Berianu, Florentina

Abstract Objective: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV) is a group of illnesses that cause inflammation and alterations to small vessels in the body. Some of the most common and detrimental manifestations, including alveolar hemorrhage and glomerulonephritis, are caused by this capillary inflammation. We sought to clarify whether patients with AAV would have abnormal nailfold capillaries when evaluated with nailfold videocapillaroscopy. Methods: Patients with a current diagnosis of AAV and a control group were identified for enrollment. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy images were used for a semiquantitative analysis on capillary density, morphology, dilation, and microhemorrhage after review by 2 rheumatologists. Disease characteristics, occurrence of recent disease flare, and presence of ANCA were recorded. Results: Thirty-three patients with a diagnosis of AAV and 21 controls were recruited. The AAV group had a median age of 59 and 17 (52%) were women. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis was the most common diagnosis (19 [58%]), followed by eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (7 [21%]) and microscopic polyangiitis (7 [21%]). Twenty-seven patients (82%) had positive ANCA tests. After assessment of capillary density, dilation, morphology, microhemorrhages, and disorganization, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Conclusion: There was no evidence of differences in nailfold capillaroscopy abnormalities between those diagnosed with AAV and the control group. While this cohort was relatively small, we did not find a high enough prevalence or specific phenotype of capillary abnormalities that could aid in diagnosis or prognostication of these diseases in the clinical setting.

ObjectiveNew‐onset and relapsed dermatomyositis (DM) has been reported following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or COVID‐19 vaccination. This study aims to show the characteristics of a DM cohort after COVID‐19 infection and vaccination.MethodsA retrospective review was performed on patients treated for DM between March 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022. Charts were evaluated for the presence of new‐onset DM or relapse of preexisting DM following either SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or COVID‐19 vaccination. Data on symptom onset, timing of vaccination, type of vaccination, and disease characteristics were collected.ResultsNinety‐eight patients treated for DM at our institution in the Division of Rheumatology were included. In total, 12 of 98 patients (12.2%) experienced DM symptoms (either incident or relapse) following either infection or vaccination. Of the 12 patients who developed incident disease or relapse, 7 (58.3%) developed postinfection symptoms, and 8 (66.7%) developed symptoms after vaccination (3 patients had symptoms following both infection and vaccination). The mean onset of symptoms following COVID‐19 infection was 3.2 days (median 0.5 days), and mean onset following COVID‐19 vaccination was 5.75 days (median 3.5 days). Nine of 12 patients (75%) had a positive myositis‐specific antibody, and the remaining 3 (25%) had myositis‐associated antibodies. There was no predominant vaccine associated with the development of postvaccination DM symptoms.ConclusionThis retrospective review revealed a strong temporal relationship between DM symptoms and COVID‐19 infection or vaccination in 12.2% of all patients with DM evaluated in our clinic during the pandemic. Additional studies are required to understand the possible pathophysiology behind this association.

AbstractIntroductionExtra‐articular involvement (EAI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is rare, severe and usually presents after years of joint involvement. Onset of RA as lung involvement has been published. We describe a series of three patients with strongly positive anti‐citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) positive in the absence of joint symptoms, but with significant EAI.MethodsThis is a descriptive case series of three patients evaluated in an academic medical center rheumatology clinic.ResultsA 50‐year‐old female presented with severe recurrent scleritis in the background of strongly positive ACPA, but no joint involvement. Her ocular disease responded well to rituximab. Four years later, she developed peripheral inflammatory arthritis consistent with RA. A 74‐year‐old male presented after developing recurrent steroid‐dependent serositis (pleuro‐pericarditis) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Serology was notable for strongly positive ACPA, but no joint involvement. Serositis responded well to adalimumab. Two years after initial symptoms, he developed peripheral joint involvement after holding adalimumab. A 56‐year‐old female presented with an isolated, biopsy‐proven subcutaneous rheumatoid nodule. Subsequently, she developed pancytopenia and fatigue. She tested strongly positive for ACPA and RF. Bone marrow biopsy was negative for malignancy and she had no evidence of infection. She responded to steroids and hydroxychloroquine and had not developed joint involvement after 2 years of follow‐up.ConclusionEAI as an onset of RA is a complex and not easily recognized entity if typical joints involvement is not yet present. Early diagnosis may help guide specific therapy and prevent sequelae and co‐morbidities.

Objective The current study was designed to evaluate the translation of clinical trial outcomes and clinical guidelines for the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) into an intensive multicomponent clinical program embedded in routine care delivery. The study aimed to assess the adaptation of these recommended strategies into routine clinical care while evaluating their effectiveness and durability in improving functional status and level of distress in a large clinical sample of FM patients. Methods Four hundred eighty-nine patients with FM completed a 2-day program that incorporated best practice recommendations for the treatment of FM. Patients completed the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire–Revised, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale at admission to the program and at follow-up on average 5 months posttreatment. Results Significant improvements were seen in functional status (p < 0.0001), depressive symptoms (p < 0.0001), and pain catastrophizing (p < 0.0001) after participation in the intensive multicomponent treatment program. Conclusions The present study shows that an intensive multicomponent treatment program embedded in routine care delivery is effective in significantly improving functional status and psychological distress in a large sample of FM patients. The significant improvements were durable and maintained at follow-up.

Introduction. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage is a rare presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment can improve outcome. Case Report. An 18-year-old male presented with hemoptysis and respiratory distress requiring orotracheal intubation. Laboratory tests showed positive anti-nuclear antibody and anti-dsDNA and low C3 and C4. Bronchoalveolar lavage became progressively hemorrhagic after each aliquot. He was treated with pulse methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, and plasma exchanges. Discussion. Alveolar hemorrhage is a rare initial presentation of lupus, with mortality rates reported at about 50%. Lupus should be considered in those presenting with alveolar hemorrhage since delay in therapy may cause a rapid deterioration of the patient. The diagnosis of SLE is illusive when DAH is the presenting symptom. Since early diagnosis and appropriate institution of treatment improve outcome, it is important to keep lupus in mind as an etiology of alveolar hemorrhage. Pulse methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, and plasmapheresis therapy resulted in rapid improvement of respiratory function in our patient.