Thongprayoon, Charat

Abstract Background/objectives Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with HCV infection might have a higher risk of osteoporotic fracture. However, the data are inconclusive. This systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted with the aims to summarize all available evidence. Methods A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE database from inception to June 2016. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of osteoporotic fracture among HCV‐infected patients versus subjects without HCV infection were included. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random‐effect, generic inverse variance method. Results Three studies with 362,285 participants met our eligibility criteria and were included in analysis. We found a significantly higher risk of osteoporotic fracture among patients with HCV infection with RR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.14). Conclusions Our study demonstrated an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture among HCV‐infected patients. Further studies are required to clarify how this risk should be addressed in clinical practice.

ABSTRACTAimPrevious studies have suggested a higher incidence of urologic malignancies in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. However, incidence trends of urologic malignancies in ESRD patients remain unclear. The aims of the present study were: (i) to investigate the pooled incidence/incidence trends; and (ii) to assess the risk of urologic malignancies in ESRD patients.MethodsA literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database from inception through April 2017. Studies that reported incidence or odds ratios of urologic malignancies among ESRD patients were included. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95%CI were calculated using a random‐effect model. The protocol for this meta‐analysis is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42017067687).ResultsNineteen observational studies with 1 931 073 ESRD patients were enrolled. The pooled estimated incidence of kidney cancer and urothelial cancers (carcinomas of the bladder, ureters, and renal pelvis) in ESRD patients were 0.3% (95%CI: 0.2–0.5%) and 0.5% (95%CI: 0.3–0.8%), respectively. Meta‐regression showed significant positive correlation between incidence of urologic malignancies in ESRD patients and year of study (slopes = +0.05 and +0.07, P < 0.001 for kidney cancer and urothelial cancers, respectively). Compared to non‐ESRD status, ESRD was significantly associated with both kidney cancer (pooled OR 6.04; 95% CI 4.70–7.77) and urothelial cancers (pooled OR 4.37; 95% CI 2.40–7.96).ConclusionOur study demonstrates a significant association between ESRD and urologic malignancies. The overall estimated incidence rates of kidney cancer and urothelial cancers are 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively. There is a significant positive correlation between the incidence of urologic malignancies and year of study.

Background/Aims Studies have shown that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, it is unknown whether severe liver fibrosis is associated with a higher prevalence of CKD among NAFLD. We examined the diagnostic performance of noninvasive fibrosis markers in identifying prevalent CKD among NAFLD. Methods This study represents an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted in the USA between 1988 and 1994. NAFLD was defined by ultrasonographic evidence of hepatic steatosis without other liver diseases. CKD was defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The presence and severity of hepatic fibrosis were determined by the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), FIB-4 score, APRI score, and BARD score. Multiple logistic regression was performed to generate odds ratios (ORs) and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the predictive values of each marker. Results A total of 4142 individuals with NAFLD were included; 200 (4.8%) had CKD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.77, 0.75, 0.62, and 0.51 for the multivariable equation with FIB-4, NFS, BARD, and APRI score, respectively. Compared with patients with a low probability of developing advanced liver fibrosis, individuals with a high probability of developing fibrosis showed significantly increased odds of CKD as estimated by NFS (adjusted OR: 4.92, 95% confidence interval: 2.96–8.15) and FIB-4 (adjusted OR: 2.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–4.52). Conclusion Advanced liver fibrosis, defined by NFS and FIB-4 scores, is associated independently with CKD among individuals with NAFLD. FIB-4 is the best predictor of an increased risk of prevalent CKD.

AbstractBackground/ObjectivesThe risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in individuals who regularly drink coffee is controversial. Several antioxidant compounds in coffee have been proposed to reduce the risk of RCC, while the findings from several studies raise concerns regarding a potential increased risk of RCC with coffee consumption.AimThis meta‐analysis aims to evaluate the association between coffee consumption and RCC.MethodsA literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception until December 2016. Studies that reported odd ratios or hazard ratios comparing the risk of RCC in individuals who consumed a significant amount of coffee (at least one cup of coffee per day) versus those who did not consume coffee were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using a random‐effect, generic inverse variance method.ResultsTwenty‐two observational studies (16 case–control and 6 cohort studies) were included in our analysis to assess the association between RCC and coffee consumption. The pooled RR of RCC in individuals consuming coffee was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.89–1.11). Subgroup analyses stratified by gender showed pooled RRs of RCC of 1.15 (95% CI, 0.85–1.55) in females and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.72–1.04) in males.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates no significant association between coffee consumption and RCC. Thus, coffee consumption is likely not a risk factor for RCC. Whether coffee consumption has a potential role in reduced risk of RCC, particularly in men, requires further investigations.

AbstractObjectiveThe study's aims were (1) to investigate the prevalence and (2) to assess the risk of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in kidney transplant recipients.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed from inception until September 2016. Studies that reported prevalence, relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios of H. pylori among kidney transplant recipients were included. Pooled risk ratios and 95% CI were calculated using a random‐effect model.ResultsEleven observational studies with 2545 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled. Between year 1990 and 2000, the estimated prevalence of H. pylori among people with kidney transplant was 50% (95% CI: 31% to 68%), with a prevalence of 46% (95% CI: 23% to 70%) in high‐income countries and 55% (95% CI: 22% to 86%) in middle‐income countries, respectively. From year 2000 to 2016, the estimated prevalence of H. pylori among people with kidney transplant was 35% (95% CI: 26% to 45%), with a prevalence of 28% (95% CI: 19% to 37%) in high‐income countries and 45% (95% CI: 38% to 51%) in middle‐income countries. Data regarding prevalence of H. pylori infection in low‐income countries were limited. The pooled RR of H. pylori in kidney transplant recipients was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.33 to 1.00) when compared to people with non‐transplant.ConclusionsThere has been a decline in prevalence of H. pylori in kidney transplant recipients with the overall estimated prevalence of H. pylori in kidney transplant recipients of 35%, particularly in both high‐income and middle‐income countries. Also, our meta‐analysis demonstrates a potential decreased risk of H. pylori infection in kidney transplant recipients compared with non‐transplant populations.

Abstract Background Clostridium difficile is a major cause of diarrhea in thoracic organ transplant recipients. We investigated the epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection ( CDI ) in heart and heart‐lung transplant ( HT ) recipients. Methods This is a retrospective study from 2004 to 2013. CDI was defined by diarrhea and a positive toxigenic C. difficile in stool measured by toxin enzyme immunoassay (2004‐2006) or polymerase chain reaction (2007‐2013). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the association of risk factors with time to CDI and survival with CDI following transplantation. Results There were 254 HT recipients, with a median age of 53 years ( IQR , 45‐60); 34% were female. During the median follow‐up of 3.1 years ( IQR , 1.3‐6.1), 22 (8.7%) patients developed CDI . In multivariable analysis, risk factors for CDI were combined heart‐lung transplant ( HR 4.70; 95% CI , 1.30‐17.01 [ P =.02]) and retransplantation ( HR 7.19; 95% CI , 1.61‐32.12 [ P =.01]). Acute cellular rejection was associated with a lower risk of CDI ( HR 0.34; 95% CI , 0.11‐0.94 [ P =.04]). CDI was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality ( HR 7.66; 95% CI , 3.41‐17.21 [ P <.0001]). Conclusions Clostridium difficile infection after HT is more common among patients with combined heart‐lung and those undergoing retransplantation. CDI was associated with a higher risk of mortality in HT recipients.

Background Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based sepsis alert systems have failed to demonstrate improvements in clinically meaningful endpoints. However, the effect of implementation barriers on the success of new sepsis alert systems is rarely explored. Objective To test the hypothesis time to severe sepsis alert acknowledgement by critical care clinicians in the ICU setting would be reduced using an EHR-based alert acknowledgement system compared to a text paging-based system. Study Design In one arm of this simulation study, real alerts for patients in the medical ICU were delivered to critical care clinicians through the EHR. In the other arm, simulated alerts were delivered through text paging. The primary outcome was time to alert acknowledgement. The secondary outcomes were a structured, mixed quantitative/qualitative survey and informal group interview. Results The alert acknowledgement rate from the severe sepsis alert system was 3% ( N = 148) and 51% ( N = 156) from simulated severe sepsis alerts through traditional text paging. Time to alert acknowledgement from the severe sepsis alert system was median 274 min ( N = 5) and median 2 min ( N = 80) from text paging. The response rate from the EHR-based alert system was insufficient to compare primary measures. However, secondary measures revealed important barriers. Conclusion Alert fatigue, interruption, human error, and information overload are barriers to alert and simulation studies in the ICU setting.