Yousefi, Kasra

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer molecular subtypes based on ETS gene fusions and SPINK1 were originally identified through distinct gene expression profiles. Such molecular subtypes may have utility in disease stratification and clonality assessment, complementing available purely prognostic tests. Hence, we determined the analytical validity of molecular subtyping and explored clinical associations using global gene expression profiles in a large cohort of PCa. Methods: We analyzed 1,577 patient Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0ST GeneChip expression profiles from 8 radical prostatectomy (RP) cohorts; 5 of them generated as part of the Decipher® platform for the Decipher® discovery or validation. Multi-feature random forest classifiers and outlier analysis were used to define microarray-based molecular subtypes and characterize clinical associations. Results: A random forest (RF) classifier (m-ERG) was trained and validated to predict ERG fusion status using separate subsets of a single-institution RP cohort (total n=407) with known ERG rearrangement status defined by FISH, achieving >95% sensitivity and specificity in the validation subset. The model was then applied to 7 independent RP cohorts to predict ERG rearrangement status. Less frequent rearrangements involving other ETS genes (ETV1, ETV4, ETV5, FLI1) or SPINK1 over-expression were predicted based on gene expression outlier analysis. Across cohorts, 45%, 9% 8% and 38% of PCa were classified as ERG+, ERG—ETS+, ERG—SPINK+, and Triple Negative (ERG—/ETS—/SPINK1—), respectively. Global gene expression analysis shows that the four subtypes could be collapsed into three entities (ERG+, ERG—ETS+ and SPINK+/Triple Negative) based on expression patterns and clinical characteristics similarity. Based on multivariable analysis, ERG+ is significantly associated with lower pre-PSA (p<0.001), lower Gleason score (p<0.001), the presence of extraprostatic extension (p<0.001) and European Americans (p<0.001), but not associated with outcome. ERG—ETS+ is significantly associated with SVI (p=0.01) and ERG—SPINK+ is enriched in African Americans (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Decipher® platform can accurately determine ERG rearrangement status and PCa molecular subtypes. Inclusion of molecular subtyping, such as m-ERG status, may enable additional precision medicine opportunities in prognostic tests and provides insights into the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Citation Format: Mohammed Alshalalfa, Scott A. Tomlins, Nicholas Erho, Kasra Yousefi, Shuang Zhao, Robert B. Den, Adam P. Dicker, Bruce Trock, Angelo DeMarzo, Edward M. Schaeffer, Ashley Ross, Eric A. Klein, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Jeffery R. Karnes, Robert B Jenkins, Elai Davicioni, Felix Feng. Molecular and clinical characterization of 1,577 primary prostate cancer tumors reveals novel clinical and biological insights into its subtypes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Translation of the Cancer Genome; Feb 7-9, 2015; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(22 Suppl 1):Abstract nr A1-64.

Purpose The optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is unclear. We hypothesized that a genomic classifier (GC) would provide prognostic and predictive insight into the development of clinical metastases in men receiving post-RP RT and inform decision making. Patients and Methods GC scores were calculated from 188 patients with pT3 or margin-positive prostate cancer, who received post-RP RT at Thomas Jefferson University and Mayo Clinic between 1990 and 2009. The primary end point was clinical metastasis. Prognostic accuracy of the models was tested using the concordance index for censored data and decision curve analysis. Cox regression analysis tested the relationship between GC and metastasis. Results The cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5 years after RT was 0%, 9%, and 29% for low, average, and high GC scores, respectively (P = .002). In multivariable analysis, GC and pre-RP prostate-specific antigen were independent predictors of metastasis (both P < .01). Within the low GC score (< 0.4), there were no differences in the cumulative incidence of metastasis comparing patients who received adjuvant or salvage RT (P = .79). However, for patients with higher GC scores (≥ 0.4), cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5 years was 6% for patients treated with adjuvant RT compared with 23% for patients treated with salvage RT (P < .01). Conclusion In patients treated with post-RP RT, GC is prognostic for the development of clinical metastasis beyond routine clinical and pathologic features. Although preliminary, patients with low GC scores are best treated with salvage RT, whereas those with high GC scores benefit from adjuvant therapy. These findings provide the first rational selection of timing for post-RP RT.

Objective To better characterize the genomics of patients with biochemical recurrence ( BCR ) who have metastatic disease progression in order to improve treatment decisions for prostate cancer. Methods The expression profiles of three clinical outcome groups after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) were compared: those with no evidence of disease ( NED ; n = 108); those with BCR (rise in prostate‐specific antigen [ PSA ] level without metastasis; n = 163); and those with metastasis ( n = 192). The patients were profiled using Human Exon 1.0 ST microarrays, and outcomes were supported by a median 18 years of follow‐up. A metastasis signature was defined and verified in an independent RP cohort to ensure the robustness of the signature. Furthermore, bioinformatics characterization of the signature was conducted to decipher its biology. Results Minimal gene expression differences were observed between adjuvant treatment‐naïve patients in the NED group and patients without metastasis in the BCR group. More than 95% of the differentially expressed genes (metastasis signature) were found in comparisons between primary tumours of metastasis patients and the two other outcome groups. The metastasis signature was validated in an independent cohort and was significantly associated with cell cycle genes, ubiquitin‐mediated proteolysis, DNA repair, androgen, G‐protein coupled and NOTCH signal transduction pathways. Conclusion This study shows that metastasis development after BCR is associated with a distinct transcriptional programme that can be detected in the primary tumour. Patients with NED and BCR have highly similar transcriptional profiles, suggesting that measurement of PSA on its own is a poor surrogate for lethal disease. Use of genomic testing in patients undergoing RP with an initial rise in PSA level may be useful to improve secondary therapy decision‐making.