Deshmukh, Abhishek

ABSTRACT Introduction Frailty is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of outcomes in cardiovascular disease, yet its population‐level impact among patients hospitalized with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections remains incompletely defined. We examined the prevalence of frailty and its association with clinical outcomes and utilization of transvenous lead removal (TLR) in a contemporary national cohort. Methods and Results We analyzed the National Readmissions Database from 2016–2021 to identify adults hospitalized for CIED infections. Frailty was defined using the Johns Hopkins adjusted clinical groups frailty‐defining diagnoses. Of 288,402 patients hospitalized with CIED infections, 25.1% were classified as frail. Frail patients experienced significantly higher in‐hospital mortality (10.8% vs. 4.6%), 30‐day mortality (9.2% vs. 5.5%), complications, longer length of stay, lower rates of discharge home, and higher 30‐day readmissions compared with non‐frail patients (all p < 0.01). TLR was performed less frequently in frail patients (10.8% vs. 13.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.76–0.83). On adjusted analyses, TLR was independently associated with lower in‐hospital mortality, 30‐day mortality, and 30‐day readmissions in both frail and non‐frail patients. Conclusion Among patients hospitalized with CIED infections, TLR was independently associated with lower mortality and readmissions in both frail and non‐frail patients, despite lower utilization in frail individuals. Frailty was common (25.1%) and independently associated with significantly worse outcomes. These findings highlight important associations between frailty, treatment patterns, and outcomes that warrant prospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) originating from the left ventricular summit may be unsuccessful, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel dual-modality focal catheter in treating left ventricular summit PVCs in patients who had failed previous RF ablation. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent a redo ablation procedure using an irrigated, contact-force sensing, dual-modality focal catheter (TactiFlex Duo, Abbott) under compassionate use indication. The ablation strategy, including the choice of energy modality (monopolar pulsed field [PF], RF, or both), was left to the operator’s discretion. Safety assessments included serial biomarkers, renal function, and CMR within 36 hours. Efficacy was defined as ≥80% reduction in PVC burden with symptom resolution at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Six consecutive patients (4 men; mean age, 53.8±15 years) with symptomatic left ventricular summit PVCs and a prior failed RF ablation (range, 1–2) were prospectively enrolled. All PVCs had an inferior axis, with a left bundle V1 morphology observed in 4 of 6 cases (mean burden, 30.1±5.3%). Acute suppression of PVCs was achieved in all cases. Acute suppression with a single PF application in the great cardiac vein-anterior interventricular vein occurred in 2 patients, while 3 patients required additional RF, PF, or combined RF+PF applications at adjacent sites. One patient with an inaccessible great cardiac vein-anterior interventricular vein was successfully treated in the left ventricular outflow tract with RF+PF application. Transient, reversible left anterior descending vasospasm was observed during PF delivery in 2 of 5 cases that underwent PF application adjacent to a coronary artery, despite pretreatment with intracoronary nitroglycerin without ECG or hemodynamic sequelae. All patients had durable suppression of PVCs at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In its first human application, dual-modality ablation was feasible and effective for refractory left ventricular summit PVCs. Transient coronary vasospasm occurred, though it was reversible and without acute clinical consequences.

Abstract Background Knowing the prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and the increasing number of people who inject drugs (PWID) with right-sided infective endocarditis (RSIE), we aimed to better characterize the syndrome of injection drug use, RSIE, and PFO with systemic embolic events. Method A systematic search across multiple databases was independently screened using predefined criteria (from inception until September 2025). Published cases of adult PWID diagnosed with RSIE and ischemic stroke or other systemic embolic event were included, provided they had PFO assessment. Individuals were excluded if they had cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections or any other conditions associated with systemic or paradoxical embolism. Results The review identified 13 studies with 14 young patients, mostly without comorbidities, predominantly infected with Staphylococcus aureus. In most cases, echocardiography revealed large tricuspid valve vegetations. Neuroimaging confirmed multiple ischemic infarcts, while 5 patients showed emboli outside the central nervous system (4 of them as the only systemic embolism). At least 11 (79%) patients had echocardiographic evidence of right-to-left shunting. Management included cardiac surgery in 6 cases that involved valve replacement or repair, percutaneous PFO closure in 2 cases, and percutaneous mechanical aspiration in 1 case. Three patients (21%) died during hospitalization, and only 27.3% patients had outpatient follow-up. Conclusions RSIE with systemic embolism in PWID with PFO has rarely been reported, affects younger patients without sex predominance, and was usually due to S. aureus with large tricuspid vegetations. Right-to-left shunting was characteristic, and outcomes were poor despite combined medical, surgical, and interventional therapies.

Abstract Aims The clinical significance of early recurrences during the blanking period following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains uncertain, particularly after pulsed field ablation (PFA). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of early recurrences at 30-, 60-, and 90-day thresholds on outcomes following PFA for atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results Consecutive patients who underwent PFA for AF across multiple centres within the Mayo Clinic health system were included. The primary endpoint was AF-free survival. Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to compare outcomes between patients with and without early recurrences using 30-, 60-, and 90-day thresholds. A total of 1162 patients were included. The estimated AF-free survival at 1 year was 70%. Early recurrences within 30-, 60-, and 90-days post-ablation were significantly associated with late recurrences beyond 90 days (hazard ratio [HR] 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4–7.9, P &lt; 0.01; HR 6.6, 95% CI: 5.0–8.6, P &lt; 0.01; and HR 9.1, 95% CI: 7.0–11.7, P &lt; 0.01, respectively). These findings remained significant among patients undergoing continuous rhythm monitoring. Early recurrences within 30 days in this subgroup were significantly associated with a 1-year AF burden &gt;1% or the need for repeat AF ablation (odds ratio 25.0, 95% CI: 6.6–126.8, P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion Early recurrences following PFA are strongly predictive of long-term arrhythmia recurrence and are unlikely to represent transient inflammatory phenomena. Accordingly, the applicability of the conventional blanking interval after PFA should be reconsidered.

Abstract The practice patterns of fluorine 18–labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F] FDG PET/CT) use in cardiac implantable electronic device infection remain undefined. Among 258 Emerging Infections Network respondents, 69% reported never or rarely using [18F] FDG PET/CT. Limited access and insurance barriers were the most common obstacles.

Abstract Introduction High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional power delivery (CPD) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its efficacy, procedural efficiency, and safety profile remain uncertain. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.Gov databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HPSD with CPD ablation for PVI in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Seven RCTs with 1,006 patients (514 HPSD, 489 CPD) were included. No significant differences were found in freedom from arrhythmia during the follow-up period (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.41–1.45; p=0.424). AF recurrence did not differ (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.65–1.36; p=0.733) between groups. HPSD had a significantly shorter procedural (MD -22.61 min; 95% CI -33.18, -12.04; p&lt;0.001) and RF ablation (MD -15.70 min; 95% CI -20.86, -10.55; p&lt;0.001) times, with comparable fluoroscopy time (MD 0 min; 95% CI -0.44, 0.45; p=0.99) between groups. Conclusion In patients with AF undergoing PVI, HPSD did not increase freedom from arrhythmia as compared with CPD ablation, however it was associated with shorter procedure and RF ablation times. These findings suggest that HPSD may be a more efficient approach without compromising clinical outcomes.

ABSTRACT Introduction Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for about half of the cases of heart failure. HFpEF and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist and share similar risk factors. The objective of this study is to examine the differences in risk of clinical outcomes among drug refractory AF patients with concomitant HFpEF treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Methods Using the Optum PanTher Electronic Health Record (EHR) database, adult HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and an AF diagnosis with a history of AAD prescription between January 2014 and March 2021 were identified. Patients were classified into CA or AAD groups based on their subsequent treatment for AF. The primary outcome of interest included a composite of AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia‐related inpatient admissions and electrical cardioversions in the 57–730 days post‐index treatment period (follow‐up extended to 1095 days for sub‐analysis). Overall HF‐related admissions and systolic HF‐related admissions were assessed as secondary outcomes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity scores was used to balance the two cohorts on study covariates. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine outcomes in the covariate‐balanced cohorts. Results The final sample included 586 CA and 1436 AAD patients. The cohorts were well balanced on patient demographics and clinical characteristics after applying IPTW. Patients treated with CA had a significantly lower rate of primary composite outcome as compared to those treated with AADs (15.4% vs. 24.9%, log‐rank p test = 0.001). Cox model revealed a 34% lower risk of atrial arrhythmia related admissions and cardioversion among patients treated with CA versus AADs in the 57–730 days post‐index treatment period (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–0.87, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in HF and systolic HF‐related admissions between the two groups (except in the subgroup analysis of patients < 70 years of age, patients with paroxysmal AF, and patients with persistent AF). Similar results were observed in sub‐analyses with 57–1095 days of follow‐up. Conclusion Among drug refractory AF patients with concomitant HFpEF, CA was shown to reduce the risk of recurrent arrhythmias as compared to AAD continuation.

ABSTRACT Background Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life‐threatening arrhythmia frequently observed in structural heart diseases, including LMNA‐related cardiomyopathy, a genetic disorder associated with high risk of sudden cardiac death and progressive systolic dysfunction. While catheter ablation is an established therapeutic option for VT, its efficacy in cardiac laminopathy remains poorly defined. Objectives To synthesize available evidence on the role and outcomes of VT ablation in patients with cardiac laminopathy. Methods A systematic review and single‐arm meta‐analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting VT ablation outcomes in LMNA‐related cardiomyopathy. An inverse variance random‐effects model was applied for meta‐analysis of proportions. Results Seven studies (six cohorts, one abstract) comprising 62 patients (mean age 53.2 ± 9.7 years; 85% male; 88% with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator) were included. An endocardial/endo‐epicardial approach was used in 93% of cases. Acute procedural success was achieved in 37% (95% CI: 14%–63%; I² = 27.4%), and 28% required multiple procedures. Over a median follow‐up of 26 (9–35) months, VT recurrence occurred in 91% (95% CI: 76%–100%; I² = 37.2%). All‐cause mortality was 54% (95% CI: 39%–70%; I² = 28%), predominantly from cardiac causes (51%, 95% CI: 25%–76%; I² = 53%), and 14% (95% CI: 1%–34%; I² = 42%) underwent heart transplantation. Conclusions In LMNA‐related cardiomyopathy, catheter ablation is associated with high VT recurrence, limited long‐term success, and substantial cardiovascular mortality and transplantation rates, underscoring the importance of ICD implantation and the need for alternative strategies, including variant‐specific and molecularly targeted therapies.

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data on its efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF are limited. Methods Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients with sarcoidosis, heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, and either left bundle branch block (LBBB) or prolonged QRS duration ( > 150 ms) between 2014 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those who received CRT and (2) those who received an ICD‐only implant. Five‐year outcomes included all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%. Results Out of 245 eligible patients, we identified a cohort of 87 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.5 years) who received CRT and 87 patients (mean age 62.1 ± 11.1 years) who received ICD‐only implant, with similar propensity scores, and included them in a comparative analysis. At 5‐year follow‐up, the CRT group demonstrated outcomes comparable to the ICD‐only implant group for all‐cause mortality (14.9% vs. 20.7%; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.31–1.28; p = 0.19), all‐cause hospitalization (83.9% vs. 77.0%; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89–1.73; p = 0.19), and heart failure exacerbation (28.7% vs. 28.7%; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52–1.57; p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50% was also similar in both groups (LVEF > 40%, 43.7% vs. 33.3%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80–2.10; p = 0.29; LVEF > 50%, 31.0% vs. 17.2%; HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.92–3.24; p = 0.09). Conclusion CRT implantation had similar long‐term outcomes compared to ICD‐only implantation in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF, particularly all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%.