Spinner, Robert J.

The gracilis free functioning muscle transfer is an established procedure for reconstructing elbow, wrist, and hand function in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury patients. Elbow flexion or distal wrist or hand function can be compromised by gracilis bowstringing in up to 17.8% of patients. Two techniques for pulley reconstruction to correct bowstringing and improve the function of the gracilis transfer are described.

We aimed to describe outcomes, including shoulder motion, deltoid strength and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, in 19 patients with terrible triad shoulder injuries (anterior shoulder dislocation, rotator cuff tear or greater tuberosity fracture, and axillary nerve injury) who required axillary nerve reconstruction. The type of nerve surgery (grafting vs. nerve transfer), demographic factors and injury characteristics were not significantly associated with outcomes. The mean postoperative abduction and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were 95° and 28, respectively. Patients with rotator cuff tears had a higher Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (more disability) than those with isolated greater tuberosity fractures. We conclude that spontaneous recovery of the axillary nerve may not occur in patients with a terrible triad injury. Functional outcomes after axillary nerve repair are poor with respect to motion, strength and patient-reported outcomes compared with reported results for axillary nerve reconstruction in the absence of rotator cuff injury. Level of evidence: IV

OBJECTIVE Triceps motor branch transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve (AXN) was originally described for patients with a loss of deltoid function secondary to upper trunk (UT) brachial plexus injuries but has evolved to restore deltoid function in isolated peripheral AXN injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes in patients who had undergone this procedure in the setting of UT brachial plexus injury versus peripheral AXN injury. METHODS The records of patients who had undergone triceps branch to anterior division of the AXN transfer at a single academic institution between 2001 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included in the study if they had either a UT or an AXN injury and were excluded if their follow-up was less than 2 years. Pre- and postoperative outcomes, including modified British Medical Research Council grade and range of motion, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Forty-two patients met the criteria for inclusion. Thirty cases were classified as UT injury and 12 cases as AXN injury. The mean postoperative abduction strength was significantly higher in the AXN injury group (3.2 ± 1.5 vs 1.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.007), as was the postoperative change in abduction strength (2.8 ± 1.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.4, p = 0.01). The mean postoperative forward flexion (136° ± 57° vs 79° ± 54°, p = 0.005) and abduction (129° ± 64° vs 59° ± 47°, p = 0.004) were significantly better in the AXN group, although postoperative changes in flexion and abduction were not different between the groups. Triceps strength preoperatively was similar to that postoperatively in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients with an AXN injury, compared to those with a UT injury, had better postoperative abduction strength and shoulder range of motion after triceps branch transfer to the anterior division of the AXN. Triceps strength was not significantly changed after the procedure in the two groups. The study findings suggest that the outcomes of triceps branch transfer to the anterior division of the AXN are different based on the location and type of injury, providing insight into prognosis while counseling patients.

OBJECTIVE Core outcome sets (COSs) are needed to promote data consistency across studies as well as data synthesis and comparability. The goal of the current study was to utilize a modified Delphi process to develop a COS–sciatic injury and neuropathy evaluation (COS-SINE). METHODS A five-stage approach was utilized to develop the COS-SINE: stage 1, consortium development; stage 2, literature review to identify potential outcome measures; stage 3, Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion; stage 4, Delphi survey to develop definitions; and stage 5, consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. The study followed the Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Development recommendations. RESULTS The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 23 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 13 countries. Three participants were excluded on the basis of agreed upon participation rules. The final COS-SINE consisted of 36 data points/outcomes covering the domains of demographics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor and sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 24 months, with consensus optimal time points for assessment identified as preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-SINE should serve as a minimum set of data that should be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on sciatic nerve injury and neuropathy. Incorporation of this COS should help improve consistency in reporting and data synthesis and comparability and should minimize outcome-reporting bias.

BACKGROUND Peripheral nerve injuries in the lower extremities impose significant functional and quality-of-life challenges. Loss of plantar flexion is a major deficit. Novel nerve transfers are being introduced to restore function. A novel nerve transfer—partial superficial peroneal to a gastrocnemius branch of the tibial nerve—aimed at restoring plantar flexion is presented in a patient with an incomplete proximal thigh-level sciatic nerve injury. OBSERVATIONS The case of a 27-year-old policeman with a right sciatic nerve injury from a gunshot wound sustained 11 months earlier, characterized by intact dorsiflexion and eversion but with complete loss of plantar flexion and inversion, is presented. The patient underwent a nerve transfer from the superficial peroneal nerve to the lateral gastrocnemius branch of the tibial nerve at 10 months postinjury. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient achieved M4 strength in plantar flexion while maintaining M5 strength in ankle eversion, dorsiflexion, and toe extension, with ongoing signs of reinnervation to the lateral gastrocnemius on electromyography. LESSONS Partial transfer of the superficial peroneal nerve to the lateral gastrocnemius branch of the tibial nerve offers a promising solution for restoring plantar flexion in partial sciatic nerve injuries affecting the tibial division. Tailored distal nerve transfers can enhance recovery, underscoring the importance of surgical innovation in treating complex peripheral nerve injuries. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24888

BACKGROUND The articular theory of the formation of intraneural cysts has significant supporting evidence at common locations but has been less accepted at rarer sites. There have been only 5 cases in the literature documenting an intraneural ganglion cyst in the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (DCBUN), with only 1 case documenting a joint connection. In this report, the authors present a second case with a proven joint connection in support of the articular theory. OBSERVATIONS The authors report the case of a 73-year-old man who developed a large intraneural ganglion cyst within the DCBUN along the palmar ulnar aspect of his left wrist. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an articular connection to the distal radioulnar joint. During surgery, the intraneural ganglion cyst was resected and the articular branch was disconnected. The patient recovered and returned to work 4 weeks postoperatively. LESSONS This case further supports the articular theory as the explanation for intraneural ganglion cysts, even at unusual locations. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24569

BACKGROUND Snapping triceps is a dynamic condition in which a portion of the medial head of the triceps dislocates over the medial epicondyle during flexion or extension. Pushed by the triceps, the ulnar nerve typically also dislocates over the medial epicondyle, causing neuropathy. Posttraumatic cubitus varus deformities resulting from pediatric supracondylar fractures have been associated with snapping triceps. This is the first case of snapping triceps associated with cubitus varus due to distal humeral malunion, which occurred in an adult. OBSERVATIONS A 23-year-old man sustained a left distal humeral fracture from arm wrestling, which was treated nonoperatively, healing in a varus malunion. Within several months, he developed ulnar neuropathy and snapping at the medial elbow, which was diagnosed as a dislocating ulnar nerve and was treated with ulnar nerve transposition. He presented 8 years later with continued ulnar neuritis symptoms and snapping and was found to have snapping medial triceps. He chose nonoperative treatment. LESSONS Snapping triceps, presenting as snapping at the elbow with ulnar nerve symptoms, can be incorrectly diagnosed as isolated ulnar nerve dislocation. Unrecognized snapping triceps leads to persistent symptoms after ulnar nerve transposition. The patient in this case demonstrated that an altered triceps line of pull can cause snapping triceps regardless of how the cubitus varus originated. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24596