We present a case of a patient with a diagnostic dilemma who was referred for possible faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for refractory diarrhoea secondary to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). On detailed history, the patient was exposed to ipilimumab concomitantly while being treated for CDI, and was instead diagnosed with diarrhoea secondary to superimposed ipilimumab-associated colitis. Ipilimumab is an anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody approved for use in metastatic melanoma and under trial for other indications. Ipilimumab is associated with several immune-related adverse effects, of which diarrhoea and colitis are the most common. While FMT has shown tremendous efficacy in managing recurrent and refractory CDI, it was not offered in this case due to negative C. difficile testing showing a high degree of suspicion for ipilimumab-associated colitis due to recent drug use. Our patient was successfully managed with fluid resuscitation and steroids, and remains symptom free at last follow-up at 9 months.
Systematic review: colitis associated with anti‐CTLA‐4 therapy
SummaryBackgroundCytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein‐4 (CTLA‐4) has an important role in T‐cell regulation, proliferation and tolerance. Anti‐CTLA‐4 agents, such as ipilimumab and tremelimumab, have been shown to prolong overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, and their use is being investigated in the treatment of other malignancies. Their novel immunostimulatory mechanism, however, predisposes patients to immune‐related adverse effects, of which gastrointestinal effects such as diarrhoea and colitis are the most common.AimsTo discuss the existing literature and summarise the epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical features of anti‐CTLA‐4‐associated colitis, and to present a management algorithm for it.MethodsWe searched PubMed for studies published through October 2014 using the terms ‘anti‐CTLA,’ ‘ipilimumab,’ ‘tremelimumab,’ ‘colitis,’ ‘gastrointestinal,’ ‘immune‐related adverse effect,’ ‘immunotherapy,’ ‘melanoma,’ and ‘diarrhoea.’ResultsWatery diarrhoea is commonly associated with anti‐CTLA‐4 therapy (27–54%), and symptoms occur within a few days to weeks of therapy. Diffuse acute and chronic colitis are the most common findings on endoscopy (8–22%). Concomitant infectious causes of diarrhoea must be evaluated. Most cases may be successfully managed with discontinuation of anti‐CTLA‐4 and conservative therapy. Those with persistent grade 2 and grade 3/4 diarrhoea should undergo endoscopic evaluation and require corticosteroid therapy. Corticosteroid‐resistant cases may respond to anti‐tumour necrosis factor‐alpha therapy such as infliximab. Surgery is reserved for patients with bowel perforation or failure of medical therapy.ConclusionGiven the increasing use of anti‐CTLA‐4 therapy, clinicians must be aware of related adverse events and their management.
MYST3/CREBBP
Rearranged Acute Myeloid Leukemia after Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Case Reports in Oncological Medicine | December 8, 2014 | Volume: 2014 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-3
Although rare, clinicians and patients must be aware that therapy related malignancies, specifically acute myeloid leukemia (AML), can occur as a complication of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Vigilance for signs and symptoms is appropriate. AML with t (8;16) is a specific translocation leading to formation of a fusion protein ( MYST3/CREBBP ). The MYST3/CREBBP AML tends to develop within 2 years of adjuvant chemotherapy, especially for breast cancer, without preceding myelodysplasia. It usually presents with disseminated intravascular coagulation and osteolytic lesions and has a poor prognosis despite aggressive resuscitation and therapy. With the increasing use of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, we are seeing a definite increase in the incidence of therapy related myelodysplastic syndromes and AML. One must keep this complication in mind while counseling and following up breast cancer patients who have received adjuvant chemotherapy. New osteolytic bone lesions in a patient with history of breast cancer do not necessarily mean metastatic disease and should be fully evaluated.