Back to Authors

Mehta, Minesh P.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-5713

A5038585908 | I19700959

Mayo Clinic

Florida International University

Citations 112

Tumor subtype and other prognostic factors in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The updated graded prognostic assessment (Breast-GPA).

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1079-1079

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.1079

1079 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are a common and fatal complication of breast cancer but survival varies widely based on various prognostic factors (PF). Hence, patient counseling and therapeutic decisions should be individualized. We previously published a prognostic index (Breast GPA) based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), updated it with tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400) and are now updating it with a larger contemporary cohort (C). Methods: A multi-institutional (19) multi-national (3) retrospective database of 2473 breast cancer patients with BM diagnosed from 1/1/2006-12/31/2017 was created and compared to our prior cohorts. Demographic, clinical, molecular factors, tumor subtype and treatment were correlated with survival. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated and compared with log-rank tests. Results: The median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B and C improved over time [12, 14 and 16 mo, respectively ( < 0.01)] despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable: Luminal B (ER/PR/HER2+) decreased from 26% to 21%; HER2 (HER2+/ER/PR-) decreased from 31% to 17%, Luminal A (ER/PR+/HER2-) increased from 20% to 31%; Basal (ER/PR/HER2-) was unchanged at 24%.MS by subtype improved from 21 to 27 mo in Luminal B, 18 to 25 mo in HER2, 10 to 14 mo in Luminal A and 6 to 9 mo in Basal tumors. The number of BM was 1 in 35%, ≤4 in 67% and > 10 in 18%. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, age, KPS, number of BM and extracranial metastases (ECM) (all < 0.01). Surprisingly, Hispanic women (7%) showed improved survival (p < 0.01). BRCA1 was mutated in 57/533 (11%) and those patients showed a trend (0.16) toward improved survival. Treatment patterns have changed: the use of whole brain radiation therapy decreased from 71% to 67% to 47% in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the shift to less favorable tumor subtypes, MS has improvedbut varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. Compared to prior cohorts, number of BM and ECM were identified as new PF. Ethnic, genetic and treatment differences between the eras are apparent. The updated Breast GPA, based on these data, and the correlation between BRCA1 and tumor subtype will be presented.
Letter: When Less is More: Dexamethasone Dosing for Brain Tumors

Neurosurgery | April 20, 2019 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 3 | Pages: E607-E608

10.1093/neuros/nyz186 | PMID 31215634

Results of NRG oncology/RTOG 9813: A phase III randomized study of radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) versus RT and nitrosourea (NU) therapy for anaplastic astrocytoma (AA).

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2002-2002

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2002

Updates in the management of intradural spinal cord tumors: a radiation oncology focus

Neuro-Oncology | January 14, 2019 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 707-718

10.1093/neuonc/noz014 | PMID 30977511

Abstract Primary spinal cord tumors represent a hetereogeneous group of central nervous system malignancies whose management is complex given the relatively uncommon nature of the disease and variety of tumor subtypes, functional neurologic deficits from the tumor, and potential morbidities associated with definitive treatment. Advances in neuroimaging; integration of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular testing into tumor classification; and developments in neurosurgical techniques have refined the current role of radiotherapy in the multimodal management of patients with primary spinal cord tumors, and corroborated the need for prospective, multidisciplinary discussion and treatment decision making. Radiotherapeutic technological advances have dramatically improved the entire continuum from treatment planning to treatment delivery, and the development of stereotactic radiosurgery and proton radiotherapy provides new radiotherapy options for patients treated in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting. The objective of this comprehensive review is to provide a contemporary overview of the management of primary intradural spinal cord tumors, with a focus on radiotherapy.
Phase III study of radiation therapy (RT) with or without procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV) in low-grade glioma: RTOG 9802 with Alliance, ECOG, and SWOG.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 3, 2019 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2000-2000

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.2000

NCOG-01. PRESERVATION OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTION (NCF) WITH HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE DURING WHOLE-BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY (WBRT) FOR BRAIN METASTASES: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF PHASE III TRIAL NRG ONCOLOGY CC001

Neuro-Oncology | November 5, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: suppl_6 | Pages: vi172-vi172

10.1093/neuonc/noy148.716

RBTT-05. TUMOR TREATING FIELDS AND RADIOSURGERY FOR SUPRA- AND/OR INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN METASTASES (1–10) FROM NSCLC IN THE PHASE 3 METIS STUDY

Neuro-Oncology | November 5, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: suppl_6 | Pages: vi235-vi235

10.1093/neuonc/noy148.975

ACTR-02. NRG ONCOLOGY/RTOG 0424: LONG-TERM RESULTS OF A PHASE II STUDY OF TEMOZOLOMIDE-BASED CHEMORADIOTHERAPY REGIMEN FOR HIGH-RISK LOW-GRADE GLIOMAS

Neuro-Oncology | November 5, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: suppl_6 | Pages: vi11-vi11

10.1093/neuonc/noy148.039

P05.83 Tumor Treating Fields and radiosurgery for supra- and/or infratentorial brain metastases (1–10) from NSCLC in the phase 3 METIS study

Neuro-Oncology | September 19, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: suppl_3 | Pages: iii322-iii323

10.1093/neuonc/noy139.409

Genetic landscape of extreme responders with anaplastic oligodendroglioma: NRG Oncology/RTOG 9402.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2054-2054

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.2054