Lee, Justin Z.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have been shown to improve outcomes across various cardiovascular diseases. However, data regarding the effects of GLP-1 agonists in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of GLP-1 agonists in patients with HCM. Methods: Using TriNetX Analytics Network, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2019. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with GLP-1 agonists for ≥ 1 year and those who were not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using demographics, cardiac medications, and comorbidities. The study outcomes were 5-year all-cause mortality and cardiac adverse events. Results: A total of 52,978 patients with HCM were identified, including 2,654 (5.0%) patients treated with GLP-1 agonists. After PSM, 2,588 patients in each group were analyzed. Patients on GLP-1 agonists were associated with lower odds of all-cause mortality (5.0% vs. 15.6%, p<0.01), all-cause hospitalization (46.3% vs. 67.8%, p<0.01), acute decompensated heart failure ((9.4% vs. 21.4%, p<0.01), cardiac arrest (3.6% vs. 5.4%, p<0.01), cerebrovascular accidents (9.5% vs. 14.1%, p<0.01), and cardiogenic shock (1.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.01). Additionally, reduced rates of new ICD implantation (3.5% vs. 7.9%, p<0.01) and septal reduction therapy (1.7% vs. 3.5%, p<0.01) were observed in the GLP-1 agonists group. Conclusion: The use of GLP-1 agonists in HCM was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Future clinical trials are needed to validate these potential benefits.

Background: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing radiation therapy face potential risks of device malfunction. Proton beam therapy (PBT), with its reduced neutron scatter, has emerged as a potentially safer alternative, yet real-world safety data remain scarce. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 100 patients with CIEDs (76 pacemakers, 24 ICDs) who underwent PBT from 2016 to 2023 at a quaternary center. Baseline and serial device interrogations were performed before, during, and after treatment to assess lead impedance, capture thresholds, battery function, and arrhythmic events. Patients were stratified by pacemaker dependence and monitored accordingly. Primary outcomes included device malfunction and new-onset arrhythmias during treatment. Secondary outcomes included device parameter changes, one-year arrhythmia incidence, and cardiac-related hospitalizations. Results: No treatment-related deaths or major device failures occurred. Device malfunction was rare (2 pacemaker patients, 2.6%), with no malfunctions in ICD recipients. Transient, non-clinically significant changes in lead impedance and capture thresholds were observed. Arrhythmias during treatment occurred in 26% of pacemaker and 25% of ICD patients, but only 4% developed new arrhythmias. At one year, device-related complications and cardiac outcomes remained comparable across groups. Independent predictors of arrhythmias during treatment included a higher radiation dose per fraction (OR 1.45; p=0.001), a longer treatment duration (OR 1.12; p=0.04), and a higher number of fractions (OR 1.20; p=0.01). Conclusion: Proton beam therapy appears safe in patients with CIEDs, with a low incidence of clinically significant device malfunctions or arrhythmias. These findings support the integration of PBT into routine practice for this population and underscore the importance of structured monitoring protocols and prospective guideline refinement.

Background: Leadless pacemaker has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional transvenous pacemaker (PM) among elderly patients who are at high risk of complications. Objective: This study aims to assess and compare 5-year clinical outcomes of leadless PM versus transvenous single-chamber PM in elderly patients using a multi-national dataset. Methods: Using the TriNetX Analytics Research Network, we included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent leadless versus transvenous single-chamber PM implantation between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed by using patient’s demographic, LVEF, cardiac comorbidities, and medications. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular events over a 5-year follow-up period. Results: After PSM, 7,501 patients in each group were analyzed. Leadless PM was associated with a significantly lower odds of 5-year all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.534; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.497-0.575), heart failure exacerbation (OR: 0.779, 95% CI: 0.721-0.841), major bleeding (OR: 0.666, 95% CI: 0.604-0.734), cardiac arrest (OR: 0.747, 95% CI: 0.646-0.864) and stroke (OR: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.750-0.908) compared to transvenous single-chamber PM. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in all-cause hospitalization (OR: 1.006, 95%CI: 0.938-1.079), cardiac thrombus (OR: 1.077, 95%CI: 0.791-1.465) or venous thromboembolism (OR: 1.028, 95%CI: 0.916-1.153). Conclusion: Leadless PM was associated with significantly improved mortality and cardiovascular outcomes compared to transvenous single-chamber PM in elderly patients. These findings support the strong consideration of leadless pacing as a strategy to reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

ABSTRACT Background Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a major contributor to sudden cardiac death among patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). While catheter ablation reduces the arrhythmic burden, the impact on long‐term outcomes remains uncertain. We assess the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with IHD. Methods We performed a meta‐analysis by systematically searching electronic databases from inception to April 2025. Pairwise, reconstructed time‐to‐event data meta‐analyses and Trial Sequential analyses were conducted. Results A total of seven studies (1192 participants) were included. Among patients with IHD with ICD, VT ablation was associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = [0.34–0.74]), a trend toward reduced VT storm (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = [0.40–1.04], p = 0.07), and lower rates of cardiovascular hospitalization (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = [0.53–1.01], p = 0.06) compared to ICD alone. However, no significant differences were observed when compared to patients receiving ICD plus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). VT ablation showed no significant impact on mortality or VT/VF recurrence compared to either ICD alone or ICD with AADs. Reconstructed Kaplan–Meier analysis for all‐cause mortality showed no significant difference between VT ablation and AAD + ICD. Trial Sequential Analysis provided conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, while further data is required for other outcomes. Conclusion Among patients with IHD with ICD, VT ablation reduces ICD shocks, VT storm, and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD‐only therapy, but offers no significant advantage over ICD combined with AADs. VT ablation does not impact overall mortality or the recurrence of VT/VF. Trial sequential analysis confirmed conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, while additional data is needed for other outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background Sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2‐Is) are primarily used to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF), but their impact on reducing stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains underexplored. We aimed to investigate the impact of SGLT2‐Is for stroke risk mitigation in patients with AF. Methods Using the TriNetX database, we performed a retrospective cohort study on patients ≥ 18 years with AF and on anticoagulation. These patients were then classified into two cohorts based on their use of SGLT2‐Is. To balance the baseline demographics, comorbidities, and medication use, propensity score matching (PSM) was used. The primary outcome was ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, and the secondary outcomes were all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalizations, need for AF cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug initiation, and cardiac arrest. Adjusted odds ratio (aORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for both the primary and secondary outcomes. Results A total of 152,778 patients with 76,389 patients were included in each cohort (SGLT2‐Is users, and non‐users) after PSM. The mean age of both SGLT2‐Is users and non‐users was 72.8 years. For the SGLT2‐Is users, the mean follow‐up period was 317 days, whereas the mean follow‐up period for the non‐users was 306 days. For the primary outcome, we found that SGLT2‐Is users had a lower risk of ischemic stroke (aOR: 0.889; 95% CI: 0.857–0.923) and hemorrhagic stroke (aOR: 0.682; 95% CI: 0.620–0.749) compared to non‐users. Regarding the secondary outcomes, SGLT2‐Is users also had lower risk for all‐cause mortality (aOR: 0.615; 95% CI: 0.595–0.636), all‐cause hospitalizations (aOR: 0.599; 95% CI: 0.587–0.611), need of AF cardioversion (aOR: 0.846; 95% CI: 0.813–0.881), antiarrhythmic drug initiation (aOR: 0.790; 95% CI: 0.766–0.815), and cardiac arrest (aOR: 0.643; 95% CI: 0.601–0.688). Conclusions SGLT2‐I use in patients with AF is associated with lower risks of stroke and other cardiovascular and non‐cardiovascular outcomes. Future prospective research is needed to validate these findings.

ABSTRACT Background Transvenous lead removal (TLR) is a Class I indication for patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. However, disparities in the utilization of TLR have not been fully explored, particularly concerning demographic and socioeconomic factors. Objectives This study aims to examine whether disparities exist among patients hospitalized for CIED infections with respect to the utilization of TLR, focusing on sex, race, and income characteristics. Methods We utilized the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to assess patients hospitalized with CIED infections and identify those who underwent TLR. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for TLR utilization, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic characteristics. Results A total of 56 709 patients were hospitalized for CIED infection in the United States in 2019, of which 9867 (17.4%) underwent TLR. On an adjusted analysis, females and Black patients were found to have lower odds of undergoing TLR compared to males and White patients (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.59–0.78; p < 0.01; and OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.39–0.57; p < 0.01, respectively). Hispanic patients also had reduced odds of TLR (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58–0.93; p = 0.01). No significant associations were observed between income or insurance status and the likelihood of receiving TLR after adjustment. Conclusions This study identified significant disparities in the utilization of TLR among patients hospitalized for CIED infections. Female, Black, and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive TLR.

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) imposes a significant mortality burden. Understanding demographic influences on the location of AS-related death is crucial for advancing equitable end-of-life care. Therefore, we investigated how demographic factors influence the location of death among AS patients in the United States. Methods: We completed a cross-sectional study utilizing US mortality data from the CDC’s WONDER database for 2019. All files related to decedents with AS identified as the primary cause of death were obtained, including demographic information and death locations (i.e., inpatient facilities, outpatient/ER facilities, home, or hospice/nursing facilities). Associations between demographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and education) and place of death were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models, yielding odds ratios (ORs). Results: In 2019, most AS-related deaths occurred in inpatient facilities (38.3%, n = 5062), home (29.2%, n = 3859), or hospice/nursing facilities (28.6%, n = 3775). Higher odds of inpatient death were observed among Black (OR 1.67, p < 0.001) and Hispanic individuals (OR 1.91, p < 0.001) compared to White decedents. Those aged >85 years were more likely to die at home (OR 1.76, p < 0.001) or in hospice/nursing facilities (OR 7.80, p < 0.001). Males had increased odds of inpatient death (OR 1.09, p = 0.044) but decreased odds of hospice/nursing facility death (OR 0.87, p = 0.003). Higher education levels were associated with increased odds of home death (OR 1.33, p = 0.023) and decreased odds of hospice/nursing facility death (OR 0.71, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Demographic factors significantly influence the location of death among AS patients, emphasizing the need for culturally and socioeconomically tailored interventions to promote equitable end-of-life care.

ABSTRACT Background Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are a serious complication associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Despite guideline recommendations for complete device removal, disparities in healthcare access and resource availability between urban and rural settings may influence patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate rural–urban disparities in the management and outcomes of patients hospitalized with CIED infections. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2021. Patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with CIED infections were identified using ICD‐10 codes. Hospital location was categorized as urban or rural based on the Urban Influence Codes. Baseline characteristics, complications, and outcomes were compared using chi‐square and t ‐tests, and a multivariable logistic regression model was employed to assess the independent association of hospital settings with transvenous lead removal (TLR) utilization. Results A total of 288,402 patients were hospitalized for CIED infections, with 94.9% treated in urban hospitals and 5.1% in rural hospitals. Urban hospital patients had a higher prevalence of key comorbidities, including heart failure, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation and peripheral vascular disorders. In‐hospital mortality was significantly higher in urban hospitals (6.2% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.01) likely due to higher burden of comorbidities and higher rates of acute complications such as stroke (3.1% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.01) and systemic embolism (1.4% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.01). TLR was more frequently performed in urban hospitals (20.1% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.01), with rural hospitals exhibiting 59% lower odds of receiving TLR (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.36–0.47, p < 0.01). TLR was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality, 30‐day mortality, and 30‐day readmission rates across both hospital settings. Conclusion Our study highlights significant rural–urban disparities in CIED infection management. Despite rural hospitals admitting patients with a lower comorbidity burden, TLR utilization was significantly lower, potentially due to limited access to specialized expertise and procedural resources. Given TLR's association with improved survival and reduced readmissions, regardless of the hospital setting, targeted interventions are needed to enhance access to specialized care in rural settings. Further research is warranted to explore strategies for bridging these disparities and optimizing CIED infection outcomes nationwide.