Reddy, Yogesh N.V.

Abstract Background Diastolic reserve decreases with aging. A recently developed artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm can predict age based on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis. Purpose This study aims to use a validated AI algorithm to assess cardiac senescence and investigate the impact of obesity on cardiac aging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods This retrospective cohort study includes 403 patients with HFpEF, admitted for treatment with intravenous diuretics. ECG age was assessed by a convolutional neural network as previously validated. Patients were stratified according to the presence of obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2) and ECG age was compared between groups. The relationship between ECG versus calendar age and structural/functional alterations on echocardiography, as well as the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) development, was evaluated. Results In 253 (63%) obese patients with HFpEF, calendar age was 8 years younger compared with their non-obese counterparts, but ECG age was only 3 years younger. ECG minus calendar age was higher in obese patients (P-value <0.001; figure) and correlated moderately strong with weight, fat free, and fat mass (r=0.35–0.41; P-value <0.001). Older ECG age was correlated with worse diastolic function, but not with left ventricular afterload (table). Calendar age correlated less strongly with diastolic dysfunction (table). ECG age did predict AF development, independently of calendar age, gender, and presence of obesity [HR (95% CI) = 1.31 (1.06–1.63) per 5-year; P-value=0.015]. Conclusions Obesity accelerates cardiac senescence in HFpEF as reflected by more pronounced diastolic dysfunction and a higher AF risk, which was identified from ECG analysis by a validated AI algorithm. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Belgian American Educational Foundation (B.A.E.F.); Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University (Hasselt, Belgium).

Abstract Background The HFA-PEFF algorithm has been recently developed and is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology to make a diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Based on functional echocardiography criteria, morphological criteria, and natriuretic peptide levels, a score from 1 to 6 is obtained with higher scores indicating a higher probability of HFpEF. Purpose This study investigates the prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF score in HFpEF patients hospitalised for decompensation. Methods This retrospective cohort study includes consecutive patients with HFpEF, admitted to Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2010–2015 and requiring treatment with intravenous loop diuretics for congestion. The HFA-PEFF score was calculated for all patients with echocardiography data available within 1 year and natriuretic peptide levels obtained upon admission. The study population was subsequently stratified according to HFA-PEFF score ≤4 (n=79), =5 (n=93), or =6 (n=271). Incidence rates of recurrent heart failure admissions per 100 patient-years of follow-up, time to all-cause mortality, and mortality causes were compared among strata. Results In 443 patients with HFpEF (78±12 years; 60% women), higher HFA-PEFF score was associated with older age, female gender, higher systolic blood pressure, and worse renal function. Heart failure readmission rates were higher in patients with HFA-PEFF score =5 [46.0 (38.5–53.5)] or HFA-PEFF score =6 [45.0 (40.1–49.8)] versus HFA-PEFF score ≤4 [28.9 (22.7–35.0); P-value<0.001 for differences; see upper panel figure]. Increasing HFA-PEFF score was associated with a shorter median survival (P-value<0.001), which was 65 months (36–89 months) in HFA-PEFF score ≤4, 45 months (26–59 months) in HFA-PEFF score =5, and 28 months (22–42 months) in HFA-PEFF score =6 (see lower panel figure). The proportions of deaths directly related to heart failure were comparable among HFA-PEFF strata (49% versus 49% versus 52%, respectively; P-value=0.903), as was the contribution of cardiovascular death (60% versus 57% versus 63%, respectively; P-value=0.662). Overall, few differences in patterns of mortality causes were observed among strata. There was a lower contribution of primary respiratory disease (mainly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) to mortality in patients with a higher HFA-PEFF score (26% versus 19% versus 6%, respectively; P-value<0.001). Conclusions Higher HFA-PEFF score in hospitalized patients with HFpEF is associated with increased risk of subsequent heart failure readmissions and all-cause mortality, which includes both heart failure specific and non-heart failure mortality. Heart failure readmissions & mortality Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Belgian American Educational Foundation (B.A.E.F.); Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University (Hasselt, Belgium)

Abstract Aims Central obesity is a major risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), particularly in women, but the mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that sex-specific differences in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) content would differentially relate to haemodynamic severity of HFpEF in women and men. Methods and results Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and invasive haemodynamic exercise testing were performed in 105 subjects with HFpEF (63 women) and 105 age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched controls. Visceral adipose tissue area was quantified by CT. As compared with control women, VAT area was 34% higher in women with HFpEF (186 ± 112 vs. 139 ± 72 cm2, P = 0.006), while VAT area was not significantly different in men with or without HFpEF (294 ± 158 vs. 252 ± 92 cm2, P = 0.1). During exercise, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) increased markedly and to similar extent in both men and women with HFpEF. Women with increased VAT area displayed 33% higher PCWP during exercise compared with women with normal VAT area (28 ± 10 vs. 21 ± 10 mmHg, P = 0.001), whereas exercise PCWP was similar in men with or without excess VAT (24 ± 9 vs. 25 ± 6, P = 0.89). In women, each 100 cm2 increase in VAT area was associated with a 4.0 mmHg higher PCWP (95% CI 2.1, 6.0 mmHg; P < 0.0001), but there was no such relationship in men (interaction P = 0.009). Conclusions These data suggest that accumulation of excess VAT plays a distinct and important role in the pathophysiology of HFpEF preferentially in women. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms and treatment implications for visceral fat in HFpEF.

Objective Bioprosthetic valves are being used with increased frequency for valve replacement, with controversy regarding risk:benefit ratio compared with mechanical valves in younger patients. However, prior studies have been too small to provide comparative estimates of less common but serious adverse events such as infective endocarditis. We aimed to compare the incidence of infective endocarditis between bioprosthetic valves and mechanical valves. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to April 2018 for studies comparing left-sided aortic and mitral bioprosthetic to mechanical valves for randomised trials or observational studies with propensity matching. We used random-effects model for our meta-analysis. Our primary outcome of interest was the rate of infective endocarditis at follow-up. Results 13 comparison groups with 43 941 patients were included. Mean age was 59±7 years with a mean follow-up of 10.4±5.0 years. Patients with bioprosthetic valves had a higher risk of infective endocarditis compared with patients receiving mechanical valves (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.88, p<0.001) with an absolute risk reduction of 9 per 1000 (95% CI 6 to 14). Heterogeneity within the included studies was low (I2=0%). Exclusion of the study with maximum weight did not change the results of the analysis (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.17, p=0.006). A meta-regression of follow-up time on incidence of infective endocarditis was not statistically significant (p=0.788) indicating difference in follow-up times did not alter the pooled risk of infective endocarditis. Conclusions Bioprosthetic valves may be associated with a higher risk of infective endocarditis. These data should help guide the discussion when deciding between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in individual patients.

Abstract Aims Lung congestion in patients with heart failure (HF) has traditionally been treated using interventions that reduce pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure. The transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channel regulates fluid transit across the pulmonary capillary-interface, and represents a novel target to reduce lung water, independent of pulmonary capillary hypertension. This pilot study examined the safety and potential efficacy of TRPV4 blockade as a novel treatment for HF. Methods and results In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover pilot trial, 11 subjects with chronic, compensated HF were treated with a novel TRPV4 antagonist (GSK2798745) or placebo. The primary endpoint was lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) after 7 days of treatment with GSK2798745 as compared to placebo. Secondary endpoints included additional diffusion parameters, spirometry and safety assessments. Compared to placebo, treatment with GSK2798745 resulted in a trend to improvement in DLCO (placebo: −0.336 mL/mmHg/min; GSK2798745: +0.458 mL/mmHg/min; treatment difference: +0.793 mL/mmHg/min; 95% confidence interval: −0.925 to 2.512) that was not statistically significant. GSK2798745 was well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. Conclusion In this pilot trial, GSK2798745 was found to be safe and well-tolerated, with a trend toward improved gas transfer. Further investigation is warranted in larger studies to determine whether treatment with TRPV4 antagonists or alternative treatments targeting capillary permeability might be effective to improve lung congestion, pulmonary gas transfer and clinical status in patients with acute or chronic HF.

Abstract Aims Patient-reported quality of life (QOL) is a highly prognostic and clinically relevant endpoint in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The relationships between QOL and different markers of HF severity remain unclear, particularly as they relate to functional capacity and directly measured activity levels. We hypothesized that QOL would demonstrate a stronger relationship with measures of exercise capacity and adiposity compared to other disease measures. Methods and results This is a secondary analysis of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored RELAX, NEAT-HFpEF and INDIE-HFpEF trials to determine the relationships between QOL (assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire) and different domains reflecting HF severity, including maximal aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption), submaximal exercise capacity (6-min walk distance), volume of daily activity (accelerometry), physician-estimated functional class, resting echocardiography, and plasma natriuretic peptide levels. A total of 408 unique patients with chronic HFpEF were split into tertiles of QOL scores defined as QOLworst, QOLintermediate, QOLbest. The QOLworst HFpEF group was youngest, with a higher body mass index, greater prevalence of class II obesity and diabetes, and the lowest N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. After adjustment for age, sex and body mass index, poorer QOL was associated with worse physical capacity and activity levels, assessed by peak oxygen consumption, 6-min walk distance and actigraphy, but was not associated with NT-proBNP or indices from resting echocardiography. QOL was similarly reduced in patients with and without prior HF hospitalization. Conclusions Quality of life in HFpEF is poorest in patients who are young, obese and have diabetes, and is more robustly tied to measures reflecting functional capacity and daily activity levels rather than elevations in NT-proBNP or prior HF hospitalization. These findings have major implications for the understanding of QOL in HFpEF and for the design of future clinical trials targeting symptom improvement in HFpEF. Clinical Trial Registration: RELAX, NCT00763867; NEAT-HFpEF, NCT02053493; INDIE-HFpEF, NCT02742129.