Citations 102

Still under the microscope: Can a surgical aptitude test predict otolaryngology resident performance?

The Laryngoscope | June 19, 2014 | Volume: 125 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/lary.24791 | PMID 24945869

Objectives/HypothesisApplication to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery residency is highly competitive, and the interview process strives to select qualified applicants with a high aptitude for the specialty. Commonly employed criteria for applicant selection have failed to show correlation with proficiency during residency training. We evaluate the correlation between the results of a surgical aptitude test administered to otolaryngology resident applicants and their performance during residency.Study DesignRetrospective study at an academic otolaryngology–head and neck surgery residency program.MethodsBetween 2007 and 2013, 224 resident applicants participated in a previously described surgical aptitude test administered at a microvascular surgical station. The composite score and attitudinal scores for 24 consecutive residents who matched at our institution were recorded, and their residency performance was analyzed by faculty survey on a five‐point scale. The composite and attitudinal scores were analyzed for correlation with residency performance score by regression analysis.ResultsTwenty‐four residents were evaluated for overall quality as a clinician by eight faculty members who were blinded to the results of surgical aptitude testing. The results of these surveys showed good inter‐rater reliability. Both the overall aptitude test scores and the subset attitudinal score showed reliability in predicting performance during residency training.ConclusionsThe goal of the residency selection process is to evaluate the candidate's potential for success in residency and beyond. The results of this study suggest that a simple‐to‐administer clinical skills test may have predictive value for success in residency and clinician quality.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 125:E57–E61, 2015
The Role of Total Parotidectomy for Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Malignant Melanoma

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | April 10, 2014 | Volume: 140 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 548

10.1001/jamaoto.2014.352 | PMID 24722863

Craniofacial Pain Secondary to Occult Head and Neck Tumors

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | February 1, 2014 | Volume: 150 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 813-817

10.1177/0194599814521762 | PMID 24486779

ObjectivesTo review the natural history of occult head and neck malignancy presenting with facial pain and evaluate the risk factors, diagnostic workup, and management of facial pain in the setting of occult malignancy.Study DesignRetrospective chart review.SettingTertiary care center.Subjects and MethodsAll patients presenting from 1980 to 2010 with facial pain and a delayed diagnosis of a head and neck cancer were reviewed.ResultsThirty‐eight patients were included. Onset of pain was rapid or sudden in 94.7%, intermittent in 84.2%, and sharp in 86.8%. Facial nerve weakness was present in 15.8%. Five patients had a history of locoregional skin cancer, and 14% had a history of malignancy. Average delay to diagnosis was 18.4 months. On average, the suspicious lesion was identified on the second scan (mean, 2.1; range, 1‐4 scans). Diagnosis was suggested by magnetic resonance imaging in 54.8% and computed tomography in 38.7% of patients. The most common pathology was squamous cell carcinoma (39.5%), and the predominant location was the parotid gland (28.9%). Surgical resection (66%) was the most common intervention. In patients who received treatment and had clinical follow‐up available for review, 97.0% (32/33) reported symptomatic improvement.ConclusionsIn our series, sudden‐onset, intermittent, sharp facial pain without resolution or improvement was associated with occult malignancy and should be considered in the differential diagnosis for facial pain. Based on the high incidence of early negative imaging, consideration should be given to repeat imaging when there is concern for malignancy. Therapeutic interventions often result in improvement of facial pain.
Clinicopathologic factors and adjuvant treatment effects on survival in adult head and neck synovial cell sarcoma

Head & Neck | January 15, 2014 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 375-380

10.1002/hed.23605 | PMID 24430934

Localized Tongue Amyloidosis: A Single Institutional Case Series

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | May 29, 2013 | Volume: 149 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 240-244

10.1177/0194599813490896 | PMID 23715681

ObjectiveReview Mayo Clinic experience of localized tongue amyloidosis.Study DesignCase series with retrospective chart review.SettingAcademic medical center.Subjects and MethodsCases of localized tongue amyloidosis were identified from the dysproteinemia database at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic records were reviewed with focus on presenting symptoms, laboratory results (ie, serum or urine immunoelectrophoresis, bone marrow biopsy, and fat aspirate analysis), treatment modality, and status of disease at follow‐up.ResultsSix cases of localized tongue amyloidosis presented to the Mayo Clinic between 1969 and 2011. Mean patient age was 69 years (range, 43‐90). Patients presented with asymptomatic tongue mass(es). Biopsy of the tongue mass in all patients showed amyloid on Congo red stains. Work‐up for systemic amyloidosis, including bone marrow biopsy, fat aspiration, and serum and urine protein immunoelectrophoresis, was negative for all 6 patients, nor was there other organ involvement. Two patients underwent resection of the lesions, and the remaining patients elected for observation. Recurrence requiring repeat excision occurred in 1 of the patients that underwent resection. Repeat evaluation for systemic involvement was performed in 3 patients 1 to 3 years after the initial diagnosis. None of these patients went on to develop systemic involvement.ConclusionsLocalized tongue amyloidosis remains a rare diagnosis and requires exclusion of systemic involvement. Localized lesions may be observed or resected; however, recurrence may occur with resection. Patients with localized tongue amyloidosis do not appear to be at increased risk of developing systemic involvement.
Level IIB lymph node metastasis in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Single‐institution case series and review of the literature

The Laryngoscope | May 20, 2013 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3032-3036

10.1002/lary.24198 | PMID 23686866

Objectives/HypothesisTo determine the incidence of level IIB lymph node metastasis in patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and to evaluate the need for elective and therapeutic neck dissection of level IIB.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study and review of the literature.MethodsPatients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (N = 65) were primarily treated with surgery at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) from 2004 through 2010. Neck dissection specimens were analyzed by a pathologist, and metastases to level IIB were reported. In addition, 18 previously published studies, totaling 1,114 neck dissections, were reviewed.ResultsLevel IIB lymph node metastases were present in 4% and 17% of elective and therapeutic neck dissections, respectively. Ipsilateral IIB metastasis was more common than contralateral IIB metastasis in elective and therapeutic neck dissection specimens. Level IIB lymph node metastasis was not significantly associated with level IIA nodal metastasis, level III nodal metastasis, clinical primary tumor stage, clinical nodal stage, or pathologic confirmation of extracapsular spread in either laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.ConclusionsThe rate of occult IIB metastasis in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is exceedingly low. In a clinically node‐negative case, the ipsilateral and contralateral level IIB nodal packet should not be dissected. For clinically node‐positive cases, ipsilateral level IIB dissection should be performed; contralateral IIB dissection should be performed only when indicated.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 123:3032–3036, 2013
Level IIB lymph node metastasis in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The Laryngoscope | May 17, 2013 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2700-2705

10.1002/lary.24129 | PMID 23686577

Objectives/HypothesisTo determine the incidence of level IIB lymph node metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and to evaluate the necessity of level IIB dissection for elective and therapeutic neck dissections.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsPatients with OPSCC (N = 348) were surgically managed at our institution from 2004 through 2010. Neck dissection specimens were reviewed by a pathologist, and level IIB metastases were analyzed with respect to clinical and pathologic data.ResultsLevel IIB lymph node metastases were present in 2.5% and 25% of elective and therapeutic neck dissections, respectively. Level IIA metastasis, clinical tumor stage, clinical nodal stage, extracapsular spread, and primary tumor location in the tonsil were significantly associated with level IIB metastasis.ConclusionsThis study uniquely demonstrated a statistically significant association between clinical tumor stage and tonsil subsite with level IIB metastasis in OPSCC. Considering the predicted incidence of nodal metastasis, we conclude that level IIB neck dissection can be omitted in early stage (T1 or T2) clinically node negative (cN0) OPSCC. In patients with a cN0 neck and advanced OPSCC (T3 or T4), primary tumor in the tonsil, or ipsilateral clinically node positive (cN+) and contralateral cN0 neck, level IIB dissection should be considered. Level IIB dissection should be performed routinely in patients with cN+ OPSCC.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 123:2700–2705, 2013
Retropharyngeal lymph node dissection in oropharyngeal cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery

The Laryngoscope | January 31, 2013 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1676-1681

10.1002/lary.24009 | PMID 23371397

Objectives/HypothesisAssess the role of retropharyngeal lymph node dissection in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS).Study DesignProspective case series.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 72 patients with oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma treated with transoral oropharyngectomy, neck dissection, and retropharyngeal node dissection.ResultsEight of 55 (14.5%) patients with tonsil primaries had retropharyngeal metastases in contrast to none with tongue base primaries. The presence of pathologically positive retropharyngeal nodes was associated with clinical tumor (T) (P=.002) and node (N) stage (P=.007), preoperative computed tomography (CT) (P<.001), and positron emission tomography (PET)‐CT scan (P<.001). The negative predictive value of early T (Tx,1‐2) and N stage (N0‐N2a) was 91.7% and 100%, respectively. Preoperative CT and PET‐CT both yielded a positive predictive value of 100%, while the negative predictive value of imaging was optimized to 95.3% when these modalities were combined.ConclusionsIn patients with tonsil cancer the risk of retropharyngeal metastases is negligible in the presence of clinically T1‐2, N0‐N2a disease and negative CT and PET‐CT. We estimate that 40% of patients meet these criteria and may safely forego treatment of the retropharyngeal nodes. Approximately 10% of patients will have positive imaging and we recommend retropharyngeal node dissection at the time of surgery to treat macroscopic disease. In the remaining patients at risk for retropharyngeal node involvement, adjuvant radiotherapy is generally indicated based on other adverse features, and these nodes may be incorporated into the treatment field.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 2013
Cost Considerations in the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | February 16, 2012 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 946-951

10.1177/0194599812437534 | PMID 22344182

ObjectivesTo determine the cost of treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OP SCCA) with transoral surgery with concomitant neck dissection (TOS), TOS with adjuvant radiation therapy (TOS + RT), TOS with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (TOS + CRT), and primary chemoradiation therapy (CRT).Study DesignCase series.SettingTwo tertiary care teaching hospitals.Subjects and MethodsUsing the databases of 2 teaching hospitals, patients were identified who had OP SCCA treated with TOS, TOS + RT, TOS + CRT, and primary CRT in 2009 to 2010. Costs were analyzed from an institutional perspective looking at reimbursement. Patients with government payers and patients with private payers in each group were identified, and net revenue data obtained for the 3‐month period from diagnosis were calculated and averaged for each group. Cost was defined as the reimbursement for all charges surrounding the 3‐month episode of treatment. All revenue associated with inpatient and outpatient care, including pharmacy charges, was included.ResultsThe mean cost of TOS (private payers/government payers) was $37,435/$15,664 (range, $22,486‐$48,746/$13,325‐$16,885). The mean cost of TOS + RT (private payers/government payers) was $74,484/$34,343 (range, $72,400‐$84,825/$31,565‐$40,810). The mean cost of TOS + CRT (private payers/government payers) was $191,780/$53,245 (range, $145,450‐$217,220/$49,400‐$58,325). The mean cost of CRT (private payers/government payers) was $198,285/$57,429 (range, $168,216‐$298,945/$52,900‐$59,545).ConclusionAn algorithm of transoral surgical treatment of OP SCCA with adjuvant treatment as indicated by pathology is more cost conscious than an algorithm of treatment of all OP SCCA with CRT.
Symptoms and Terminal Course of Patients Who Died of Head and Neck Cancer

Journal of Palliative Medicine | February 10, 2009 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 117-118

10.1089/jpm.2008.0225 | PMID 19207051