Rounds, Alexis D.

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate gender‐specific differences in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients electing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).MethodsThis study was a retrospective review of CRS patients electing ESS (2011–2013) at a tertiary‐care center.ResultsESS was elected by 272 patients (mean age 54.6 years; 48.5% female). Mean Lund‐Mackay computed tomography (CT) score was 10.9; total 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) score was 41.8. Compared to men, women electing ESS had lower CT score (10.1 vs 11.7; p = 0.01) but higher total SNOT‐22 score (44.9 vs 39; p = 0.02). Women reported significantly worse postnasal drainage (p < 0.0001) and embarrassment (p = 0.0021). SNOT‐22 scores declined with advancing age (women, p = 0.003; men, p = 0.0005). Reduction in CT scores with age was seen only in males (p = 0.03). Stratifying by age, females aged 61 to 80 years had higher SNOT‐22 scores compared to male counterparts (p = 0.04), whereas CT scores were similar. More women underwent surgery for CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) (54.9%) whereas more men underwent surgery for CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (57.4%), but this difference missed statistical significance (p = 0.052). Women with CRSwNP had higher SNOT‐22 scores than men (p = 0.02) for similar CT scores. Men electing ESS for CRSsNP had higher CT scores than women (p = 0.02). Women with CRSsNP aged 18 to 40 years reported higher SNOT‐22 scores than men (p = 0.003), even though CT scores were lower (p = 0.005).ConclusionEquivalent numbers of men and women underwent ESS for CRS. Overall, women electing ESS had higher total SNOT‐22 scores and lower Lund‐Mackay CT scores than men. Women reported more problems with postnasal drainage (CRS overall, CRSsNP, and CRSwNP), embarrassment (CRS overall and CRSwNP), and facial pain (CRSwNP). Gender differences in CRS are poorly understood and merit further study.

BackgroundThe objective of this work was to study patient and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) characteristics in primary headache disorders (PHDs).MethodsRetrospective chart review of “sinus” headache/pressure/pain patients was conducted. Patients that had rhinosinusitis excluded (negative endoscopy/computed tomography [CT]), and neurologist‐confirmed PHD were studied. Patterns in symptom and SNOT‐22 items were analyzed by network visualization and cluster analysis.ResultsForty‐six patients met study criteria. Forty‐three (93.5%) reported “need to blow nose” and 40 (86.9%) reported postnasal drainage. Sneezing was reported by 37 (80.4%) patients, “blockage/congestion of nose” by 33 (71.8%), and “runny nose by 32 (69.6%) patients. The median SNOT‐22 score was 54 (interquartile range [IQR], 40 to 63). Past history included neurological diagnoses (60%), rhinologic disease (39%; chronic rhinosinusitis [CRS], rhinitis, recurrent acute sinusitis), asthma (28%), and allergen‐sensitivity (26%). Previous sinonasal surgery had been performed in 41%. Network layout and cluster analysis identified 2 patient clusters and 2 symptom clusters. Two‐thirds (31) of patients formed a tight cluster (cluster 1) linking to a symptom cluster of psychosocial items wrapped tightly with “facial pain/pressure.” The remaining one‐third of patients (cluster 2) linked to rhinologic symptoms loosely grouped away from “facial pressure/pain.” In contrast to patients in cluster 2, patients in cluster 1 were predominantly female (p < 0.04), had significantly higher (p < 0.0001) median SNOT‐22 scores (60 vs 34; IQR, 53 to 67 vs 17 to 42), were more likely to have migraine history (p = 0.058), and reported being “sad” (p < 0.0001) or “embarrassed” (p < 0.006).ConclusionProminent rhinologic symptoms can be present in PHD patients in the absence of rhinosinusitis. In particular, high symptom‐burden/SNOT‐22 scores and high psychosocial symptoms should raise suspicion of PHD when endoscopy and/or CT results do not correlate with symptoms.

Objectives/HypothesisTo study differential diagnosis and efficacy of management strategies in patients presenting to an otolaryngologist for sinus pressure, pain, or headache.Study DesignRetrospective analysis at an academic medical center.MethodsPatients were seen in the clinic (2010–2012) for sinus‐related headache, pressure, pain or fullness (study symptoms) by a rhinologist. A retrospective chart review of patients with study symptoms was conducted.ResultsOf 211 patients with study symptoms, 70.62% met American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery criteria for sinusitis or had rhinologic disease. Otolaryngic therapy alone (medical or surgical) relieved study symptoms in 51.66%; combined neurology intervention helped another 15.17%. Nearly half of the patients (48.82%) were diagnosed with primary headache disorders. Comorbid rhinologic‐neurologic disease was present in 27.96% and odontogenic disease in 7%. Initial otolaryngology referral was likely unnecessary for 36.49% of the study patients. Sinus computed tomography (CT) was available for 91% of 211 patients, and 80% of scans were positive. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) was used in only 80/211 patients (37.69%) and was effective in 66/211 (31.28%). ESS was most successful in patients receiving concurrent neurological intervention. The Lund‐Mackay CT score did not predict outcomes from ESS. Interdisciplinary otolaryngology‐neurology efforts resulted in a positive outcome for 92.4% of patients.ConclusionsWe present the first series detailing management of patients with sinus‐headache pain in an otolaryngology practice. Such symptoms have multifactorial etiologies. Positive sinus CT results require cautious interpretation. ESS should be judiciously used. Interdisciplinary care is critical for success: approximately 50% of patients benefited from otolaryngic management, 50% needed neurological treatment, and 7% required dental disease management.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 125:303–310, 2015