Citations 89

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Hospitalized Renal Transplant Recipients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide Analysis

Journal of Clinical Medicine | April 17, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 524

10.3390/jcm8040524 | PMID 30999564

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the hospitalization rates for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) among renal transplant patients with adult polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and its outcomes, when compared to non-ADPKD renal transplant patients. Methods: The 2005–2014 National Inpatient Sample databases were used to identify all hospitalized renal transplant patients. The inpatient prevalence of SAH as a discharge diagnosis between ADPKD and non-ADPKD renal transplant patients was compared. Among SAH patients, the in-hospital mortality, use of aneurysm clipping, hospital length of stay, total hospitalization cost and charges between ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients were compared, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: The inpatient prevalence of SAH in ADPKD was 3.8/1000 admissions, compared to 0.9/1000 admissions in non-ADPKD patients (p < 0.01). Of 833 renal transplant patients with a diagnosis of SAH, 30 had ADPKD. Five (17%) ADPKD renal patients with SAH died in hospitals compared to 188 (23.4%) non-ADPKD renal patients (p = 0.70). In adjusted analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality, use of aneurysm clipping, hospital length of stay, or total hospitalization costs and charges between ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients with SAH. Conclusion: Renal transplant patients with ADPKD had a 4-fold higher inpatient prevalence of SAH than those without ADPKD. Further studies are needed to compare the incidence of overall admissions in ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients. When renal transplant patients developed SAH, inpatient mortality rates were high regardless of ADPKD status. The outcomes, as well as resource utilization, were comparable between the two groups.
Reply to: ‘Effects of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis’

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine | March 24, 2019 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 645-645

10.1093/qjmed/hcz075 | PMID 30907969

Associations between sarcopenia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis in the USA

European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology | March 20, 2019 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1121-1128

10.1097/meg.0000000000001397 | PMID 30888971

Background and aim Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may be associated with sarcopenia. This study aims to determine whether sarcopenia is independently associated with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis. Participants and methods Cross-sectional data from 11 325 participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. NAFLD was defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis from the ultrasound. Sarcopenia was defined as the skeletal muscle index. Results NAFLD was more common in participants with sarcopenia than in those without (46.7 vs. 27.5%). Univariate analysis showed that sarcopenia was associated with NAFLD [odds ratio (OR): 2.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.01–2.64], which remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, metabolic risk factors (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03–1.48). This finding persisted after adjustment for C-reactive protein as a marker of chronic inflammation. NAFLD-associated advanced fibrosis was more common in participants with sarcopenia than in those without (7.8 vs. 1.6%). Sarcopenia was associated with NAFLD-associated advanced fibrosis independent of metabolic risk factors (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.18–2.72). Conclusion Sarcopenia was independently associated with increased odds of NAFLD and NAFLD-associated advanced fibrosis independent of well-defined risk factors. Interventions to strengthen muscle mass may reduce the burden of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis.
Incidence and Impact of Acute Kidney Injury after Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

Journal of Clinical Medicine | March 18, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 372

10.3390/jcm8030372 | PMID 30884912

Background: The study’s aim was to summarize the incidence and impacts of post-liver transplant (LTx) acute kidney injury (AKI) on outcomes after LTx. Methods: A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases from inception until December 2018 to identify studies assessing the incidence of AKI (using a standard AKI definition) in adult patients undergoing LTx. Effect estimates from the individual studies were derived and consolidated utilizing random-effect, the generic inverse variance approach of DerSimonian and Laird. The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42018100664). Results: Thirty-eight cohort studies, with a total of 13,422 LTx patients, were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated incidence rates of post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) were 40.7% (95% CI: 35.4%–46.2%) and 7.7% (95% CI: 5.1%–11.4%), respectively. Meta-regression showed that the year of study did not significantly affect the incidence of post-LTx AKI (p = 0.81). The pooled estimated in-hospital or 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality rates of patients with post-LTx AKI were 16.5% (95% CI: 10.8%–24.3%) and 31.1% (95% CI: 22.4%–41.5%), respectively. Post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring RRT were associated with significantly higher mortality with pooled ORs of 2.96 (95% CI: 2.32–3.77) and 8.15 (95%CI: 4.52–14.69), respectively. Compared to those without post-LTx AKI, recipients with post-LTx AKI had significantly increased risk of liver graft failure and chronic kidney disease with pooled ORs of 3.76 (95% CI: 1.56–9.03) and 2.35 (95% CI: 1.53–3.61), respectively. Conclusion: The overall estimated incidence rates of post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring RRT are 40.8% and 7.0%, respectively. There are significant associations of post-LTx AKI with increased mortality and graft failure after transplantation. Furthermore, the incidence of post-LTx AKI has remained stable over the ten years of the study.
Effects of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine | February 6, 2019 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 421-427

10.1093/qjmed/hcz039 | PMID 30753687

Risk of hip fracture in patients on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A meta‐analysis of observational studies

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine | January 31, 2019 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 98-104

10.1111/jebm.12341 | PMID 30701673

AbstractBackgroundBone and mineral metabolism disorders are common among end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, which could lead to hip fracture. It is unclear whether the hip fracture risk is different among patients on hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD). This meta‐analysis was conducted to evaluate the hip fracture risk in ESRD patients on HD, when compared to PD.MethodsA literature review was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases through January 31, 2018 to identify studies that appraised the rate or risk of hip fracture among patients on HD, when compared to PD. Effect estimates from the individual studies were derived and consolidated utilizing random‐effect, generic inverse variance approach of DerSimonian and Laird.ResultsFive cohort studies with 1 276 677 ESRD patients were enrolled. HD status was associated with a significantly higher risk of hip fracture with the pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50‐1.73, I2 = 10.0%), compared with PD. When the analysis was limited to studies with confounder‐adjusted analysis, the pooled OR of hip fracture among HD patients was 1.57 (95% CI 1.43‐1.72, I2 = 13.6%). Funnel plots and Egger's regression test demonstrated no significant publication bias in our meta‐analysis.ConclusionsAmong ESRD patients, HD status is associated with a 61% higher risk of hip fracture compared to PD.
The interaction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and smoking on mortality among adults in the United States

Liver International | January 30, 2019 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1202-1206

10.1111/liv.14058 | PMID 30697898

AbstractBackground & AimsNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common liver disease in Western countries. Smoking and diabetes mellitus (DM) have been shown to increase mortality; however, whether NAFLD adds to the detrimental effect of smoking in DM and non‐DM patients is unknown. We evaluated the possible interactive effect of NAFLD and smoking on mortality risk in a US population‐based sample.MethodsCross‐sectional data from 11 205 participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analysed. NAFLD was defined as ultrasonographic hepatic steatosis without evidence of other liver diseases. Proportional hazards regression modelling was used to test for the multiplicative interaction of NAFLD and smoking on overall mortality, controlling for DM.Results36.5% of the participants had NAFLD of whom 21.1% were current smokers, while among non‐NAFLD subjects, 26.2% reported current smoking. Smoking was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.23 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.87‐2.65) among non‐NAFLD subjects, and 2.31 (95% CI: 1.33‐2.92, P < 0.01) among NAFLD patients. In contrast, the HR for NAFLD was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.78‐1.31, P = 0.96) among smokers and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.87‐1.10, P = 0.73) among non‐smokers. There was no evidence of interaction between NAFLD and smoking (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.74‐1.38, P = 0.94) in the combined model.ConclusionWe found that smoking increased mortality by two‐fold among the US population. Although the magnitude of the increase in mortality did not differ from that in non‐NAFLD subjects, smoking represents a modifiable determinant of long‐term outcomes in NAFLD patients.
Reply: Risk of fall injury in patients taking proton pump inhibitors—a meta-analysis

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine | November 19, 2018 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 319-319

10.1093/qjmed/hcy274 | PMID 30476239

Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in patients with cirrhosis and clinical significance: a meta-analysis

European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology | November 17, 2018 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 514-519

10.1097/meg.0000000000001315 | PMID 30451705

ObjectiveThe epidemiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cirrhosis and its clinical significance remain unclear. This study aimed (i) to investigate the pooled prevalence and/or incidence of AF in patients with cirrhosis and (ii) to assess the mortality risk of AF in patients with cirrhosis.Patients and methodsA literature search for studies that reported incidence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was carried out using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database from inception through July 2018. Pooled incidence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effect model. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42018102664).ResultsSeven cohort studies including 385 866 patients with cirrhosis were identified. The pooled estimated prevalence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was 5.0% (95% CI: 2.8–8.6%). When studies that solely assessed patients undergoing transplant evaluation or on transplant waiting list were excluded, the pooled estimated prevalence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was 7.4% (95% CI: 3.5–15.2%). There was a significant association between AF and increased mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with a pooled odds ratio of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.36–1.53).ConclusionThe overall estimated prevalence of AF among patients with cirrhosis is 5.0%. Our study demonstrates a statistically significant increased mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with AF.
Use of cannabis and risk of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine | November 6, 2018 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 272-277

10.1111/jebm.12317 | PMID 30398032

AbstractObjectivesChronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the most common chronic liver diseases. Several risk factors for the progression of liver fibrosis among these patients have been identified. Use of cannabis could be another risk factor, but the results from epidemiological studies remain inconclusive.MethodsComprehensive literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through December 2017 to identify studies that compared the risk of advanced liver fibrosis among HCV‐infected patients who use and who do not use cannabis. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined together using the random‐effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.ResultsA total of three cohort studies with 898 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. The risk of advanced liver fibrosis among HCV‐infected patients who use cannabis was numerically higher than those who do not use cannabis, although the result did not achieve statistical significance (pooled odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–4.02). The statistical heterogeneity was high with an I2 of 75%.ConclusionsThis meta‐analysis showed that the risk of advanced liver fibrosis among HCV‐infected patients who use cannabis was higher than those who do not use cannabis, but the result was not statistically significant. Further studies are required to better characterize the risk.