Petersen, Ronald C.

Passive surveillance for disease is a public health approach that relies on documentation available within existing health records for the region or community being studied. Its two primary advantages over active case‐finding are the lower cost of research and the lower burden on the population under study. The effectiveness of passive case‐finding depends on the comprehensiveness of the healthcare coverage in a given community and the adequacy of the available medical records. The Rochester Epidemiology Project has permitted dementia case detection for Olmsted County, Minnesota, using a medical records‐linkage system. These data were compared with case ascertainment using direct assessment of individuals in an epidemiological study of the same community. At the Group Health Research Institute, investigators compared dementia and Alzheimer's disease cases detected using an electronic medical record database search with those identified by a parallel active case‐finding study. In this article, the advantages and disadvantages of passive case‐finding were discussed, and the following conclusion was drawn: the purpose of the study being conducted should determine the case‐finding approach that is to be used.

BackgroundDiabetes is a risk factor for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. However, the association between high normal fasting blood glucose (FBG) and dementia has not been studied.MethodsPolytomous logistic regression was used to assess the association of dementia and MCI with FBG in an age‐ and sex‐matched sample of 32 dementia patients, 27 amnestic MCI (aMCI) patients, and 31 normal controls (NC). Analyses were repeated for those with normal FBG. Correlations between FBG and cognitive test scores were obtained.ResultsControlling for age, gender, education, body mass index, Hachinski Ischemic Score, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stroke, and normalized brain, hippocampal, and white matter hyperintensity MRI volumes; higher FBG was associated with dementia versus aMCI status (OR = 3.13; 95% CI, 1.28–7.69). This association remained (OR = 7.75; 95% CI, 1.10–55.56) when analyses were restricted to subjects with normal FBG. When dementia patients were compared with NC adjusting for age, gender, and education, a significant association with FBG also was seen (OR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.09–3.08), but it was lost when vascular covariates were added to the model. FBG was not associated with aMCI status versus NC. Higher FBG was correlated with poorer performance on the Trailmaking Test Part B (P = .003). The percentage of dementia patients with high normal FBG (90%) was significantly higher than that of aMCI patients with high normal FBG (32.9%) (χ2 = 13.9, P < .001).ConclusionsHigher FBG was associated with dementia (vs. aMCI) independent of vascular risk factors and MRI indicators of vascular disease, and remained a significant risk factor when analyses were restricted to subjects with normal FBG. The results of this cross‐sectional study suggest that a high normal level of FBG may be a risk factor for dementia.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the association of type 2 diabetes with subcortical infarctions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We investigated this association in subjects with type 2 diabetes (case subjects; n = 93) and without type 2 diabetes (control subjects; n = 186), matched by age, sex, and years of education. Participants were a subset of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (median age 79 years) who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS The frequency of subcortical infarctions was 39% in case subjects and 29% in control subjects (odds ratio 1.59 [95% CI 0.91–2.75]). The association was stronger in case subjects without treatment (2.60 [1.11–6.08]) and in case subjects with diabetes-related complications (1.96 [1.02–3.74]) compared with control subjects. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that untreated type 2 diabetes and type 2 diabetes with complications are associated with subcortical infarctions.

BackgroundApolipoprotein E ɛ4 (APOE ɛ4) allele carrier status has been well established as a risk factor for developing Alzheimer's disease. However, the specific influence of APOE ɛ4 allele status on cognitive and functional rates of decline in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is poorly understood. We examine the prospective association of APOE ɛ4 allele status on measures of cognitive and functional decline in subjects with amnestic MCI (aMCI).MethodsA total of 516 aMCI participants aged 55–90 years who received placebo or vitamin E from the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study's MCI treatment trial were evaluated. During the 36‐month study period, neurocognitive and functional measures were collected. These measures were assessed over time for change and association with APOE ɛ4 status. Generalized Estimating Equations were performed to model each outcome measure over the study period.ResultsAPOE ɛ4 status had a significant impact on cognitive and functional decline on multiple measures; those who were APOE ɛ4 positive had significantly more rapid decline in performance on all cognitive and functional measures except Number Cancellation and Maze tracing (P < .05). The greatest decline was seen in global measures of cognition and function including the Clinical Diagnostic Rating scale, followed by the Mini‐Mental State Examination, Global Deterioration scale, and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale‐Cognitive Subscale.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that APOE ɛ4 genotype is predictive of increased general rates of decline with global measures of cognition and function most affected. With accelerated declines in common clinical trial primary efficacy measures, APOE ɛ4 status needs to be accounted for in treatment trials of MCI.