Mills, John R.

AbstractBACKGROUNDDroplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is an emerging technology for quantitative cell-free DNA oncology applications. However, assay performance criteria must be established in a standardized manner to harness this potential. We reasoned that standard protocols used in clinical chemistry assay validation should be able to fill this need.METHODSWe validated KRAS, EGFR, and BRAF quantitative ddPCR assays based on the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act regulations for laboratory-developed tests in clinical chemistry and the matching Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. This included evaluation of limit of the blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), intraassay and interassay imprecision, analytical range, dilution linearity, accuracy (including comparison with orthogonal platforms), reference range study, interference, and stability studies.RESULTSFor the ddPCR assays, the LOB was 4 mutant copies, LODs were 12 to 22 copies, and LOQs were 35 to 64 copies. The upper limit of the dynamic range was 30000 copies, and dilutions were linear down to the LOQs with good accuracy of spike recovery of Horizon reference material. Method comparisons with next-generation sequencing and an alternative ddPCR platform showed complete qualitative agreement and quantitative concordance, with slopes of 0.73 to 0.97 and R2s of 0.83 to 0.99. No substantial interferences were discovered. Wild-type copy numbers in plasma ranged from 462 to 6169/mL in healthy individuals.CONCLUSIONSStandard clinical chemistry assay validation protocols can be applied to quantitative ddPCR assays. This should facilitate comparison of the performance of different assays and allow establishment of minimal significant change thresholds in monitoring applications.

e19534 Background: Our group has developed a mass spectrometry (MS) method that can identify circulating monoclonal proteins, based on their unique molecular mass signatures. Given the propensity for patients with AL amyloidosis to have MS patterns consistent with post-translational modifications (PTMs), we posed the question whether these changes might be present long before the diagnosis of AL and potentially serve as a predictor for AL in patients with an asymptomatic plasma cell dyscrasia (aPCD). Methods: We included 64 patients with AL who had a preceding aPCD and who had stored serum samples at both time-points. The mass/charge (m/z) of monoclonal LC peaks (P) was noted for each sample. Presence of a PTM was defined as the presence of ≥1 “heavy” Ps at a particular charge state. A P was considered heavy if its m/z exceeded the right sided 95% C.I. of the m/z distribution of the respective normal LC. We used 9 patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) without AL as controls. Results: Prior aPCDs were MGUS (N = 33), smoldering myeloma (n = 9) and MM (N = 1). In 21 patients aPCD was not further classified with a bone marrow biopsy. The median interval between aPCD and AL diagnosis was 77 months. At aPCD diagnosis, 42 patients had a single, typical P and 21 patients (33%) had PTMS: 13 patients had a single heavy P; 5 patients had 2 P (only one of which was heavy); and 3 patients had 2 heavy peaks. No PTMs were noted in our MM controls. The m/z of all typical and heavy P observed at aPCD remained unchanged for 63 patients as they transitioned to AL, which suggests no new PTMs occurred with the exception of one patient, who had a single PTM at aPCD diagnosis, but developed 2 additional heavy P appearing at +1232 and +1392 Dalton at AL diagnosis, suggestive of new PTMs. In all but 3 aPCD, the typical P was more abundant relative to heavy P. Heavy P abundance increased in 6 patients as they transitioned from the aPCD to the AL state and exceeded that of the typical P in 3 patients, suggestive of increasing abundance of existing PTMs in these cases. Conclusions: Pre-existing PTMs are present in 1/3 of AL patients and not in MM and can be used to identify patients at risk for AL. New PTMs are uncommon, but the relative abundance can change over time.

AbstractBackgroundSince the first monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy hit the market in 1996, the number of disorders treated with this class of therapeutics has seen tremendous growth, with over 50 antibody-based therapeutics currently approved for use in the US and Europe. This class of therapeutics recently made profound progress in the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Treating MM with the mAbs will challenge the laboratory's ability to differentiate exogenous mAbs being used to treat patients from endogenous mAbs associated with disease.ContentAn overview of the therapeutic mAbs (t-mAbs) developed for the treatment of MM is provided. The anticipated impact of these therapies on patient care, laboratory testing, and clinical research is discussed. Efforts underway to develop strategies and technologies to help laboratories address the growing challenge of mAb interferences are reviewed.SummaryLaboratories can implement risk mitigation strategies at the preanalytical and postanalytical phase of testing to reduce the likelihood of reporting false-positive M-protein results in patients receiving t-mAbs. However, at the analytical phase of testing, current laboratory methods are ill-suited to differentiate between residual disease and residual drugs. Mass spectrometry–based methods might be best positioned to aid laboratories with the rapidly evolving landscape of MM treatment.

Fibrillary GN (FGN) is a rare primary glomerular disease. Histologic and histochemical features of FGN overlap with those of other glomerular diseases, and no unique histologic biomarkers for diagnosing FGN have been identified. We analyzed the proteomic content of glomeruli in patient biopsy specimens and detected DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B9 (DNAJB9) as the fourth most abundant protein in FGN glomeruli. Compared with amyloidosis glomeruli, FGN glomeruli exhibited a >6-fold overexpression of DNAJB9 protein. Sanger sequencing and protein sequence coverage maps showed that the DNAJB9 protein deposited in FGN glomeruli did not have any major sequence or structural alterations. Notably, we detected DNAJB9 in all patients with FGN but not in healthy glomeruli or in 19 types of non-FGN glomerular diseases. We also observed the codeposition of DNAJB9 and Ig- γ . Overall, these findings indicate that DNAJB9 is an FGN marker with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The magnitude and specificity of DNAJB9 overabundance in FGN also suggests that this protein has a role in FGN pathogenesis. With this evidence, we propose that DNAJB9 is a strong biomarker for rapid diagnosis of FGN in renal biopsy specimens.

A 28‐year‐old female with PIK3CA‐related segmental overgrowth presented with headaches. She also had a unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS), as well as 3 small (<2 cm) meningiomas, which according to the Manchester consensus diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is sufficient for a clinical diagnosis. Analysis of blood revealed a mosaic PIK3CA c.2740G>A (p.Gly914Arg) mutation, confirming the diagnosis of PIK3CA‐related overgrowth, but no mutations in NF2 were detected. Although VS has not previously been reported in PIK3CA‐related segmental overgrowth, meningiomas have, raising the question of whether this patient's VS and meningiomas represent coincidental NF2 or phenotypic extension of her overgrowth syndrome. Genetic analysis of the VS revealed a heterozygous NF2 mutation c.784C>T (p.Arg262Ter) and loss of a portion of 22q, including NF2, SMARCB1, and LZTR1 genes. These results suggest that the patient has 2 different mosaic disorders, NF2 and PIK3CA‐related overgrowth. The PIK3CA mutation was also present in the VS. Confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of mosaic NF2 in this patient has implications for monitoring and highlights the possibility of co‐occurrence of mosaicism for multiple rare disorders in a single patient.

The detection and quantification of monoclonal‐proteins (M‐proteins) are necessary for the diagnosis and evaluation of response in plasma cell dyscrasias. Immunoglobulin enrichment‐coupled with matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass‐spectrometry (MASS‐FIX) is a simple and inexpensive method to identify M‐proteins, but its clinical generalizability has not yet been elucidated. We compared MASS‐FIX to protein electrophoresis (PEL), serum/urine immunofixation‐electrophoresis (IFE), and quantitative serum free‐light chain (FLC) for the identification of M‐proteins in different clinical diagnoses. Paired serum and urine samples from 257 patients were tested. There were six patients for whom s‐IFE and FLC ratio were positive and serum MASS‐FIX was negative, but when serum and urine MASS‐FIX results were combined, only one patient with light chain‐MGUS was missed. Serum/urine‐MASS‐FIX detected M‐proteins in 18 patients with negative serum/urine‐PEL/IFE and serum‐FLC, 10 of whom had multiple myeloma or AL amyloidosis, who were mistakenly thought to have complete hematologic response by serum/urine‐PEL/IFE and serum‐FLC. Nearly half of the AL amyloidosis patients had atypical spectra, which may prove to be a clue to the diagnosis and pathogenesis of the disease. In conclusion, MASS‐FIX has a comparable sensitivity with PEL/IFE/FLC methods and can help inform the clinical diagnosis.