Wu, Xiaosheng

Introduction Due to the higher metabolic demand, malignant cells have an increased dependency on the nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of proteins, as compared to normal cells. Chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1), encoded by the XPO1 gene, is the main protein receptor which facilitates export of molecules, including tumor suppressor proteins, from the nucleus to the cytoplasm thereby making them inactive. Expression of CRM1 in tumor tissue has been shown to be an independent prognostic marker in several solid tumors and in acute myeloid leukemia; high CRM1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was associated with more aggressive disease and shorter survival. Importantly, selinexor, a first in class small molecule inhibitor of CRM1, was recently approved for the treatment of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The expression of CRM1 on tumor cells and the assessment of its prognostic impact have not been studied in patients (pts) with DLBCL or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas (PMBCL). Methods Paraffin embedded tumor tissue from pts with DLBCL or PMBCL treated with immunochemotherapy was assessed for CRM1 expression through IHC on tissue microarray (TMA). CRM1 anti-rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling, catalog-no: 46249) was used at 1:100 dilution. Tumor cell grading was based on CRM1 staining in tumor cells compared to background non-malignant lymphocytes and non-malignant lymphocytes in spleen and tonsillar tissue controls. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was used as a positive control [known high levels of CRM1 staining (Inoue et al, J Urol, 2012)]. Two expert hematopathologists (RLK & AJW) independently scored CRM1 nuclear staining and assigned a grade of 0-3; 0 (no definitive nuclear staining, equal to background lymphocytes), 1 (dim nuclear staining), 2 (consistent nuclear staining, nuclear detail still visible behind the stain) and 3 (strong nuclear staining obscuring most nuclear detail, staining equivalent to RCC control). The average CRM1 score per case across all available cores on the TMA was calculated. Low CRM1 expression for a case was arbitrarily defined as a score of 0-2.0; high CRM1 expression was score 2.1-3.0. Scoring reliability between reviewers and between cores was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient; score 0.75-0.90 was considered as a good scoring reliability. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to progression, relapse, retreatment, or death. The association of CRM1 expression and risk of failing to achieve EFS at 24 months after diagnosis (EFS24) was estimated using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from logistic regression models, while the association of CRM1 expression with continuous EFS and overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI from Cox regression models. Results Tumor tissue from 282 pts was studied for CRM1 staining, including 275 pts with DLBCL and 7 pts with PMBCL. Median age of the study population was 61 years (range: 18-93) and 59% were male. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 88.6 months. The first-line treatment regimens and baseline patient characteristics at diagnosis are outlined in Figure 1A. Of the 282 pts, 200 (71%) had high level of CRM1 expression and 82 (29%) had low CRM1 expression [only 4 (1.4%) had no or 0 staining]. Intra-class correlation coefficient to measure scoring reliability was 0.8. There was no difference in International Prognostic Index (IPI), ECOG performance score, lactate dehydrogenase or age at diagnosis among the groups with high CRM1 expression compared to low CRM1 expression (Figure 1A). The EFS24 failure was 29% for pts with low CRM1 expression while 26% in pts who had high CRM1 expression, OR=1.16, 95% CI 0.63-2.07; p=0.63. Null associations were also observed for EFS (HR=1.21, 95% CI 0.80-1.83; p=0.38) and OS (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.61-1.69; p=0.95), (Figure 1B, C). Results were similar when adjusted for gender and IPI. Conclusion CRM1 expression by IHC on paraffin embedded tumor tissue is feasible in DLBCL and PMBCL. These data demonstrate that the CRM1 protein, the target for selinexor, is indeed expressed in the vast majority of these tumors; only 1.4% had no staining. However, CRM1 expression by IHC is not a prognostic marker for EFS24, EFS or OS. Whether CRM1 staining predicts selinexor response has not been studied but should be included in any new studies using CRM1 inhibitors. Disclosures Maurer: Nanostring: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene / BMS: Research Funding. Cerhan:BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; NanoString: Research Funding. Witzig:Acerta: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; MorphSys: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Chromosome region maintenance protein1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anti-cancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first in class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), has been limited by substantial adverse effects (AEs). To address this clinical problem, we focused on identifying novel strategies to boost the potency, reduce toxicity, and broaden the applicability of CRM1 inhibitors to a wider range of malignancies. We discovered that salicylates could markedly enhance the anti-tumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. KPT-330 was chosen as the prototypical CRM1 inhibitor given its current FDA approval status and characterized pharmacokinetics; and choline salicylate (CS) was chosen as the prototypical salicylate given its favorable pharmacokinetics and reduced antiplatelet, renal, neurological and gastrointestinal AEs in humans compared to other salicylates. By using cell lines belonging to different hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, we demonstrated ex vivo that the combination of KPT-330 and CS (K+CS) could induce unique and significant antitumor effect at much lower dose of KPT-330 (at 25% of the dose used in the clinic), thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical AEs (Figure 1a-d, and e-g). This significant synergetic antitumor effect observed with K+CS ex vivo was also validated in vivo by using an NSG mouse model of mantle cell lymphoma (Figure 1h). Moreover, the K+CS combination did not show this potent toxic effect on non-malignant cells in vivo and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in NSG mice. Mechanistically, protein profiling through mass spectroscopy revealed that K+CS uniquely affects the cellular pathways of DNA damage repair, DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. Studies involving immunoblotting, cell cycle analysis, immunofluorescence microscopy assessing nucleocytoplasmic molecular export and DNA damage, reporter assay to assess homologous recombination repair proficiency and immunohistochemistry showed that, compared to KPT-330 treatment alone, K+CS decreased the expression of CRM1, Rad51 and thymidylate synthase proteins in vitro and in vivo, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, and importantly a unique cell cycle arrest in S-phase, thus leading to cell apoptosis. These effects on cellular proteins and pathways were unique to K+CS treatment and were not observed with KPT-330 or CS single agent treatment. Pathway analyses through RNA sequencing also paralleled the findings of proteomic studies thus further validating the unique effect of K+CS treatment on the aforementioned cellular pathways. Importantly, K+CS treatment exerted unique and significant antitumor effect ex vivo on primary malignant cells obtained from patient's with high-risk hematologic malignancies such as double hit DLBCL, BTK and BCL2 inhibitor resistant mantle cell lymphoma, TP53 deleted/mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high-risk multiple myeloma thus signifying its broader applicability as a treatment option for these aggressive hematologic malignancies where there is a dire need to find new treatment strategies (Figure 1i). In summary, we describe a unique all-oral drug combination with a novel constellation of mechanisms of action on cellular pathways that are exploited by cancer cells. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple cancer types and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for therapy of blood cancers. Disclosures Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphSys: Consultancy; Immune Design: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy.

Abstract Chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anticancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first-in-class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for relapsed multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been limited by substantial toxicity. We discovered that salicylates markedly enhance the antitumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. Using salicylates in combination enables targeting of a range of blood cancers with a much lower dose of selinexor, thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical adverse effects. Choline salicylate (CS) with low-dose KPT-330 (K+CS) had potent, broad activity across high-risk hematological malignancies and solid-organ cancers ex vivo and in vivo. The K+CS combination was not toxic to nonmalignant cells as compared with malignant cells and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in mice. Mechanistically, compared with KPT-330 alone, K+CS suppresses the expression of CRM1, Rad51, and thymidylate synthase proteins, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, cell-cycle arrest in S-phase, and cell apoptosis. Moreover, the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors further potentiates the K+CS antitumor effect. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple types of blood cancers and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for cancer therapy in general.

Abstract Constitutive activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling is a major driving mechanism for the proliferation and survival of various B-cell lineage non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Blocking BCR signaling using the first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib, has proved effective and is currently FDA approved for the treatment of several B-cell lymphomas. Unfortunately, significant subsets of patients possess either primary or acquired resistance to ibrutinib, often resulting in worse prognosis and poorer responses to subsequent therapies. Therefore, overcoming ibrutinib resistance is an urgent clinical need requiring new tools to both delineate the molecular mechanisms of resistance and develop viable therapeutics. To that end, we developed a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell line, MCIR1, from a patient with clinically acquired ibrutinib resistance. MCIR1 is a bona fide MCL cell line featuring CD19+/CD5+/CD10-/CD23-/t(11;14)+/TP53+/-; and lacking the previously described mutations in BTK (C481S) and phospholipase C-gamma-2 (R665W, L845F). Importantly, MCIR1 cells possess hallmarks of ibrutinib resistance, including the insensitivity of ERK1/2 phosphorylation to ibrutinib in vitro, and the irresponsiveness of MCIR1 xenograft tumors to ibrutinib treatment in mice as compared with ibrutinib-sensitive Jeko-1 tumors. To delineate the molecular mechanism(s) of ibrutinib resistance, we identified by RNA-Seq analysis that MCIR1 cells possess robust activity of the non-canonical NFkB pathway and elevated expression of NFkB target genes, suggesting that this pathway likely drives their resistance to ibrutinib. Finally, we demonstrated the utility of MCIR1 as a tool for testing new drugs to combat ibrutinib resistance in vitro by showing its sensitivity to the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) protein inhibitor, venetoclax. To our knowledge, MCIR1 is the first patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant cell line to be established. Hence, MCIR1 is especially useful because uniquely possesses the relevant clinical and biological features of patients with ibrutinib-resistant MCL. We propose MCIR1 as a tool to further the understanding of molecular mechanisms conferring ibrutinib resistance by providing a clinically relevant system with the capacity for molecular and genetic manipulations. Further, these features make MCIR1 an ideal model to screen drugs for combating ibrutinib resistance through both in vivo and in vitro approaches. Citation Format: Kevin E. Nowakowski, Jithma P. Abeykoon, Mary J. Stenson, Michael M. Timm, Curtis A. Hanson, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Anne J. Novak, Xiaosheng Wu, Thomas E. Witzig. MCIR1: A patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma line for the study of ibrutinib resistance and drug discovery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 650.

Abstract One of the major mechanisms by which the immune system combats unpredictable foreign pathogens is to produce highly specific and effective antibodies by B cells. Somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) are two key events required for the production of highly specific and effective antibodies. Both SHM and CSR occur in the germinal center (GC), and are mediated by a common enzyme, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) that specifically mutates the variable regions (IgV) and switch regions (IgS) of immunoglobulin genes by converting cytidines to uridines. It has been shown that in addition to the central deaminase domain, an N-terminal domain is essential to target SHM to the IgV region whereas a C-terminal domain is necessary for Ig CSR. Given its mutagenic nature, it has been postulated that AID may play causative roles in B cell lymphomagenesis. Consistent with this notion, AID is expressed and alternatively spliced in B cell tumors such as B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). However, it remains unclear whether post-GC malignant B cell AID expression and alternative splicing is a consequence of B cell transformation and/or is required to maintain growth and/or malignant B-cell survival, or whether post-GC AID expression and alternative splicing may also occur in normal B cells. To discriminate between these two possibilities, we analyzed AID expression and splicing in normal human B cells. Our data demonstrate that human tonsillar B cells prominently express the full-length AID transcript, and of interest, also express all four alternative transcripts that have been previously described in B-CLL and NHL B cells. To determine if all normal B cells express all of the AID transcripts, we performed limiting dilution of tonsillar B cells and used RT-PCR to detect AID expression. We surprisingly discovered that AID splicing variants are singly expressed by individual B-cells. To address the functional significance of each splicing variant, we considered the possibility that B cells expressing the alternative transcripts may be by-products of the normal GC reaction and are eliminated prior to GC exit. Conversely those B cells may contribute to the memory B cell pool if those AID variants are functional. Therefore, we examined AID expression and splicing in memory B cells using a more sensitive nested PCR approach. Our data show that AID is indeed expressed in peripheral blood memory cells but not in naïve B cells. Moreover, at least one splicing variant was expressed at levels comparable to the full-length AID transcript. Using limiting dilution, we again found that the full-length and alternatively spliced AID transcripts are singly expressed by individual memory B cells. Our results suggest that AID expression beyond the GC stage may play a role in sustaining selection pressure. Since the AID domains specific for SHM and CSR are encoded by different exons, we hypothesize that those variants may function differentially in SHM and CSR and this concept is under current study. Since each B cell only expressed one AID transcript, our data strongly suggest that SHM and CSR are coordinated in a stepwise process by generation of alternative AID splice variants that exhibit selective activity thereby allowing fine-tuning of humoral immunity.

Abstract Malignant plasma cell (PC) disorders are clonal diseases based on their immunoglobulin variable region sequence signature. However, intratumor phenotypic, genetic, and morphologic heterogeneity is often observed, fueling the notion that a subpopulation of the malignant PC clone may have extensive self-renewal properties whereas others may not. Little information exists regarding the relationship between these putative tumor subpopulations that is instrumental to our understanding of the growth, progression and therapeutic targeting of PC disorders. We recently described establishment of two novel cell lines from one patient initially diagnosed with primary amyloidosis (ALMC-1), who eventually progressed to a combination of AL and symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM; ALMC-2). Although both cell lines are clonally related, they exhibit a number of intriguing differences, including a marked variability in their makeup of mononuclear (MoN) and multinuclear cells (2 − >10 nuclei; MuN). The ALMC-1 cell line consistently displays a much larger fraction of MuN cells (~50%) than the ALMC-2 cell line (~20%). By contrast, the growth rate of the ALMC-2 cells is significantly higher than ALMC-1 cells suggesting an inverse relationship between growth rate and fraction of MuN cells. It has been demonstrated that MoN plasmablastic morphology is a predictor of poor survival in MM, however the clinical significance of MuN PCs, which are frequently observed in bone marrow biopsies, has yet to be determined. We therefore used the ALMC-1 and ALMC-2 cell lines to begin to test the hypothesis that the MoN fraction in both cell lines contains cells with extensive self-renewal properties whereas the MuN cells are no longer capable of cell division. The central questions become by what mechanism are MuN PCs generated and how are MoN PCs maintained? Two hypotheses that can explain the dual persistence of both types of cells are: random cell fusion; regulated or sporadic cell division of MoN cells into 2 daughter cells, one of which divides normally and the other one fails to undergo cytokinesis. To address the first possibility, each cell line was transfected with GFP or YFP. Single positive (GFP or YFP) cells were then mixed and cocultured for assessing the frequency of dual positive cells by flow cytometry at various time points. However, studies to date suggest this mechanism does not occur. To begin to address the second possibility and determine whether extrinsic factors, e.g., cytokines, may regulate the rate of generation of MuN PCs, we cultured both cell lines +/− IL-6 and IGF-I and assessed numbers of MoN and MuN PCs. Initial analyses suggest that IL-6, but not IGF-I, increases the proportion of MoN PCs in both cell lines. To address the hypothesis that MuN PCs are no longer capable of growth, cells were labeled with bromodeoxyuridine (BrDU) to assess the capability of MuN cells to synthesize DNA. We observed that MuN PCs incorporating BrDU did so uniformly in each nucleus present in the cell. We then assessed the ability of cell division of MuN cells by quantitating normal vs abnormal metaphases in both cell lines and observed that >90% of metaphases were present in MoN PCs, suggesting that MoN PCs largely give rise to MuN PCs and the latter are likely compromised in cytokinesis. As centrosomes play a critical role in regulating cell division and centrosome abnormalities have been noted in MM by others, we next used gamma-tubulin immunofluorescence to detect centrosomes. MoN PCs exhibited uniformly normal centrosome numbers and positioning while MuN PCs showed clear centrosomal abnormalities including accumulation of centrosomes, centrosome clustering, and multiple directional centrosome polarization, suggesting a mechanism by which the MuN cells may be generated. In summary, our data suggest that MuN PCs lack growth potential and that intrinsic and/or extrinsic factors may drive accumulation of these cells. These observations support the possibility that patients with a larger proportion of MuN PCs may have differences in clinical outcome from those patients with largely MoN PCs. To test this, we have begun hematopathological analysis of a large series of patients diagnosed with various plasma cell disorders. Knowledge of the signals that regulate the balance between MoN and MuN cells could lend itself toward identification of therapeutic modalities that may maximize differentiation of tumor cells into end-stage cells.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Karyotype analysis of metaphase cells for discovering genome-wide cytogenetic abnormalities has played an important role in prognosis and counseling of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Due to the low proliferative rate of CLL B cells, karyotype analysis has been of limited clinical utility in this disease. Thus, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on interphase cells has replaced karyotype analysis for the assessment of recurrent genetic changes in CLL. Recently, immunostimulatory CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG) have been shown to induce primary CLL B cell proliferation via engagement of toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), thereby rendering karyotype analysis feasible and providing for a useful and reliable method to discover new cytogenetic abnormalities in CLL B cells. However, we and others have shown that CpG stimulation of CLL and normal B cells also induces robust expression of activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a mutagenic enzyme that is linked to the development of cytogenetic abnormalities. It is therefore plausible that cytogenetic abnormalities observed following CpG stimulation of CLL B cells may not reflect de novo abnormalities but rather reflect CpG induced-AID mediated cytogenetic alterations. We began to address this possibility by assessing the effects of CpG stimulation on the karyotypes of normal blood B cells. HYPOTHESIS: Since CpG stimulation induces AID expression in CLL and normal B cells, we hypothesize that: robust B cell activation by CpG could result in cytogenetic abnormalities thereby contributing to lymphomagenesis; and if CpG induces cytogenetic abnormalities that are linked to disease initiation and/or progression, such information would be of great value in the interpretation of cytogenetic data obtained from CpG-stimulated CLL B cells. METHODS: We performed interphase FISH analysis on freshly isolated blood B cells, and metaphase karyotype analysis on CpG stimulated B cells from 17 healthy blood donors. Pure (>98%) B cells obtained by negative selection, were hybridized at isolation with a probe set to identify deletion 6q, 11q, 13q, and 17p, trisomy 12, and IGH gene rearrangements, and cells were also stimulated for 5 days with 10 μg/ml CpG (CpG 2006, synthesized in-house) plus IL-2 and IL-15 for metaphase analysis. At least 20 post-CpG metaphase spreads were analyzed for each sample and abnormalities were considered clonal using the accepted convention (gains or translocations are present in two or more cells and loss present in at least 3 cells). The expression of AID in the B cells pre- and post-CpG stimulation was assessed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: FISH analysis of freshly isolated B cells showed that all 17 subjects were normal. After CpG stimulation, all samples examined exhibited strong AID expression as revealed by RT-PCR. By karyotype analysis, none of the 17 CpG stimulated samples showed evidence of clonal abnormalities. However, one or more nonclonal chromosomal abnormalities were observed in 7 out of 17 (41.2%) samples. Among those 7 samples, 4 samples had 1 abnormal metaphase out of a minimum of 20 examined while the other 3 samples exhibited two or more cells, each with distinct abnormalities. Some of those nonclonal abnormalities have also been observed in CLL (i.e., trisomy 3, trisomy 12 and 14q32 rearrangements). This is a much higher incidence of nonclonal abnormalities than has been seen with peripheral blood cells cultured by other methods. CONCLUSION: Our data have significance for the biology of CLL and for clinical practice. First, our data suggest that signaling through TLR9, and perhaps other receptors that likewise induce robust B cell AID expression, may represent a natural mechanism by which B lineage cells acquire chromosomal abnormalities during normal immune responses that may predispose toward neoplastic transformation. Second, given that none of the CpG-induced metaphases in normal B cells resulted in clonal abnormalities in the 5 day timeframe, our data also validate the clinical utility of CpG as a valuable tool for the cytogenetic analysis of CLL B cells since only clonal abnormalities are currently scored. However, it remains possible that non-clonal abnormalities seen in CpG-stimulated CLL B cells may be relevant to the disease process if future work shows that CpG stimulation uncovers recurring non-clonal defects of chromosomes/genes associated with tumorigenic events.

Abstract Background: Normal and tumor stem cells are characterized by high activity of multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters. One of these, ABCG2 (ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G member 2 protein), is an ATP dependent transporter and putative stem cell marker responsible for verapamil sensitive Hoechst efflux. While ABCG2 is known to be expressed in normal and leukemic stem cells, as well as a small population of normal lymphocytes and some B-cell malignancies, its expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unknown. It has been postulated that leukemic stem cells due to their quiescent nature and expression of MDR transporters represent a population resistant to therapy and that this residual population is critical for tumor persistence and recurrence. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that ABCG2 is expressed in a small percentage of primary CLL B cells; gene expression profiles of ABCG2 positive versus ABCG2 negative CLL B cells differ in respect to expression of self renewal and lymphoid development genes; the frequency of ABCG2+ CLL B cells increases after treatment in patients responding to therapy. Methods: We analyzed ABCG2 expression by primary CD5+, CD19+ CLL-B cells from untreated CLL patients of all Rai stages by flow cytometry. In a subset of patients we used fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) to sort CD19+, CD5+ ABCG2+ and CD19+, CD5+ ABCG2- cells. Gene expression profiling was then performed using the U133 plus 2.0 Affymetrix microarray platform. In a separate cohort of patients treated in a clinical trial of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PCR), the percentage of ABCG2+, CD19+, CD5+, CD79b dim cells at baseline and then two months after completion of 6 cycles of PCR therapy where patients had minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed and correlated with clinical response. Results: ABCG2+ CD19+, CD5+ detectable populations were seen in all 20 CLL assessed patients (median percentage 0.6%; range 0.08%–3.8%). There was no difference in percentage of ABCG2+ cells based on Rai stage, IGVH mutational status, Zap70 or CD38 expression. Preliminary analysis of the gene expression profiling of ABCG2 positive versus negative CLL B cells from four randomly selected patients revealed significantly higher expression of genes associated with self-renewal, cell cycle and early B-cell development including: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C, p=0.034), transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2, involved in WNT pathway regulation, p=0.016), beta-catenin (p=0.034) and pre-B-cell colony enhancing factor 1 (PBEF-1, p=0.037). Flow based assessment of the levels of ABCG2 positive populations at baseline and after therapy with PCR in patients with minimal residual disease showed a dramatic increase in frequency of ABCG2 positive CLL B cells. The percentage of ABCG2+ cells went from a median level of 0.19% (range 0.04%–0.19%) prior to therapy to a median level of 10.93% (range 0.15%–25.12%), p<0.001. In contrast two patients who did not reach MRD (partial responses by NCI-WG criteria) had no significant increase in percentage of ABCG2 positive cells (0.14%; 0.23% and 0.16%; 0.21% prior and after therapy, respectively, p=0.68). Conclusion: Our data indicate that ABCG2 positive CLL B-cells constitute 0.1–3.8% of circulating CLL B-cells in untreated patients. The frequency of ABCG2+ CLL B-cells appears to dramatically increase after therapy in the MRD state; this could be related to their relative resistance to therapy and/or a shift from extravascular compartments post therapy. Since ABCG2 positive CLL B-cells demonstrate expression of early B-cell development and self-renewal genes we believe that that this population could represent a putative self renewing CLL B-cell compartment. Further studies to characterize features of ABCG2 CLL-B –cells in relation to their capacity to be self renewing and resistance to therapy are warranted.

Abstract Introduction: Given the established role of PD-1 in mediating immune suppression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we tested and reported the efficacy of PD-1 blocking antibody pembrolizumab in relapsed and transformed CLL patients. A selective response of pembrolizumab (~40%) in patients with RT, particularly after prior ibrutinib, was observed (Ding, Blood, 129:3419). Correlative analysis showed PD-1 expression in tumor B-cells of patients with RT and aggressive CLL after progression on ibrutinib. PD-1, an inhibitory receptor expressed on CLL T-cells, inhibits the immune synapse and cytotoxic T cell functions via the interactions with its ligands. However, the expression pattern and role of PD-1 in tumor B-cells is not well defined. In this study we investigated the functional implication of the PD-1 signaling axis in B-cell pathobiology in CLL and RT patients. Methods: 26 CLL-involved lymph node (LN) and 20 RT-involved LN were tested for PD-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (mouse clone NAT105, Abcam). For in vitro study, we checked PD-1 expression in 11 lymphoma cell lines and 1 CLL cell line by both flow cytometry and Western blot (WB) analysis. Effect of PD-1 knockdown using CRISPR/Cas9 system (Addgene) and over-expression of PD-1 using pLEX-lentiviral (Thermoscientific) or pRetro-retroviral (Clonetech) system were evaluated on pro-survival and apoptotic signaling pathways by Western blot analysis. Gene expression signatures in CLL and RT patients were also evaluated by Illumina-based RNA sequencing using FFPE-nodal tissue obtained by clinical biopsy (Tempus Labs; Chicago, IL). Results: The expression of PD-1 was significantly increased in RT-LN compared to CLL-LN. (mean ± SEM in RT vs. CLL, 30.6 ± 4.7 vs. 11.5 ± 2.8, p < 0.001). PD-1 expression was highest in patients with RT where the immediate prior CLL therapy was ibrutinib (Figure 1A). Among all cell lines tested for PD-1 expression, the expression of PD-1 by WB and flow was highest in Mino (mantle cell lymphoma line), followed by moderate expression in Jvm2 (B-PLL line) and Mec1 (CLL line), and very low-level expression in both Jeko-1 (B-NHL line) and lymphoma line 'Karpas299'. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated depletion of PD-1 in Mino cells inhibited constitutively active Akt, p70S6K and mTOR pathway, accompanied by significant downregulation of the anti-apoptotic proteins, Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and XIAP, but P-ERK1/2 was not affected. Constitutive lentiviral (pLEX-PD-1)-mediated overexpression of PD-1 in Jeko-1 and doxycycline regulated inducible retroviral (pRetro-PD-1) mediated overexpression of PD-1 in Karpas299 activated Akt, mTOR and p70S6K pathway. Overexpression of PD-1 in Jeko-1 significantly increased Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 and in Karpas299 increased Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and XIAP expression (Figure 1B). A parallel genetic analysis using RNA sequencing was performed on 5 nodal tissues involved by either RT or progressive CLL after these patients developed clinical progression after prior ibrutinib therapy. In all 5 patients, overexpression of PD-1 was associated with increased expression of Bcl-2 and mTOR regardless of the genetic mutations detected (including TP53, ATM, BTK, NOTCH1, XPO1, SF3B1, TET2 etc). However, in 2 patients who received prior chemoimmunotherapy, similar overexpression of gene signature was not observed by RNA sequencing analysis, alternative pathways including Met or NFkB overexpression was detected. Given these clinical and laboratory findings, we have treated 2 RT patients with a combination of BTK and Bcl-2 inhibitors (ibrutinib and venetoclax, respectively) whose CLL transformed after prior ibrutinib. Significant reduction of tumor burden was observed in both cases with one complete response and one mixed response. Conclusion: An increased expression of PD-1, Akt/mTOR and Bcl-2 gene signature was first observed in RT patients after prior ibrutinib therapy. PD-1 overexpression in the tumor B-cells of RT and progressive CLL patients likely regulate AKT/mtOR to upregulate Bcl-2. Targeting both BTK and Bcl-2 pathways in addition to PD-1 blockade appear to be a promising strategy to treat these aggressive diseases. Disclosures Parikh: Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Humanigen: Research Funding. Ansell:Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kay:Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Research Funding; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ding:Merck: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 691 Malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma (MM) patients display a variety of recurrent genetic abnormalities. In this regard, tumor cells in approximately 15% of all MM patients will exhibit a translocation involving the immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy chain locus at 14q32 and the short arm of chromosome 4. The breakpoint on chromosome 4 (4p16) frequently results in overexpression of FGFR3 and/or full-length or truncated versions of the multiple myeloma SET domain protein, MMSET. MM patients with t(4;14) translocations are considered to have high-risk disease. MMSET has been shown to have histone methyltransferase activity and we have recently shown that this protein plays a pivotal role in DNA repair and maintenance of genetic stability (1). Thus, dysregulation of MMSET may result in aberrant responses to DNA damage, which may be related to the poor prognosis of MM patients with t(4;14) translocations. The MMSET gene is also known as the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome candidate (WHSC1) gene. Expression of the WHSC1 gene is uniformly misregulated due to haploinsufficiency in patients with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) resulting in characteristic facial features and developmental disorders. Of great interest, WHS patients also display significant antibody deficiencies and IgG and IgA deficiencies are particularly frequent. Currently, the underlying cause of antibody deficiencies in WHS patients remains unknown. However, our recent studies have shown that a robust DNA repair process in germinal center B cells is required for fertile antibody maturation processes (2). This observation, taken together with our recent discover that MMSET regulates the recruitment of 53BP1 to sites of DNA damage through its histone methyltransferase activity during DNA damage repair (1), suggested to us the hypothesis that MMSET may also be critically involved in Ig gene maturation, particularly as it concerns class switch recombination, a process known to result from double strand DNA breaks and subsequent effective DNA repair. By using shRNA knockdown technology in murine lymphoma cell line CH12F3 cells, which can be specifically induced to switch from IgM to IgA expression ex vivo by CD40 ligand stimulation in the presence of IL-4 and TGFb, we clearly demonstrate that downregulation of MMSET expression by shRNA significantly impaired class switch recombination from IgM to IgA. While it plays no detectable roles in cell viability, proliferation, or apoptosis, we found that MMSET is important for histone methylation at H3K36 and H4K20 sites of the Igh loci, which in turn modulate the recruitment of 53BP1 to the Igh loci as well as the transcription of the Igh switch regions, leading to defective class switch recombination. Further DNA sequence analysis of post-switched Sm-Sa junctions from MMSET compromised cells showed a significant increase in microhomology suggesting that homologous recombination (HR) repair is alternatively used as a compensatory mechanism during DNA repair of the switch region when MMSET is absent. Our results suggest that defective CSR caused by MMSET deficiency may underpin the antibody deficiency phenotype in WHS patients. Furthermore, our results showing that MMSET expression dose dictates the usage choice between two competing DNA repair pathways, i.e., error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and error-free HR, may also suggest that MMSET overexpression in MM may favor usage of the NHEJ pathway therefore leading to more error-prone DNA repair and possibly additional genetic damage. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.