Talley, Nicholas J.

AbstractBackgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder, diagnosed on symptom‐based criteria. Many have reported discrepancies between formal Rome criteria and diagnoses made in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to explore whether a quantitative version of the Rome criteria would better represent a clinical diagnosis of IBS than the current dichotomous criteria for symptom measure.MethodsAs part of a large, case‐control study, participants completed a validated bowel disease questionnaire. Rome criteria were analyzed based on 15 individual symptoms. Penalized logistic regression model with stepwise selection was used to identify significant symptoms of IBS which were independently associated with case‐control status.Key ResultsIn cases with a clinical diagnosis of IBS, 347 (70%) met Rome criteria for IBS. Increasing number of Rome symptoms were found related to the odds of being diagnosed with IBS. Nearly half of the Rome‐negative case group experienced infrequent symptoms suggesting milder disease. Five of 15 Rome symptoms were associated with predicting case‐control status in the final model, with 96% correctly classified among Rome‐positive cases, 76% for Rome‐negative cases, and 91% for controls.Conclusions and InferencesIrritable bowel syndrome appears to be a spectrum disorder. Quantifying individual symptoms of Rome criteria has greater utility than the current application in representing the degree of IBS affectedness and appears to better reflect a clinical diagnosis of IBS applied by physicians. The use of a quantitative diagnostic Rome “score” may be helpful in clinical practice and research studies to better reflect the degree an individual is affected with IBS.

If you haven’t measured something, you really don’t know much about it. —Karl Pearson (attributed)Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms represent an important and often unappreciated cause of morbidity in diabetes, although the significance of this burden across the spectrum of patients and the underlying pathophysiology, including the relationship of symptoms with glycemic control, remain poorly defined. The relevance of GI symptoms and the necessity for their accurate assessment have increased with the greater focus on the gut as a therapeutic target for glucose lowering. This review addresses the prevalence, assessment, pathogenesis, and management of GI symptoms in diabetes, beginning with broad principles and then focusing on specific segments of the GI tract. We initially performed a literature search of PubMed by using synonyms and combinations of the following search terms: “gastrointestinal symptoms”, “diabetes”, “prevalence”, “pathogenesis”, “diagnosis”, and “management”. We restricted the search results to English only. Review papers and meta-analyses are presented as the highest level of evidence where possible followed by randomized controlled trials, uncontrolled trials, retrospective and observational data, and expert opinion.

Background and aimsRoutine serologic testing for celiac disease (CD) may be useful in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients, but this is controversial. We aimed to compare the prevalence of unrecognized CD in a large cohort of patients with and without IBS.Participants and methodsThis is a family case–control IBS study conducted at a single US academic medical center. Stored serum and DNA were available. Tissue transglutaminase (TTg) immunoglobulin A was performed, followed by indirect immunofluorescence testing for endomysial antibodies with positive or weakly positive TTg results. Individuals were considered to have CD if both results were positive.χ2and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare prevalence between the two groups.ResultsSerum samples were studied from 533 cases and 531 controls. In all, 80% of participants were female, with a median age of 50 years; 65% of cases and 0% controls met the Rome criteria for IBS. Previous serological testing for CD had occurred in 142 (27%) cases and 13 (2%) controls, but none had CD on subsequent testing. Six (1.1%) cases versus five (0.9%) controls had positive or weakly positive TTg test. Six cases (1.1%) versus three (0.6%) controls were confirmed to have CD by endomysial antibody (P=0.51).ConclusionNo difference in the prevalence of CD between patients with IBS and patients without IBS at a tertiary medical center was observed. Our findings do not support routine celiac serologic or genetic testing in patients with IBS in all US populations.

Goals: The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between early life infections and subsequent adult onset irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Background: Infections during adulthood are a known risk factor for adult-onset IBS. This investigation examined the role of childhood infections and infection risk factors in the development of IBS symptoms. Study: In total, 1010 subjects (509 outpatients with IBS, 501 matched controls) were mailed questionnaires regarding early-life infections during infancy (0 to 12 mo), toddler years (1 to 3 y), and child years (4 to 18 y). Comparisons between cases and controls were performed using logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, and somatization score. Results: Around 648 (64.2%) subjects responded. The median age was 51.3 years (range, 18.0 to 70.7 y) and 535 (83%) were female. Childhood (below 18 y) infections were common in cases and controls (98% vs. 98%; P=0.465), with no differences between cases and controls during infant, toddler, and child-age periods. For gastrointestinal infections experienced below 18 years, no differences were observed by infection type (bacterial, viral, or parasitic) or age group. Cases were more likely to report bronchitis by age 18 [43% vs. 25%; P=0.003; odds ratio, 1.73 (1.20-2.51)], but not other common infections. Regular antibiotic exposure was greater amongst cases (43%) than controls (30%) [P=0.09; odds ratio, 1.37 (0.96-1.96)]. The association between bronchitis and IBS case status remained significant after adjusting for antibiotic use (P=0.01). Conclusions: Greater early childhood gastrointestinal infections rates were not observed in adult individuals with IBS compared with adult controls. The study does not support a statistically significant link between early life infections and IBS aside from bronchitis.

AbstractBackgroundRumination syndrome is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by effortless and repetitive regurgitation of recently ingested food from the stomach to the oral cavity followed by either re‐swallowing or spitting. Rumination is thought to occur due to a reversal of the esophagogastric pressure gradient. This is achieved by a coordinated abdominothoracic maneuver consisting of a thoracic suction, crural diaphragm relaxation and an increase in intragastric pressure. Careful history is important in the diagnosis of rumination syndrome; patients often report “vomiting” or “reflux” and the diagnosis can therefore be missed. Objective testing is available with high resolution manometry or gastroduodenal manometry. Increase in intra‐gastric pressure followed by regurgitation is the most important characteristic to distinguish rumination from other disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux. The mainstay of the treatment of rumination syndrome is behavioral therapy via diaphragmatic breathing in addition to patient education and reassurance.PurposeThe purpose of this review was to critically appraise recent key developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy for rumination syndrome. A literature search using OVID (Wolters Kluwer Health, New York, NY, USA) to examine the MEDLINE database its inception until May 2016 was performed using the search terms “rumination syndrome,” “biofeedback therapy,” and “regurgitation.” References lists and personal libraries of the authors were used to identify supplemental information. Articles published in English were reviewed in full text. English abstracts were reviewed for all other languages. Priority was given to evidence obtained from randomized controlled trials when possible.

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal infections are risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) and functional dyspepsia ( FD ). We investigated whether non‐enteric infections and antibiotic exposure are also associated with the development of functional gastrointestinal disorders ( FGID s). Methods In a nested case–control study, random samples of Olmsted County, MN , were mailed valid self‐report questionnaires from 1988 through 1994, and then follow‐up questionnaires from 1995 through 2003. Survey responders who did not report any FGID symptoms at baseline, but then reported such symptoms in at least one subsequent survey, were classified as new‐onset cases. Age‐matched controls were individuals who did not have symptoms at either the initial or subsequent surveys. Key Results The overall response rate was 78% to the initial survey and 52% to the follow‐up survey. Based on the responses, 316 participants had a new onset of an FGID (43 IBS constipation, 95 IBS diarrhea, 25 IBS mixed, and 153 other FGID s, including FD ) and 250 did not (controls). Around 76% (241/316) of cases reported a non‐enteric infection vs 66% (166/250) of the controls. The frequency of enteric infections was similar between the two groups. Of the new FGID cases, 83% had a non‐enteric infection that was treated with antibiotic. In a logistic regression model, treatment with antibiotics for a non‐gastrointestinal infection was associated with the development of an FGID (odds ratio = 1.90; 95% CI : 1.21–2.98; p = 0.005), after adjusting for age and sex. Conclusions & Inferences Based on a case–control study, treatment of a non‐gastrointestinal infection with antibiotics appears to be a risk factor for development of an FGID .