DeMartino, Randall R.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open aortic repair (OAR) on mortality and reintervention after ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). Background: The optimal treatment modality for rAAA remains debated, with little data on long-term comparisons. Methods: VQI rAAA repairs (2004–2018) were matched with Medicare claims (VQI-VISION). Primary outcomes were in-hospital and long-term mortality. Secondary outcome was reintervention. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for treatment selection, and Cox Proportional Hazards models and negative binomial regressions were used for analysis. Landmark analysis was performed among patients surviving hospital discharge. Results: Among 1885 VQI/Medicare rAAA patients, 790 underwent OAR, and 1095 underwent EVAR. Median age was 76 years; 73% were male. Inverse probability weighting produced comparable groups. In-hospital mortality was lower after EVAR versus OAR (21% vs 37%, odds ratio: 0.52, 95% CI, 0.4–0.7). One-year mortality rates were lower for EVAR versus OAR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI, 0.6–0.9], but not statistically different after 1 year (HR: 0.95, 95% CI, 0.8–1.2). This implies additional benefits to EVAR in the short term. Reintervention rates were higher after EVAR than OAR at 2 and 5 years (rate ratio: 1.79 95% CI, 1.2–2.7 and rate ratio:2.03 95% CI, 1.4–3.0), but not within the first year. Reintervention was associated with higher mortality risk for both OAR (HR: 1.66 95% CI, 1.1–2.5) and EVAR (HR: 2.14 95% CI, 1.6–2.9). Long-term mortality was similar between repair types (HR: 0.99, 95% CI, 0.8–1.2). Conclusions: Within VQI/Medicare patients undergoing rAAA repair, the perioperative mortality rate favors EVAR but equalizes after 1 year. Reinterventions were more common after EVAR and were associated with higher mortality regardless of treatment.

Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging with endovascular delivery of intra-arterial (IA) contrast could potentially provide higher attenuation with lower contrast volumes than intravenous (IV) administration. We aimed to compare IA and IV contrast use for organ-specific CT abdominal imaging. Five anesthetized swine had external jugular and brachial artery access with ascending aortic pigtail placement. An IV protocol was 100 mL at 5 mL/sec over 20 sec vs 50 mL of IA contrast at 5 mL/sec over 10 sec. Region-of-interest markers were applied to anatomical regions to measure attenuation (HU) over time. IA and IV contrast protocols achieved adequate aortic opacification (IA, 455 ± 289 vs IV, 450 ± 114 HU). The IA contrast aortic attenuation curve reached peak attenuation compared with IV contrast (IA, 8 vs 23 sec; P < .001). Time to peak attenuation was similar between IA and IV contrast in the portal vein (IA, 38 vs IV, 42 sec, P = .25). IA administration achieved a superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in less time compared with IV (R 2 = .94; P < .001). IA contrast achieved adequate opacification with less bolus broadening and a superior CNR compared with IV contrast while using a smaller contrast volume for directed organ-directed imaging.

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze malpractice claims for aortic pathologies and to assess if there has been a change in rate of malpractice lawsuits with evolution of endovascular therapy. Methods Malpractice lawsuits were individually screened and compiled from the Westlaw database from 2000 to 2017 through use of relevant search terms. Data were collected of allegations, diagnoses, and outcomes of each case and compared. Results 268 unique cases were included in this study, with aneurysms (54%, n = 145) and dissection (35%, n = 94) making up the majority. There was a defendant verdict in 53% (n = 141), plaintiff verdict in 24% (n = 65), and settlements in 23% (n = 62) of lawsuits. Litigation was higher in the Midwest and Northeast. There was a gradual decline in litigation overall, however endovascular case numbers remained constant. There was negligible difference in the primary allegation underlying the litigation for various aortic pathologies, time to litigation and award between open and endovascular procedures. Conclusion The proportion of litigation for clinical negligence in endovascular cases amongst all vascular surgical lawsuits is increasing. As novel methods of endovascular therapy emerge, it is imperative that physicians remain vigilant to legal considerations to minimize malpractice risk.

Abstract Background Bloodstream infection (BSI) following arterial aneurysm repair may signify vascular graft infection (VGI). The incidence of BSI and its implications in patients with arterial grafts have received scant attention with limited contemporary study. Therefore, the aim of the current investigation is to describe the incidence and epidemiology of BSI following arterial aneurysm repair in a population-based cohort. Methods Retrospective case-cohort study using the expanded Rochester Epidemiology Project (e-REP) to identify all arterial aneurysm repairs performed in adults (&gt;18 years) residing in eight counties in southern Minnesota between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020. All repairs were performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Electronic health records were screened for initial BSI episode following aneurysm repair and complicating VGI. Results Overall, 643 patients underwent 708 aneurysm repairs: 417 endovascular and 291 open surgical repairs. Forty-two patients developed BSI during 2,992 cumulative person-years of follow-up. The median time from repair to BSI was 3.1 [interquartile range 0.5, 6.4] years. The BSI incidence rate, in cases per 1000 person-years, was 14.0 (95% CI 10.1-19.0) overall, including 18.2 (95% CI 11.9-26.7) following open surgical repair and 10.2 (95% CI 5.8-16.6) following endovascular repair (p=0.148). Thirty-nine (92.9%) of the BSI cases were monomicrobial, with 18 (46.2%) due to Gram-positive organisms and 21 (53.8%) due to Gram-negative organisms. Of the 42 patients with BSI, 10 (23.8%) had VGI. VGI occurred in 8/18 (44.4%) monomicrobial Gram-positive BSI as compared to 2/21 (9.5%) monomicrobial Gram-negative BSI (p=0.013). The 3-year mortality rate following BSI was 52.3%. Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in incidence rates of BSI following open surgical repair and endovascular repair. Higher rates of VGI were seen with Gram-positive BSI as compared to Gram-negative BSI. Disclosures Larry M. Baddour, M.D., Boston Scientific: Advisor/Consultant|Botanix Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Roivant Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate, Inc.: Royalty payments - authorship duties.

Objective: The aim of this multicentric registry was to assess the outcomes of “anteRior versus posteRior divisional bRanches Of the hYpogastric artery as distAl landing zone for iLiac branch devices (R3OYAL).” Methods: The main exposure of interest for the purpose of this study was the internal iliac artery (IIA) divisional branch (anterior vs posterior) that was used as distal landing zone. Early endpoints included technical success and adverse events. Late endpoints included survival, primary/secondary IIA patency, and IIA branch instability. Results: A total of 171 patients were included in the study, of which 50 received bilateral implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs). This resulted in a total of 221 incorporated IIAs included in the final analysis, of which 40 were anterior divisional branches and 181 were posterior divisional branches. Technical success was high in both groups (anterior division: 98% vs posterior division: 100%, P = .18). Occurrence of any adverse event was noted in 14% of patients in both groups ( P = 1.0). The overall rate of freedom from the composite IBD branch instability did not show significant differences between patients receiving distal landing in the anterior or posterior division of the IIA at 3 years (79% vs 87%, log-rank test = .215). The 3-year estimates of IBD patency were significantly lower in patients who received distal landing in the anterior divisional branch than those who received distal landing in the posterior divisional branch (primary patency: 81% vs 96%, log-rank test = .009; secondary patency: 81% vs 97%, log-rank test < .001). Conclusions: The use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the IIA as distal landing zone for IBD implantation shows comparable profiles in terms of immediate technical success, perioperative safety, and side-branch instability up to 3 years. However, IBD patency at 3 years was higher when the distal landing zone was achieved within the posterior divisional branch of the IIA. Clinical Impact The results from this large multicentric registry confirm that use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the internal iliac artery (IIA) as distal landing zone for implantation of iliac branch devices (IBD) shows comparable profiles of safety and feasibility, thereby allowing to extend the indications for endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms to cases with unsuitable anatomy within the IIA main trunk. Although mid-term rates of device durability and branch instability seem to be similar, the rates of primary and secondary IBD patency at three years was favored when the distal landing zone was achieved in the posterior divisional branch of the IIA.

The advent and refinement of complex endovascular techniques in the last two decades has revolutionized the field of vascular surgery. This has allowed an effective minimally invasive treatment of extensive disease involving the pararenal and the thoracoabdominal aorta. Fenestrated-branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) now represents a feasible technical solution to address these complex diseases, moving the proximal sealing zone above the renal-visceral vessels take-off and preserving their patency. The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review on the peri-operative management of patients undergoing F/BEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism (TAAA). It will focus on how to prevent, diagnose, and manage the complications ensuing from these complex interventions, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, F/BEVAR remains a technically, physiologically, and mentally demanding procedure. Intraoperative adverse events often require prolonged or additional procedures and complications may significantly impact a patient’s quality of life, health status, and overall cost of care. The presence of standardized preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative pathways of care, together with surgeons and teams with significant experience in aortic surgery, should be considered as crucial points to improve clinical outcomes. Aggressive prevention, prompt diagnosis and timely rescue of any major adverse events following the procedure remain paramount clinical needs.

Background: We aimed to assess the effect of surgeons’ shunting practice and shunt use on the early outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in recently symptomatic patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study based on a multicenter national prospective database. The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010–2019) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days after an ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack. Surgeons were gauged as routine shunters if they shunted in >95% of CEAs, otherwise were classified as selective shunters. In-hospital stroke and death rates were compared between routine and selective shunters, stratifying by type of index event (transient ischemic attack versus stroke) and timing of CEA (≤2 versus >2 days). Results: Thirteen thousand four hundred sixty-nine CEAs were performed after a transient ischemic attack (43%) or stroke (57%), 3186 (24%) by routine shunters, and 10 283 (76%) by selective shunters. Comparing routine and selective shunters, in-hospital stroke (1.9% versus 2.4%; P =0.09) and death (0.4% versus 0.5%; P =0.73) rates were similar. A lower stroke rate (1.5% versus 4.2%; P =0.02) was achieved by routine shunters for CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, a higher stroke rate occurred in case of shunt use (2.9% versus 2.3%; P <0.01), mainly due to cases presenting with stroke (3.5% versus 2.4%; P <0.01) but not transient ischemic attack (1.8% versus 1.5%; P =0.57). Awake anesthesia was adopted in 7.8% of cases by selective shunters and in 0.8% by routine shunters, without impact on the perioperative stroke rate (1.8% versus 2.3%; P =0.349). Conclusions: In this large national cohort, the overall outcomes of CEA were similar between routine and selective shunters. A lower postoperative stroke rate was achieved by routine shunters in CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, intraoperatively indicated shunting determined an increased stroke rate, likely due to intraoperative hypoperfusion. These data may guide the decision regarding timing of CEA and shunting intention in symptomatic patients.

Key Points At 1 year after placement, 60% of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) will develop venous neointimal hyperplasia (VNH) and subsequent venous stenosis (VS). Autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells may help reduce VS formation associated with hemodialysis AVF. There are no therapies available to prevent VS formation associated with hemodialysis AVF. Background Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred vascular access for patients on hemodialysis. In the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study, 44% of the patients achieved unassisted maturation of their fistula without needing an intervention. Venous neointimal hyperplasia (VNH) and subsequent venous stenosis are responsible for lack of maturation. There are no therapies that can prevent VNH/VS formation. The goal of this paper is to present the background, rationale, and trial design of an innovative phase 1/2 clinical study that is investigating the safety of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells delivered locally to the adventitia of newly created upper extremity radiocephalic (RCF) or brachiocephalic fistula (BCF). Methods The rationale and preclinical studies used to obtain a physician-sponsored investigational new drug trial are discussed. The trial design and end points are discussed. Results This is an ongoing trial that will complete this year. Conclusion This is a phase 1/2 single-center, randomized trial that will investigate the safety and efficacy of autologous AMSCs in promoting maturation in new upper-extremity AVFs. Clinical Trial registration number : NCT02808208

Background: Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) includes aortic dissection (AD), intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) and confers high rates of aortic related events. However, the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in this patient group is unknown. The aim of this study was to define the rates of CV events in an incident cohort of AAS patients. Methods: Medical records and death certificates of all Olmsted County, MN residents with a diagnosis of AAS from 1995-2015 were reviewed and compared to age- and sex- matched population controls. Primary outcome was non-aortic CV mortality. Secondary outcome was overall mortality and first time non-fatal CV event (myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) or stroke). Events were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for comorbidities. Results: Of 133 patients with AAS (77 AD, 21 IMH, 35 PAU) 57% were male, median age was 72 (SD 14) and median follow-up was 10 years. Overall survival in AAS cases and controls was 62% versus 83% at 5 years and 44% versus 60% at 10 years (adj HR 1.8, p<.001, 95% CI 1.3-2.4). CV death occurred in 21 (29%) of 73 AAS decedents due to HF (9), MI (5), other cardiac causes (5), stroke (1) and peripheral vascular disease (1). CV-related survival at 5 and 10 years after AAS diagnosis (91% and 81%) was not significantly different from controls (95% and 86%) after adjustment for comorbidities (adj HR 1.8, p=.1, 95% CI 0.9-3.6). AAS was associated with an increased risk of any first time CV event (adj HR 2.6, p<.001, 95% CI 1.6-4.4; Figure), first time diagnosis of MI (adj HR 2.8, p<.001, 95% CI 1.7-4.7) and HF (adj HR 3.2, p<.001, 95% CI 1.6-6.2) but not stroke. When excluding acute events within 14 days of diagnosis, AAS was still associated with a significantly higher mortality (adj HR 1.6, p=.011, 95% CI 1.1-2.4) and an increased risk of any first time CV event (adj HR 2.2, p=.018, 95% CI 1.1-4.1), first time MI (adj HR 2.2, p=.012, 95% CI 1.2-4.1) and HF (adj HR 2.9, p=.006, 95% CI 1.4-6.2) but not stroke. Conclusions: AAS is associated with a higher overall mortality and an increased risk of any first time CV event, first time MI and HF that persists beyond the acute phase. These data highlight the risk of CV events among those with AAS and implicate the need for long-term cardiovascular management in these patients.

Introduction: Statin dose guidelines for PAD patients are based on coronary artery disease and stroke data. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of statin dose (based on 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines) on PAD outcomes of amputation and mortality. Methods: Patients with PAD in the Veterans Affairs database were identified from 2003-2014. The exposure was highest statin dose usage (none, low-moderate and high intensity) around diagnosis of PAD (within 1 year). The outcomes were risk of incident amputation (below knee or above knee) and mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years. The effect of statin dose on the two outcomes was also analyzed using Cox proportional hazards modeling to adjust for covariates. Results: In 208,275 patients with PAD [Males: 98.1%; Mean age: 67.4 yrs (SD 9.9)], 17,643 amputations and 99,951 deaths occurred in a median follow up of 5.2 years. Almost a quarter (27.7%) of patients were not on a statin while 30.4% were on simvastatin 80 mg (no longer recommended due to drug toxicity). The risk of incident amputation declined significantly at the high intensity statin dose as seen in Table 1. In Cox models adjusting for age, gender, race, comorbidities, cholesterol levels and creatinine, the high intensity statins were associated with lower amputation risk and mortality as compared to no statin [HR 0.67; 95% CI (0.63, 0.72) and HR 0.71; 95% CI (0.68, 0.73), respectively]. Low-moderate-dose statins also had significant but smaller reductions in risk of amputation and mortality [HR amputation 0.78 (0.75, 0.82), HR death 0.78 (0.77, 0.80)]. Conclusion: This is one of the largest population based studies to examine the effect of statins on long-term PAD outcomes and the first to explore the dose-dependent effect of statins on amputation and mortality. High intensity statins are associated with a significant reduction in limb loss and mortality in PAD patients followed by a smaller risk reduction by low-moderate intensity statins as compared to no statin therapy.