Spinner, Robert J.

Background: Shoulder function after spinal nerve grafting in pan–brachial plexus injuries (pan-BPI) is not well described. The authors evaluated shoulder abduction (ABD) and external rotation (ER) after spinal nerve grafting to the suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, or posterior division of the upper trunk and determined patient characteristics, injury severity and characteristics, and nerve graft factors that influenced outcomes. Methods: A total of 362 patients undergoing pan-BPI reconstruction and spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation in a single institution between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), graft characteristics, strength, range of motion for shoulder ABD and ER, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on recovery of shoulder function: no return, ABD only, and ABD and ER. Results: A total of 110 patients underwent spinal nerve grafting, with 41 meeting inclusion criteria. Seventeen (41.5%) had no return of shoulder function, 14 (34.1%) had ABD alone, and 10 (24.4%) had ABD and ER. Patients with recovery of both ABD and ER were significantly younger (18.6 ± 5.56 years), had lower body mass index (22.4 ± 4.0), and had a lower ISS (10.5 ± 6.24; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis found that with increasing age (OR, 0.786; 95% CI, 0.576, 0.941) and ISS (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.606, 0.979), odds for return of ABD and ER decreased significantly. Conclusions: In pan-BPI, 24.4% of patients demonstrated return of both ABD and ER after spinal nerve grafting to suprascapular nerve and either axillary nerve or posterior division of the upper trunk. Age, body mass index, and ISS were associated with poorer recovery of shoulder function. Careful patient selection and consideration of age, body mass index, and ISS may improve outcomes of spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries typically cause immediate loss of upper limb function. Timely multidisciplinary treatment in specialized centres often results in a useful helper arm. Both the patient and the surgical team can benefit from an open discussion to set realistic expectations. Surgical reconstruction is customized for each patient, considering their injury factors and functional objectives. Optimizing pain control, adherence to procedure indications and using meticulous surgical techniques help minimize the risk of failing to meet the patient’s goals. The need for potential alternative treatment(s) if the desired result is not achieved should be detailed before the initial reconstruction. This review discusses late treatment options, including tendon transfers, joint fusions, free functioning muscle transfers and prosthetics, for managing the failed primary reconstruction of the traumatic adult brachial plexus.

The presentation, management and outcomes of brachial plexus injuries are likely to be subject to regional differences across the globe. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant articles related to spinal accessory to suprascapular, intercostal to musculocutaneous, and ulnar and/or median nerve fascicle to biceps and/or brachialis motor branch nerve transfers for treatment of brachial plexus injuries. A total of 6007 individual brachial plexus injuries were described with a mean follow-up of 38 months. The specific indication for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers were considerably different among regions (e.g. upper plexus vs. pan-plexal), while uniform for fascicular transfer for elbow flexion (e.g. upper plexus +/− C7). Similarly, functional recovery was highly variable for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers, while British Medical Research Council grade ≥3 strength after fascicular transfer for elbow flexion was frequently obtained. Overall, differences in outcomes seem to be inherent to the specific transfer being utilized. Level of evidence: III

OBJECTIVE When considering traumatic brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries, iatrogenic nerve injuries, and nontraumatic nerve injuries, brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Despite this, data synthesis and comparison of available studies are difficult. This is at least in part due to the lack of standardization in reporting and a lack of a core outcome set (COS). Thus, there is a need for a COS for adult brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries (COS-BPUE). The objective of this study was to develop a COS-BPUE using a modified Delphi approach. METHODS A 5-stage approach was used to develop the COS-BPUE: 1) consortium development, 2) literature review to identify potential outcome measures, 3) Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion, 4) Delphi survey to develop definitions, and 5) consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. The study followed the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. RESULTS The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 23 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 13 countries. The final COS-BPUE consisted of 36 data points/outcomes covering demographic, diagnostic, patient-reported outcome, motor/sensory outcome, and complication domains. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 24 months, with the consensus optimal time points for assessment being preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-BPUE should serve as a minimum set of data that should be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on adult brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries. Incorporation of this COS should help improve consistency in reporting, data synthesis, and comparability, and should minimize outcome reporting bias.

BACKGROUND Lipomatosis of nerve (LN) is a rare disorder characterized by the massive enlargement of peripheral nerves, frequently accompanied by generalized fibroadipose proliferation and skeletal overgrowth. OBSERVATIONS The authors have been routinely following a 20-year-old male for lipomatosis of median nerve at the wrist noted shortly after birth. He had undergone resection of the lesion accompanied by sural nerve grafting at another institution. Clinically, although his neurological loss of function has been stable, he has had continued soft tissue growth. Serial magnetic resonance imaging has revealed persistent LN proximal to the repair sites with evidence of fatty proliferation in the sural grafts and continued LN and fatty proliferation distally. There has been a progressive circumferential pattern of fibrosis around the proximal and distal suture lines, which has a similar radiological pattern to desmoid type fibromatosis (a pattern recently described in neuromuscular choristoma [NMC] desmoid-type fibromatosis). LESSONS Considering the similar reaction of nerve in both LN and NMC despite differing genetic cascades, the authors believe a unifying process occurs in both lesions. The pattern of circumferential fibroproliferation would be most consistent with neuron-mediated growth from unspecified trophic factors, supporting a previously reported a nerve-derived “inside-out mechanism.” The clinical consequences of this unifying process are presented.