Kohlhagen, Mindy

Background: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe thrombotic thrombocytopenia that predominantly occurs after adenoviral vector-based vaccines. VITT patients produce anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies with restricted clonality (i.e., mono/oligoclonal) with lambda light chains. Long-term follow-up studies in VITT show a disconnect in the persistence of anti-PF4 antibodies, whereby ELISA-positive antibodies persist significantly longer than platelet-activating antibodies. The mechanistic basis of this is unclear and could be explained by a couple of hypotheses: (1) Epitope spreading where, with time, the specificity of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies may “spread” to recognize only PF4 complexed to heparin vs. (2) Persistence of clonally restricted platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies which decrease in titers with time such that their levels are insufficient to crosslink platelet FcGRIIa and induce platelet activation. Methods: Acute, convalescent patient sera and affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibodies were evaluated in antigen-based, functional (platelet-activation-based), and mass spectrometry studies as previously described (Blood, 2022 Jul 7;140(1):73-77). The median time to last follow-up was 243 days after the acute episode (range: 114-664 days). Results: Follow-up samples were obtained from 6 VITT patients after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. At last follow-up, anti-PF4 IgG antibodies reactive in PF4/polyanion ELISA were detected in the sera of 5/6 VITT patients. However, only one of these samples stimulated platelet activation in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA; 199 days after acute presentation). Affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibodies were detected by ELISA in all follow-up samples and three of the six affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibody samples activated platelets in the PEA. Four of the six VITT patients demonstrated a monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody, while one each had a biclonal and triclonal profile. Five VITT patients produced IgG lambda light chain antibodies, while one produced an IgG kappa. All six VITT patients demonstrated synonymous anti-PF4 antibody profiles when comparing acute and follow-up antibody repertoires, without evidence of VITT patients producing new anti-PF4 antibodies after the acute episode. In all cases, levels of anti-PF4 antibodies were significantly lower in convalescent samples relative to acute samples. Given this data on the persistence of clonally-restricted VITT antibodies, samples from another VITT patient with thrombocytopenia (100-150,000/uL) persisting for more than three years were similarly evaluated. This patient, who experienced severe thrombosis after ChAdOx1 nCoV19 vaccination, demonstrated persistent ELISA and PEA positivity even three years after symptom onset but had not experienced breakthrough thrombosis while on anticoagulation therapy. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) did not detect a monoclonal gammopathy. Anti-PF4 antibodies immuno-enriched from a sample obtained >2 years after acute presentation demonstrated a monoclonal profile. While non-availability of an acute sample for anti-PF4 antibody characterization precluded a firm determination of whether this “Long VITT” case represented a subset of monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS; Blood 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776; New Eng J Med 2024 Aug 8), the chronicity of thrombocytopenia, presence of a monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody and persistently positive anti-PF4 serology supports this diagnosis. Conclusions. Clonally-restricted VITT antibodies persist for months-years with no evidence for the production of novel anti-PF4 antibodies after the acute event. Decreased abundance of anti-PF4 antibodies leads to negative functional results with follow up samples. Some platelet-activating antibodies can persist for very long periods (>3 years) and mediate persistent thrombocytopenia, representing an SPEP-negative MGTS-like state. This study also demonstrates the first example of a VITT antibody with a kappa light chain. The requirement for anticoagulation in patients demonstrating ELISA-positive/functional test-negative results is not clear, but the persistence of mono/oligoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies raises the possibility for the upregulation of pathogenic antibody production in proinflammatory settings.

Monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) is a recently recognized thrombophilia characterized by the production of a monoclonal antibody that binds to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and stimulates platelet activation (Blood. 2022 Jul 7;140(1):73-77). Typical signs of MGTS include a history of recurrent thrombosis, persistent thrombocytopenia, and positive laboratory results in PF4/polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) testing, as in the related thrombotic disorder heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Here, we present a case of MGTS, presenting with transient thrombocytopenia coincident with thrombotic episodes and negative test results in SRA and PF4/polyanion-based testing platforms (ELISAs and automated assays). A 56-year-old male patient initially presented with acute left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and a pulmonary embolism. Following the administration of warfarin, the patient experienced a second DVT four months later and was transitioned to a factor Xa inhibitor. Fifty-two months later, the patient developed occlusion of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins despite additional anticoagulation therapy. Further testing led to a diagnosis of an IgG2 kappa monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Eleven months later, the patient again suffered breakthrough thrombosis, specifically radial artery thrombosis, and a thrombotic cerebrovascular accident, leading to the addition of aspirin to the patient's treatment regimen. Notably, where detailed blood counts were available in the patient's clinical history, the patient experienced only transient thrombocytopenia coinciding with his two most recent thrombotic episodes and has had platelet counts in the normal range in the four-year period since his last thrombotic event. After initiating dual anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, the patient has not developed recurrent thrombocytopenia or new thrombotic events. Antigen-based and functional testing for HIT antibodies (ELISA, SRA, and automated immunoassays) were negative in this patient, unlike in the previously described index case of MGTS, where serological testing mimicked classical HIT serology (i.e., HIT ELISA and SRA positivity). The sample was also non-reactive in a vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)-specific ELISA employing uncomplexed PF4 targets, as previously described (Am J Hematol. 2022 May;97(5):519-526). Conversely, the patient's antibody consistently stimulated platelet activation in a PF4- and IgG-dependent manner in functional testing using PF4-treated platelets. This included PF4-treated platelets that were freshly isolated and used in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) and cryopreserved platelets used in the thrombospondin-1 release assay. Interestingly, consistently positive PEA results have been documented from four samples over the last four years, during which the patient had normal platelet counts. To further characterize the patient's IgG2 MGUS antibody, the patient's monoclonal was immuno-enriched. Patient sera and the immuno-enriched MGUS were then compared by mass spectrometry, which generated identical mass profiles. After confirming the effective enrichment of the patient's MGUS by mass spectrometry, the antibody was de novo sequenced or “reverse-engineered” to obtain the antibody's amino acid sequence. The antibody was then expressed and tested in ELISA-based and functional platelet assays. Importantly, the recombinant antibody replicated the PF4-dependent platelet activation observed with patient serum and did not bind PF4/polyanion targets in ELISA testing. Together, these data strongly support the identification of a new class of ELISA- and SRA-negative anti-PF4 monoclonal antibodies that cause MGTS. This case illustrates the diagnostic challenges in MGTS. MGTS patients may not exhibit persistent thrombocytopenia, and diagnostic tests for detecting HIT antibodies may be ineffective in accurately diagnosing this new thrombophilia. This case emphasizes the importance of reviewing platelet counts in the peri-thrombotic period to recognize transient thrombocytopenia and establishes the utility of PF4-enhanced functional assays to detect pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies, even in settings where classical HIT testing (i.e., ELISA/SRA) is negative.

Background: Recent data from the field of autoimmune platelet antibodies in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) suggests that antibodies with restricted clonality may be associated with more severe outcomes. Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA) is an IgG-mediated red blood cell (RBC) disorder. The goal of this study was to investigate the clonality of anti-RBC IgG antibodies in WAIHA, and to assess if clonal restriction was associated with more severe disease course and outcomes. Methods: 15 patients with WAIHA were evaluated. All patients had proven IgG positivity in direct antiglobulin testing (DAT, or “Coombs” test). RBC eluates were prepared and both the patient plasma sample, as well as the RBC eluate, were subject to liquid chromatography electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-QTOF MS). Based on the number of antibodies seen in the RBC eluate, patients were classified into mono/oligoclonal vs. polyclonal antibody WAIHA groups Assessment of response to treatment was based on international consensus criteria: complete (CR; normal Hb or Hb ≥12 g/dL, with resolution of hemolysis); partial (PR; Hb >10 but <12 g/dL or Hgb >12 g/dL without resolution of hemolysis); or no response (neither CR nor PR). Results: Eleven of the 15 patients (73%) were found to have polyclonal antibodies, while four patients (27%) had mono/oligoclonal WAIHA antibodies. Of these four patients with restricted clonality, two patients had monoclonal antibodies (Figure 1 shows one of the monoclonal WAIHA antibodies identified). There was no significant difference in demographic composition, clinical findings, or treatment received in both groups (Table 1). 66.7% (n=10) of patients were male, and the mean age (SD) was 62.5 years (24.5). Two pediatric patients, ages 10 and 16, were included. Concomitant lymphoproliferative disease was present in 46.7% of the patients. The three most common treatments were steroids (100%), rituximab (93.3%), and splenectomy (13.3%). 40.0% of patients had died at the time of this analysis with no difference between the groups. The number of treatments received were similar between the mono/oligoclonal and polyclonal groups. After the first line of treatment, 100% and 77.8% of the mono/oligoclonal and polyclonal groups respectively achieved PR or CR (P=0.31). Additionally, 100% of the mono/oligoclonal group and 54.5% of the polyclonal group were in PR or CR by their most recent CBC (P=0.10). 50.0% and 54.5% of the mono/oligoclonal group and polyclonal groups respectively relapsed at least once (P=0.25). In those who relapsed, there was an average of 1.0 relapse events in the mono/oligoclonal group compared to 1.7 relapse events in the polyclonal group (P=0.32). Conclusion: This study demonstrates, for the first time, that monoclonal and oligoclonal antibodies can mediate warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia. While these data suggest no difference in clinical outcomes or disease course between patients with mono/oligoclonal vs. polyclonal anti-RBC antibodies, a key limitation is the small sample size.

We identified a patient with a recently described syndrome, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS; Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776), and three additional patients with high 4Ts scores who were consistently negative in the PF4-polyanion HIT ELISA (Lifecodes PF4 IgG, Immucor). The MGTS patient, with a monoclonal IgG kappa, had recurrent thrombosis, and transient mild thrombocytopenia (nadir in the low 100s) over a period of years, and was noted to have a HIT ELISA optical density (OD) of 0.117. The three HIT patients experienced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis with ELISA ODs of 0.37, 0.18 and 0.20. All patients were positive in platelet-activation (functional) testing demonstrating PF4 dependence and inhibited with both high concentrations of heparin (100U/mL) and the FcγRIIa blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) IV.3, consistent with the presence of anti-PF4 antibodies in the patient samples ( data not shown). Because the serologic profile of these patients suggested a novel HIT subtype characterized by negative HIT ELISA results, we undertook a functional platelet assay screen of 500 consecutive HIT ELISA-negative patients tested in our diagnostic laboratory. Research studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. Of the 500 patients tested, 20 (4.0%) stimulated platelet activation in the PF4-dependent P-selectin Expression Assay (PEA ≥19%; data not shown). To exclude non-specific activation that can be induced by HLA antibodies, additional testing was performed to evaluate whether platelet activation was PF4-dependent using buffer or PF4-treated platelets. Three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent activation that was inhibited by high heparin concentrations and mAb IV.3, as would be expected for HIT antibodies (ELISA-negative HIT, EN-HIT1-3; Figure 1). On retrospective review, all three patients thus identified had clinical histories and courses consistent with high clinical probability for HIT. To develop tools to study this new class of antibodies, monoclonal HIT antibodies were generated in mice after PF4/heparin immunizations and screened using a novel approach that included simultaneous testing of hybridoma supernatants in the PEA and PF4-polyanion ELISA. This strategy was designed to enabled us to identify mAbs that activated platelets (in the PEA), but that did not bind antigenic targets in the HIT ELISA. A novel mAb 431.4 that was developed using this approach, and the well-characterized HIT-like mAb KKO were evaluated for their abilities to both bind PF4-polyanion targets in ELISA, and to activate PF4-treated platelets in the PEA (Figure 2). In significant contrast to KKO, mAb 431.4 did not bind PF4/polyanion complexes, however, like KKO, strongly activated platelets in a PF4-dependent manner. Activation induced by both KKO and mAb 431.4 was inhibited by high heparin concentrations, as would be expected for HIT antibodies. In vivo murine studies using this novel mAb are pending at this time. In summary, the non-canonical diagnostic profile of HIT ELISA-negative but platelet activation-positive antibodies were found at a relatively high incidence in HIT-suspected patients (0.6%; 3 of 500 ELISA-negative patients). These findings have important diagnostic/management implications and suggest a re-evaluation of ASH's HIT management guidelines as noted in recommendations 2.7 and 2.8 of that document (“In patients with an intermediate (Recommendation 2.7) or high (Recommendation 2.8)-probability 4Ts score and a negative immunoassay, the ASH guideline panel recommends discontinuation of the non-heparin anticoagulant and resumption of heparin, if indicated ”; Blood Adv (2018) 2 (22): 3360-3392). Figure 1. A subset of ELISA-negative HIT-suspected patients harbor anti-PF4 platelet-activating antibodies. Three ELISA-negative (EN) HIT patient samples from a screen of 500 samples demonstrate PF4-dependent platelet activation and inhibition with high heparin concentration and mAb IV.3 incubation. PBS, phosphate buffered saline; IC, isotype control; HDH- high dose heparin (100U/mL). Figure 2. Murine mAb 431.4 serologically mimics pathogenic ELISA-negative HIT/MGTS antibodies. ELISA and PEA testing was performed using the “HIT-like” mAb KKO, novel mAb 431.4, or an isotype control (IC) antibody. PVS-polyvinyl sulfonate (polyanion used in the Immucor IgG ELISA assay).

Abstract Background Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry coupled to immune enrichment (MASS-FIX) as an alternative to serum immunofixation electrophoresis has demonstrated increased sensitivity in monoclonal protein (MP) detection with improved laboratory workflow. This study explored similar replacement of urine immunofixation electrophoresis (u-IFE) with urine MASS-FIX (u-MASS-FIX) by method comparison. Methods Residual urine (n = 1008) from Mayo Clinic patients with a known plasma cell disease were assayed neat by u-MASS-FIX analysis. Each sample was paired with the following: u-IFE, urine total protein, urine protein electrophoresis, serum κ/λ free light chain (LC) ratio (rFLC), and serum MASS-FIX (s-MASS-FIX). Analytical sensitivities were measured in pooled urine spiked with daratumumab. Results u-IFE and u-MASS-FIX had 91% agreement in determining the presence/absence of MPs (Cohen kappa = 0.8200). In discrepant cases, serum rFLC statistically aligned more closely with positive u-MASS-FIX cases than u-IFE. Patients positive by both s-MASS-FIX and u-MASS-FIX had matching MP masses (±20 daltons) in 94% of cases. The u-MASS-FIX spectra further identified κ/λ LC fragments and glycosylated LCs not appreciated on u-IFE. The unconcentrated u-MASS-FIX limit of detection of 0.156 mg/mL was determined equivalent to 100× concentrated u-IFE. Conclusion u-MASS-FIX is a reliable alternative to u-IFE with the added benefits of LC glycosylation detection and MP mass tracking between serum and urine. Furthermore, u-MASS-FIX is performed using neat urine. Eliminating the need to concentrate urine for u-IFE has potential to increase productivity by decreasing labor minutes per test.

Kanack and colleagues analyze anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies from 5 patients with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) secondary to COVID-19 adenoviral vaccination and antibodies from patients with spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and classical HIT. VITT antibodies are monoclonal or oligoclonal, similar to spontaneous HIT, whereas classical HIT antibodies are polyclonal. Heparin inhibits antibody-induced platelet activation in VITT, suggesting that heparin should be considered for the treatment of VITT.

Abstract Background: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen Johnson & Johnson) vaccines against COVID-19 have been associated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic reactions referred to as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) characterized by the presence of platelet-activating, anti-PF4 antibodies. While VITT shares key clinical features with a similar but separate entity, Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), there appear to be important differences: 1) VITT patients have extremely high thrombosis rates and are very strongly positive in PF4-polyanion ELISAs, and 2) Many patients with VITT frequently present with refractoriness to therapy or have disease recurrence that suggests distinct antibody characteristics due to a strong autoimmune anti-PF4 response. Aims: The goal of this study was to characterize anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT. Methods: Five VITT patients were studied, one after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and four after Ad26.COV2. Reactivity of VITT anti-PF4 antibodies to uncomplexed PF4, PF4-Polyvinyl sulfonate (PVS), and PF4-heparin targets was evaluated, and the platelet-activating ability of these antibodies was examined in the PF4-dependent P-selectin Expression assay (PEA). Anti-PF4 antibodies were isolated from patient blood samples using PF4-treated heparin sepharose beads, and isolated antibodies were subject to mass spectrometric evaluation (Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry [LC-ESI-QTOF MS]). Results: Antibodies from all VITT patients recognized both uncomplexed and complexed PF4 (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, recognition of PF4 by VITT antibodies was lower if PF4 targets were complexed with polyanions, PVS, or heparin (Fig. 1A). These results contrasted with those obtained in a "classical" HIT patient which showed reactivity to PF4/polyanion complexes, but not to uncomplexed PF4 (Fig 1A). All samples activated platelets in the PEA (data not shown). Mass spectrometric evaluation of anti-PF4 antibodies isolated from VITT patients demonstrated monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies in three patients, and bi- and tri-clonal antibodies in one patient each (a representative monoclonal antibody anti-PF4 antibody is shown in Fig 1B). Consistent with current dogma, polyclonal anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies were seen in "classical" HIT (Fig 1C). Evaluation of anti-PF4 antibodies in spontaneous HIT, a type of autoimmune HIT seen in pro-inflammatory milieus such as orthopedic surgery and infectious prodromes also demonstrated monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies (Fig 1D). Eluates from control heparin-sepharose beads did not reveal any immunoglobulins (data not shown). Conclusion: Although development of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies and the thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome seen after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccination resembles HIT, these findings demonstrate that clonally restricted anti-PF4 antibodies mediate VITT while polyclonal anti-PF4 antibodies mediate HIT. In addition, we noted clonally-restricted anti-PF4 antibodies in another condition that does not require proximate heparin exposure, spontaneous ("autoimmune") HIT. In VITT, the strong immune response after vaccine administration may result in the activation of a single or few pre-existing anti-PF4 reactive clones, and development of clonally restricted anti-PF4 antibodies with a similar pathophysiology to Spontaneous HIT. It is also likely that high levels of monoclonal/oligoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies cause the severe thrombotic phenotypes seen in VITT and Spontaneous HIT. The high mortality rate and reports of disease refractoriness to therapy in VITT may warrant consideration of additional therapeutic modalities like rituximab and therapeutic plasma exchange in select cases. Figure Legends: (A): VITT (Patient 1-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; Patients 2-5, Ad26.COV2.S) patient samples were tested in ELISA against uncomplexed PF4 (white), and PF4 in complex with polyvinyl sulfonate (light grey), or unfractionated heparin (dark gray). (B-D) Mass spectrometric evaluation of anti-PF4 antibodies isolated from VITT (B), HIT (C) and spontaneous HIT patient sera (D). "Relative Intensity" refers to abundance of the Ig light chain relative to the polyclonal background. Numbers above Ig light chain peaks depict mass/charge ratios. NC- Normal control. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Murray: Mayo Clinic: Other: Has received patents for the Mass-Fix technology which has been licensed to the Binding Site with potential royalties.. Padmanabhan: Veralox Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Heavy Chain Disease (HCD) is a group of rare B-cell proliferative disorders. Diagnosis depends on the detection of a truncated heavy chain with no associated light chain, often done by serum or urine immunofixation. This approach has been reported to have low specificity, since associated light chain bands are sometimes not visible and heavy chain bands can be mistaken for polyclonal bands. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) offers improved sensitivity in detecting monoclonal immunoglobulins. Truncation is thought to happen in the constant heavy chain (CH1) region, detected as a fragment of mass 27,000 Da on MALDI-TOF. Other mass patterns have not been reported in the literature. In this study, frozen serum samples from 8 heavy chain disease patients were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Spectra were reviewed on Mass-Fix software and visually inspected for monoclonal peaks. We detected two types of patterns for the IgG heavy chain disease. One pattern shows an IgG heavy chain with truncated mass (27,000 Da vs. 50,000 Da) and another in which the mass of the IgG heavy chain is greater than normal (65,000 Da). Follow-up work demonstrates that these are most likely dimers of truncated heavy chains. Thus, mass spectrometry-based immunofixation can provide new insights into heavy chain disease biology, mechanism, and progression, which are not identified by traditional diagnostic methods.