Kwon, Eugene D.

52 Background: Ipi enhances antitumor immunity by blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. We recently reported the results of CA184-043, a phase 3 study of post-docetaxel mCRPC with Ipi vs Pbo, following single-dose radiotherapy (RT). While the study did not meet the primary endpoint of improving overall survival (HR=0.85, p=0.053), Ipi demonstrated antitumor activity in other efficacy endpoints, including progression-free survival. The present analyses further characterize the safety profile of Ipi in this study. Methods: Safety was evaluated for all treated patients (pts; N=393 for Ipi 10 mg/kg, N=396 for Pbo) starting from first study dose and ending 70 days after the last study dose, including maintenance dosing. Results: Any grade (Gr) irAEs occurred in 63.4% and 21.7% of pts in the Ipi and Pbo arms, respectively. Most common Gr 3/4 irAEs were gastrointestinal (GI) (18.1%; mostly diarrhea and colitis). Gr 3/4 liver irAEs (4.6%) were mostly elevations in AST or ALT. Other Gr 3/4 irAEs were uncommon: endocrine (2.0%), skin (1.0%), and neurological (0.3%). Among Ipi-treated pts, there were no meaningful differences in the frequency or severity of GI AEs between those who received baseline pelvic RT and those who did not (n=141 vs 252; any Gr 77.3% vs 69.8%; Gr 3/4 25.5% vs 21.8%, respectively). There were 5 GI perforations in the Ipi arm (3 within 70 days of last dose [2 related, 1 unrelated], 2 after 70 days of last dose, both related), and none in the Pbo arm. Deaths due to study drug toxicity, as per the investigators, occurred in 4 pts (4, Ipi and 0, Pbo). Conclusions: In this study of Ipi in mCRPC, the most frequent severe irAEs were diarrhea and colitis. Most irAEs were manageable using established treatment algorithms. Clinical trial information: NCT00861614. [Table: see text]

2 Background: The CA184-043 phase 3 study did not reach statistical significance for its primary endpoint of OS (HR=0.85, p=0.053). However, antitumor activity was observed in other efficacy endpoints, including progression-free survival. Prespecified subset analyses were performed to understand if any prognostic features may identify mCRPC patients (pts) more likely to benefit from Ipi treatment. Methods: 799 pts were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy (RT) followed by either Ipi (N=399) or Pbo (N=400). Prespecified subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed using known prognostic factors for OS in mCRPC. Results: Prespecified subset analyses suggested that Ipi may be more active in pts with favorable prognostic factors, including no visceral disease, alkaline phosphatase <1.5 ULN, and hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL (Table). The safety profile in this study was consistent with previous reports of Ipi. Conclusions: Based on these subset analyses, Ipi added to RT appears to have greater activity than RT alone in pts with a favorable prognostic profile. These results support continued investigation of Ipi in the ongoing CA184-095 study in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00861614. [Table: see text]

447 Background: Components of the peripheral blood counts (PBC) are associated with poor prognosis in patients diagnosed with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Related to this, higher tumor expression of programmed death ligand one (PDL1) is also associated with poor ccRCC prognosis. Herein, we utilize a large cohort of patients undergoing nephrectomy for localized ccRCC to evaluate the association of PBC with tumor expression of PDL1. Secondarily, we examine the association of PBC and relapse free survival (RFS) after adjusting for age and PDL1 expression. Methods: Through chart review, we obtained PBC values at time of nephrectomy for patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Renal Registry from 1990-2009 who were treated for localized (M0) ccRCC including the following: hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute eosinophil count (AEC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), and platelets (PLT). We determined tumor PDL1 expression as a continuous variable (% of positive PDL1 tumor cells) using the 5H1 antibody on archived tissues. We analyzed the correlation of PBC values with PDL1 expression as a continuous variable using a linear estimate. To evaluate the association of PBC values with RFS after adjusting for PDL1 expression, we employed multivariate Cox regression models. Results: A total of 706 ccRCC patients had available PDL1 expression and PBC. PDL1 expression was inversely associated with HGB (linear estimate of -0.02, p<0.001) and positively associated with platelets (linear estimate 1.73, p<0.001) whereas there was no association with PDL1 with WBC, ANC, AEC, or AMC. After adjusting for age and PDL1 expression, a higher HGB (HR=0.87, p<0.001), higher ALC (HR 0.68, p=0.003), and higher AEC (HR 0.12, p=0.002) were all associated with improved relapse free survival. Conversely, higher PLT was associated with decreased RFS (HR 1.002, p<0.001). Conclusions: PDL1 expression is associated with decreased HGB and increased PLT at the time of nephrectomy. After adjusting for PDL1 expression and age, higher HGB, ALC, and AEC are associated with improved RFS, while higher platelets are associated with decreased RFS.

255 Background: The purpose of this study was to identify site-specific recurrence patterns for patients (pts) with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostatectomy (RP) using C-11 Choline PET/CT (C11Ch) and 3T pelvic MRI with endorectal coil (pMRI). Methods: Between 2008 and 2006, 2,466 men underwent C11Ch and pMRI for BCR after RP. From this cohort, we identified 261 pts who received no adjuvant or salvage therapy (androgen deprivation or radiation). Suspected radiographic relapse was confirmed by biopsy (46%) or progression/response to treatment in concordance with subsequent rise/decline in PSA (54%). Results: Of the 261 men evaluated, 202 (75%) had positive pMRI, C11Ch or both. Seventy nine (39%), 105 (52%) and 18 (9%) pts had high, intermediate, and low risk CaP, respectively at RP. Median PSA at the time of positive scan was 2.3 ng/mL, with a median time from BCR to radiographic disease identification of 15 months. Of these 202 men, 67 (33%) harbored prostate fossa recurrence only, 44 (22%) had a combination of local and metastatic disease and 91 (45%) had metastatic disease without local recurrence. Forty (20%) pts had pelvic nodal recurrence only and 18 (9%) had perirectal nodal involvement. Median PSA for pts with local only recurrence, distant metastases only, and local + distant disease was 2.3, 2.7 and 2.2 ng/mL, respectively, with a median interval from BCR to positive scan of 16.7, 7.9 and 11 months. Imaging revealed that 33% to 66% of our cohort would have all sites of disease treated by salvage RT depending on the extent of the treatment field Conclusions: C11Ch and pMRI were used to identify recurrence patterns in pts with BCR after RP only. At median PSA of 2.3 ng/ml, our study demonstrates a low rate of local-only recurrence, higher than anticipated frequency of metastatic recurrence with peak frequency within the pelvic lymph nodes, and substantial perirectal recurrences. Despite the high rates of distant recurrences, 2/3 of our cohort had their disease limited to the pelvis and could be potential candidates for local therapies, including salvage radiation.

213 Background: Daily oral prednisone (P) has been employed for the therapy of mCRPC, alone or in combination regimens. Despite palliative benefits and PSA responses, the overall clinical impact of P is unknown and it may foster resistance mechanisms. We performed a pooled analysis of control arms of randomized trials which either did or did not administer single agent P to evaluate its impact on overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Methods: Individual patient data from control arms ofrandomized trials of post-docetaxel men receiving placebo or P + placebo were eligible for analysis. Patient demographics, survival, and toxicity data were collected. The impact of P on OS and toxicities was investigated in Cox regression models adjusted for known clinical and laboratory prognostic factors. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05 and all tests were two-sided. Results: The control arms of 2 randomized phase III trials were available totaling 794 men: the COU-AA-301 trial (n = 394) administered P plus placebo and the CA184-043 trial (n = 400) administered placebo alone. P plus placebo was not significantly associated with OS compared to placebo alone in a multivariable analysis (HR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.72-1.10], p = 0.27). Other factors associated with poor OS were Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG)-performance status (PS) ≥ 1, Gleason Score ≥ 8, liver metastasis, high PSA, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated LDH.In contrast, CTCAE grade ≥ 3 therapy-related toxicities were significantly increased with P plus placebo compared to placebo alone (HR = 1.48 (1.03-2.13), p = 0.034) in a multivariable analysis. Other baseline factors significantly associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicities were ECOG-PS ≥ 1, hypoalbuminemia and elevated LDH. Conclusions: P plus placebo compared with placebo alone for post-docetaxel men with mCRPC was not associated with extension of OS, but was associated with higher grade ≥ 3 toxicities. With the exception of the use of P in combination with abiraterone, P alone or in combination regimens should be questioned given its unclear palliative benefits and association with increased toxicities.

Purpose Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral metastases. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy was administered to nonprogressing patients every 3 months. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to ipilimumab and 202 to placebo; 399 were treated with ipilimumab and 199 with placebo. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) in the ipilimumab arm versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88 to 1.39; P = .3667). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the ipilimumab arm versus 3.8 with placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95.87% CI, 0.55 to 0.81). Exploratory analyses showed a higher prostate-specific antigen response rate with ipilimumab (23%) than with placebo (8%). Diarrhea (15%) was the only grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE) reported in ≥ 10% of ipilimumab-treated patients. Nine (2%) deaths occurred in the ipilimumab arm due to treatment-related AEs; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Immune-related grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 31% and 2% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Ipilimumab did not improve OS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The observed increases in progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen response rates suggest antitumor activity in a patient subset.