Atri, Alireza

Background New antiamyloid therapies (AAT) for treating patients with early Alzheimer disease (AD) have become available in the past 3 years. Although AAT can be beneficial in slowing progression of AD, they also come with potentially serious side effects, particularly for patients requiring anticoagulation or thrombolysis for cardiovascular conditions. Given that most patients with AD are older and likely to have cardiovascular risk factors, there is urgent need for additional guidance for clinicians about potential risks and benefits associated with AAT for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, best practices for management of these patients, and special considerations with respect to emergency evaluation and treatment of patients on AAT who develop acute neurological symptoms. Methods The American Heart Association convened 75 multidisciplinary experts for the Amyloid‐Related Imaging Abnormalities Summit: Cardiovascular and Stroke Considerations for β‐Amyloid Immunotherapy in AD in July 2025. These experts were divided into 8 work groups to evaluate the current evidence related to AAT usage in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and conditions and develop consensus‐based guidance for clinicians. Results This statement outlines the outcomes of the Summit, including considerations for prescribers, primary care professionals, emergency personnel, and health care system stakeholders. These considerations are intended to improve identification of patients as appropriate candidates for AAT, management of patients with co‐occurring AD and cardiovascular conditions, and their emergency evaluation and treatment. The statement also includes guidance for shared decision‐making, implementation of system changes for improving dementia care, and recommendations for future research and data collection to add to the body of evidence for treating patients with concomitant AD and cardiovascular conditions. Conclusions Building on lessons learned from the establishment of stroke systems of care, the consensus‐based considerations outlined in this document can serve as a foundation for AD systems of care aimed at ensuring optimal use of these ground‐breaking therapies.

Objective To investigate sex differences in Alzheimer's disease (AD) related pathology among autopsy-confirmed Parkinson's disease (PD) cases. Background AD and PD frequently co-occur in older adults, yet the influence of sex on AD pathology in the context of PD remains unexplored. Methods All subjects were enrolled in the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND) and Brain and Body Donation Program (BBDP) and had annual standardized research clinical assessments by neuropsychologists, subspecialty behavioral and movement disorders neurologists, as well as comprehensive neuropathological examinations after death. Results Among 230 autopsy-confirmed PD cases, females exhibited greater amyloid plaque pathology burden than males, regardless of a co-occurring AD diagnosis. Specifically, females with PD had significantly higher mean cortical total plaque scores (mean 6.5/15 vs. 4.9/15, p = 0.045) and greater CERAD neuritic plaque density (mean 1.7/3 vs. 1.3/3, p = 0.035). Females were also more likely to have a higher cortical plaque burden (plaque total ≥ 5: 56.8% vs. 39.7%, p = 0.015). In multivariable logistic regression models, female subjects showed greater than twice the odds of having an amyloid plaque burden ≥5 compared to males (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.17–4.06; p = 0.014), when controlling for ApoE ε4 status, Lewy body density score, and age at death. Conclusions Female sex is associated with increased amyloid plaque pathology in PD, independent of ApoE ε4 status. These findings highlight a sex-specific vulnerability to AD pathology in PD patients and support the need for sex-informed approaches to reseach in mixed neurodegenerative disease.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers reflect neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD), it remains unclear whether these biomarkers track neurodegeneration in early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). METHODS In 80 EOAD patients, we examined correlations between eight CSF biomarker levels and cortical thickness decreases within the EOAD cortical atrophy signature. Significant correlations were then entered into a multiple regression analysis. We also examined contributions of EOAD atrophy and CSF biomarkers to cognitive impairment. RESULTS The levels of four CSF biomarkers correlated to EOAD signature atrophy. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels best predicted EOAD signature atrophy. Multiple regression showed EOAD signature atrophy combined with CSF NfL levels explained more variance in cognitive impairment than either factor alone. DISCUSSION Within EOAD patients, CSF NfL levels relate to the magnitude of cortical atrophy, and a combination of EOAD signature atrophy and CSF NfL levels most robustly predict cognitive impairment.