Carey, James L.

Objectives: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a disorder of subchondral bone that commonly affects the knee.The purpose of this study is to (1) evaluate the rate of arthritis and knee arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of patients with OCD lesions treated non-operatively and (2) evaluate factors that may predispose patients to knee osteoarthritis and arthroplasty. Methods: 86 patients (mean age 21.4 years) with OCD lesions treated nonoperatively were identified between 1976 and 2014. Information related to the diagnosis, laterality of lesion, details of treatment, and progression to arthritis was obtained from the medical record. Factors predictive of arthritis and arthroplasty (age, gender, body mass index, and lesion location) were examined. Results: At a mean follow-up of 12.6 (±9.8) years from diagnosis, 13 patients (15%) were diagnosed with arthritis corresponding to a cumulative incidence of 5.0% at 5 years, 10.0% at 10 years, 20.0% at 25 years, and 30.0% at 35 years. The cumulative incidence of arthroplasty was 1.0% at 5 years, 3.0% at 10 years, 8.0% at 25 years, and 8.0% at 35 years. BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 (HR 15.4, 95% CI: 1.9, 124.5) and patellar OCD lesions (HR 15.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 345.3) were associated with arthritis. Conclusion: Arthritis following nonoperative treatment of OCD lesions is a challenging problem with an estimated 30% cumulative incidence at 35 years after diagnosis. In contrast, the long-term rate of arthroplasty is low. BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 and patellar OCD lesions are predisposing factors for arthritis. Older age at diagnosis was associated with a greater risk of arthritis and knee arthroplasty.

Objectives: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a disorder of subchondral bone that causes adverse effects on the overlying cartilage and commonly affects the knee. The purpose of this study is to (1) evaluate the rate of arthritis and knee arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of patients with OCD lesions treated operatively and (2) evaluate factors that may predispose patients to knee osteoarthritis and arthroplasty. Methods: 221 patients (mean age 26.1 ± 13.6 years) with OCD lesions treated operatively were identified between 1976 and 2014 and followed for a mean of 16.3 (±11.4) years from diagnosis. Information related to the diagnosis, laterality of lesion, details of treatment, and progression to arthritis was obtained from the medical record. Surgical treatment was classified as palliative (fragment excision) or restorative (lesion drilling, fragment fixation, osteochondral allograft or autograft). Factors predictive of arthritis and arthroplasty were examined. Results: In the palliative group, the cumulative incidence of arthritis was 12.0% at 5 years, 17.0% at 10 years, 26.0% at 15 years, 39.0% at 20 years, and 70% at 30 years. The cumulative incidence of arthroplasty was 2.0% at 5 years, 4.0% at 10 years, 4.0% at 15 years, 10.0% at 20 years, and 32.0% at 30 years. In the restorative group, the cumulative incidence of arthritis was 3.0% at 5 years, 7.0% at 10 years, 16.0% at 15 years, 25.0% at 20 years, and 51% at 30 years. The cumulative incidence of arthroplasty was 0.0% at 5 years, 0.0% at 10 years, 3.0% at 15 years, 6.0% at 20 years, and 11.0% at 30 years. BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 (HR 3.3, 95% CI: 1.6, 7.0), older age at diagnosis (HR 4.9, 95% CI: 1.8, 17.3) and fragment excision (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2, 4.6) were predictive of arthritis. Conclusion: OCD patients treated with fragment excision have a high rate of arthritis and knee arthroplasty at long-term follow-up. In contrast, patients treated with fragment repair or osteochondral restoration have lower rates of arthritis and arthroplasty. BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 , older age at diagnosis, and fragment excision were predictive of arthritis.

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a disorder of subchondral bone that commonly affects the knee. Purpose: To (1) evaluate the rate of arthritis and knee arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of patients with OCD lesions treated nonoperatively and (2) evaluate factors that may predispose patients to knee osteoarthritis and arthroplasty. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Eighty-six patients (mean age, 21.4 years) with OCD lesions treated nonoperatively were identified between 1976 and 2014. Information related to the diagnosis, laterality of lesion, details of treatment, and progression to arthritis was obtained from the medical record. Factors predictive of arthritis and arthroplasty (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], and lesion location) were examined. Results: At a mean ± SD follow-up of 12.6 ± 9.8 years from diagnosis, 13 patients (15%) were diagnosed with arthritis, corresponding to a cumulative incidence of 5.0% at 5 years, 10.0% at 10 years, 20.0% at 25 years, and 30.0% at 35 years. The cumulative incidence of arthroplasty was 1.0% at 5 years, 3.0% at 10 years, 8.0% at 25 years, and 8.0% at 35 years. BMI at diagnosis greater than 25 kg/m 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 15.4; 95% CI, 1.9-124.5), patellar OCD lesions (HR, 15.0; 95% CI, 1.3-345.3), and diagnosis as an adult (HR, 21.7; 95% CI, 2.7-176.3) were factors associated with an increased risk of arthritis. Conclusion: Arthritis after nonoperative treatment of OCD lesions is a challenging problem, with an estimated 30% cumulative incidence at 35 years after diagnosis. In contrast, the long-term rate of arthroplasty is low. BMI at diagnosis greater than 25 kg/m 2 and patellar OCD lesions are predisposing factors for arthritis. Diagnosis of OCD as an adult was associated with a greater risk of arthritis.

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a disorder of subchondral bone that causes adverse effects on the overlying cartilage and commonly affects the knee. The incidence of OCD and its long-term effect on the knee joint are controversial. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the rate of osteoarthritis and knee arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of patients with OCD lesions treated operatively and (2) evaluate factors that may predispose patients to knee osteoarthritis and arthroplasty. The investigators hypothesized that OCD lesions diagnosed after skeletal maturity and treatment with fragment excision would be predictive of a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The investigators identified 221 patients (mean ± SD age, 26.1 ± 13.6 years) with OCD lesions treated operatively between 1976 and 2010 and followed for 16.3 ± 11.4 years (mean ± SD) from diagnosis. Information related to the diagnosis, laterality of lesion, details of treatment, and progression to osteoarthritis was obtained from the medical record. Surgical treatment was classified as fragment excision, fragment preservation (lesion drilling and/or fragment fixation), or chondral defect grafting (osteochondral allograft or autograft). Factors predictive of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty were examined. Results: There were 134 patients in the fragment excision group, 78 patients in the fragment preservation group, and 9 patients in the chondral defect grafting group. In the fragment excision group, the cumulative incidence of osteoarthritis was 12.0% at 5 years, 17.0% at 10 years, 26.0% at 15 years, 39.0% at 20 years, and 70% at 30 years. The cumulative incidence of arthroplasty was 2.0% at 5 years, 4.0% at 10 years, 4.0% at 15 years, 10.0% at 20 years, and 32.0% at 30 years. In the fragment preservation group, the cumulative incidence of osteoarthritis was 3.0% at 5 years, 7.0% at 10 years, 16.0% at 15 years, 25.0% at 20 years, and 51% at 30 years. The cumulative incidence of arthroplasty was 0.0% at 5 years, 0.0% at 10 years, 3.0% at 15 years, 6.0% at 20 years, and 11.0% at 30 years. No patients in the chondral defect grafting group developed osteoarthritis or underwent arthroplasty. Body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 kg/m 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-7.0), older age at diagnosis (HR 4.9; 95% CI, 1.8-17.3), and fragment excision (HR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6) were predictive of osteoarthritis. Conclusion: OCD patients treated with fragment excision have a high rate of osteoarthritis and knee arthroplasty at long-term follow-up. In contrast, patients treated with fragment preservation or chondral defect grafting have lower rates of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty. BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 , older age at diagnosis, and fragment excision were predictive of osteoarthritis.

Objective Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has not been proven to be durable over the long-term. The purpose of this systematic review was (1) to evaluate activity level and knee function, (2) to evaluate reoperation and failure rates, and (3) to analyze risk factors for reoperation and failure of ACI at minimum long-term follow-up. Design A comprehensive review was performed for studies with long-term outcomes after ACI for cartilage defect repair. Studies reported outcome scores such as Tegner score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Society (IKDC) score along with rates of failure and reoperation. Modified Coleman Methodology Scores were calculated to assess study methodological quality. Results Nine studies with a total of 771 patients with a mean age of 33.4 ± 2.5 years, mean defect size of 5.9 ± 1.6 cm 2 , and mean follow-up of 11.4 years were included. Tegner score, Lysholm score, and IKDC score change from preoperative to final follow-up was 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.4, P < 0.001), 24.9 points (95% CI 18.8-31, P < 0.001), and 16.5 points (95% CI 5.4-27.5, P < 0.01), respectively. The mean failure and reoperation rates were 18% and 37%, respectively. Increased age and lesion size (>4.5 cm 2 ) were significantly correlated with increased risk of reoperation and failure. Conclusions Overall, ACI demonstrated successful outcomes in 82% of patients over the long-term. Increased patient age and lesion size greater than 4.5 cm 2 were risk factors for a higher reoperation and failure rate. Nonetheless, this review is limited by heterogeneity in surgical technique, and lesion and patient characteristics.

Abstract A recent randomized trial from the Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study Group was published in the New England Journal of Medicine and attempted to determine the efficacy of partial meniscectomy without osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to either arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or sham surgery. The authors concluded that the clinical outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were no better than those after the sham surgical procedure. However, there are several important limitations of this trial that make it difficult to generalize to the 700,000 arthroscopic partial meniscectomies performed in the United States each year. In this small sample of 146 patients, patients with traumatic meniscal tears and locking symptoms—those most likely to benefit from a partial meniscectomy—were excluded. In addition, although patients with radiographic arthritis were excluded, most of the patients in the study had degenerative changes at the time of arthroscopy. Therefore it is difficult to determine whether the patients were symptomatic from their chondral degeneration or their degenerative meniscal tear. In our opinion this study does not change the role of surgery in current clinical practice. The primary indication for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy remains symptoms of well‐localized joint line pain with acute onset and mechanical symptoms such as catching or locking that have failed comprehensive nonoperative management.