Hathcock, Matthew

e19556 Background: CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy possesses unique side effects including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Age is a major risk factor for ICANS. However, whether ICANS in older patients is different compared to younger patients is unknown. Herein, we report clinical course, outcomes and risk factors for ICANS in older patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Methods: We comprehensively reviewed detailed clinical courses of ICANS in 78 adult patients with LBCL treated with axi-cel between June 2016 and October 2020. Incidence, manifestation, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of ICANS were compared between patients age ≥60 (n=32) and <60 (n=46) years old. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between older and younger patients except higher proportion of high international prognostic index and underlying cerebral microvascular disease in older patients. ICANS was observed in 16 patients in the older and 24 patients in the younger age group, with a 30-day incidence of 52% and 50%, respectively. Median time to CRS and ICANS were similar between 2 age groups. The most common initial neurological findings included aphasia, dysgraphia and encephalopathy in both age groups. Table summarizes the characteristics, clinical course and interventions of ICANS in older and younger patients. In Cox regression model, the presence of CRS was the only factor associated with ICANS in both age groups. Age, history of central nervous system involvement and cerebral microvascular disease were not associated with ICANS. Importantly, all patients had complete resolution of ICANS. No elderly patients in our cohort experienced seizure as a manifestation of ICANS. Conclusions: In our study, older age was not a risk factor for ICANS. CRS was the only factor associated with ICANS in both younger and older patients. Incidence, clinical course and neurological outcomes of ICANS in older patients treated with axi-cel were comparable to younger patients. [Table: see text]

e19554 Background: Obesity is associated with a pro-inflammatory state and immune dysregulation. Retrospective studies indicate that obesity could affect toxicities and outcomes after immunotherapies including checkpoint inhibitors and allogeneic stem cell transplant. Currently, there are no data specifically on outcomes for obese patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells. We described the clinical outcome in obese patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) who received axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Methods: We analyzed the effect of body weight (BW) and body mass index (BMI) on toxicities and outcomes of 78 adults with LBCL who received axi-cel between June 2016 and October 2020 at Mayo Clinic. Obesity was defined as having BMI of 30 or higher. Results: Of 78 patients, 22 (28%) and 19 (24%) were classified as overweight (BMI 25-29.99 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), respectively. Baseline characteristics were not statistically significantly different between non-obese and obese patients. The median delivered dose of fludarabine was similar between non-obese and obese patients (89 [0-105] vs 88 [56-94] mg/m2, P=0.32) whereas the median delivered dose of cyclophosphamide was lower in non-obese patients (1503 [1077-1525] vs 1512 [1021-1660] mg/m2, P=0.01). The 30-days cumulative incidence of CRS and ICANS were similar between non-obese and obese patients. BW and BMI were not associated with CRS or ICANS. The overall response rate was 66% (CR 47%) and 68% (CR 53%) in non-obese and obese group, respectively ( P=0.83). The 1-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was 34.6% and 64.5%, neither were different between non-obese and obese patients (EFS 35.8% vs. 30.7%, P=0.60; OS 59.4% vs. 83.9%, P=0.18). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was comparable (60.8% vs. 69.0%, P=0.40 and 3.4% vs. 0%, P=0.42). In the Cox proportional hazards model, higher dose of fludarabine, but not cyclophosphamide, was associated with better EFS and OS; however, neither obesity nor BW were associated with toxicities and outcomes. Conclusions: In our study, Obesity was not associated with risk of toxicities or adverse survival outcomes. The effect of obesity on the pattern of LD chemotherapy dosing including toxicities and outcomes after CAR-T warrants further exploration. [Table: see text]

7558 Background: A low absolute lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (ALC/AMC) has been found to predict decreased survival in lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy and stem cell transplant. We report its clinical significance and additional cellular phenotype changes in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy. Methods: Records were reviewed for patients (pts) who received axicabtagene ciloleucel between 6/2016 and 12/2020. Receiver operator curve was generated using nominal logistic regression to predict CR as best response. Survivals were calculated using Kaplan- Meier method. Blood immune phenotype were assayed by multiparametric flow. Principle component analysis (PCA) was performed using ClusterVis. Results: Low ALC/AMC (≤0.8) prior to lymphodepletion (LD) chemotherapy on day -5 was associated with lower CR rate (AUC=0.68, Table). Our cohort of 81 pts had similar baseline characteristics except that noted in Table. Low ALC/AMC ratio is associated with shorter EFS and OS (EFS: 2.6 vs. 6.4 months, P<0.0001; OS: 5.3 months vs. not reached, P=0.0006), respectively. Prognostic association remained significant in multivariate analysis including ASCT, bridging therapy and CRP. Interestingly, compared to the high ALC/AMC group, the low ALC/AMC group had decreased CD8 Tem, increased CD16+CCR2+ monocytes and increased monocytes’ producing IL12, IL-10, and IL-1β (n=26). Unsupervised PCA identified 3 clusters: 1. Low ALC/AMC, all non-CR; 2. High ALC/AMC, some non-CR; 3. High ALC/AMC, all CR. Compared to cluster 1 and 2, cluster 3 had increased CD4 Tnaive, CD8 Tcm and IL-17 producing CD4 T and NK cells. Conclusions: ALC/AMC is a clinically accessible test that is strongly associated with CAR-T response and survival. Immune characterization revealed that the biologic effect is not just associated with cell ratio. Increased inflammation has been found to negatively impact CAR-T response, with some cytokines known to be from the myeloid lineage. We show that CRP is elevated in the low ALC/AMC group with increased cytokine production by monocytes. In addition, presence of T cell subset and IL-17 producing cells, before LD, are associated with clinical response. Further investigation on optimizing host immunity may help improve clinical outcome with CAR-T.[Table: see text]

7555 Background: While CAR-T therapy is not myelo-ablative, patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) are lymphodepleted and have prolonged B cell aplasia. The impact of CAR-T on immunologic protection from vaccine-preventable diseases (and thus the need to revaccinate) is not known. We report the vaccine titers of patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) at Mayo Clinic. Methods: Retrospective chart review of adult lymphoma patients who received axi-cel from 9/2018 to 9/2020 for anti-viral and anti-bacterial titers prior to CAR-T infusion and at month 3 (MO3) post CAR-T. Results: Prior to CAR-T therapy, positive titer rate was highest for tetanus and lowest for Strep pneumoniae (Strep PNA) (Table). Similar trends were seen whether patients had stem cell transplant (ASCT) within 2 years of CAR-T (i.e. within immunization timeframe post ASCT) or not (Table). Compared to patients who had ASCT, those who did not had higher rate of positive titer for Strep PNA and lower rate for hepatitis B, Mumps, and VZV. The same trend for sero-positive rate were observed at MO3 post CAR-T. Patients with IgG<400 mg/dl received IVIG supplement for prophylaxis. Among the 23 patients who received IVIG, variable rate of conversion from negative to positive titers were seen for measles (1/2, 50%), mumps (2/3, 67%), rubella (2/3, 67%), varicella-zoster (VZV, 3/3, 100%), hepatitis A (6/6, 100%), hepatitis B (6/7, 86%) and Strep PNA (0/10, 0%). For patients who did not receive IVIG prophylaxis, there was one loss of seropositivity for Strep PNA (1/4, 25%). Conclusions: The presence of protective vaccine titers is variable for patients receiving CAR-T, regardless of recent ASCT. The loss of protective titers post CART was low. IVIG variably impacted vaccine titer status. Immunization remains important for patients with ASCT prior to CART, without completion of post ASCT immunization protocol. Further study is needed to inform the need for immunization and optimal timing post CART.[Table: see text]

7554 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) are commonly administered inpatient due to concern for early onset cytokine release syndrome (CRS), especially with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). We report Mayo Clinic Rochester experience for hospital-based outpatient (HBO) management of patients (pts) receiving axi-cel and identify opportunities for improvement. HBO is closely integrated with inpatient practice and includes the same specialty trained clinical team. It is the first point of contact 24/7 for pts and triage evaluations. Lymphodepletion chemotherapy and CAR-T infusion is given on HBO followed by daily monitoring till day 8 and thereafter, as clinically needed until admission criteria is met. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed database of pts who received axi-cel between 1/2018 and 1/2021. After 06/2020, remote patient monitoring (RPM) tools were implemented to collect patient-reported neurologic symptoms and vital signs via bluetooth-enabled devices 4 times daily through month 1. Adverse data trends are addressed by the HBO team. Results: Among 72 recipients, 89% received their cells outpatient; 8% remained outpatient for the entire month. CRS and neurotoxicity incidence were comparable to those reported from CIBMTR. Median time to first admission was 2 days (Table). Use of bridging therapy, increased CRP and LDH were associated with early admission (≤3 days). Median time to tocilizumab, steroid, oxygen support, vasopressor was 4 days after admission. Half of HBO visits required intervention such as blood transfusions, IV medications through the first month. Nine pts had enrolled in RPM to date; with 8 having evaluable data. With 4 scheduled entries/day, a median of 1 entry/day was skipped and 2 entries/day were answered incompletely. An average of 57 additional unscheduled entries were generated per pt. Among a median of 373 (range 91-522) readings per pt over the first month, 4% (2%-20%) of the readings generated alerts. An average of 4 alerts were seen within 48 hours prior to admission. Data including additional subjects will be presented at ASCO meeting. Conclusions: We report a feasible outpatient care model for management of axi-cel recipients with safe outcomes. Clinical characteristics associated with more aggressive disease are associated with likelihood of early admission. Early RPM experience suggest use of digital tools could improve monitoring compliance and may predict evolution to symptoms requiring escalation of care.[Table: see text]

Abstract BACKGROUND: It is estimated that one third of women in the United States opt for permanent tubal sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery. Evidence suggests that ovarian cancer begins in the fallopian tubes. Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality of all gynecologic malignancies. There is no proven effective screening for ovarian cancer. In view of this, the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend considering counseling patients about prophylactic salpingectomy as an effective method of sterilization. There are limited well designed clinical trials that compare the safety and feasibility of total salpingectomy to that of traditional partial salpingectomy for tubal sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Women age 21 years and older who were undergoing cesarean delivery and desired concomitant sterilization were enrolled between May 17, 2017 and July 16, 2018. Stratified randomization was performed based on number of previous cesarean deliveries and their Basal Metabolic Index, into a bilateral total salpingectomy group and bilateral partial salpingectomy group. All salpingectomies were performed using clamps and suture. The primary outcome was to compare the mean peri-operative hemoglobin change for both groups. Secondary objectives included sterilization completion time, postoperative length of stay, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 111 women screened, 40 were enrolled and randomized. Of these, 38 underwent the assigned procedure (18 BTS, 20 BPS). There were no demographic differences between groups. No difference in Mean ±SD hemoglobin drop between groups (1.4±0.7 g/dl for the BTS group and 1.8±1.0 g/dl for the BPS group, p=0.08). Mean time to completion of sterilization procedure was significantly longer in the BTS group (16.3±5.6 minutes for the BTS group vs 5.1±1.6 minutes for the BPS group, p < .01). No significant differences for other outcome measures.CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral total salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery does not increase the risk for blood loss and has similar peri-operative outcomes, with a small increase in operative time when compared to traditional bilateral partial salpingectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03135431, 27/04/2017

Background: Infection during the period of neutropenia following chemotherapy represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancy.(Freifeld, et al, 2011, Baden LR, et al, 2012) Several guidelines recommend granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) to reduce the duration and severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and abate infection risk.(Lyman, et al 2018, Aapro, et al, 2011, Smith, et al, 2015). Optimal GCSF administration following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy remains undefined and requires characterization. Methods: The Mayo Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective, single-center study. Electronic medical records for patients prescribed axicabtagene ciloleucel were reviewed until disease relapse, death, or a maximum of 60 days after infusion. Baseline characteristics and laboratory values were abstracted prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy. GCSF support was originally prescribed when the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) declined below 500 cells/mm3 and discontinued when the ANC exceeded 1000 cells/mm3 (neutropenia) for 2 consecutive days. A practice change was made where GCSF was recommended only in those with febrile neutropenia and an increased concern for infection. The primary endpoint was the difference in the total days of neutropenia for patients receiving and not receiving GCSF. Secondary outcomes compared total days of severe neutropenia, number of neutropenia episodes, infection rates by GCSF use, and outcomes by protocol change. Neutropenia and severe neutropenia were defined as an ANC below 500 cells/mm3 and 100 cells/mm3, respectively. Updated data with more patients will be presented at the conference. Results: The 60 included patients had a median age of 59 (IQR: 44, 63) years, 38 (63%) were male and 53 (88%) were Caucasian. Significantly fewer patients were prescribed GCSF according to infection-related concerns compared to ANC-based indication, 18% vs. 94%, p&lt;0.001. Because only 3 subjects received GCSF based on infection-related concerns, results based on GCSF use versus no use is shown here. GCSF was prescribed to 35 (58%) patients for a median of 8 (IQR: 6, 12) doses with a median cumulative dosage of 3840 mcg (IQR 2100-5400) and median time to first dose of 3 days (IQR: 1, 4) post CAR T-cell infusion. Table 1 displays additional baseline characteristics and laboratory parameters according to GCSF support utilization. GCSF prescribed: Table 2 displays outcomes by GCSF use. Total days of neutropenia were similar between groups (13 vs. 16, p=0.52) with a trend towards significantly fewer days of severe neutropenia when prescribed GCSF (6 vs. 9, p=0.129). Patients prescribed GCSF were more likely to experience multiple episodes of neutropenia (83% vs. 43% p=0.002) with a significantly greater median number of episodes (3 vs. 1, p=0.002) when compared to those not prescribed GCSF. GCSF use significantly decreased the median days of the first neutropenia episode (6 vs. 12, p=0.001). There was a trend for decreased median days of severe neutropenia in the first episode with GCSF (5.0 vs. 8.0, p=0.236). Figure 1 displays a trend towards a lower overall risk of infection (HR 0.55, 95%CI: 0.16-1.87, p=0.34) and lower risk of bacterial infection (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.18-1.31, p=0.15); however, these were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Patients prescribed GCSF according to ANC-based indication were significantly more likely to experience multiple neutropenia episodes; however, duration of first neutropenic episode and days of severe neutropenia during the first neutropenic episode were significantly reduced. Interestingly, the total days of neutropenia and severe neutropenia were similar between groups. It is possible that using the parameter of ANC more than 1000 cells/mm3 for 2 consecutive days is not the optimal criteria for stopping GCSF. Risk of overall and bacterial infection was lower with ANC-based initiation of GCSF, although non-significant likely due to small sample size. The potential benefit for using CSF and the optimal timing after CAR T-cell infusion requires further, rigorous, prospective investigation. Disclosures Ansell: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Bennani:Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board. Lin:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Background: Anti CD-19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is approved to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive NHL after 2 or more lines of therapy. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing comparing CAR-T and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in second line. In standard of care practice, patients refractory to second line chemotherapy are sometimes treated with third line chemotherapy and taken to ASCT if disease is chemo-sensitive. Current study aims to evaluate the impact of prior lines of therapy on the efficacy of CAR-T and ASCT. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who received ASCT and/or axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for R/R aggressive NHL from June 2016 - January 2020 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester was performed. The lymphoma types included in the study were DLBCL, transformed lymphoma (TFL), high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Response to all lymphoma-directed therapy was evaluated using 2014 Lugano criteria. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from CAR-T or ASCT infusion to death, and progression free survival (PFS) was defined as time from CAR-T or ASCT infusion to disease progression, or next treatment. Categorical data was analyzed as Chi-square or fishers exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables were analyzed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Analysis was performed in R3.6.3. Results: A total of 105 patients underwent ASCT and 53 patients underwent CAR-T therapy in the study period with at least 6 months follow-up. Of the 105 ASCT patients, 87 received ASCT after 2 lines of chemotherapy, ASCT(2), and 18 received ASCT after 3 lines of chemotherapy, ASCT(3). Twenty six of the ASCT [n=19, ASCT(2) and n=7, ASCT(3)] patients received CART in subsequent therapy. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups except ASCT(3) had higher percent of refractory disease after first line (table 1). With a median follow up of 17.4 months, the PFS was significantly longer for the ASCT(2) group with a trend toward longer OS (Figure 1; PFS @ 1 year: ASCT(2) 67%, 95%CI 58-79%; ASCT(3) 27%, 95%CI 27-74%; p = 0.036). Among the CAR-T recipients, only 18 (33%) patients received CAR-T in the earliest possible indication, CAR-T(2): after 2 lines of chemotherapy (n=12) and/or after ASCT(2) (n=6), table 1. Compared to patients who received CAR-T in later lines (CAR-T 3+), OS was significantly longer for patients who received CAR-T(2), with a trend toward longer PFS (Figure 1; OS @ 1 year: CAR-T (2) 82%, 95%CI 65-100%; CAR-T later lines 62%, 95%CI 47-82%; p = 0.05). Additionally, 12 (23%) of patients received CAR-T immediately after ASCT (9 after ASCT(2), 3 after ASCT(3)). Baseline demographics in these 12 patients, CAR-T(ASCT), were comparable to the others who had chemoimmunotherapy as the last salvage therapy prior to CAR-T [CAR-T(chemo)], except a smaller proportion received bridging therapy (33% vs. 73%, p = 0.01). The CAR-T (ASCT) group had significantly prolonged PFS (median PFS - not reached [95%CI 3-not reached (NR)] vs. 3 months [95% CI 3-4 months]), and OS (median OS - NR, [95%CI 10.34-NR] vs. 15.1 months, [95%CI 11.9 - NR], p = 0.03). Updated analysis will be presented at the meeting with longer follow up (Figure 1). Conclusion: CAR-T use at the earliest current approved indication may confer survival advantage. Referral for earlier use of CAR-T remains low at only one third of our CAR-T practice volume. CAR-T use for relapse immediately after ASCT appear to have longer PFS and OS than after other systemic salvage therapy, although contributing parameters such as the need for bridging therapy requires further study. While patients who are chemo-refractory to second line chemotherapy may demonstrate chemo sensitivity with third line chemotherapy, PFS is shorter for ASCT(3). Comparison between ASCT(3) and CAR-T (2, chemorefractory) require larger cohorts with longer follow-up. Disclosures Bennani: Affimed: Research Funding; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board. Ansell:Takeda: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding. Lin:Juno: Consultancy; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vineti: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding.