Dearani, Joseph A.

Background— Use of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) in multivessel coronary artery disease improves survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery; however, the survival benefit of multiple arterial (MultArt) grafts is debated. Methods and Results— We reviewed 8622 Mayo Clinic patients who had isolated primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease from 1993 to 2009. Patients were stratified by number of arterial grafts into the LIMA plus saphenous veins (LIMA/SV) group (n=7435) or the MultArt group (n=1187). Propensity score analysis matched 1153 patients. Operative mortality was 0.8% (n=10) in the MultArt and 2.1% (n=154) in the LIMA/SV ( P =0.005) group, which was not statistically different ( P =0.996) in multivariate analysis or the propensity-matched analysis ( P =0.818). Late survival was greater for MultArt versus LIMA/SV (10- and 15-year survival rates were 84% and 71% versus 61% and 36%, respectively [ P <0.001], in unmatched groups and 83% and 70% versus 80% and 60%, respectively [ P =0.0025], in matched groups). MultArt subgroups with bilateral internal mammary artery/SV (n=589) and bilateral internal mammary artery only (n=271) had improved 15-year survival (86% and 76%; 82% and 75% at 10 and 15 years [ P <0.001]), and patients with bilateral internal mammary artery/radial artery (n=147) and LIMA/radial artery (n=169) had greater 10-year survival (84% and 78%; P <0.001) versus LIMA/SV. In multivariate analysis, MultArt grafts remained a strong independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–0.94; P =0.007). Conclusions— In patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery with LIMA to left anterior descending artery, arterial grafting of the non–left anterior descending vessels conferred a survival advantage at 15 years compared with SV grafting. It is still unproven whether these results apply to higher-risk subgroups of patients.

Surgical flow disruptions can significantly increase the probability of surgical errors. However, little is known about the frequency and nature of surgical flow disruptions, making the development of evidence-based interventions extremely difficult. The goal of this project was to prospectively study surgical errors and their relationship to surgical flow disruptions within the context of cardiac surgery. A trained observer recorded surgical errors and flow disruptions during 31 cardiac operations over a three-week period. Flow disruptions were then reviewed and analyzed by an interdisciplinary team of surgical and human factors experts. Results revealed that flow disruptions consisted of teamwork/communication failures, equipment and technology problems, extraneous interruptions, training-related distractions, and resource accessibility issues. Errors increased significantly with increases in flow disruptions. Teamwork/communication failures were the strongest predictor of surgical errors. These findings provide preliminary data for developing evidenced-based error management and patient safety programs within cardiac surgery.

Errors with serious consequences continue to occur at a high rate in many surgical specialties. In this study, the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (Wiegmann & Shappell, 2003) was used to develop a structured interviewing tool for prospectively assessing the systemic factors that may predispose operating room (OR) personnel to making errors. Approximately 50% (n = 68) of all staff involved in patient care within the cardiac surgery OR at our institution participated, with an equal proportion represented across staff specialties (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists, Nurses, Perfusionists and Technicians). Results identified a variety of potential error-producing factors present in the OR setting. While such factors were viewed by OR staff as occurring infrequently, significant relationships between the estimated frequency of systemic problems and specific error forms were identified. These findings can inform both the development of theoretical models of surgical error, as well as the practice of developing targeted intervention programs.

Background— Few data exist on long-term outcomes of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement. We evaluated latest follow-up information for patients ≥70 years of age after aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results— Late overall survival of 2890 consecutive patients ≥70 years of age who underwent aortic valve replacement between January 1993 and December 2007 was reviewed retrospectively, analyzed, and stratified by preoperative and intraoperative variables. Observed 5-, 10-, and 15-year late postoperative survival was lower than generally expected (68%, 34%, and 8% versus 70%, 42%, and 20%, respectively; P <0.001). Independent predictors of late death included older age, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, stroke, myocardial infarction, immunosuppression, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, implanted pacemaker, lower ejection fraction, hypertension, and New York Heart Association class III or IV. After stratification by age–comorbidity risk score, 10-year survival for the lowest-risk group (n=946 [33%]) was similar to expected survival (55% versus 55%; P =0.50), but for the highest-risk group (n=564 [20%]), survival was significantly lower than expected (9% versus 26%; P <0.001). For 229 pairs of propensity-matched patients with mechanical or biological prostheses, survival was not significantly different (67%, 40%, and 19% versus 71%, 45%, and 7% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively; P =0.81). Structural deterioration of bioprostheses occurred in 64 patients (2.4%). Conclusions— Survival of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement is influenced by age and preoperative comorbidities; 33% at lowest risk had overall survival similar to that of an age- and sex-matched general population. There was no sufficient evidence that valve type affected survival. Structural deterioration of aortic bioprostheses was rare.

Although the Fontan procedure has been enormously successful in palliation of single-ventricle patients, many seem to experience progressive failure of the Fontan circulation over time. Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have developed into stable platforms for long-term support of adult patients with heart failure. Given the success of axial flow devices, it was hypothesized that the technology could provide clinical benefit to failing Fontan patients. The aim of this study was to use a computer model to evaluate VAD support in failing Fontan physiology. A computer model of Fontan circulation with heart failure was developed and the HeartMate II (HM II) (Thoratec Corp) axial flow ventricular assist device was connected to this model in a systemic configuration to examine its impact. Cardiac catheterization data from 7 patients (8 catheterization studies) with failing Fontan physiology were applied to this model to evaluate the impact of using the HM II in this manner. When the HM II was used in a systemic configuration at 8000 rpm, there was a 35% decrease in the systemic venous pressure in the Fontan circuit and a 63% decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with a resultant 41% increase in CI. The model also predicted patient-specific parameters where the VAD may not benefit the patient, such as fixed elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, low systemic ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and high unresponsive systemic vascular resistance. These data suggest a potential benefit from application of axial flow VAD technology in the management of failing Fontan physiology. Clinical correlation will allow for refinement of this model as a predictive tool in discerning which patients may benefit from placement of a VAD and what issues must be addressed prior to implanting the device.

Background— After repair of aortic coarctation, patients may develop restenosis, aneurysms, and pseudoaneurysms at the site of prior repair. We assessed the outcomes of late reintervention on the descending aorta after aortic coarctation repair. Methods and Results— From March 1954 to July 2008, 130 patients had operations or endovascular procedures on the descending aorta after previous coarctation repair. We excluded patients who had complex left-sided cardiac lesions or interrupted aortic arch. Mean age at reintervention was 32±24 years and 28% were female. The interval between coarctation repair and reintervention was 17±13 years. Seventy-four percent of patients had hypertension. Reasons for reintervention were restenosis (n=122 [94%]), aneurysm (n=4 [3%]), and pseudoaneurysm (n=4 [3%]). Ninety-five patients (73%) underwent operative procedures including an extra-anatomic conduit (n=41), patch repair (n=32), interposition graft (n=14), end–end anastomosis (n=6), and subclavian flap (n=2). Thirty-five patients underwent endovascular treatment (balloon dilatation, n=22 or stenting, n=13). There was no early mortality. In the surgical group, 5 patients required early reoperation for bleeding and 5 patients had early vocal cord paralysis. One patient in the endovascular group had aortic rupture at the time of intervention requiring urgent operation. Survival was 97% at 10 years. At 5 years, freedom from a second repeat procedure on the descending aorta was 96% in the surgical group and 72% in the endovascular group ( P <0.001). Five years after reintervention, fewer patients required treatment for hypertension (57% versus 74% , P <0.001) and a median of 1 antihypertensive medication was prescribed compared with a median of 2 medications preintervention. Conclusions— Operative and endovascular management of recoarctation can be performed safely with good late outcomes.

Background— Proposed advantages to the Ross procedure included presumed increased freedom from reoperation and simpler reoperation for pulmonary conduit replacement if needed. It is increasingly apparent, however, that reoperations are frequent after the Ross procedure and that when required, they may be more complex than previously thought. Methods and Results— Between September 1991 and August 2008, 56 patients underwent reoperation at our institution after a Ross procedure performed by ourselves (n=13) or elsewhere (n=43). Median age at first reoperation at our institution was 26 years (range 1 to 69 years). The 4 most common indications for reoperation were isolated autograft (neoaortic) regurgitation in 11 cases (20), isolated pulmonary conduit regurgitation/stenosis in 9 (16), combined autograft regurgitation/dilatation in 8 (14), and combined autograft regurgitation and pulmonary conduit regurgitation/stenosis in 6 (11). A total of 144 procedures were performed in these 56 patients during first reoperation at our institution. The autograft valve required replacement in 21 cases (38) and aortic root replacement in 21 (38), with ascending aortic/arch reconstruction in 13 (23) and mitral valve surgery in 5 (9). The pulmonary valve was replaced in 33 cases (59) and the tricuspid valve was repaired/replaced in 10 (18). Early mortality was 1.8 (1 of 56 patients), and morbidity included 6 patients with respiratory failure and 3 who required postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There were 4 late deaths during the median follow-up of 8 months (range 1 to 179 months). Conclusions— A broad spectrum of complex reoperations may be required after the Ross procedure. Patients and family members considering the procedure should be informed of the potential for associated morbidity should reoperation be necessary.

Irreparable mitral pathology may lead to early mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children. Often, a small mechanical prosthesis (<23 mm) is required, raising concerns about annular growth in patients who may eventually require subsequent mitral valve re-replacement (MVRR). The aim of this study was to evaluate interval mitral annular growth in this cohort. Between January 1972 and December 2006, 164 children underwent MVR with a mechanical prosthesis; 110 of these children (median age, 4 years; range, 7 days to 14 years) received a small mechanical prosthesis (<23 mm). The most common diagnoses were congenital mitral stenosis (10%), regurgitation (46%), and left atrioventricular valve dysfunction after previous atrioventricular septal defect repair (44%). The cohort was analyzed for age, body surface area (BSA), prosthesis size, and Z score at the time of MVR and MVRR. At the time of MVR, 78 patients had a BSA of 0.77 ± 0.06 m2, had an annular size of 24 ± 0.62 mm ( Z score, 2.91 ± 0.23), and ultimately did not require MVRR. Another cohort, who eventually did require MVRR (n = 24), had an initial BSA at the time of MVR of 0.62 ± 0.05 m2 ( P = NS vs MVR only) and an annular size of 20 ± 0.49 mm ( Z score, 1.85 ± 0.22) ( P = .008 vs MVR only). In the interval between MVR and MVRR (7.8 ± 1.1 years), BSA increased to 1.12 ± 0.07 m2, and annulus size increased to 24 ± 0.47 mm ( Z score, 1.80 ± 0.28). These data suggest growth of the mitral annulus following MVR with a small mechanical prosthesis, as evidenced by an unchanged Z score in the setting of normal interval increase in BSA. Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference in initial Z scores between the cohorts requiring MVRR and those who have not needed re-replacement, suggesting that the feasibility of placement of a slightly larger prosthesis may be associated with a decreased need for MVRR.