% in the CICU). Notably, 59.4% of all in-hospital deaths occurred in patients with DR. DR was independently associated with higher in-hospital (adjusted OR 2.00 [1.51-2.64], p<0.001) and 1-year (adjusted HR 1.64 [1.44-1.88], p<0.001) mortality. Patients with DR had higher mortality in each AKI stage (Figure 1), and patients with concomitant DR and AKI had the highest risk of 1-year mortality (Figure 2). Conclusion DR, defined by our easily applicable threshold, emerged as a powerful, independent predictor of adverse outcomes and was associated with substantially higher mortality, demonstrating potential as a valuable risk stratifying tool.

Abstract Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and its presence is associated with more severe echocardiographic abnormalities and poorer outcomes through unclear mechanisms. CKD-associated endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and activation of profibrotic pathways could worsen pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) in HFpEF, but such relationships have not been explored. Methods Consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF undergoing invasive haemodynamic cardiopulmonary exercise testing were stratified by baseline kidney function to characterize potential differences in pulmonary vascular loading, haemodynamics, cardiopulmonary reserve, and outcomes based upon the presence and severity of kidney dysfunction. Results Of 925 patients with HFpEF, 319 (34.5%) had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients with more severe kidney dysfunction were older and more likely to have diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. At rest, reduced kidney function was associated with lower haemoglobin, higher biventricular filling pressures, and lower cardiac output, but the severity of kidney dysfunction was most conspicuously associated with worsening PVD, evidenced by increasing pulmonary arterial (PA) pressures due to marked increases in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) as kidney dysfunction progressed (median [IQR] 1.3 [0.86, 1.88] to 2.8 [2.0, 3.8] WU from eGFR ≥ 90 to eGFR < 30, P < .001), along with progressively lower PA compliance (PAC, 4.7 [3.6, 5.8] to 2.2 [1.8, 3.4] ml/mmHg from eGFR ≥ 90 to eGFR < 30, P < .001). With exercise, differences in the severity of PVD became even more striking, with more severe elevation in PA pressures and PVR, and lower PA compliance, leading to lower transmural left-sided distending pressures, with no difference in exertional PA wedge pressure. Patients with worse kidney dysfunction displayed the most dramatic cardiac output limitations with exercise, which along with more severe anaemia and markedly reduced O2 delivery, caused marked impairment in aerobic capacity. Worsening kidney function was associated with a striking gradient of increased risk of a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization [ranging from HR 2.38 (95% CI 1.01–5.59) for eGFR 60–90 to HR 16.77 (95% CI 6.65–42.28) for eGFR < 30 (vs. reference eGFR ≥ 90)]. Conclusions Kidney dysfunction in patients with HFpEF is characterized by more severe PVD at rest and with exercise, leading to reduced cardiac output reserve, impaired exercise capacity, and increased risk for adverse events. Further study is warranted to better understand causal relationships between CKD and PVD, and determine whether novel therapies to improve kidney function might target these impairments to improve clinical status.

BACKGROUND: With pulmonary hypertension (PH), a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP)>15 mm Hg is used to diagnose left heart dysfunction, but some patients with adjudicated group 1 PH demonstrate PAWP>15 mm Hg. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate group 1 PH with high PAWP>15 mm Hg. METHODS: Patients with adjudicated group 1 PH from PVDOMICS between 2016 and 2019 were separated into high PAWP(>15 mm Hg) or normal PAWP and compared with adjudicated combined pre- and postcapillary (Cpc) PH related to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Participants underwent dynamic right heart catheterization and metabolomics. Findings were validated in 3 independent cohorts with adjudicated group 1 PH (validation cohorts 1 and 2 with exercise right heart catheterization and validation cohort 3 with resting right heart catheterization). RESULTS: Of 325 patients with group 1 PH (73% women, mean age 53.0±14.3 years), 15% (n=48) had high PAWP. Group 1 PH+high PAWP demonstrated greater obesity, left ventricular hypertrophy ( P <0.0002), left ventricular strain impairment ( P <0.0001), and decreased left ventricular compliance ( P <0.0001) compared with group 1 PH+normal PAWP, with changes comparable to Cpc-PH HFpEF (n=75). Compared with Cpc-PH HFpEF, left atrial function was better in group 1 PH+high PAWP with lower PAWP V wave, higher left atrial compliance, and left atrial ejection fraction ( P <0.0001 for all). Metabolomics demonstrated little difference between group 1 PH with high versus normal PAWP but large differences between group 1 PH+high PAWP versus Cpc-PH HFpEF (100 metabolites altered at false discovery rate P <0.05). Elevated PAWP was also observed in 18% of group 1 PH in the validation cohort 1 (n=402), with exercise PAWP response intermediately abnormal in group 1 PH+high PAWP relative to Cpc-PH HFpEF and group 1 PH+normal PAWP (interaction P <0.0001). Elevated PAWP was similarly observed in 22% and 19% of group 1 PH in validation cohorts 2 (n=55) and 3 (n=787), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 adjudicated patients with group 1 PH has elevation in resting PAWP despite severe pulmonary vascular dysfunction and metabolomics consistent with traditionally defined group 1 PH. Despite resting PAWP elevation, these patients with group 1 PH were metabolomically and biologically distinct from Cpc PH HFpEF, with better left atrial function and diastolic reserve during exercise. These data emphasize the limitations of using resting PAWP alone to separate group 1 PH from HFpEF and call for development of more integrated clinical diagnostic criteria.

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often complain of dyspnea, raising the question that symptoms could be related to unrecognized heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We used the HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF algorithm to estimate the probability of undiagnosed HFpEF in CABANA (Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy), and its interaction with catheter ablation on quality of life (QOL). Probable HFpEF was defined as patient‐reported dyspnea with HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability≥75%. Absence of dyspnea or HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability<75% was considered to reflect patients without HFpEF. The effect of randomization to catheter ablation on QOL (Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory questionnaire and EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score) was assessed using mixed models. Results Of participants without known HF, 70% (n=1225) had probable HFpEF and the remaining 30% (n=522) did not. Those with probable HFpEF had worse New York Heart Association class, EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score, Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity, and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory frequency scores ( P <0.0001 for all), with higher risk of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.11–4.31], P =0.01). Ablation resulted in greater improvement in EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity/frequency scores in probable HFpEF (interactions P =0.005, P =0.05, and P =0.04 respectively). In probable HFpEF, catheter ablation was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66–0.92], P =0.003, interaction P =0.03) but not HF hospitalization (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.55–1.64], P =0.84). Conclusions Nearly three quarters of CABANA participants had potentially undiagnosed HFpEF, with worse QOL and risk of HF hospitalization. Catheter ablation in probable HFpEF resulted in greater improvement in QOL, but residual QOL impairment and HF risk remained elevated despite ablation. These data reinforce the importance of diligent consideration of HFpEF among patients with symptomatic AF to ensure optimal use of foundational treatments for HF.

BACKGROUND: Although obesity and insulin resistance (IR) are established risk factors for left heart dysfunction, their clinical impact in group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH) remains unclear. We sought to determine the impact of excess adiposity versus IR on biventricular hemodynamic and functional reserve in group 1 PH. METHODS: Homeostasis model of insulin resistance and adiposity indices (body mass index [BMI], fat mass, waist circumference) were measured among group 1 patients with PH recruited to PVDOMICS (Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension Through Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics). Functional capacity, and dynamic pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and right atrial pressure responses were compared stratified by obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) and IR status (HOMA-IR≥2.6) using repeated-measure mixed models. RESULTS: Among patients with group 1 PH (n=418), 158 (38%) had BMI≥30 kg/m 2 (94 [60%] of whom had IR), and 260 (62%) had BMI<30 kg/m 2 (74 [28%] of whom had IR). Among those with waist circumference measurement (n=375), 287 (77%) had excess adiposity by elevated waist/height ratio, with 214 (57%) having elevated waist circumference. Patients with obesity had worse quality of life, exercise capacity and left heart remodeling, along with higher resting/dynamic PCWP, right atrial pressure and cardiac output ( P <0.0001 for all). Higher PCWP response with obesity persisted after adjusting for IR (IR-adjusted PCWP+2.5 mm Hg [95% CI, +1.4 to +3.6]; P <0.0001). All adiposity indices were consistently associated with PCWP response, but IR was not. Similar associations were observed between adiposity indices with higher right atrial pressure and cardiac output. Greater visceral adiposity as measured by body shape index (hazard ratio, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.16–3.47]; P =0.01) or weight-adjusted waist index (hazard ratio, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.10–2.46]; P =0.01) was associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Excess adiposity is common in group 1 PH, occurring in 4 out of 5 patients by the more sensitive waist/height ratio, in contrast to only 2 out of 5 patients having obesity by traditional BMI criteria. Excess adiposity is associated with higher biventricular filling pressures, cardiac output demand, worse functional status and reduced survival. These data support trials of adipose-reducing therapies in patients with group 1 PH and excess adiposity.

Achieving optimal unloading in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is associated with improved outcomes but remains unattainable in some cases. We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients with a HeartMate 3 LVAD who underwent speed optimization with concomitant echocardiography and right heart catheterization for inadequate left ventricular (LV) unloading between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were stratified based on left ventricular transmural pressure (LVTMP) into two groups: LVTMP ⩽7 mmHg and LVTMP >7 mmHg using a median split approach. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) decreased in both groups with increased LVAD speed; however, the mean PCWP change per 100 rpm was significantly smaller in patients with LVTMP ⩽7 mmHg (−0.50 vs −0.99 mmHg per 100 rpm, p = 0.003). Comparative analysis demonstrated LVTMP’s superiority over established RV markers, with the strongest interaction effect for predicting speed optimization response. Changes in cardiac output were similar between the two groups. In univariate analysis, multiple hemodynamic parameters were significantly associated with reduced LVTMP, including right atrial pressure (OR = 1.27, p = 0.036), TPG (OR = 1.25, p = 0.037), DPG (OR = 1.69, p = 0.012), and PAPi (OR = 0.35, p = 0.019).LVTMP, as a surrogate for true LV preload, particularly in the context of RV failure, may offer predictive value for the success or failure of LV unloading with LVAD speed optimization.

Abstract Background and Aims Decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during exercise confers favourable prognosis in biventricular physiology, but its role in Fontan circulation remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PVR index (PVRI) response to exercise in adults post-Fontan palliation. Methods Retrospective cohort of 88 adults (age ≥18 years) post-Fontan undergoing exercise (supine cycling) cardiac catheterization. Patients were categorized into absence (n = 23) or presence (n = 65) of exercise-induced reduction in PVRI. The clinical endpoint was a composite of death or transplantation. Results Age at catheterization was 32.2 ± 8.8 years, and 45.5% were female. Resting and exercise PVRI were 1.9 ± 0.9 and 1.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.8–2.1) WU·m2, respectively. Clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic parameters were not associated with PVRI response to exercise. During a follow-up of 2.2 ± 1.4 (IQR 1.2–2.6) years, resting PVRI was not associated with the clinical endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95 per WU·m2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–1.74; P = 0.86), whereas exercise PVRI was (HR 2.15 per WU·m2, 95% CI 1.24–3.73; P = .007). Exercise PVRI remained predictive of outcomes after adjusting for exercise pulmonary artery wedge pressure (HR 2.08 per WU·m2, 95% CI 1.19–3.62; P = .01) or clinical risk factors individually. Two-year event-free survival was lower in the no PVRI reduction than in the reduction group (67% vs 95%; P &lt; .001). Conclusions In adults post-Fontan, PVRI response to exercise is a robust predictor of clinical outcomes and offers additive prognostic information beyond resting invasive haemodynamic data and clinical risk factors, underscoring the importance of invasive exercise testing in this population.

Background Exercise cardiac catheterization is the gold standard for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction and impaired pulmonary reserve in patients with Fontan circulation. The diagnostic value of noninvasive parameters is unclear. Methods Patients who underwent simultaneous exercise hemodynamic evaluation and peripheral venous pressure (PVP) measurement were included. Echocardiographic surrogates for ventricular filling pressure were compared with invasive measures. Diastolic dysfunction was defined invasively as either resting pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≥12 mm Hg or exercise pulmonary artery wedge pressure >20 mm Hg. Results Twenty‐nine patients were included. Age at catheterization was 34±9 years. Atrioventricular valve systole‐to‐diastole duration ratio (S/D) and resting PVP were significant predictors of resting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (S/D: β=0.71 per 0.1 S/D [95% CI, 0.16–1.25]; P =0.01; PVP: β=0.68 per mm Hg [95% CI, 0.41–0.96]; P <0.001). By contrast, resting PVP was a predictor of diastolic dysfunction, whereas S/D was not. Based on these data, we proposed a 2‐tier assessment algorithm with the first tier considering resting PVP ≤15 mm Hg and S/D ≤1.1 and the second tier considering exercise PVP ≤25 mm Hg in those with 1 elevated resting parameter. This algorithm showed a positive predictive value of 88% (95% CI, 47%–100%), a negative predictive value of 90% (95% CI, 70%–99%), a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI, 40%–97%), and a specificity of 95% (95% CI, 75%–100%). Exercise PVP indexed to peak oxygen consumption also predicted invasively measured exercise pulmonary vascular resistance index (β=0.36 WU·m 2 per mm Hg/100 mL per min [95% CI, 0.08–0.64]; P =0.01). Conclusions This study presents a simple, noninvasive approach for evaluating diastolic function and pulmonary vascular reserve in patients with a Fontan circulation.