Nowakowski, Grzegorz S.

TPS7571 Background: The majority of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse after HSCT, or who are not candidates for HSCT have poor outcomes and are in need of novel therapies. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a CD30-directed ADC and preclinical data provide a strong rationale for combining BV, lenalidomide, and rituximab in the treatment of R/R DLBCL. In addition, in a phase 1 trial in which 37 pts with R/R DLBCL were treated with BV + lenalidomide, the ORR was 56.7% (73.3% in CD30+ pts; manuscript in preparation). The median duration of remission was 13.2 months in pts with a CR or PR and 11.7 months in pts with CR, PR, or stable disease > 6 months. The PFS and median OS were 11.2 months and 14.3 months, respectively and results were similar in the CD30+ and CD30 < 1% groups. The clinical activity and manageable safety profiles of BV, lenalidomide, and rituximab as single agents, make the combination a viable option in multiply relapsed and heavily pretreated pts. Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, multicenter phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy of BV vs placebo, in combination with lenalidomide + rituximab, in subjects with R/R DLBCL (NCT04404283). Prior to randomization, there will be a safety and PK run-in period where 6 pts will receive BV, lenalidomide + rituximab, and safety and PK will be evaluated after the first cycle of treatment; 6/6 subjects have been enrolled. Key eligibility criteria include: pts aged ≥18 with R/R DLBCL with an eligible subtype; ≥2 prior lines of therapy and must be ineligible for, or have declined, stem cell transplant, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy; ECOG 0 to 2; fluorodeoxyglucose-avid disease by PET and bidimensional measurable disease of at least 1.5 cm by CT. Patients (n = 400) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either BV or placebo in combination with lenalidomide + rituximab and will be stratified by CD30 expression (positive [ ≥1%] versus < 1%), prior allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant therapy (received or not), prior CAR-T therapy (received or not), and cell of origin (GCB or non-GCB). The primary endpoints are PFS per BICR in the ITT and CD30+ populations. Key secondary endpoints are OS in the ITT and CD30+ populations, and ORR per BICR. Other secondary endpoints include CR rate, duration of response, and safety and tolerability of the combination. Disease response will be assessed by BICR and the investigator according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System. Radiographic disease evaluations, including contrast-enhanced CT scans and PET, will be assessed at baseline, then every 6 weeks from randomization until Week 48, then every 12 weeks. PET is not required after CR is achieved. The trial is currently enrolling and will be open in 16 countries. Clinical trial information: NCT04404283.

e19552 Background: Leukemic involvement (LI) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (L-DLBCL) is very rare and has been sparsely reported. We report our experience with this entity in a large academic multi-center setting. Methods: Medical records of patients with DLBCL who received care at Mayo Clinic between 1/2003 and 6/2020 were reviewed. DLBCL patients with LI were identified. LI was defined as increased white blood cell counts and the presence of clonal B cells on peripheral blood flow-cytometry. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results: Twenty patients with L-DLBCL were identified with a median follow-up of 32.5 months (CI95%, 32.5-NR). Median age at initial diagnosis was 62 (45-80) years. 60% (12/20) were male; 90% (18/20) were Caucasian. Pathologically, 90% (18/20) had DLBCL and 10% (2/20) had high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBCL) with intermediate features between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma. By Hans criteria, 58% (11/19) had germinal center B-cell DLBCL (GCB-DLBCL) and 42% (8/19) had non-germinal center B-cell DLBCL (non-GCB-DLBCL). 40% (8/20) had transformed DLBCL (t-DLBCL); 36% (5/14) had double-hit lymphoma (DHL) by FISH analysis. LI was present in 55% (11/20) at initial diagnosis and 45% (9/20) at relapse. Median WBC was 39.5/ul (range, 4.3-121) with median absolute lymphocyte count of 25 k/ul (range, 0.7-117). Immunophenotypically, the leukemic lymphoma cells expressed CD19, CD20, and CD79a. Bone marrow involvement and pancytopenia were documented in all patients with a median bone marrow cellularity of 80%. Other extranodal sites of involvement with LI included spleen (65%;13/20), liver (20%;4/20), breast and soft tissue (20%;4/20), bladder or kidneys (10%;2/20), skeleton (10%;2/20), and myocardium (5%;1/20). 65% (13/20) had B-symptoms. All patients had LDH elevation (UNL 222 U/L) with a median of 2125 U/L (range, 308-10,760). 45% (5/11) of patients with LI at initial diagnosis had CNS involvement on relapse/progression. All patients with LI at initial diagnosis received anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy with or without CNS prophylaxis. Patients with LI at relapse had had a median of 2 prior treatments (range, 1-5) before LI. Median overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 9 months (CI 95%; 5.8-11.8). There were no long-term survivors. Median progression free survival after LI was 4.7 months (CI95%; 0.8-7.6) in the newly diagnosed group and 3 months (CI95%; 0.9-20) in the relapsed group. 90% (18/20) died due to their progressive disease. Cell of origin, DHL status, or newly diagnosed vs. relapsed status did not have a significant impact on OS in patients with L-DLBCL. Conclusions: Leukemic involvement at any time during the course of DLBCL is associated with poor prognosis. It also appears to be a major risk factor for CNS relapse. It is most frequently associated with DHL and t-DLBCL. Novel therapeutic approaches at the time of initial therapy need to be developed for L-DLBCL.

e19547 Background: Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL, LT) is a rare, aggressive lymphoma characterized by skin involvement predominantly in the lower extremities, and is associated with an inferior prognosis compared to other primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas. Immunochemotherapy with or without involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) is considered standard, front-line therapy. Interestingly, over-expression of PD-L1/PD-L2 has been shown in a high proportion of PCDLBCL, LT cases, but efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in relapsed/refractory, PCDLBCL, LT has not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, we describe the outcomes of 1) immunochemotherapy with and without IFRT as front-line treatment of PCDLBCL, LT, and 2) ICIs in the relapsed/refractory setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with PCDLBCL, LT seen at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2020. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we calculated progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS) in patients who received front-line R-CHOP with and without IFRT, and salvage ICI therapy for relapsed/refractory disease. Results: A total of 28 patients with PCDLBCL, LT were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 71.6 years (range 48.0-91.7), 50% (N = 14) were male, and 78.6% (N = 22) had disease involvement of the lower extremities at diagnosis. For front-line treatment, 31.2% (N = 9) received R-CHOP with IFRT, and 31.2% (N = 9) received R-CHOP without IFRT. The median PFS in patients treated with R-CHOP plus IFRT was 41.8 months [95% CI: 30.2-69.6] compared to 13.7 months [95% CI: 10.7-27.7; p= 0.01] in those treated with R-CHOP without IFRT. The median OS in patients treated with R-CHOP plus IFRT was 74.7 months [95% CI: 53.0-108.6] compared to 38.2 months [95% CI: 26.0-80.4; p= 0.14] in those treated with R-CHOP without IFRT. Patient and disease characteristics were similar among these two groups. ICIs were used in 17.9% (N = 5) of patients with relapsed/refractory, PCDLBCL, LT, and these patients had received a median of three (range 2-10) prior systemic therapies. The overall response rate was 60% as three patients treated with ICIs achieved a complete response, and the other two patients showed no clinical response. The median DOR from ICIs was 23.0 months [95% CI: 3.6-26.0]. The median PFS from ICI therapy was 10.2 months [95% CI: 3.6 – not reached]. Only one of the five patients was noted to have a mild side effect from ICI treatment (elevated alkaline phosphatase, grade 1). Conclusions: R-CHOP with IFRT was associated with a longer median PFS compared to R-CHOP without IFRT as front-line therapy for PCDLBCL, LT. Furthermore, ICIs may have a role in treating relapsed/refractory disease as reasonable activity in heavily pre-treated patients and a favorable safety profile were observed in this study. Further studies would be of benefit to confirm our findings.

e19501 Background: The current standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) following frontline immunochemotherapy (IC) is salvage therapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) rescue in patients responding to salvage therapy. Time to first relapse (or refractory status) and response to salvage therapy in patients with RR DLBCL may reflect the chemosensitivity of the underlying disease. The aim of this study is to determine whether these factors impact post-ASCT outcomes. Methods: Patients with DLBCL that relapsed after R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like frontline therapy who underwent salvage therapy and ASCT at Mayo Clinic or University of Iowa between 07/2000 and 4/2020 were identified from institutional lymphoma and transplant databases. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 437 patients with RR DLBCL who underwent salvage therapy and ASCT were identified. 280 (64%) were male. Median time from initial diagnosis to 1st relapse/salvage was 1.0 years (range 0.1-16.4). A median of 1 line (range 1-3) of salvage therapy was required. Response prior to ASCT was complete response (CR) in 211 (48%), partial response in 199 (46%), stable disease in 24 (5%), and unknown in 3 (1%) patients. Median age at ASCT was 61 years (range 19-78), and median follow up after ASCT was 8.0 years (95% CI 7.2-8.7). Median PFS and OS was 2.7 (95% CI 1.5-4.3) and 5.4 (4.2-7.4) years, respectively. Time to 1st relapse/salvage (≤1 vs 1-2 vs > 2 years) was not associated with PFS (median 0.8 vs 2.4 vs 4.9 years, p = 0.170) but was associated with OS (2.4 vs 7.4 vs 6.8 years, p = 0.013). Patients who required > 1 line of salvage therapy had significantly inferior PFS (median 0.3 vs 4.5 years, p < 0.001) and OS (0.9 vs 7.4 years, p < 0.001). In addition, patients who failed to achieve a CR prior to ASCT had significantly worse PFS (median 0.8 vs 5.3 years, p < 0.001) and OS (2.7 vs 9.2 years, p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for age and sex, time to 1st relapse/salvage was not associated with PFS (p = 0.313) or OS (p = 0.081); however, lines of salvage and response prior to ASCT remain significantly prognostic for PFS ( > 1 line of salvage: HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.59-2.87, p < 0.001; non-CR: HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.26-2.05, p < 0.001) and OS ( > 1 line of salvage: HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.66-3.05, p < 0.001; non-CR: HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.26-2.12, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with RR DLBCL following frontline IC, requiring more than 1 line of salvage therapy and failure to achieve CR are strong independent risk factors for poor PFS and OS after ASCT. Novel therapies such as CAR-T cell therapy should be studied in this population.