Schwarz, Christopher G.

AbstractBackgroundAutomated face recognition can potentially re‐identify de‐identified research brain MRI, PET, and CT, and direct differences of brain measurements from original and de‐faced images are statistically significant but very minor, i.e. below scan‐rescan differences. Their effects on analyses correlating brain imaging biomarkers with clinical variables remain unknown.MethodWe sampled 3 age‐and‐sex‐matched groups (CU, MCI, and clinical AD) from Mayo Clinic aging studies, each with 61 participants with same‐visit 3D T1‐weighted and 3D T2‐FLAIR MRI, PiB amyloid PET, and Flortaucipir tau PET (total n = 183). We automatically measured hippocampal volume, PIB global SUVR, and tau temporal meta‐ROI SUVR using a) our in‐house pipeline with SPM12, MCALT, and ANTs, and b) FreeSurfer 7.3.2 (PETSurfer), and we measured voxels associated with clinical group separation using SPM12. We also measured WMH from FLAIR using a) our in‐house pipeline, b) Lesion Segmentation Tool (LST), and c) FreeSurfer’s Samseg. For each measurement, we calculated pair‐wise group separation AUC values and Spearman’s rho with age and CDR‐SOB. We then de‐faced all PET and MRI using mri_reface, our top‐performing automated de‐facing software that replaces imaged faces with an average face (“re‐facing”), and we repeated all measurements and analyses with de‐faced images. We then compared the magnitudes of clinical correlations with original images and those of de‐faced images.ResultAnalyses of original and de‐faced images had very high agreement. Only 2/55 paired comparisons were significant (Tables 1‐2): FreeSurfer‐measured global PIB SUVR from de‐faced images was more correlated with age (rho 0.003 vs ‐0.227, p = 0.046), and Mayo‐measured WMH volume from original images was more correlated with CDR‐SOB (rho 0.321 vs 0.308, p = 0.020). Another comparison‐pair tested p = 0.041 for an AUC change +0.008, which we consider not practically meaningful. All others had p>0.05. In voxel‐based analyses of CU vs AD participants, all comparisons were qualitatively similar between original and de‐faced variants (Figure 1).ConclusionDe‐facing PET and MRI using mri_reface did not significantly affect 53/55 correlations between imaging and clinical variables; of the two affected, one became stronger with re‐faced images. Stronger correlations with clinical variables may be explained by de‐facing’s standardizing face voxels and artifacts that irrelevantly affect brain segmentations.

AbstractBackgroundDisruption of default mode network (DMN) connectivity is common in Alzheimer’s disease. We investigated cross‐sectional and one‐year longitudinal changes in DMN sub‐systems in atypical clinical presentations of AD, in relation to age and tau.MethodSixty‐four amyloid‐positive atypical AD (Aty‐AD) patients diagnosed with posterior cortical atrophy (n = 35) or logopenic progressive aphasia (n = 29) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group. Patients underwent structural and resting‐state functional MRI, and [18F]flortaucipir PET at baseline and one‐year follow‐up. 140 amyloid‐negative cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging were included as controls. Global tau SUVR was calculated in a meta‐ROI including parietal, temporal, and occipital regions. DMN connectivity was calculated in native space for posterior (pDMN), ventral (vDMN), anterior ventral (avDMN) and anterior dorsal (adDMN) DMN sub‐systems using the dual regression method. A global measure of DMN connectivity, the Network Failure Quotient (NFQ), was calculated as (vDMN_to_pDMN+ adDMN_to_pDMN)/(pDMN+vDMN). Linear mixed‐effects models were computed for each DMN connectivity measure, including diagnosis (Aty‐AD, CU), age, time and their interaction, and a per‐person random effect. SPM paired t‐tests were run to compare baseline and follow‐up images in Aty‐AD and CU separately. Linear mixed‐effect models were run in the Aty‐AD cohort only to investigate the effect of global baseline tau SUVR on each DMN connectivity measure.ResultMixed‐effects models showed evidence of lower cross‐sectional pDMN and higher adDMN connectivity in Aty‐AD relative to CU, with no significant time effects (Fig. 1). While connectivity in all DMN sub‐systems declined with age in CU, connectivity was higher in older Aty‐AD patients relative to younger, particularly in vDMN and pDMN. A similar trend was observed for NFQ, which was significantly higher in Aty‐AD, with a negative age effect (Fig. 1). In Aty‐AD, voxel‐based analyses showed moderate evidence of decline in vDMN connectivity and increase in avDMN connectivity over time (Fig. 2). Greater baseline global tau SUVR was associated with lower vDMN connectivity, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally (Fig. 3).ConclusionDMN connectivity was altered in Aty‐AD, with strongest alterations in younger patients. The vDMN declined over time, suggesting a shift in DMN connectivity with disease progression that was likely related to tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundPosterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) are atypical variants of Alzheimer’s disease which typically show different cross‐sectional patterns of atrophy and tau deposition. Patterns of atrophy remain distinct longitudinally. A direct comparison of rates of atrophy and tau accumulation between these syndromes has not yet been reported.MethodWe evaluated 20 PCA and 20 LPA patients; all were amyloid‐positive on [11C]PiB‐PET. Structural MRI and tau‐PET were performed at baseline and one‐year follow‐up. Annualized rates of change in grey matter volume (log Jacobians from tensor‐based morphometry) and flortaucipir‐PET SUVRs were calculated at the lobar level. A global tau SUVR was calculated using parietal, temporal, and occipital regions. Lobar rates were compared between PCA and LPA with linear models, accounting for education, sex, age, baseline global tau SUVR (for tau‐PET), with significance set at p = 0.05. SPM voxel‐level comparisons were performed, with the same covariates, with significance set at p = 0.001.ResultGroups did not differ in age, Apoe status, baseline global tau SUVR or whole brain volume, or their annualized rates of change. LPA had shorter disease duration. In the lobar models, PCA had faster rates of atrophy in the occipital lobe and there were no significant differences on rates of tau accumulation, but a trend for LPA having faster rates of tau accumulation in all lobes. Baseline global tau SUVR was negatively associated with rate of tau accumulation in parietal and temporal lobes. Age was negatively associated with rates of tau accumulation in frontal, temporal and occipital lobes and with rates of atrophy in frontal and parietal lobes. Voxel‐level analysis confirmed these results, with PCA showing faster rates of occipital atrophy, and LPA showing subtle evidence for diffuse faster rates of tau accumulation (Figure 1).ConclusionLongitudinal patterns of neuroimaging abnormalities differ between PCA and LPA, although with divergent results for tau accumulation and atrophy that may reflect differences in disease stage. Rates of change are strongly influenced by age and severity of baseline tau, with faster rates of tau accumulation in patients with younger age and lower baseline tau deposition.

AbstractBackgroundCo‐morbid Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in the form of amyloid‐β plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles are frequently observed in people with probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) is an emerging technique to characterize white matter (WM) tissue microstructure, although NODDI alterations and associations with AD biomarkers remain undefined in DLB. The objectives of this study are to compare NODDI and DTI parameters between DLB and controls and (ii) evaluate the pattern of DTI and NODDI changes associated with amyloid and tau deposition.MethodConsecutive patients within the DLB spectrum (n = 45), including probable DLB (n = 32) and probable Mild Cognitive Impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) (n = 13) from the Mayo Clinic ADRC underwent multi‐shell diffusion MRI, [18F]‐Flortaucipir and [11C]‐PiB PET. A comparison group of 45 age‐ and gender‐matched clinically unimpaired controls (CU) was included. Voxelwise non‐parametric permutation models were used to determine pair‐wise group differences and assess the associations of AD biomarkers with fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), tissue‐weighted neurite density index (tNDI; NDI x (1 – Free water fraction)) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), controlling for age. Complementary analyses were performed using regions‐of‐interest (ROI) obtained from the JHU atlas.ResultCompared to CU, the DLB spectrum group exhibited widespread decreases in FA and tNDI and increases in MD and ODI, with the most pronounced effects in the cingulum bundles, uncinate, inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi (Fig. 1). Greater [18F]‐Flortaucipir uptake was also associated with lower FA and tNDI, and higher MD and ODI in the DLB spectrum compared to CU, independently of age and [11C]‐PiB uptake (Fig. 2). In contrast, no associations were found between [11C]‐PiB uptake and any of the DTI or NODDI parameters. Complementary ROI analyses corroborated these findings.ConclusionWidespread loss of WM integrity was observed on DTI and NODDI in probable DLB and prodromal DLB. These findings were associated with greater cortical tau, but not with amyloid‐β deposition. Although alpha‐synuclein pathology underlies the loss of WM integrity in DLB, amyloid‐independent tau pathology may also be an important influence on white matter integrity within the DLB spectrum.

AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to assess axonal integrity in MAPT mutation carriers and early white matter (WM) neurodegeneration in asymptomatic carriers using traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measurements, i.e., fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI).MethodWe included available multi‐shell diffusion MRI data from 21 MAPT mutation carriers (16 asymptomatic; 5 symptomatic) and 31 non‐carrier family members as controls from the ALLFTD consortium. We used linear mixed‐effect models to assess WM abnormalities measured with FA and MD, neurite density index (NDI) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), combined across hemispheres. Separate models were conducted in all MAPT mutation carriers relative to controls while accounting for relatedness and age, then in symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers relative to controls. ComBat was used to harmonize data across sites.ResultIn models contrasting all MAPT carriers versus controls, WM alterations involved the cingulum bundle (FA, ODI), fronto‐temporal, entorhinal (FA, MD, NDI), and the inferior temporal WM (FA) after correcting for multiple comparisons (Fig. 1). In models contrasting symptomatic and asymptomatic MAPT carriers versus controls, symptomatic carriers had widespread involvement of the fronto‐temporal WM including the cingulum (FA, ODI), entorhinal (MD, FA, NDI), amygdala (MD, NDI) and inferior temporal (FA) areas after correcting for multiple comparisons. Asymptomatic carriers showed higher entorhinal MD and lower inferior temporal and cingulum FA relative to controls, and a more widespread pattern of higher ODI involved the medial temporal, superior temporal and occipital WM as well as long association and projection fibers including the internal capsule, cingulate bundle and fronto‐occipital fasciculi, although they were not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.ConclusionTraditional DTI and novel NODDI measurements revealed some extent of overlap as well as divergences in patterns of WM abnormalities, indicating axonal loss is a feature of neurodegeneration in MAPT mutation carriers. Our results suggest that traditional DTI and novel NODDI measurements may have different sensitivities to WM alterations in MAPT mutation carriers, and that axon‐based metrics, particularly ODI measurements, may be more sensitive to the early WM involvement during the asymptomatic stage of the disease.

AbstractBackgroundKnowledge of the temporal evolution among plasma Alzheimer’s biomarkers and PET will inform disease pathophysiology and appropriate implementation of plasma biomarkers (Therneau, NeuroImage 2021; Betthauser, Brain 2022). This study investigates the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, GFAP, and amyloid PET on individual and population levels.MethodWe included 957 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with clinical diagnoses of cognitively unimpaired (n = 732), MCI (n = 205), and Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome dementia (n = 20). An accelerated failure time (AFT) model was fit with amyloid (PiB) PET, plasma p‐tau217 (Meso Scale Discovery, Lilly), plasma p‐tau181, and GFAP (Simoa, Quanterix HD‐X) as quad‐variate endpoints, and sex, APOE genotype status, and education as covariates. The model output included a per subject adjustment or time‐shift for each biomarker indicating how much earlier or later it was estimated to progress relative to the average participant, the correlation (R) between adjustments for each pair of biomarkers, and the impact of covariates on each biomarker’s timing. Secondly, we estimated progression at a given age for selected cutpoints.ResultTemporal trajectories for each biomarker are shown in Figure 1. Individual‐level adjustments between plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET were highly correlated, R = 0.69(0.64‐0.74); how early or late an individual progressed on plasma p‐tau217 explained 48% of the variation in relative timing of amyloid PET progression. Associations of plasma p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET individual adjustments were moderate and low, respectively (Figure 2). Using the chosen cutpoints, the estimated order of biomarker progression was GFAP, amyloid PET, plasma p‐tau181, and plasma p‐tau217 (Figure 3).ConclusionOn the individual level, the strong association of the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET supports that these processes are mechanistically related. The relatively lower associations of the timing of p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET likely reflect a lower biological association and greater measurement noise for p‐tau181. The individual adjustments, the primary output of this model, are independent of cutpoints. On the population level, relative timing of biomarker change is highly dependent on the cutpoints applied. This true for any analysis that employs cutpoints, regardless of the approach.

AbstractBackgroundPatients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may have Alzheimer´s disease (AD) pathology. Plasma biomarkers of beta‐amyloid (Aß), phosphorylated tau (pTau), and neurodegeneration are sensitive to AD neuropathologic changes in AD dementia. While these plasma biomarkers are well tested in the AD continuum, their performance for concomitant AD pathology in the DLB continuum is still unclear.MethodWe included patients with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD; n = 15), with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB; n = 37), and with DLB (n = 70) from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Cognitively unimpaired individuals (CU; n = 100) included from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging were balanced on age and sex. A panel of plasma biomarkers of Aß40, Aß42, p‐tau181, neurofilament light chain (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) measures was obtained. We calculated the ratio of plasma Aß40/42. Lower Aß40/42 indicates increased Aß pathology. Plasma Aß40, Aß42, GFAP, and NfL were measured using the Simoa® Neurology 4‐Plex E Advantage kit and pTau‐181 was measured with the Simoa® pTau‐181 Advantage V2 kit. Both were run on a Quanterix HD‐X analyzer. AD imaging biomarkers were assessed on PET using Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) for Aß and 18F‐Flortaucipir for tau.ResultHigher levels of plasma GFAP were observed in the MCI‐LB (p = 0.014) and DLB (p<0.001) groups compared to CU (Figure). DLB patients also showed higher levels of plasma pTau181 (p<0.001) and NfL (p<0.001). Higher amyloid and tau PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) in the DLB continuum were associated with higher levels of plasma p‐tau181, NfL, and GFAP (p<0.001). After accounting for age, plasma Aß40/42 did not correlate with amyloid or tau PET SUVr.ConclusionIn the DLB continuum, abnormal levels of GFAP in plasma can be detected as early as the prodromal stages of the disease. Plasma pTau181 reached abnormal levels in the DLB stage. Higher plasma GFAP, NfL, and p‐tau181 are associated with higher amyloid and tau PET SUVr in the DLB continuum. Plasma biomarkers have the potential to contribute to screening and early diagnosis in the DLB continuum, which has implications in designing new treatments.

AbstractBackgroundWe have previously shown that 3D T1‐weighted and 3D T2‐FLAIR brain MRI can potentially be re‐identified using face recognition, but this has not been tested for other MRI sequences commonly used in imaging studies of aging and dementia. Here we compare match rates of automated face recognition to re‐identify 3D T1‐weighted, 3D T2‐FLAIR, 3D T2‐weighted, 2D Axial T2‐FLAIR, multi‐echo GRE (T2*), diffusion MRI, functional MRI, ASL, and T2* GRE images.MethodWe used a dataset of 182 Mayo Clinic participants each with MRI and face photographs. MRIs used Siemens and GE vendor‐product sequences similar to ADNI3 and ADNI4 protocols. We created face reconstructions (“basic”, with minimal preprocessing, and “advanced” that automatically filled missing face regions using a template) from each MRI sequence, and we trained a Microsoft Azure PersonGroup face recognition classifier to recognize these MRI‐based faces. We then queried the classifier with five face photographs for each participant, and we recorded how often the classifier chose the correct MRI as the top‐ranked match. For image types with match rates > = 10%, we then repeated the experiment after de‐facing each MRI with mri_reface, our leading software that replaces faces in each image (“re‐faces”) with an average face.ResultResults are presented in Table 1. 3D T2‐FLAIR, 3D T1‐weighted, and 3D T2‐weighted images were matched at 96‐98%, and mri_reface reduced all to 8%. Axial T2‐FLAIR and ME‐GRE were matched at 32‐45%, and mri_reface reduced both to 1%. T2*‐GRE matched at 10%, and mri_reface reduced this to 1%. ASL matched at 8%, while dMRI and fMRI matched at only 0‐2%.ConclusionAmong current‐generation vendor‐product sequences, we recommend that de‐facing be applied before research data sharing of T1‐weighted, T2‐weighted, T2‐FLAIR, T2*, and ME‐GRE images. Minimal match rates for current‐generation product fMRI, ASL, and fMRI images suggest that they present low risk of re‐identification and can be shared without de‐facing, but this conclusion should be re‐evaluated if they are acquired without fat‐suppression, with a larger field of view, or if newer developments reduce the current levels of artifacts and distortion around the face.

AbstractBackgroundCo‐morbid Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in the form of amyloid‐ß plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles are frequently observed in people with probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) is an emerging technique to characterize white matter (WM) tissue microstructure, although NODDI alterations and associations with AD biomarkers remain undefined in DLB. The objectives of this study are to compare NODDI and DTI parameters between DLB and controls and (ii) evaluate the pattern of DTI and NODDI changes associated with amyloid and tau deposition.MethodConsecutive patients within the DLB spectrum (n = 45), including probable DLB (n = 32) and probable Mild Cognitive Impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) (n = 13) from the Mayo Clinic ADRC underwent multi‐shell diffusion MRI, [18F]‐Flortaucipir and [11C]‐PiB PET. A comparison group of 45 age‐ and gender‐matched clinically unimpaired controls (CU) was included. Voxelwise non‐parametric permutation models were used to determine pair‐wise group differences and assess the associations of AD biomarkers with fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), tissue‐weighted neurite density index (tNDI; NDI x (1 – Free water fraction)) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), controlling for age. Complementary analyses were performed using regions‐of‐interest (ROI) obtained from the JHU atlas.ResultCompared to CU, the DLB spectrum group exhibited widespread decreases in FA and tNDI and increases in MD and ODI, with the most pronounced effects in the cingulum bundles, uncinate, inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi (Fig. 1). Greater [18F]‐Flortaucipir uptake was also associated with lower FA and tNDI, and higher MD and ODI in the DLB spectrum compared to CU, independently of age and [11C]‐PiB uptake (Fig. 2). In contrast, no associations were found between [11C]‐PiB uptake and any of the DTI or NODDI parameters. Complementary ROI analyses corroborated these findings.ConclusionWidespread loss of WM integrity was observed on DTI and NODDI in probable DLB and prodromal DLB. These findings were associated with greater cortical tau, but not with amyloid‐ß deposition. Although alpha‐synuclein pathology underlies the loss of WM integrity in DLB, amyloid‐independent tau pathology may also be an important influence on white matter integrity within the DLB spectrum.

AbstractBackgroundAutomated face recognition can potentially re‐identify de‐identified research brain MRI, PET, and CT, and direct differences of brain measurements from original and de‐faced images are statistically significant but very minor, i.e. below scan‐rescan differences. Their effects on analyses correlating brain imaging biomarkers with clinical variables remain unknown.MethodWe sampled 3 age‐and‐sex‐matched groups (CU, MCI, and clinical AD) from Mayo Clinic aging studies, each with 61 participants with same‐visit 3D T1‐weighted and 3D T2‐FLAIR MRI, PiB amyloid PET, and Flortaucipir tau PET (total n = 183). We automatically measured hippocampal volume, PIB global SUVR, and tau temporal meta‐ROI SUVR using a) our in‐house pipeline with SPM12, MCALT, and ANTs, and b) FreeSurfer 7.3.2 (PETSurfer), and we measured voxels associated with clinical group separation using SPM12. We also measured WMH from FLAIR using a) our in‐house pipeline, b) Lesion Segmentation Tool (LST), and c) FreeSurfer’s Samseg. For each measurement, we calculated pair‐wise group separation AUC values and Spearman’s rho with age and CDR‐SOB. We then de‐faced all PET and MRI using mri_reface, our top‐performing automated de‐facing software that replaces imaged faces with an average face (“re‐facing”), and we repeated all measurements and analyses with de‐faced images. We then compared the magnitudes of clinical correlations with original images and those of de‐faced images.ResultAnalyses of original and de‐faced images had very high agreement. Only 2/55 paired comparisons were significant (Tables 1‐2): FreeSurfer‐measured global PIB SUVR from de‐faced images was more correlated with age (rho 0.003 vs ‐0.227, p = 0.046), and Mayo‐measured WMH volume from original images was more correlated with CDR‐SOB (rho 0.321 vs 0.308, p = 0.020). Another comparison‐pair tested p = 0.041 for an AUC change +0.008, which we consider not practically meaningful. All others had p>0.05. In voxel‐based analyses of CU vs AD participants, all comparisons were qualitatively similar between original and de‐faced variants (Figure 1).ConclusionDe‐facing PET and MRI using mri_reface did not significantly affect 53/55 correlations between imaging and clinical variables; of the two affected, one became stronger with re‐faced images. Stronger correlations with clinical variables may be explained by de‐facing’s standardizing face voxels and artifacts that irrelevantly affect brain segmentations.